Pipeline Hydraulic Design Proposal PDF

(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING

Rev. 3.6
Page i of62 Hydraulic Design Proposal -
Issue Date: August 23 , 20 11 Mainline
Company Confidential
Pipeline Hydraulic Design Proposal

Northern Gateway Pipeline - 36" Crude Oil / 20" Condensate
Enbridge Pipelines Inc.
Project Code: <459.01>

Charge Code: 4032800002
Prepared by: Maury Porter, P. Eng I Yuntong She I Gary Carmichael
Revision: 3.6
Issue Date: August 23, 201 1
Note: This is a prelimimuy DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous
review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
Page 2 of 62 Hydraulic Design Proposal -
Issue Date: August 23 , 2011 Mainline
DGE
Table of Contents
1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................•................ 3
2 Project Background & Scope of Work ................................................................................................ 4
2.1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 4
2.1.1 Revision History ......................................................................... 5
2.2 Scope of Work ....................................................................................................................... 6
2.2.1 Business Development Engineering - Hydraulics Design ..... 6
2.2.2 Facilities Management ............................................................... 6
2.2.3 Deliverables ................................................................................ 7
2.2.4 Assumptions ............................................................................... 7
2.2.5 Scope Not Included .................................................................. 11
3 Hydraulic Design ................................................................................................................................ 12
3.1 Pipeline ·Facilities ................................................................................................................ 13
3.1.1 J-Curves and Diameter Selection ............................................ 13
3.1.2 Line Description ....................................................................... 14
3.2 Pump Station Facilities ....................................................................................................... 17
3.2.1 Station Locations ..................................................................... 17
3.2.2 Pump Plan ................................................................................. 19
3.2.3 Power......................................................................................... 23
3.2.4 Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) .............................................. 31
3.2.5 Case Pressure Limits ............................................................... 32
3.2.6 Pump Standby .......................................................................... 33
3.3 Operational Limitations and Concerns .............................................................................. 35
3.3.1 Petroleum Quality and Batching ............................................. 35
3.3.2 Minimum Reynolds Number .................................................... 35
3.3.3 Maximum Mainline Fluid Velocities ........................................ 35
3.3.4 Operating Limits ....................................................................... 36
3.4 Pipeline Thermal Analysis ................................................................................................... 39
3.4.1 Annual Average Temperature Profile ..................................... 39
3.4.2 Maximum Temperature Analysis ............................................. 42
4 Transient Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 45
4.1 Crude Oil Pipeline System ................................................................................................... 45
4.2 Condensate Pipeline System .............................................................................................. 47
5 Risk Management ............................................................................................................................... 49
5.1 Risk Register ......................................................................................................................... 49
Appendix A: Product Specification ......................................................................................................... 50
Appendix B: Batch Plans .......................................................................................................................... 51
Appendix C: Pump Curves ....................................................................................................................... 52
Appendix D: Graphical Hydraulic Profiles .............................................................................................. 55
Appendix E: Sensitivity Analysis ............................................................................................................. 59
Pump Design Limit Basis ............................................................................................................. 59
Maximum Temperature Design Limit Basis ................................................................................. 61
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for infomlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
review by intemal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)

Rev. 3.6
Page 3 of62 Hydraulic Design Proposal -
Issue Date: August 23,2011 Mainline
1 Executive Summary
Business 0 evelopment (BO) has requested th at Business Oevelopme nt Engineering
(BOE) Hydraulic Oesig n Group prepare a Hy draulic Design Proposal for the En bridge
Gateway Pi pelines Proj ect (the Project). The Project will consist of a crude oil pip eline
system to transport oil f rom the Bruderheim Terminal, locat ed near Bru derheim, Alberta
to the Kitimat Terminal located near Kitimat, British Colombia. The Project also includes
a condensa te pipeline system to unload cond ensate (Oilu ent) from ship at the K itimat
Terminal and transport it to the Bruderheim Terminal for distribution to markets in
Alberta.
The proposed system consists of:
Crude Oil Pipeline

• From Bruderheim Terminal to Kitimat Terminal - 731.274 miles (1 176.869 km) of
NPS 36, X70 grade pipe with an average wall thickness of 0.665"
• Total Pump Facilities Required at Phase I (525 kbpd ann ual) - 7 stat ions, 28 x
5,750 hp pump and motor units, 7 x 6,000 hp VFOs
• Total Pump Facil ities Required at Phase IV (850 kbpd annual) -1 2 stations, 80 x
5,750 hp pump and motor units , 12 x 6,000 hp VFDs
• 38°C maximum inlet temperature
Condensate Pipeline
• From Kitimat Terminal to Bruderheim Terminal -731 .274 miles (1176.869 km) o f
NPS 20, X70 grade pipe with an average wall thickness of 0.273"
• Total Pump Facilities Required at Phase I (193 kbpd ann ual) - 9 stat ions, 18 x
• Total Pump Facilities Requ ired at Phase III (275 kbpd annual) - 15 stations, 31 x
This report also contain s preliminary design information for future exp ansion phases.
Northern Gateway notes that the se expansion facilities are not part of the applied for
Project; the information provided has been primarily developed from a hydraulics
perspective and to assist in syste m design and pipe wall thickne ss selection. Further
work would be done during detailed eng ineering to finalize th e hydraulic design and the
locations of any potential future pump stations. Any futu re expansion scenario and
associated facilities beyond the applied for Project would be the subject of a future
design review and optimization.
The following report pro vides the a ssumptions and inputs, as well as t he details of the
hydraulic studies for the proposed design.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 20 II) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous
rev iew by internal stakehol der groups.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
Page 4 of62
Issue Date: August 23,2011
Hydraulic Design Proposal -
Mainline
'&INB I GE
2 Project Background & Scope of Work

2.1 Background
Business Development Engineering (BDE) Hydraulic Design Group prepared an
unclassified Hydraulic Design Proposal for th e construction of a Greenfield pip eline
system to transport liq uid hydrocarbons between central Alberta and western British
Colombia in Canada. The proposed system consists of:
• A Crude Oil Pipeline which will ca rry crude oil from Bruderheim Terminal to
Kitimat Terminal.
• A Condensate Pipelin e which will carry condensate (Diluent) from Kitimat

Terminal to Bruderheim Terminal.
The followin g pipeline capacities were identif ied for use in the design of the Crud e Oil
Line:
Capacity Summary (bpd)
Annual Operating Design
Phase
(90% of Design) (95 % of Design)
I 525,000 554,167 583,333
II 600,000633,333 666,667
III 750,000 791,667 833,333
IV 850,000897,222 944,444
The following pipeline capacities were identified for use in the design of the Condensate
Line:
Capacity Summary (bpd)
Annual Operating Design
Phase
(90% of Design) (95 % of Design)
I 193,000203,722 214,444
II 250,000 263,889 277,778
III 275,000 290,278 305,556
Note: the Annual Capacity is the capacity required by the business and is provided by
the Business Development sponsor. Flow rates for all ph ases are co nsidered in wall
thickness design, but only the hydraulic resu Its of Phase I (initia I) and Ultimate are
presented in this report.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for infollllatioll only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)

Rev. 3.6
Issue Date: August 23,201 1 Mainline
A significant amount of hydraulics related work has been d one on this project and this
effort should be recognized. Some but not all areas carried out were:
oJ-curve analysis
• Steady State Hydraulics - heavy and light wall thickness designs, station locating
considering electrical infrastructure issues
• Preliminary pump selection
• Transient Analysis by Tau Engineering - NPS 30 - 10 st ation parallel an d series

configurations for crude oil and series for condensate line
An attempt to compile this information and updated information in d etail has been
carried out as this project was re-initiated.
2.1.1 Revision History

August 23, 2011 - Unclassified Hydraulic Design Proposal v3.6 - Issued for Information
- updated and revised for final NEB IR Submission
August 16,2011 - Unclassified Hydraulic Design Proposal v3.3 -Issued for Information
August 10,2011 - Unclassified Hydraulic Design Proposal v3.1 -Issued for Information
- updated with route revision T and updated manufacturer's pump curves
Note: This is a preliminaIY DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infom1ation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
GE
October 20, 2009 - Un classified Hydraulic Design Proposal v2.0 - is sued for internal
stakeholder review
- updated with route revision R
July 22, 2009 - Unclassified Hydraulic Design Proposal v1.1

- updated with operating limits
- updated with thermal study results
April 29, 2009 - Unclassified Hydraulic Design Proposal v1.0

- to be cir culated in t he project team for the purpose of confirmin g scope a nd
assumptions
2.2 Scope of Work
2.2.1 Business Development Engineering - Hydraulics Design

The following scope of work has been identified:
2.2.1.1 Task 1: Pipeline, Pump Station and DRA Facilities

BDE Hydraulics will identify the pump and pipeline facilities required to meet the desired
throughputs. Pipeline wall thickne ss, pump station facilit ies, and exp ansion plan s to
meet the required annual capacities have been identified in this proposal.
2.2.1.2 Task 2: Tank and Terminal Facilities

• A review will be conducted upon receipt of the tank and ter minal facility design
from consultants
• BDE Hydraulics will provide power requirement for booster pumps. It is assumed
that others will select and size the booster pumps.
2.2.2 Facilities Management

Initial power costs estimation has been performed by Enbridge's Fa cilities Management
Group (FACMAN) base d on the tot al horsepower of the hydraulic design. Operational
feasibility assessments are to be performed by Facilities Management upon completion
of the final hydraulic design.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23, 20ll) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)

Rev. 3.6
Issue Date: August 23, 2011 Mainline
2.2.3 Deliverables
The Business Development Engin eering Hydraulic Desig n group has developed this
Hydraulic Design Proposal which identifies the new facilities required to meet the scope
as defined above. A design review meeting wi th the relevant internal stakeholders will
also be conducted.
2.2.4 Assumptions
2.2.4.1 Model Files

There are no base files for th is project as it is a Greenfield project. The following names
represent the cu rrent hydraulic model files in use:
Crude Oil Line Model File:

Phase I: E28-N00310-REVT-v1A-PH1-Ann
Phase IV: E28-N0031 O-REVT-v2A-U LT-Ann
Condensate Line Base File:

Phase I: E29-N00310-REVT-v1A-PH1-Ann
Phase III: E29-N00310-REVT-v2A-ULT-Ann
2.2.4.2 Pressure Boundary Conditions

