UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

FAKULTI KEJURUTERAAN KIMIA

CHEMICAL PROCESS CONTROL
(CPE501)

: SHARIFAH HANNAN AINA BT SYED SAIFUL

NAME BAHARI

STUDENT NO. : 2016584145

GROUP : EH2205C

SEMESTER :5

PROGRAMME / CODE : EH220

SUBMIT TO : SITI RAFIDAH BINTI AB RASHID

Remarks:

Checked by :

---------------------------

Date :
Lab 1: Effect of Controller Gain

Table 1 – Simulink Lab’ Parameter

Proportional (P) Integral (I) Derivative (D)

1 0.05 0.01 0.00
2 0.10 0.01 0.00
3 0.15 0.01 0.00

PV

PV1

PV2

Figure 1 – Combination of Process Response for Different Proportional (P) Value

From Table 1, it shows that the Proportional (P) values differ for each set which are P = 0.05, P =
0.10 and P = 0.15. In studying the effect of controller gain, values for Integral (I) and Derivative (D) remain
fixed for each proportional value. Figure 1 clearly shows that at P = 0.05, the maximum process variable is
at 1.6% compared to P = 0.10 and P = 0.15 where the process variables is at 1.4% and approximately 1.25%,
respectively. At P = 0.05, the controller action is faster compared to P = 0.10 and P = 0.15 whereby P value
at 0.15 reaches set point the fastest. As the proportional value increasing, the controller action becomes
slower and thus, it will slow down the process response.

The proportional value also affects the stability of the process. From Figure 1, at time = 100, the
process reaches it stability first for P = 0.15 in comparison to P = 0.10 and P = 0.05. P = 0.05 reaches it
stability at time = 500 while P = 0.10 is 300. Hence, it can be said that

At P = 0.05, the max process variable is at 1.6%compared to at P = 0.10 and P = 0.15 where the process
variables is at 1.4% and approximately1.25%, respectively. The proportional control applies corrective
action appropriate to eliminate error. From the graph, larger value of controller gain will further decreasing
the error from the process.Other than reducing the oscillates number, larger value of P ensure the stability
of the process. As seen in figure, for P = 0.15 at approximate time = 100, the process already
reachedstabilization compared to at P = 0.10 and P = 0.05 where the process reached stabilization at time=
200 and time = 500, respectively. Larger value of P will reduce the time taken for the processto reached the
set point since the controller action becomes slower and slows down the processresponse
Lab 2: Effect of Integral Time

Table 2 – Simulink Lab’ Parameter

Proportional (P) Integral (I) Derivative (D)

1 0.05 0.01 0.00
2 0.05 0.05 0.00
3 0.05 0.10 0.00

PV1

PV2

PV

Figure 2 – Combination of Process Response for Different Integral Value

From Table 2, it shows that the Integral (I) values differ for each set which are I = 0.01, I = 0.05
and I = 0.10. In studying the effect of integral time, values for Proportional (P) and Derivative (D) remain
fixed for each proportional value. Figure 2 shows that at I = 0.10, the maximum process variable is
approximately 1.84% compared to I = 0.05 and I = 0.01 where the process variables are at 1.8% and 1.6%,
respectively. Based on the graph above, it can be concluded that the higher the value of Integral (I), the
higher the number of oscillates.
 Besides that, another conclusion could be made is that the lower the value of Integral (I), the higher
the stability of the process. From Figure 2, approximately at time = 420, the process reaches it stability first
for I = 0.01 in comparison I = 0.05 and I = 0.10. I = 0.05 reaches it stability at time = 500 while I = 0.10 is
around 550s. Hence, as the integral values increases, the controller actions and process response become
faster. This will lead to the increasing of time taken for the process to reach the set point.
Lab 3: Effect of Derivative Time

Table 3 – Simulink Lab’ Parameter

Proportional (P) Integral (I) Derivative (D)

1 0.05 0.01 0.00
2 0.05 0.01 0.05
3 0.05 0.01 0.10

PV

PV2

PV1

Figure 3 – Combination of Process Response for Different Derivative Value

From Table 3, it shows that the Derivative (D) values differ for each set which are D = 0.00, D =
0.05 and D = 0.10. In studying the effect of derivative time, values for Proportional (P) and Integral (I)
remain fixed for each derivative value. Figure 3 shows that at D = 0.00, the maximum process variables is
1.6% compared to D = 0.05 and D = 0.10 where the process variables is 1.58% and 1.56%, respectively.
The derivative control depends on the rate of errorchange. From the graph, smaller value of D, increase the
overshoot of the graph but do not haveany effects on the number of oscillates.
 We can see by increasing the values of D, the controller action becomes faster.
Consequently, process rate also becomes faster. The major difference between D= 0, D= 1 and D=
2 can be observed as the D values doubles. This can be seen where the distance between the peak
to peak of the process response curve doubles for every value of D doubles.
Lab 4: Effect of Deadtime

Table 4 – Simulink Lab’ Parameter

Proportional (P) Integral (I) Derivative (D) Time Delay

1 0.02 0.01 0.00 5
2 0.02 0.01 0.00 7
3 0.02 0.01 0.00 9

Figure 4 – Combination of Process Response for Different Time Delay Value

Table 4 presents studying impact of dead time at various Time Delay values through 5, 7 and 9 at fixed
values of Proportional, Integral and Derivative. Dead time is the delay from when a controller output
(CO) signal is issued until when the measured process variable (PV) first begins to respond. (Dead Time
Is The "How Much Delay" Variable, 2015). In a PID Control, the impact of a dead time is critical and
is unfavorable in a control loop. At TD = 5, the maximum process variable is at 2.3% compared to at
TD = 7 and TD = 9 where the process variables is at approximately 1.8% and 1.5%, respectively. As as
the dead time increases, the controller action turns out to be slower. Thus, the process rate also turns out
to be slower. Expanding dead time prompts more overshoot and oscillations. Increasing value of time
delay, increases the time taken for the process to reached its set point. This is because of the more
extended time taken for the reaction to achieve half of its final value from the zero instant. For this
situation, the controller gain must be adjusted.