ASSESSMENTS

MODULE OF BILINGUAL PHYSICS PROGRAM IN FLUID STATIC AND

DYNAMIC

Dear,
Name : ......................................
Agency origin : ......................................

In connection with the development of the Mathematics Module for Junior High
School, we request your willingness to provide an assessment of the module developed. The
assessment questionnaire of this module is intended to find out the opinions of Mr / Ms about
the module being developed, so that it can be known whether or not the module is suitable for
use in learning at school. For this reason, we request your willingness to fill out the
questionnaire for the assessment of the following modules. The assessments, comments and
suggestions that you give will be used as indicators of quality and consideration for module
improvement. For your attention and willingness to fill out the assessment questionnaire for
this module, we thank you.

A. Instructions for completing

This assessment is carried out by giving a check mark (√) to the column in
accordance with the judgment of Mr / Ms for each item in the Assessment Sheet with the
following conditions:
score 5 = very good score 4 = good
score 3 = enough score 2 = less
score 1 = very less

B. Assessment Aspects
1. Feasibility of Presentation

Assessment Rating Item Score

Indicator 5 4 3 2 1

A. Technique 1. Systematic presentation.

Presentation
2. Presentation wrinkles.

B. Presentation 3. Sample questions.

Completeness.
4. Exercise
.
 5. Key answers to questions

6. exercise.
7. Glossary.
8. Bibliography.
C. Presentation of 9. Activating participants
Learning. student
.
10. Realistic problems

11. Growing thinking

critical, creative and
innovative.

2. Language Feasibility

Assessment Rating Item Score

Indicator 5 4 3 2 1

A. In accordance 12. Conformity with level of

with the level of intellectual development.
development of
students.
13. Conformity with
level of social emotional
development.
 B.Communicative 14. Readability of messages
15. Accuracy of language
rules
C. Prosecution and 16. Prosecution and
integration of thought integration between
lines. paragraphs

3. Feasibility of Integrity

Assessment Rating points Score

Indicator 5 4 3 2 1

A. Module Size 17. Module size compliance

with standards ISO.

B. Module Skin 18. Appearance of elements of

Design (Cover) the layout on the cover, back
and back harmoniously has
rhythm and unity as well
consistent.

19. The color elements of the

layout are harmonious and
clarify function.

Letters that are interesting and easy to read

20. The font size of the

module title is more dominant
and proportional than the size
book, author's name

21. Color of module title

contrast with color
 22. Don't use too much
font combination.

Cover Module Illustration

23. Describe content / teaching

material and disclose
object character

C. Desain Isi Harmonious Layout Element

Modul
24. Printing and
proportional margin

25. Margins of two pages side

by side
proportional

26. Space between text and

illustration accordingly

Complete layout element

27. Title of chapter, chapter

subtitles,
and number of pages / folios.

28. Illustration and description

picture (caption).

Typography of Simple Module Contents

29. Don't use too many types

alphabet.

30. Use of variations

letters (bold, italic, all capital,
small capital) not excessive.
 Tipogragi Easy to Read

31. Appropriate font type with

content material.

32. Text layout width

normal.

33. Spacing between lines

normal text arrangement.

Illustration Contents

34. Able to reveal

meaning / meaning of object.

35. Creative and dynamic.

We also hope that Mr. / Ms would like to provide entries about the wrong part,
the type of error or suggestion for this module in writing in the available column. Or you
can simply revise it by crossing out the wrong part of the module and writing down what
the researcher should correct. For your willingness to fill out this evaluation sheet, we
thank you.
Wrong Section Error Type Suggestions for
Improvement
A. General comments
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………… ........ ………………………………………………
B. Conclusion
This learning module is stated *):
1. It is worth testing in the field without any revisions.
2. It is worth testing in the field with revisions.
3. Not worth testing in the field.

*) Circle one