Pressure
Condition
psig
Injection Pressure @Bruderheim 75
Injection Pressure @Kitimat 75
Station Suction (Minimum) 50
Terminal Holding (Minimum) 100
2.2.4.3 Allowable Design Limits

Flow Rate (bpd)
Minimum Flow I TBD I Maximum Flow I 944 kbpd
Temperature (0C)
Minimum Temp I TBD I Maximum Inlet Temp I 38°C
Velocity (ttls)
Minimum Velocity I TBD I Maximum Velocity I 20 ftIs (stn)
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information oniy. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
Soil Properties
11_
11-
11-
11-
Note: Soil properties are based on the AMEC 2005 report on thermal conditions for the Northern Gateway route. Therefore,
some uncertainties can be expected and a sen sitivity analysis has been conducted around these soil properties. According
to the comments of an industry recognized ex pert in the field of pipe line heat tra nsfer modeling, it is recommended that
additional soil sample to be taken during the detailed engineering phase of the project.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by intemal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
NBRIDGE
2.2.4.5 Fluid Properties

Fluid Properties
TVP@ TVP@ RVP
Density @ 15°C T1 Viscosity @ T1 T2 Viscosity @ T2
Fluid Identifier T1 T2
kg/m3 °C cSt kPa °C cSt kPa kPa
OX193 .0 11.9 350.0 20.9 21.2 177.1 36.1 64.3
Dilbit
HVB.Q3B 35.3 17.5 350.0 - 26.8 177.1 - -
Light Oil 21E 829.2 4.0 9.7 - 18.3 6.2 - 31.7
Diluent 7 )E 731.0 7.5 1.24 34.2 21.0 1.07 56.9 80.6
Note: Single product was assumed in this proposed desig n. There are possibilities of shipping multiple products in the
Northern Gateway Delivery System. The OX1 is used in the model t 0 determine the system design requirements of the oil
pipeline. HVB.Q3B is the diluted bitumen blended to a summer reference temperature. This fluid specification will be used in
model runs to determin e the worst case (summer) te mperature profile only. The 21 E is light crude and will be used to
generate the worst case scenario in the operating limits study.
2.2.4.6 Fluid Injection Temperatures

Injection Temperature
Injection Flow Rate Annual
I
Pipeline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
I
I Location kbpd Average
OF °C OF °C OF °C OF DC DF DC
Crude Oil line Bruderheim 583 50 9.8 53 11.5 0 21.1 3 11.5 531 .5
Crude Oil line Bruderheim 944 50 9.8 53 11.5 ( 0 15.6 3 11.5 571, .9
Condensate line Kitimat 214 40 4.4 45 7.27D 21.1 50 9.8 487.3 I
Condensate line Kitimat 306 40 4.4 45 7.27D 21.1 50 9.8 487.3 I
Note: As suggested by Facilities Management. For the maximum in-line temperature studies, a summer injection temperature
of 38.0°C (1 OOA OF) was used as decided by the project team.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
2.2.4.7
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for inf ormation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)

Rev. 3.6
Page 11 of62 Hydraulic Design Proposal-
2.2.5 Scope Not Included

The following scope has not been considered a s part of the baseline estimates for cost
and schedule in this proposal:
o Tankage requirement at injection and delivery locations
o Terminal facilities
Note: This is a preliminruy DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infoTl1lation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
IDGE
3 Hydraulic Design
The followin g sectio ns describe th e detailed pipeline and related facilities require d to
achieve the desired th roughput for the pipelines describ ed above in Section 2.1 :
Background.
For design purposes, the following capacity definitions are required:
• Design Capacity - Maximum theoretical capacity of the pipeline assuming ideal

operating conditions, which mayor may not be achievable in actual operation.
• Operating Capacity - Sustainable average capacity re suIting from ta king into

account un -planned e vents such as un- scheduled maintenance, operating
problems, leaks, varia tions from forecast, an d schedulin g proble ms (95% 0 f
Design Capacity).
• Annual Average Capacity - Sustainable average capacity on an annu al basis

taking into account planned eve nts such a s schedu led maintenance and
construction (90% of Design Capacity).
The following design philosophy represents Enbridge's typical appr oach for pipeline
design. Thermal effects can playa large role in determining the achievable capacity of a
pipeline, especially in heavy crud e lines where frictional heating ca n contribute to a
significant increase of in-line crude temperat ures. With a n increase in temperatu res
there is a decrease in fluid visco sity resultin g in lower pressure dr ops and highe r
predicted capacities. Therefore, these effect s must be taken into account when
completing a hydraulic design.
Enbridge's design philo sophy invol ves two steps. The first step involves solving an
energy balance where the frictional heating generated by the annual average capa city,
and the flu id heat tran sferred to th e soil durin g annual average conditions, deter mines
the resulting in-line fluid temperature profile.
Secondly, the temperature profile created at the annual average capacity is force don
the pressure drop calculations at t he design rates, resulting in a conservative pressure
drop calculation at the design capacity due to the realistic th ermal profile created at t he
annual average capacit y. Impleme nting this philosophy reduces the possibility of over
estimating the design capacity of the pipeline.
For the detailed ste ady state hydraulic design r esults ( capacity, pressures,
temperatures, and power) please refer to Appendix E.
Note: This is a preliminruy DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 20 II) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)

Rev. 3.6
3.1 Pipeline Facilities
3.1.1 J·Curves and Diameter Selection

BDE Hydraulics conducted the J-Curve and diameter selection study for the oil line . The
diameter 36" was selected for this pipeline design based 0 n the econo mic results as
shown in the following figure.
Normalized Cost of Service
1.00
0.90
\
0.80
\
0.70
\
~
0.60
0.50
0.40
'" .., ~.
~ "'~ ~ ~
::----..
-- ------- --+-NPS 24-A
_____ NPS 30-8
NPS 36-C
0.30
------ , ..
.;~ ~--~~--~
c.:.
"
- ---t - NPS42-D
0.20
0.10
0.00
200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000 1,100 ,000
bblld
BDE Hydraulics conducted the J-Curve and diam eter selection study for the conden sate
line. The d iameter 20" was select ed for th is pipeline design based 0 n the econo mic
results as shown in the following figure.
Normalized Cost of Service
1.00
0.90
0.80
'" ~
0.70
~
0.60
~ ~
0.50
~ ~ ~
......
--+- NPS 16-A
____ NPS 20-8
~-----u:: ":--- NPS 24-C
0.40
~ ~
:.~ ---it- NPS 30-D
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
100,000 125,000 150,000 175,000 200,000 225,000 250,000 275,000 300,000 325,000
bbl/d
Note: Th is is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,201 1) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)

Rev. 3.6
3.1.2 Line Description
3.1.2.1 Crude Oil Pipeline

• Outer Diameter - 36 inches
• FromlTo - From Bruderheim Station to Kitimat Terminal
(S Length - 731.274 miles (1176.869 km)
o Steel Grade - X70
13 Approximate Steel Tonnage - 484,735 tons (imperial)
Pipe From To Length Proposed Wall MOP Steel Tonnage

Segment KP KP km in psig kPag Tons (Imperial)
1 0.000 24.551 24.551 0.781 2,430 16,753 11,831
2 24.551 231.522 206.971 0.719 2,237 15,423 91,983
3 231.522 286.769 55.247 0.656 2,041 14,071 22,442
4 286.769 295.500 8.731 0.719 2,237 15,423 3,880
5 295.500 324.500 29.000 0.656 2,041 14,071 11,780
6 324.500 331.200 6.700 0.625 1,944 13,406 2,595
7 331.200 347.150 15.950 0.656 2,041 14,071 6,479
8 347.150 361.850 14.700 0.625 1,944 13,406 5,694
9 361.850 364.249 2.400 0.656 2,041 14,071 975
10 364.249 373.849 9.600 0.625 1,944 13,406 3,718
11 373.849 387.749 13.900 0.656 2,041 14,071 5,646
12 387.749 418.999 31.250 0.719 2,237 15,423 13,888
13 418.999 427.001 8.002 0.781 2,430 16,753 3,856
14 427.001 493.499 66.498 0.719 2,237 15,423 29,553
15 493.499 496.149 2.651 0.781 2,430 16,753 1,277
16 496.149 502.149 6.000 0.719 2,237 15,423 2,666
17 502.149 522.599 20.450 0.656 2,041 14,071 8,307
18 522.599 564.498 41.899 0.563 1,752 12,077 14,645
19 564.498 570.099 5.601 0.594 1,848 12,742 2,064
20 570.099 586.348 16.250 0.625 1,944 13,406 6,294
21 586.348 594.348 8.000 0.656 2,041 14,071 3,250
22 594.348 602.498 8.150 0.719 2,237 15,423 3,622
23 602.498 605.149 2.651 0.656 2,041 14,071 1,077
24 605.149 612.899 7.751 0.594 1,848 12,742 2,856
25 612.899 619.948 7.049 0.563 1,752 12,077 2,464
26 619.948 635.998 16.050 0.469 1,459 10,OGO 4,686
-
27 635.998 642.249 6.251 0.594 1,848 12,742 2,303
28 642.249 647.399 5.150 0.656 2,041 14,071 2,092
29 647.399 . 681.499 34.100 0.719 2,237 15,423 15,155
30 681.499 687.549 6.050 0.625 1,944 13,406 2,343
31 687.549 712.349 24.800 0.656 2,041 14,071 10,074
32 712.349 725.098 12.749 0.719 2,237 15,423 5,666
33 725.098 739.299 14.201 0.656 2,041 14,071 5,768
34 739.299 779.199 39.900 0.719 2,237 15,423 17,733
35 779.199 809.548 30.349 0.656 2,041 14,071 12,328
36 809.548 836.798 27.249 0.719 2,237 15,423 12,110
37 836.798 842.899 6.101 0.625 1,944 13,406 2,363
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011 ) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)

Rev. 3.6
ENBRIDGE
Pipe From To length Proposed Wall MOP Steel Tonnage
Segment KP ·KP km in psig kPag Ton s (Imperial)
38 842.899 847.149 4.250 0.594 1,848 12,742 1,566
39 847.149 851.148 3.999 0.500 1,556 10,725 1,244
40 851.148 854.198 3.050 0.563 1,752 12,077 1,066
41 854.198 865.298 11.100 0.625 1,944 13,406 4,299
42 865.298 869.899 4. 601 0.656 2,041 14,071 1,869
43 869.899 877.099 7.200 0.625 1,944 13,406 2,789
44 877.099 886.749 9.650 0.563 1,752 12,077 3,373
45 886.749 889.848 3.100 0.625 1,944 13,406 1,201
46 889.848 892.200 2.352 0.594 1,848 12,742 867
47 892.200 901.748 9.548 0.563 1,752 12,077 3,337
48 901.748 917.598 15.850 0.500 1,556 10,725 4,929
49 917.598 924.348 6.750 0.563 1,752 12,077 2,359
50 924.348 927.148 2.800 0.656 2,041 14,071 1,138
51 927.148 928.849 1.701 0.719 2,237 15,423 756
52 928.849 933.897 5.049 0.625 1,944 13,406 1,956
53 933.897 935.248 1.350 0.594 1,848 12,742 498
54 935.248 936.299 1.051 0.594 1,848 12,742 387
55 936.299 939.849 3.550 0.563 1,752 12,077 1,241
56 939.849 946.248 6.399 0.500 1,556 10,725 1,990
57 946.248 950.899 4.651 0.594 1,848 12,742 1,714
58 950.899 954.499 3.600 0.563 1,752 12,077 1,258
59 954.499 959.948 5.449 0.469 1,459 10,060 1,591
60 · 959.948 972.848 12.900 0.406 1,263 8,709 3,266
61 972.848 976.197 3.349 0.469 1,459 10,060 978
62 976.197 981.449 5.251 0.500 1,556 10,725 1,633
63 981.449 988.849 7.400 0.594 1,848 12,742 2,727
64 988.849 998.698 9.849 0.563 1,752 12,077 3,443
65 998.698 1005.599 6.901 0.656 2,041 14,071 2,803
66 1005.599 1014.498 8.900 0.594 1,848 12,742 3,279
67 1014.498 1029.000 14.502 0.625 1,944 13,406 5,617
68 1029.000 1031.647 2.647 0.563 1,752 12,077 925
69 1031.647 1043.449 11.801 0.625 1,944 13,406 4,571
70 1043.449 1054.848 11.399 0.563 1,752 12,077 3,984
71 1054.848 1063.648 8.800 0.594 1,848 12,742 3,242
72 1063.648 107l.398 7.751 0.563 1,752 12,077 2,709
73 1071.398 1087.405 16.007 0.594 1,848 12,742 5,898
74 1087.405 1089.598 2.193 0.656 2,041 14,071 891
75 1089.598 1094.347 4.749 0.719 2,237 15,423 2,111
76 1094.347 1170.048 75.700 0.781 2,430 16,753 36,480
77 1170.048 1176.871 6.824 0.781 2,430 16,753 3,288
Note: SM YS MAOP i s the Maximum Allowable 0 perating Pres sure based on t he prel iminary desi gned wall
thickness and the Barlow Equation. No considerations for actual planned hydro-test pressW"es, which may be lower,
are included.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infol1nation on ly. It has not undergone a rigorous
rev iew by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING 01
ENS IDGE
3.1.2.2 Condensate Pipeline

• Outer Diameter - 20 inches
• FromlTo - Kitimat Terminal to Bruderheim Terminal
• Length - 731.274 miles (1176.869 km)
• Steel Grade - X70
• Approximate Steel Tonnage - 111,053 tons (imperial)
Pipe From To length Proposed Wall MOP Steel Tonnage

Segment KP KP km in psig kPag Tons (Imperial)
1 0.000 47.500 47.500 0.297 1,663 11,467 4,870
2 47.500 92.149 44.649 0.312 1,747 12,047 4,805
3 92.149 347.719 255.570 0.250 1,400 9,653 22,108
4 347.719 503.725 156.006 0.297 1,663 11,467 15,994
5 503.725 667.949 164.224 0.250 1,400 9,653 14,206
6 667.949 885.677 217.728 0.297 1,663 11,467 22,322
7 885.677 969.212 83.535 0.250 1,400 9,653 7,226
8 969.212 1066.590 97.378 0.297 1,663 11,467 9,983
9 1066.590 1126.541 59.951 0.250 1,400 9,653 5,186
10 1126.541 1176.871 50.331 0.250 1,400 9,653 4,354
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for infornlation on ly. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
ENBRIDGE
3.2 Pump Station Facilities

BDE Hydra ulics h as pr oposed a pump selection and pu mp plan for each of th e flow
stages with the appropriate number of pumps, pump/motor sizes, and minimum required
VFD sizes. The pump plans for th e future flo w phases h ave not und ergone extensive
reviews with Engineering Services or the pum p manufacturer. Therefore, BDE Hydraulics
recommends a detailed review of the proposed future pump plans at the appropriate time
during detailed engineering.
3.2.1 Station Locations
3.2.1.1 Crude Oil Pump Stations

The Gateway Delivery System crude oil pipeline will start at Phase I with seven (7) pump
stations, and will expand to encompass twelve (12) pump stations in total at Phase IV.
The proposed station locations for the oil pipeline are summarized in the table below:
Station (HAINAGE (m) (HAINAGE (km) ELEVATION (m) UTME UTMN ZONE
Bruderheim 0.0 0.0 623.0 364,279 5,964,720 12
Majeau 98,000.0 98.0 713.0 659,786 5,969,024 11
Whitecourt 203,267.1 203.3 753.8 579,695 6,005,207 11
Fox Creek 286,808.6 286.8 860.5 502,839 6,027,042 11
Smoky River 400,733.8 400.7 784.0 410,493 6,065,773 11
Elmworth 506,632.2 506.6 843.0 319,684 6,086,216 11
Tumbler Ridge 600,906.7 600.9 845.3 615,383 6,074,335 10
Bear Lake 719,650.7 719.7 715.9 519,557 6,040,283 10
Fort St. James 828,401.1 828.4 720.0 416,897 6,026,782 10
Burns Lake 929,347.6 929.3 847.1 321,593 6,015,353 10
Houston 1,006,033.1 1006.0 680.9 640,322 6,008,003 9
Clearwater 1,129,293.4 1129.3 211.0 530,634 6,014,828 9
Kitimat Te rmi nal 1,176,870.7 1176.9 158.0 518,460 5,977,762 9
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
GE
3.2.1.2 Condensate Pump Stations

The Gateway Delivery System con densate pip eline will start at Phase I with nin e (9)
pump stations, and will expand to encompass fifteen (15) stations in total at Phase III.
The proposed station locations for the condensate pipeline are summarized in the table
below:
Station CHAINAGE (m) CHAINAGE (km) ELEVATION (m) UTME UTMN ZONE
Kitimat Terminal 0.0 0.000 158.0 518,460 5,977,762 9
Clearwater 47,577.3 47.577 211.0 530,634 6,014,828 9
Clore 92,149.0 92.149 TBD TBD TBD TBD
Houston 170,837.6 170.838 680.9 640,322 6,008,003 9
Burns Lake 247,523.1 247.523 847.1 321,593 6,015,353 10
Future Station 1 293,249.0 293.249 TBD TBD TBD TBD
Fort St. James 348,469.6 348.470 720.0 416,897 6,026,782 10
Bear Lake 457,220.0 457.220 715.9 519,557 6,040,283 10
Future Station 2 503,723.0 503.723 TBD TBD TBD TBD
Tumbler Ridge 575,964.0 575.964 845.3 615,383 6,074,335 10
Elmworth 670,238.5 670.239 843.0 319,684 6,086,216 11
Smoky River 776,136.9 776.137 784.0 410,493 6,065,773 11
Fox Creek 890,062.1 890.062 860.5 502,839 6,027,042 11
Whitecourt 973,603.6 973.604 753.8 579,695 6,005,207 11
Majeau 1,078,870.0 1078.870 713.0 659,786 5,969,024 11
Bruderheim 1,176,870.7 1176.871 623.0 364,279 5,964,720 12
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 20 II) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
3.2.2 Pump Plan

Phase I - Appl ication 525,000 bpd
Brake Horsepower Pump Minimum

Pump Typ~
Station @ Design Rate Speed VFD
bh_ r--" I
- - I
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infomlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by intemal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
Phase IV - Ultimate 850,000 bpd
Brake Horsepower Minimum

Pump Type
Station @ Design Rate VFD
_I bhp .
- - -I
-.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6

Phase I - Application 193,000 bpd
Brake Horsepower Pump Minimum

Station @ Design Rate Speed VFD
-- --
bh
••
••
-- ••
• --
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
Phase III - Ultimate 275,000 bpd
Minimum
Station VFD
•• --
••
•• --
•• -•
- - I
••
• -
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
3.2.3 Power
3.2.3.1 Crude Oil Pump Stations

The followin g table pro vides a su mmary of the pressure and power requirements of the oil pipeline at the init ial design
capacity of 583 kbpd and the ultimate design capacity of 944 kbpd.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by intemal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
Page 24 of62 Hydraulic Design Proposal
Conf igurat ion Name:E28-N003 10-REVT-v1A-PH 1-Ann PH 204: Hydraulic Horsepower Report
C:lse N:lme:525_TA_EA_FC Page 31 of 38
PR E SSUR E {P S I) pow E R (H PI
Rate OfoTime %Time Hold Suet Case Diso RMO Avg Avg Peak Peak AVij %
Station PUnlP rm'\ 3/dav) SIn PumD} Pres Pres Pres P res Pres BHP HH P BHP HHP Eft RP M
BR 02745 100.00 75.00 75.00 2160.09 2 160.00 ·0.09 Total: 27 360 20745 27360 20745 0.758
Th rottle: 1 0 1
Diff= 2085.0g Useful: 27359 20744 27359 20744
BR· l ·5750 92743 100.00 2403 16 12 2493 16 12 0.647 75.23
BR~2-5750 92743 100.00 4973 38 26 4973 3826 0.769 100.00
BR-3-5750 n743 100.00 4973 3826 4973 3826 0.769 100.00
BR-4-5750 92743 100. 00 4973 3826 4973 3826 0.769 100.00
BR-5-5750 n743 100.00 4073 3826 4973 3826 0.769 100.00
BR-6-5750 92743 100.00 4973 3826 4973 3826 0.769 100.00
OL 92745 0.00 107.35 1162.26 1162.2e 1162.26 ' 074 .63 TOt31: 0 0 0 0 0.000
Throttle: 0 0 0
Diff;=O.OO Useful: 0 0 0 0
OL"-5750 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00
WC 92745 100.00 107.35 107.35 20 19.79 20 19 .78 140.2 1 Total: 24453 16094 24823 19281 0.777
Throttle: 0 0 0
Oiff;= ' 912.44 Useful: 24453 18004 24823 1928 1
WC- I-5750 92743 100.00 4694 3649 5068 3Q35 0.778 97.80
WC-2-5750 92743 100.00 4939 3836 4940 3836 0.777 100.00
WC-3-5750 ~274 J. ' 00.00 4 939 3836 4940 3836 0.777 100.00
WC-4-5750 92743 100.00 4939 3836 4940 3836 0.777 100.00
WC-~ 5750 92743 100.00 4 939 3836 494 0 3836 0.777 '00.00
Fe 92745 0.00 194;96 1131.64 1131.64 1131.64 965.43 Total: 0 0 0 0 0.000
Throttle: 0 0 0
Diff=O.OO Useful: 0 0 0 0
FC-I -6750 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 .000 0 .00
SR 92745 100.00 194.96 194.96 21 18.75 2 11 8.75 41.25 Total: 24602 191 10 24823 1928 1 0 .777
Throttle: 0 0 0
Oiff;= '923.79 Usefu l: 24 602 19110 24823 1928 1
SR- I -5750 Q2743 100.00 4845 3764 5068 3935 0.777 99.1 4
SR·2·575D 92743 100.00 4 939 3838 4940 3836 0.777 100.00
SR-3-6750 92743 100.00 4939 3836 4940 3836 0.777 100.00
SR-4-575o 92743 100.00 4 939 3836 4940 3836 0.777 100.00
SR-~575o 92743 '00.00 4939 3836 4940 3836 0.777 100.00
EW 92745 0.00 212.98 '071.01 107 1.0 ' '071.0 1 96B.88 Total: 0 0 0 0 0.000
Throttle_: 0 0 0
Diff;=O.OO Useful: 0 0 0 0
EW-I-57S0 0 0. 00 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00
TR 92745 ' 00.00 2 12.98 2 12.98 1250.09 1250.0 9 681.57 Total: 13275 10304 13275 10304 0.776
Tluottle: 0 0 0
Diff;= 1037.1 1 Useful: 13275 10304 13275 10304
TR- I -5750 92743 100.00 3389 2634 3389 2634 0 .777 85.25
TR-2-5750 Q2743 100.00 494 3 3835 4943 3835 0.776 100.00
TR-3-5750 92743 100.00 4 943 3835 4943 3835 0 .776 100.00
BL 92745 100.00 344.4' 344.41 1438.21 1468.2 1 633.89 Total: 14266 11174 14266 11174 0 .783
Throttle: 0 0 0
Diff= 11 23_80 UsefuJ: 14266 111 74 14266 11174
BL-I-5750 92743 lCO.CO 4444 3486 4444 3486 0.784 95.80
BL-2-S750 92743 100.00 4911 3844 4911 3844 0.783 100.00
BL-3-6750 92743 10C.00 4911 3844 49 11 3844 0.783 100.00
FJ 92745 100.00 485.4 1 485.4 1 ' 610.74 161 0.74 54(f.2e Total: 14266 11174 14266 1 11 74 0.783
Th rottle- : 0 0 0
Diff-:: 1125.34 Useful: 14266 11174 14266 11174
FJ- I-6750 92743 100.00 4443 3485 4443 3486 0 .784 95.80
FJ-2-5750 9274:> 100.00 49 11 3844 4911 3344 0 .783 100.00
FJ -3-5750 92743 ' 00.00 49 11 3844 49 11 3844 0.783 100.00
BU 92745 100.00 565.27 565.27 1580.45 1580.45 110.55 Tolal: 12934 10063 12934 10063 0 .778
Throttle: 0 0 0
Diff= 1015 .17 Useful: 12934 10063 12934 10063
BU- H i750 92743 100.00 3069 2387 3069 2387 0 .778 82.02
BU-2-5750 ~2743 100.00 4932 3838 4932 3838 0 .778 '00 .00
BU-3-5750 9274 3 100.00 4932 3838 4932 3838 0 .778 '00.00
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 20 11) and has been issued for info rmation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
Configuration Name:E28-N0031 O-REVT -v1 A-PH 1-Ann PH 204: Hydraulic Horsepower Report
C;!se N3me:525_TA_EA_FD P;!ge 32 of 38
PR E SSUREjPSI) PO"N E R (H P)
Hold RMD
%i~~~~ r;D~~~~
Rate Suet Case Disc Avg Avg Pea k Peak Avg %
St<ltion Pump Ilm A 3ldav) Pres Pres Pres Pres PrE's BHP HHP BHP HHP Eft RPM
HU g2745. 0 .00 270.57 1137.21 1137.21 113721 682.13 Tat']l: 0 0 0 0 0 .000
Throttle: 0 0 0
Diff=O.OO Us£oful: 0 0 0 0
H lJ-1-5750 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 o.oon 0 .00
OW Q2745 0.00 270.57 641.01 641.01 64 1.01 1781.47 TOI.lI: 0 0 0 0 0 .000
Th:rottle: 0 0 0
Diff=O.OO Useful: 0 0 0 0
OW·l·575<1 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 .000 o.on
KM Q2745 0.00 270.57 270.57 270.57 1Da.OO 99999832.00 Tot-a!: 0 0 0 0 O.OOD
Throttle : 16P2 i 6"2 H3Q2
[)iff: O.O~ USEfu l: ·1692 · 1692 · len - l!592
KM- l 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 .000 0.00
KM (Termi:nrJIl 270.57
Note: This is a preliminruy DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) ruld has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
Page 26 of 62 Hydraulic Design Proposal
GE
Configuration Name:E28-N00310-REVT-v2A-UL T-Ann PH 204: Hydraulic Horsepower Report
Case Name:850_TA_EA_FD Page 33 of 41
P R E S SUR E (P S I) POW ER(H P)

Rate %Time %Time Hold Suet Case Disc RMD Avg Avg Pea k Peak Avg %
Station Pump I(m '3Iday) (St n) (P ump) Pres Pres Pres Pres Pres BHP HHP BHP HHP Eft RPM
BR 150157 100.00 75.00 75.00 2 145.03 2 145.03 14.97 To ta l: 42317 33389 42317 33389 0.789
Throttle: 0 0 0
Diff= 2070.03 Useful: 42317 33389 42317 33389
BR- 1-5750 150 154 100.00 2918 2 192 29 18 2 1"2 0.751 83.05
BR-2-!l750 150154 100.00 4924 3899 4924 3899 0.792 100.00
BR-3-!l750 150 154 100.00 4 924 3S99 4924 3899 0.792 100.00
BR-4-5750 150 154 100.00 4 924 3899 4n4 3899 0.792 100.00
BR-5-5750 150 154 100.00 4924 3899 4924 3899 0.792 100.00
BR-6-!l750 150 154 100.00 4924 3899 4924 3899 0.792 100.00
BR-7-5750 150 154 100.00 4924 3899 4924 3899 0.792 100.00
BR-8-5750 150 154 100.00 4924 3899 4924 3899 0.792 100.00
BR-9-5750 150 154 100.00 4924 3899 4924 3899 0.792 100.00
Ol 150 157 100.00 60·06 50.01t '2 152.00 2152.00 8.00 Total: 41408 33744 4 1406 33744 0.815
Throttle: 0 0 0
Oiff= 2091.94 Useful: 4 1408 33744 4 1406 33744
Ol-I -5750 150154 100.00 2877 2240 2877 2240 0.779 83.19
Ol-2-5750 ~
150154 '100.00 48 18 3937 4818 3937 0.818 100.00
; .I~
Ol-:l-5750
OL-4-5750
150154
150154
100.00
100.00 - .. - -
46 18
4B16
3937
3937
4816
4B16
3937
3937
0. B1B
0.B1B
100.00
100.00
OL-5-5750 150154 100.00 48 18 3937 4816 3937 0.8 18 100.00
OL-6-5750 150 154 100.00 4616 3937 48 16 3937 0.81 B 100.00
OL-7-5750 150154 100.00 .. - 481 6 3937 4816 3937 0.8 18 100.00
OL-8-5750 150 154 100.00 48 18 3937 4B 16 3937 0.81 8 100.00
OL-rl-5750 150154 100.00 48 16 3937 4B1 6 3937 0.81 B 100.00
WC 150 157 100.00 g9.65 99.65 1726.27 1726.27 433.73 Total: 3 158B 26236 31588 26236 0.83 1
Throttle: 0 0 0
Oiff= 1626.63 Useful: 31588 28238 31588 26236
WC-I -5750 150 154 100.00 3112 2514 3112 2514 0.B08 85.79
WC-2-!i750 150 154 100.00 4745 3953 4745 3953 0.833 100.00
WC-3-5750 150 154 100.00 4745 3953 4745 3953 0.833 100.00
'lVC-4-5750 150 154 100.00 4745 3953 4745 3953 0.833 100.00
'lVC-!l-!l750 150 154 100.00 4745 3953 4745 3953 0.833 100.00
'lVC.(l-!l750 150 154 100.00 4745 3953 4745 3953 0.833 100.00
WC-7-5750 150 154 100.00 4745 3953 4745 3953 0.833 100.00
FC 150157 100.00 116.33 116.33 2086.09 2086.09 8.91 Total: 37684 31668 37684 3 1868 0.840
Throttle: 0 0 0
Oiff= 1969.76 Useful: 37684 31668 37684 3 1868
FC- I-5750 1501 54 100.00 4706 3954 4706 3954 0.840 99.96
FC-2-5750 150154 100.00 4711 3959 47 11 3959 0.840 100.00
FC-:l-5750 150 154 100.00 471 ' 3959 47 11 3959 0.840 100.00
FC-4-5750 150 154 100.00 4711 3959 47 11 3959 0.840 100.00
FC-5-5750 150154 100.00 47 11 3959 4711 3959 0.840 100.00
FC- 6-5750 150154 100.00 47 11 3959 47 11 3959 0.840 100.0 0
FC-7-5750 150 154 100.00 47 11 3959 47 11 3959 0.840 100.00
FC' B-5750 150154 100.00 4711 3959 4711 3959 0.840 100.00
SR 150157 100.00 253.33 253.33 1978.45 1978045 181.55 Total: 32876 27725 32B76 27725 0.843
ThrotUe: 0 0 0
Diff=: 1725. 12 Useful: 32876 27725 32B76 27725
SR- 1-5750 150 154 100.00 4898 3geO 4696 3960 0.843 100.00
SR-2-5750 150 154 100.00 4696 3960 4696 3960 0.843 100.00
SR-3-5750 150 154 100.00 4696 3960 4896 3980 0.543 100.00
S R-4-5750 150154 100.00 4696 3960 4696 3960 0.843 100.00
SR-5-!l750 150 154 100.00 4696 3980 4696 3980 0.843 100.00
SR-1l-5750 150 154 100.00 4696 3980 4698 3960 0.843 100.00
SR-7-5750 150 154 100.00 4696 3960 4696 3960 0.843 100.00
EW 150157 100.00 113.44 113.44 1838.40 1838.40 194.Bo To!.>l: -32774 277 26 32774 27726 0.846
Throttle; 0 0 0
Oiff= 1724.96 Useful: 32774 27726 32774 27726
EW- I-5750 150 154 100.0 0 4672 3953 4672 3953 0.846 99.92
EW-2-5750 150154 100.00 4683 3962 4883 3962 0.846 100,00
EW-3-575o 150 154 100.00 4683 - '3962 4683 3962 0.846 100.00
EW-4-5750 150 154 100.00 4683 3962 4683 3962 -0.846 100:00
EW-5'5750 150 154 ~ 100.00 4683 3g62 4683 3982 0.848 100.00
EW-1l-5750 150 154 100.00 4683 3982 4683 3982 0.846 100.00
_~~~EW-7-5L5.0 15_0154 1.0_0.,0.0_ . 46_8_3~~3_9_6_2_ _46~_3~_3_96 2 ~_0._8.'1ll~~_1 0_0"OO_
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23, 201 1) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
Configuration Name:E28-N00310-REVT-v2A-ULT-Ann PH 20 4: Hydrau lic Horsepower Repo rt

Case Name:850_TA_EA_FD Page 34 of 41
P RE S SUR E (P S I) POWER(HP}
Rat. %Time %Time Hold Suet Case Disc RMD Avg A vg Pea k Pea k Avg %
Station Pump m A 3 ld.y} (Stn) (Pump) Pres Pres Pres Pres Pres BHP HHP BHP HHP Elf RPM
TR 150 157 100.00 3 19.33 3 19.33 191 0.33 191 0.33 5 1.99 Total: 30642 25707 30642 25797 0.842
Throttle: 0 0 0
Diff= 159 1.00 Useful: 30642 25797 30642 25707
TR- I-5750 150 154 100.00 25 52 2022 2552 2022 0.79 2 80.84
TR-2-5750 150 154 100.00 4681 3962 468 1 3062 0.846 100.00
TR-3-5750 150 154 100.00 468 1 3062 4681 3062 0.846 100.00
TR-4-5750 150 154 100.00 468 1 3062 4681 3062 0.846 100 .00
TR-5-5750 150154 100.00 4681 3062 4681 3962 0.846 100.00
TR-6-5750 150 154 100.00 4681 3962 4681 3962 0.846 100.00
TR-7-5750 150 154 100.00 4681 3962 4681 3962 0.846 100.00
BL 150157 100.00 191.38 191.38 1913.41 1913.41 226.33 Total: 32563 27703 32563 27703 0.85 1
Th rottle: 0 0 0
Diff= 1722.03 Useful: 32563 27703 32563 27703
BL-I-S750 150154 100.00 4606 39 17 4606 39 17 0.85 1 99.59
BL-2-5750 150154 100.00 4650 3964 4 659 3964 0.85 1 100.00
BL-3-5750 150154 100.00 4 650 3964 4659 3964 0.85 1 100.00
BL-4-5750 150154 100.00 4659 3964 4659 3964 0.85 1 100.00
BL-5-5750 150154 100.00 4659 3964 4659 3964 0.85 1 100.00
BL-6-5750 150154 100.00 4659 3964 4659 3964 0.85 1 100.00
BL-7-5750 1501'54 100.00 4659 3964 4659 3964 0.85 1 100.00
FJ 150 157 100.00 186. 10 186. 10 2 160.07 2 160. 00 -0.07 Total: 37 167 3 1720 37 167 3 1720 0.853
Throttle: 1 1 I
Diff= 1973.97 Useful: 37165 317 19 371 65 3 17 19
FJ- I-5750 150 154 100.00 4645 3964 4645 3964 0.853 100.0 0
FJ-2-5750 150 154 100.00 4645 3965 4645 3965 0.853 100.00
FJ -3-5750 150 154 100.00 4845 3965 4845 3965 0.853 100.00
FJ -4-5750 150154 100.00 4645 3065 4645 3965 0.853 100.00
FJ -5-5750 150 154 100.00 4645 3Q65 4645 3965 0.8 53 100.00
FJ--6·575<Q 150 154 100.00 4645 3965 4645 3965 0.8 53 100.00
FJ-7-575iJ 150154 100.00 4645 3965 4645 3965 0.853 100.00
FJ-8-5750 150 154 100.00 4645 3965 4645 3965 0.853 100.00
BU 150157 100.00 453.7 1 453.71 1687.56 18B7.56 38.30 Total: 23229 19825 23229 19825 0.853
Throttle: 0 0 0
Diff= 1233.85 Useful: 23229 19825 23229 19825
BU-I -575<Q 150154 100.00 4645 3965 4 645 3965 0.853 100.00
BU-2-5750 150154 100.00 4 645 3965 4 645 3965 0.853 100.00
BU-3-5750 150154 100.00 4645 3965 4645 3965 0.853 100.00
BU-4-5750 150154 100.00 4645 3965 4 645 3965 0.853 100.00
BU-5-6750 150154 100.00 4645 3965 4645 3965 0.853 100.00
HLJ 150 157 100.00 752.48 752.49 168 1.36 168 1.36 142.25 Tota l: 17537 1494 1 17537 1494 1 0.852
Throttle: 0 0 0
Diff= 928.88 Useful: 17537 14941 17537 1494 1
HU-I-5750 1501 54 100.00 3594 3046 3594 3046 0.847 9 1.53
HU-2-5750 150 154 100.00 4847 3965 4647 3965 0.853 100. 00
HU-3-5750 150 154 100.00 4647 3965 4647 3965 0.853 100.00
HU-4-5750 150 154 100.00 4647 3965 4647 3965 0.853 100.00
CW 150157 100.00 383.97 383.97 838.37 838.37 1321.63 Total: 8580 7329 8580 7329 0.854
Throttle: 0 0 0
Diff= 4 54.41 Useful: 8580 7329 8580 7329
CW-I -5750 150154 100.00 3945 3363 3945 3363 0.853 94.58
CW-2-5750 150154 100.00 4 634 3965 4634 3965 0.856 100.00
KM 150 157 0.00 148.36 148.36 148.36 100.0099999952.00 Tota l: 0 0 0 0 0.000
Throttle: 776 776 776
Diff= 0.00 Useful: -77 6 -776 -776 -776
KM- l 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00
KM K ennina.l 148.36
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
3.2.3.2 Condensate Pump Stations

The followin g table provides a summary of the pressure a nd power requirements of the cond ensate pipeline at the initial
design capacity of 214 kbpd and the ultimate design capacity of 306 kbpd.
Configuration Name:E29-N0031 O-REVT -v1 A-PH 1-Ann PH 204: Hydraulic Horsepower Report
Case Name:193_TA_EA]D Page 24 of 34
PRE S SUR E (P S I) P OWER(H P}
Station Pump m"'3/~:~; '!.I~~n} (~J~)

Hold
Pres
Suet
Prl!S
Case
PreS
Disc
Pres
RMD
Pres
Avg
BHP
Avg
HHP
Peak
BHP
Puk
HHP
Avg
Eft RPM
yJ
KM 34095 100.00 75.00 75.00 590.55 590.55 997.9(} Total: 2257 1880 2257 1880 0.833
Throttle: 0 0 0
Diff= 515.55 Useful: 2257 lB80 2257 1880
KM·' 34094 100.00 2257 lsaO 2257 1880 0.833 78 ,97
KM-2 0 a.{)O 0 0 0 0 0 .000 0 .00
CW 340g5 100.00 23tHIS 236.95 1682.9a 1682.98 0.02 Total: 6744 5277 6744 5277 0.782
Throttle: 0 0 0
Diff= 1446.03 UseflJl: 6744 6277 6744 5277
CW-1 340g4 100.00 2627 2155 2627 2155 0 .820 64,23
CW-2 34004 100.00 4117 31 2 1 4117 3121 0.758 100.00
NB 34095 0.00 435.00 797.34 797.34 707.34 470.28 Tot.!!l: 0 0.000
Throttle: 0
Diff= 0.00 Useful: 0 0
NB·l 0.00 0 0 0 .000 0.00
HU 340115 100.00 435.00 4315.90 1140.25 1146.25 252.75 Total: 326g 259 1 3270 2592 0.793
Throttle: 0 0 0
Diff= 710.35 Useful: 326g 25g 1 3270 2592
HU-l 340114 100.00 3269 2591 3270 2592 0.793 92.06
HU-2 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 .000 0.00
BU 34095 100.00 507.28 507.28 1180.S0 1180.S9 212. 11 Tot.11: 3060 2457 3106 248 1 0.801
Throttle: 0 0 0
Oiff= 673.61 Usefu l: 3069 2457 3106 248 1
BU- l 34094 100.00 3069 2457 3 106 2481 0.801 89 .74
BU-2 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00
X, 341X1!5 (LOD 69S.69 636.4 1 636.41 636.41 609.31 TOt31: 0.000
Throttle:
Diff= 0.00 Useful:
XI-I 0.00 0.000 0.00
FJ 34095 100.00 ege.e9 696.69 1387.17 1367.17 240.83 Tot.)l: 316 1 2519 3 192 2539 0.797
Throttle: 0 0 0
Oiff=: 690.46 Useful: 31 0 1 2~19 31Q2 2539
FJ- l 34094 100.00 31 6 1 2519 3192 2539 0.797 9o.a2
FJ-2 0 0 .00 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00
Bl 34095 100.00 709.84 70Q.84 1416.81 1416.81 246.39 Total: 3251 2579 3270 2591 0.793
Throttle: 0 0 0
DifF 706.97 Useful: 3251 21579 3270 2591
BL-I 34094 100.00 3251 2579 3270 2591 0.793 9 1.65
Bl-2 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 .00
IX2 34095 0.00 553.47 1114.39 1114.39 111 4.39 285.61 Total: 0.000
Throttle:
Oiff= 0.00 Useful:
I )(2-1 0 .00 0.000 0.00
ITR 34095 100.00 553.47 553.47 1224.50 1224.50 148.15 TObl: 3055 2448 3072 2459 0.80 1
Throttle: 0 0 0
Oiff= 671.03 Useful: 3055 2448 3072 2459
TR-1 34094 10 0.00 3055 2448 3072 2450 0.S01 89.58
TR-2 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 .000 0.00
EW 34005 0 .00 4Q.Q3 651.77 6S1.n 651 .77 876.76 Total: 0.000
Throttle:
Oifi: 0.00 Useful:
EW-1 0.00 0 .000 0.00
SR 341XJ5 100.00 4 9.{j3 40.g3 1285.78 1285.78 358.22 Tot.!!l: 6750 45 11 5861 4506 0.783
Throttle: 0 0 0
Dif'f: 1235.85 Useful: 5759 4511 5861 4506
SR.1 34004 100.00 " 1640 1390 1741 14 74 0.S48 68.02
SR-2 34094 100.00 4119 ' 3121 4119 3121 0 .758 100.00
FC 3409S 0 .00 95.S1 495.24 495.24 495.24 904 .70 Tot.11: 0 0 0.000
Throttle: 0 0
Diff=: 0.00 Useful: 0 0
Fe- , 0.00 0 0 0 .000 0 .00
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
Configuration Name:E29-N0031 O-REVT -v1A-PH 1-Ann PH 204: Hydraulic Horsepower Report
Case Name: 193_TA_EA_FD P.lge 25 of 34
PRE S SUR E (P S II POW ER (H P)
Station Pump l(m'31~~~ %I~':'n; (~Tim.

Pump)
Hold
Pres
Suet
Pre-s
Case
Pres
Disc.
Pres
RMD
Pres
Avg
BHP
Avg
HHP
Peak
BHP
Peak
HHP
Avg
Eft RPM
'10
we 340Q5 UHLO[} fl5.B l ~5.81 1225.66 1225.66 40(;.34 To~l : 5303 4 122 5305 4124 O.n7
Throttle: 0 0 0
Oiff= 1120.04 Useful: 5303 ';122 5305 4124
WC-l 34oij4 100.00 1184 1001 1186 1002 0.845 60.54
WC-2 340Q4 100.00 41 1 ~ 3121 41H} 3121 0 .i58 100.00
OL 34oQ5 0.00 100.13 653.81 653.81 653.81 746. 19 Total: 0.000
Thrat1le:
Oiff=O.O~ Useful:
OL-l 0.00 0.000 0.00
9il 34095 0.00 100.13 100. 13 100. 13 100.00 00000000.00 Total : 0.000
Throttle:
Oift=O.O[} Useful:
eR·l 0.00 0.000 0.00
BR (Termin.l) 100.13
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERI NG
Rev. 3.6
Page 30 of 62 Hyd ra ulic Design Proposal
Issue Date: August 23 , 2011 Mainli ne
Configuration Name:E29-N0031O-REVT -v2A-UL T-Ann PH 204: Hydraulic Horsepower Report
C3se Name:275_TA_EA_FD P3ge 24 of 32
P R E S SU R E (P S I) pow ER(H P)
Statio n Pump l (mA31~!~ %I;;;'i [~nme

Pump)
Hold
Pre.
Suet
Pres
Case
Pres
Dis c
Pres
RMD
Pres
Avg
8HP
Avg
HHP
Peak
8HP
Peak
HHP
Avg
Elf
%
RPM
Kid 48581 100.00 75.00 75.00 690.47 690.47 9 11.53 Total: 3774 3 199 3774 3199 0.848
Throttle: 0 0 0
Difr-o 6 15.47 Useful: 3774 3 199 3774 3199
KM- l 48580 100.00 3774 3 199 3774 3199 0.848 89.60
KM-2 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 .00
CW 48581 100.00 50.06 50.06 1666.08 1666.08 4 2.92 Toul: 9904 8400 9904 8400 0.848
Throttle: 0 0 0
. Dift= 1616.02 Useful: 9904 8400 9904 8400
CW-l 48580 100 .00 4951 4 199 4951 4199 0.848 99.99
CW-2 48580 100.00 4952 4200 4952 4200 0.848 100.00
N8 4858 1 100.00 510.18 5 10.18 1058. 19 1058.19 2 12.77 Total: 3369 2848 3369 2B48 0.845
Throttle: 0 0 0
Diff= 548.0 1 Useful: 3369 2B48 3369 284B
NB- l 48580 100.00 3369 2648 3369 2848 0.845 85.75
NB-2 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00
HI) 48581 100.00 237.36 237. 36 1399.09 13911.00 -0.00 Total: 7 194 606 1 7194 6061 0.842
Throttle: 0 0 0
Dift= 1161.73 Useful: 7 194 606 1 7194 6061
HU- l 48580 100.00 2242 1660 224 2 1660 0.830· 73.73
HUC2 48580 100.00 4952 4200 4952 4200 0.848 100.00
BU 4858 1 100.00 3 11.53 31 1.53 l11B.96 1118.96 275.04 Total: 4947 4 197 4947 4197 0.848
Throttle: 0 0 0
DifF 807.43 Useful: 4947 4 197 4947 4197
8 U- l 4 8 ~80 100.00 4947 4 197 4947 4197 0.848 99.96
BU-2 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00
Xl 4858 1 100.00 307. 14 307.14 11 14.1IIl 1114.99 118.0 1 T01.1: 4950 4199 4950 4 190 0 .848
Throttle: 0 0 0
Diff= 807.85 Useful: 4950 4199 4950 4199
Xl -1 48580 10.0.00 4950 4 199 4950 4190 0.B48 09.99
X1-2 0 0. 00 o· 0 0 0 0.000 0.00
FJ 4858 1 100.00 852.59 852.50 1585.66 1585.66 49.34 Tot.31: 4492 3Bl0 44Q2 3B l 0 0.B48
Throttle: 0 0 0
Diff= 733.0.7 Useful: 44 92 3810 4492 3810.
FJ- l 485BO 100.00 4492 3B l 0 4492 38 10 0.848 96.09
FJ-2 0 0. 00 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00
Bl 4858 1 100.00 257.39 257.39 1658.08 1658.00 -0 .0.8 Total: 8597 7293 8597 7293 0.B48
I~
Throttle: 0 0 0
Diff= 1400.69 Useful: B596 7293 B596 7293
8l-1 48580 100.00 364 5 3092 3645 3092 0.B48 88.39
Bl -2 48580 100.00 495 1 4 200. 4951 4200 0.848 100.0 0
X2 4858 1 100.00 974.43 974.4 3 1399.0B 1399.00 -0.08 Total: 2639 2207 2639 2207 0.836
Throttle: 0 0 0
Diff= 424. 65 Useful: 2639 2207 2639 2207
X2- 1 48580 100.00. 2639 220.7 2639 2207 0.B36 78.21
)(2-2 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.0.00 0 .00
T~ 4858 1 100.00 519.00. 519.00 1223,54 1223.54 14 9.46 Total: 43 16 3662 4316 3662 0.848
Throttle: _ 0 0 0
-- Difr-0704.53 Usefuf: 4316 · 3662 4 316 il!O 3662
TR-l 48580 100.00 43 16 3682 4316 3662 ·0.84 B 94.5B
TR-2 0 0.00 cO 0 0 ~-- ·0 0.000· 0.00
EW 485Bl 100.0.0 100.3 1 100.3 1 14 72.7e 1472.76 88.24 Total: B444 7 157 B455 7167 0.848
Throttle: 0 0 0
Diff= 1372.45 Useful: 8444 7 157 8455 7167
EW- l 48580 100.00 3492 2956 3503 2966 0.847 86.92
EW-2 48580 100.00 4952 4200 4952 4 200 0.84B 100.00
-
SR · 48581 100.00 237.72 237.72 1654.09 .1!l54.00 -0.09 Toul: 86Q7 7377 c8703 · 7382 0.848
Throttte: 0 0 " 0
- Dift= 1416 .36 Useful: 8696 7377 87 02 7382
· S R- l
SR-2
- "'l'-''''
4 8580.
48580.
100.00
100.00 ~-~ ~ ~ !""::,,':-,
3744
4952
3 176
4200
375 1
4952
-, 3181
4 200
0. 848
0.848
89.35
100.00
SR-3 0 0:00 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 .00
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated Angust 23 , 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
Configurati.on Name:E29-N0031 O-REVT -v2A-UL T -Ann PH 204: Hydraulic Horsepower Report

C<lse N<lme:275_TA_EA]D P<lge 25 of 32
PRE S SUR E (P S II pow ER(H P)
Station Pump (mA31~~~'; %nrni (~J:i

Hold
Pres
Suet
Pres
Case
Pres
Disc
Pres
RMD
Pres
Avg
BHP
Avg
HHP
Peak
BHP
Peak
HHP
AV[J
Elf RP~I
rC 48&8 1 1 0~ . 00 18 1.24 181. 24 9:>8. 15 Q38 .15 456.85- To!.sl: 4"39 3934 4639: 3934 0.848 I
Throttle: Q 0 0
Oiff= 756.91 Us ..!ul: 453Q 3934 463S 3lJ34
FC-l 48580 100.1l0 4639 3934 ~63 G' 3934 0.848 97.34
FC-2 0 0.00 I) 0 G I} 0.000 0.00
WC 48M I I IlO.OO 50.09 50.00 164,Ulll 1648.0!) - O.O~ TOtal: 9S03 83 14 9803 8314 0.848
Throttle: 0 0 (I
Diff= 1597.97 lJse!ul: 9a03 83 14 9803 B3 14
we-l 485-80 100.00 4850 41 13 4ll5D 4113 0.848 -g9.13
WC-2 48580 100.00 49S3 420() 4953 4200 0.848 100.00
OL 4859 1 100.00 500.33 5-DO.3S 1272.3-6 1272.36 122.64 To:~I : 4731 4() 13 473 1 40 13 0.848
Throtle: G 0 0
Diff= 772.03 Uselul: 4 731 40 13 473 1 40 13
O L-l 48580 10().OO 473 1 4D l 3 4731 4013 0.848 98.13
O L-Z 0 I}.OO I} Q I} I} D.Q{)O 0.00
BR 4858 1 0.01} 100.06 100.06 100.1l6 100.000000[1000.01} Tobl: 0 (} () 0 0.000
Thronle: 0 [} I}
Oili: 0.00 Uselut () 0 0 0
8R-1 0 0.00 [) 0 0 0 0.000 0.00
8R-2 0 0.00 () (} (} 0 D.1l00 0.00
BR (Terminal} 100.1l6
3.2.4 Variable Frequency Drive (VFD)

Since both the oil and the diluent pipelines are large diameter pipelin es with relatively large motor sizes, BDE Hydra ulics
recommends the use of a Variable Frequency Drive (VFO) to enhance operability and reduce pressure throttling.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING ?J
N RIDGE
3.2.5 Case Pressure Limits

For crude oil pipeline pump stations, all the st ation piping will be designed to PN 150
(ANSI 900) class resulting in a case pressure limit of 2160 psig for all pump stations. To
maintain maximum operational flexibility, it is recommended that all the station piping be
hydro-tested to the full ANSI 900 (2160 psig) rating

For condensate pipelin e pump stat ions, Clearwater, Fort St. James, Be ar Lake, Smoky
River, and Whitecourt will be designed to PN 150 (ANSI 900) cia ss resulting in a case
pressure limit of 2160 psig for these 5 stations. All the other stations will be designed to
PN 100 (ANSI 600) class resulting in a case pressure limit of 1440 psig.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
3.2.6 Pump Standby

The current Enbridge standby philosophy is to ensure that when the largest unit at a
pump station is out of service, the pipeline can still achieve operating capacity (95 % of
design capacity). A sta ndby analysis was com pleted to en sure the pro posed desig n for
the NGP meets the above criteria. The results are summarized in this section.
Note: This is a preliminalY DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for infollllation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
~
Rev. 3.6
ENBRIDGE
••
••
••
••
••
•
Note: This is a preliminruy DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
3.3 Operational Limitations and Concerns
3.3.1 Petroleum Quality and Batching

The oil and condensate pipelines were hydraulically designed based on a single product
for each pipeline. During detailed engineerin g, the final hydraulic design for t he oil
pipeline will incorporate the additional lighter oil products anticipated to be transported in
batches, a nd this will re suit in revis ions to the design pressures and wa II th icknesses at
some specific locations along the pipel ine.
3.3.2 Minimum Reynolds Number

The table below summarizes the range of the Reynolds number in any crude oil pipeline
and condensate pipeline at in itial and ultimate flow rates. It can be seen that the flow
regime is fully turbulent in both system at the target flow rates.
Pipeline Phase Design Flow Rate (bpd) Reynold's Number
I 583,333 4,531 - 5,395

Oil
IV 944,444 9,763 - 25,082
I 214,111 803,725 - 824,213

Condensate
III 305, 556 1,179,335 - 1,240,192
3.3.3 Maximum Mainline Fluid Velocities

The maxi mum fluid velocity in the crude oil pipel ine is 9.5 ftlsec ba sed on the ultimate
phase targe t design ca pacity of 944,444 bpd. The ma ximum fluid velocity in the
condensate pipeline is 9 .7 ftlsec based on the ultimate phase target design capacity of
305,556 bpd. These values are within the typical flu id velocities found acceptable on the
Enbridge System.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
-etNBRIDGE
3.3.4 Operating Limits
Operating limits were critical due to the significant elevation changes along the route.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infomlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
3.4 Pipeline Thermal Analysis
3.4.1 Annual Average Temperature Profile

The followin g profiles contain a summary of the average station in let and outlet in-line
temperature under annual average conditions. These are the thermal conditions used in
the hydraulic design capacity and pressure loss calculations.
Note: This is a preliminruy DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING
Hydraulic Design Proposal -
£)
Page 40 of62
ENBRIDGE

Phase I - Application 525 kbpd Annual
Conflg: E28-SE2109-REVRLF-A/'IEC Case: 583kbpd_DesI(11
Thermal Profile
Profile of temperalJJe vs Milepost
85 .•
80 .•
75.0
70.0
65 .•
60 .•
55 .•
so .•
<15.0
..
l <i ti ~
Phase IV - Ultimate 850 kbpd Annual

Conflg: E28-SE2109-REVRHF-AMEC Case: 944kbpd_Design
Thermal Profile
Profile of temperature vs Milepost
00.
95.•
').0
85 .•
80 .•
~
.>
~ ill ~ :" ~ ~
"
~ ~ ~
-<""")
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6

Phase 1- Application 193 kbpd Annual
Conflg: E29-AU1009-DL-REVR ease: 214kbpd_deslgo
Thermal Profile
Profile of temperature vs Milepost
o.
65.0
60.0
55.0
SO.O
I
i
~
'15.0
40.0
35.0
l ~ !! '2 ~
;..;;: ~ ~ ;j
'" i!i ~
Phase III - Ultimate 275 kbpd Annual

Config: E29-AU1009-DL-REVR case: 306kbpd_design
Thermal Profile
Profile of temperabJre \IS Milepost
o.
65.0
60.0
55 .0
SO.O
15.0
40.0
35.0
0.0
l ~ ~ '2 ~
x ~
= !l
"
r1iepost(o*s)
i1; iii
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infon11ation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
3.4.2 Maximum Temperature Analysis
3.4.2.1 Baseline
Phase I - Application 525 kbpd Annual

Conflg: E28-SE2109-REVRLF-38Clnj case: max_temp_Q3
Thermal Profi Ie
Profile of temperalLre vs Milepost
"'.0
as.O
I
~&
00.0
! 75.0
70.0
$ .0
O.
l" <> ~ :t' iii ~ !!
r.uepost(mles)
0
Note: This is a preliminruy DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
Phase IV - Ultimate 850 kbpd Annual

Config: E28-SE2109-REVRHF-38Cinj Case: maJ,-Temp_Q3
Thermal Profile
Profile of temperabJre vs Milepost
'''.
125.0
120.0
115.0
110.0
IOS.0
100.0
95.0
90.0
65.0
9.6
~
~ ~ :c "
" Ii'
"
c
'" '"
~
r'li!e~t(miles)
The temperature profile shown above indicates that the maximu m in-line temperatures
between Bruderheim and Kitimat range from between 19.3°C (66.8°F) and 39.SoC
(103.1°F) at the Pha se I flow rate; 38.1 °C (100.S0F) and 40.9°C (1 os. rF) at the
ultimate flow rate. These in-line temperatures are well within the desig n limitation of the
pipeline SO.O°C (122.0°F).
3.4.2.2 Sensitivity Study

There is so me uncertainty in some of the thermal assumptions u sed in determinin g the
baseline thermal profile shown above, specifica lIy soil prop erties (ther mal conduct ivity
and temperature). Th erefore a sensitivity analysis was conducted around th ese
parameters to determine the range of potential maximum in-line temperatures that could
be seen.
Sensitivity Assumptions:
• Summer soil thermal conductivity -lower by 30% from the values in AMEC
report (200S) based on previous project experience.
• Summer soil temperatures - 10°C (SO°F) based on preliminary reCD mmendations

provided by Derick Nixon (2008).
The in-line temperature profiles of the above two sensitivity runs are presented in the
graph below, together with the baseline profile for the purpose of comparison.
Note: This is a preliminaIY DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 20 II) aIld has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
~
Rev. 3.6
ENBRIDGE
Comp any Confidential
Dilbit Line Maximum In-line Temperature Sensitivity - Phase IV Fll ow
- Baselin e - 70%Conductivity - 50FG round
125 -,--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---,- 51.7
LL..
120 48 .9 U
0.0 0.0
<1.1 <1.1
OJ OJ
115 46 .1 -<1.1
...
<1.1
...
....
:::I :::I
.....
...
til
<1.1
110 ---- ---- -- - -. - - - -- ---- - -- - - - --- - --- - ----- -- -- - - - - -- - - - -------- - - _.- ----.--- - --- - - -- ----------- -----
~
43.3 ...
til
<1.1
Co Co
E E
<1.1
l-
105 40.5 ~
E E
:::I :::I
E 100 37.8 E
'xtil 'xtil
~ 95 35 .0 ~
90
o 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750
Milepost
The results show that th e maximu m temperatures are arou nd 40.0°C (1 04.0°F) in most
cases. However, it can get close to 50.0°C (122.0°F) when the soil co nductivity is 30 %
lower than the AMEC re port values, It is recom mended that an addition al soil sampling
program be conducted at the commencement of detailed engineering.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
Issue Date: August 23,20 11 Mainline
4 Transient Analysis
A preliminary transient analysis ha s been conducted for both the crude oil pipelin e and
the conden sate pipeline systems
4.1 Crude Oil Pipeline System

Thirty-eight (38) scenarios in tota I were ex ami ned for the oil pipeli ne system at the
ultimate flo w rate. The transient scenarios examined include sudde n and unplanned
pressu re co ntrol valve (peV) closure (95% at intermediate stations, 1 00% at delivery
locations), station suction valve closing, and station lockout.
The transie nt study resulted maxi mum pressure profiles of all scenario s, as well as the
steady-state pressure profile are sho wn in the figure below. I t can be seen that the wall
thickness design is adequate as the maxi mum pressure profile of all scenarios is under
the 110% MOP limit.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infomlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
NGP Oil Pipeline Maximum Pressure Profile - All Scenarios

- - Min MOP - - 110% Mill MOP - - Maximum Pressure - - Steady State - - Wa ll Thickness
2800 I 2.8
2400 h n r=n II fl n nn n n I 2.4
2000 ~. I.\ L--...JA~ R-I-r=-,.,I .-, ~ r1" rf Ir L.J L......J L'I-lt-n'Hl-I~HI n IF I Ir -1- 1-1--+ 2
:c-
u
bii 1600 I •
~
I • '" ~ PJ '. IN\ • fI : l 'I, IV~" H IlfIl--:rI~HIA j
,
I • rIllU--+-lfIIH h ~ I I ~,----+ 1.6 :§.
c. V>
VI
Q)
Q) I:
5
V>
.¥
.~
..c:
't "'.11.n.H--f V'4lR----..I- -- - - +
VI
~
l-
1200 I W • 11 I ';1. • ,V,' 1.2 n;
$:
800 _ 0 .8
,, ,,
L.!
,
I
,'1 ,
1\ I
\ , tI I, , .Ii . '/ .. •
400 \1 h,
'.. ,,' i
1~1 11
_'I ,
,f~ I,
• ~r \ I 0.4
~ I ~
I
1
'/.' ''I ~ I I
•
o . BR OL we Fe SR EW TR BL , 'FJ BU HU ew oKI,,1
I 0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750
Milepost
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only_ It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
4.2 Condensate Pipeline System

Thirty (30) scenarios in total were examined for the condensate pipel in e system at the
ultimate flo w rate. The transient scenarios examined include sudde n and unplanned
pressure co ntrol valve (peV) closure (95% at intermediate stations, 1 00% at delivery
locations) and station lockout.
The transient study resulted maxi mum pressu re profiles of all scenario s, as well as the
steady-state pressure profile are shown in the figure below. I t can be seen that the wall
thickness design is adequate as the maxi mum pressure profile of all scenarios is under
the 110% MOP limit.
Note: This is a prel iminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 201 1) and has been issued for infomlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
NGP Condensate Pipeline Maximum Pressure Profile - All Scenarios

- - Min MOP - - 110% Min MOP - - Maximum PressLI,'e - - Steady Stete - Wall Thickness
2000 2.800
2.400
,\ 2.000
_ 1200
1 1 :;:-
u
.2P 1.600 :§.
III
C. III
III
Q)
Q)
C
:5
III
..)::
u
III :E
...
Q)
0- 1.200 ~ro
800 $
\ 0.800
\
400 I 1 I ~. "PI _ , .. If ',. _. I r? I I I' I I' \ 0'" ." I I \

, 0.400
'1 ~
II
if \I 'II
I
KM NB BU Xl r I BL X2 TR EW SR H1r
OL
o I
BR , 0.000
'
o 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750
Milepost
Note: Tllis is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
5 Risk Management
The followin 9 section 0 utlines the risks identified by the hydraulics gro up that wi ll need to be
addressed prior to project execution.
5.1 Risk Register
Assumption/ Risk Probability Impact Mitigati n Strategy

Description
(High/
Low/Med ium)
The proposed desig n of the High Operating limit and h ydrau lic Conduct ope rating limit and hydraulic
crude oil pipelin e is based on resu lts w ill change. Batch modeling for Linefill w ith heavy an d
single product (a II heavy). The pigging w ill need to be lights. Incorporate light products in
line w ould be ver y likely considered. hydraulic design s and adjust pipeline
shipping multiple products design pressures and wall thickness
(heavy an d light) in batches. where required. Model batch pig .
Parallel pump alignment Medium Re-selection of new pump an d Work with Eng ineering Services to
motor units optimize pump plan . To be reviewed
by affected groups.
ORA ma y be u sed to reduce Medium Number of stati ons w ill reduce. Should ORA usage be conside red, a
the number of stations on the Pressu re profile along the line review of the h ydraulic design w ould
condensate line at Phase III. will change. necessary.
Initial oil pipe line th roug hput High Low fluid vela city and small Conduct hyd raulic analysis on low flow
may be low. Reynolds num ber. Ma y be rate. Identif y th e flow pattern a nd the
operating in laminar flo w, requirements of batch pigging.
causing quality problem.
Soil properties a long the right- High If actual soil conductivity is A sensitiv ity analysis in ter ms of th e
of-way a re based on AMEC higher than pred icted , there will soi l conduct ivity was conducted. It is
desktop report. Discrepancies be risk of not making the target recommended t hat an addition al soil
with actual values ar e capacity; if the actual is lower sampling prog ram be conducted at the
expected. than predicted value, in-line commencement of detailed
temperature will increase. engineering.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for inforn1ation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING
?J
EN RIDGE
Appendix A: Product Specification

The tables below present the specification of crude oi l and condensate prod ucts.
Configuration Name: E28-7F 5-S E1808-REVPLFTR PH 102: Fluid Report

Case Name:58J_kbpd_deslgn_w_BU_AT_AMEC Page 5 of 67
Temperature 1 Temperature 2 Vapor

Visco Visco Pressure
Descri tion T e Fahr. Cel. cSt Fahr. Cel. cSt S .Grav. si
350.000 70.0 21.'1 '177 ..100
PH 102: Fluid Output Report
Configuration Name:E29-4A-AUG2108-DL PH 102: Fluid Report

Case Name:214_khpd Poge 5 0150
Temperature 1 Tempemture 2
Descri tion T e 'Fahr. Cel. Fahr. Cel.
COND 50.0 "10.0 64.9 18.3
PH 102: Fluid Output Report
40 F (4.44 C) Co nv.
Visco Factor
cSt silfi
1.276 0.321 4
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 20 II) and has been issued for infomlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
Appendix B: Batch Plans

Crude Oil Pipeline
Configurat ion Name:E28-7F5-SE1808-REVP LFTR PH 101: Batch Plan Data
Case Nalne:583_kbpd_design_w_BU_AT _AMEC Page 2 of 67
8lte h eR4NJ KM-DEl
10 O? Fluid Volum!; OP Fluid V olu m,",
OXI ;O'J(I-) FL' OXI
OXI HlJG-J FL' 'JXl
OX I i OJOJ FL' OXI
OXI
Tot~:-=
OXI FL'
To::'IfD ~v: 4IJClIJO
Condensate Pipeline
Configuration Name:E29-4A-AUG2108-DL PH 101: Batch Plan Data
Case Nom e :214_kbpd Page 2 of 50
Batc h KM -1NJ BR-DEL
.0 OP Fluid Volume- OP Fluid Volum~
7:;:;: 1 0][])FL' 7:! E

7::0:: ; (j]O]FL' nE
71E ; OJCD FL' 7::E
.~
721: FL' 71E
TcUI: 4 0000
Total.'Oav: 4 0000
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,20 II) and has been issued for infonllation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
DGE
Appendix C: Pump Curves
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23 , 2011) and has been issued for infornlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
Page 53 of62 .Hydraulic Design Proposal -
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23 , 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
Appendix D: Graphical Hydraulic Profiles

36" Crude Oil Pipeline Hydraulic Profiles - Phase I Flow (583 kbpd)
(onng: E28~N00310-REVT-vlA-PH1-Ann Case: 525_TA_EAJD
Hydraulic Gradient Profile

Profile of max head + elevation, head + elevation, elevation vs Milepost
Hilepos t:8.60 (m.iles) HAOH=8110 (tt) HoIIIad"'7055 (ft.) Iilev&t1on-Z110 ( tt)
1000 IiQQQQl
9.5K 9.5K
9 .0K 9.0K
8 .5K 8.5K
a.OK B.OK
7 . SK 7.SK
7.0K 7.0K
6.5K 6.5K
6.0K 6.0K
S.SK 5 .5K
g ~
§ 5 , oK "'"
1l 5 .0K
£
" i .5K 4.5K
" .OK ".OK
3.5K 3.5K
3.0K 3.0K
2 . SK 2.51(
2.OK 2.0K
1.5)( l.5K
1000.0 1000.0
500.0 500 .0
Ml
Milepost (mSes)
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
36" Crude Oil Pipeline Hydraulic Profiles - Phase IV Flow (944 kbpd)
Config: E28-SE2109-REVRHFAfvIEC Case: 944kbpd_Design

Hydraulic GradientProfile
Profile of max head + elevation, head + elevation, elevation vs Mi lepost
9.0K 9,OK
:3,5K 8,5K
a,OK a,OK
7, 5K 7,5K
7.0K 7.0K
6,5K 6,5K
6,OK 6,OK
5,5K 5,5K
5.0K 5.0K
~
I
0
4,5K
4,OK
g
~
4~rI
4,OK
<[
::: 3,5K "
I 3,5K [;
iii
3,OK 3,OK
2, 5K 2,5K
2,OK 2,OK
L5K 1.5K
1000,0 1000,0
500,0 500,0
P.Ol P.O
f~ilepost (miles)
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
20" Condensate Pipeline Hydraulic Profiles - Phase I Flow (214 kbpd)
[onflg: E29-N003tO-REVT-YIA-PHl-Ann Case: 193_TA_EA]D

Profile of max head + elevation) head + elevation) elevation vs Milepo51:
llilepost=606.6Z (lAiles) lIAOH =7617 (ftl Ha.d-6264 (ft) Blevat:ion-Z343 (ft)
~
10000 [jQQQ
9.SK 9.51( 9.5K
9,()K 9.0K
B.5K 8.51(
8.0t( 8,OK
7.SK 7.SK
7.01: 7.Q!(
6,s*( 6.51(
6.01: 6.0K
g 5'5K~ So
~
S.5K
So
~ 5.0K S.CK ~
'" ; .51(
1 4.51(
t
tiJ
4 ,ot~ 4.0K
3.SK 3.SI(
3 .0K 3.01(
2.51( 2.5K
2.OK 2.0I(
1.5K 1.51:
1000.0 1000.0
500.0 500 ,0
IJ:Ol IJ:Ol
Milepo5t(miles)
Note: Th is is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
20" Condensate Pipeline Hydraulic Profiles - Phase III Flow (306 kbpd)
(oong: E29- N00310-REVT-v2A-UlT-Ann Case: 275_TA_EA_FD
Prone of max head + elevation, head + ele....ation, elevation 'IS Milepost
IUlepo 5t:z460 . 47 (triles ) HAOH=7618 (ft) He ad"'4675 I te) Elevation" Z370 Ctt)
~
,I ~
9.51( 9.51(
9.01( 9.0K
6.51:: 8.5K
B.OK B.OK
7.5K 7, 5K
7.0K 7,OK
6.5K 6.51(
6.01( 6,OK
g 5'5] ~
5. 5K
Z"
1 5.01: 'Ii
'=-
J:
0 5.0K
«
~
" ' .5K 4.5K iii
"1.0K 4.0K
3.5K 3.5K
3.0K 3.0K
2.5K 2.5K
2,OK 2.0K
1.51( J.5K
1000.0 1000.0
501),0 500,0
Il.(j Il.O
Milepost (miles)
Note: Tllis is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information only, It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
Appendix E: Sensitivity Analysis
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6
ENBRIDGE
(A39833)
Rev. 3.6

Pipeline Hydraulic Design Proposal PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pipeline Hydraulic Design Proposal PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

(A39833)

Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING