Professional Documents
Culture Documents
YiChen Luo
Dr. Arpaia
1. What does Dr. Arpaia mean by history and what interests him (and historians in
general)?
In the podcast, SA01 Intro to a History of Antisemitism Dr. Arpaia indicates that history is
a type of study that focuses on change and persistence over time. He adds that history is
about findings of historical studies or what is commonly known as discourse. Dr. Arpaia
states that like other historians in general, he is inquisitive of what changes or remains the
same over time, why and how human activities and the environment change or remain the
same over time, as well as the impact (or not) that human activities and the environment
As he mentioned earlier, history studies change and persistence over time and while there
are many types of historians, he is a cultural historian because his study involves making
basics assumptions or postulates which are a type of hypotheses where the scholar does
not necessarily have to provide evidence to the audience since the claim’s validity is
postulates. For example the in his definition of culture by postulating that culture “ both
every day practices by which humans live their lives and anything resulting from the use
of the human mind.” and that "Culture is embedded in socio-economic politics and in the
larger cultural context" Dr. Arpaia is making postulations without providing evidence
since these assumptions are regarded as self-evident. Through this process, Dr. Arpaia
means that being a cultural historian means analyzing cultural traditions and discourse
3. What is the common meaning of anti-Semitism in the USA today? Why are we not
going to use it in this course and how can we apply the scientific method to create an
In the USA today, anti-Semitism commonly refers to a strong dislike for Jews or any
prejudice against them. However, this term is vague and therefore not a precise analytical
tool required to do history. He, therefore, says that there is a need to come up with a
scientific definition or model of antisemitism which would ensure that all activities
conform to the scientific method. Unlike in pure sciences where hypotheses, analytical
tools, and theories can be verified through experimentation this is impossible in history
discipline.
As such we must rely on the test of logic, verifiability, and objectivity as a scientific
method. Objectivity can be achieved through scholarly verification by peers in the same
field of history whereas the work must follow the rules of logic. Similarly, analytical
tools, hypotheses, and theories must be verifiable for a historian's work must be
vague and indistinct, it is unusable in the scientific model required to study history.
3
Drawing from mathematical set theory, Dr. Arpaia conceives of a scientific model for
antisemitism as cultural concepts being two sets of elements where one set containing the
core elements which give the cultural term its discrete meaning thereby giving that term
consistency. On the other hand, the secondary elements of a cultural term/concept give
nuance or subtle differences without eroding its discreet meaning and consistency.
According to Dr. Arpaia, cultural concepts like antisemitism are theoretically structured
in levels which he exemplifies with a nesting Russian matryoshka doll, suggesting that
they can be highly complex with many levels. At the primary level in Dr. Arpaia’s
theoretical model lies the core elements which give cultural terms their discreet meaning
and consistency. At the primary also lie secondary elements which give a cultural concept
nuance or subtle differences that do not affect the concepts consistency. However, Dr.
Arpaia does not dwell on the secondary elements since they do not an essential part of the
definition in his model. At the primary level can have a single or multiple core elements
In the podcast, he depicts three core elements as an example. At the secondary level, the
core elements of a cultural term are composed of analogous pairs of subsets of core
elements and secondary elements. At the secondary level, this model holds that core
elements of a term can be defined by a different number of subset elements. The model
Dr. Arpaia indicates that to effectively understand the core elements of antisemitism, it is
indicates that the literal meaning does not express precisely what the term means.
Therefore he proposes the scientific meaning in which the term represents a three-fold
simultaneous process of how groups and individuals perceive themselves, a changing and
fluid external reality and how they perceive the logic that governs their world view. With
this in mind, the core elements of antisemitism include a Weltanschauung where all Jews
and Jewishness are at the core of the issue. The second core element of antisemitism is
that there exist separate and very different stereotypes that depict Jews as inherently
Jews where their humanity is denied. The fourth element of antisemitism is mythopoeia
realities such as antisemitism and their origins which can help promote religious, racial
and cultural harmony. As such by studying the elements and origins of Semitism we can
real truth about Jews and Jewishness by anti-Semitic stereotypes that emanate from
society where Christians and Jews are grouped together due to some of their shared
shared Abrahamic covenant and the proclamation of each group as the proclamation of
5
each group as the god of Abraham's chosen people, we can easily discern the complex
origins and purposes of antisemitism. Christians and muslim societies emerged after
telling and retelling of tales of Jesus Christ and Mohammed respectively and both derive
The truths derive from the Hebrew Bible especially in the book of, in particular from a
myth about named Abram who later changed his name to Abraham. Judaism, Islam, and
Christianity as well as modern societies that emerged from claim descent from Abraham.
According to the myth, Abraham was asked by the god of Abraham to believe and follow
his wishes for which he would be rewarded with many descendants. Abraham agreed to
settle elsewhere. Abraham lay with his servant Hagar after his wife asked her to do so,
convinced that she could not bear a child. This caused a spite between Hagar and
Abraham’s wife Sarah forcing Hagar to flee only to return soon after claiming to have
been instructed by an angel who also said that she should name the child Ishmael. The
god later told Abraham that he would have a child (Isaac), with his wife Sarah which they
later did. The god also promised Abraham many descendants and never to abandon him
should he believed in him and lived in his ways. As a sign of accepting the covenant, the
god asked Abraham to circumcise himself and members of his house and his descendants.
After qu8arrels between Sarah and Hagar Abraham sent Hagar and Ishmael to Egypt. The
god promised that since both Isaac and Ishmael were both Abraham’s, they would also
9. How do Jews, Christians, and Muslims each claim to be heirs of the covenant and to
Jew, Christians, and Muslims each claim to be heirs to the covenant and title of the
chosen people. Jews claim biological descent from Abraham through Isaac (Abraham’s
son) who had a son Jacob, who later came to be known as Israel. Christians, on the other
hand, have a theological claim to descent. The refuted biological descent after the coming
of Jesus offered a new covenant based on the faith of Abraham they also claimed that
Jesus was the god of Abraham in a way beyond human comprehension. According to
Christians, Jesus offered a new superseding covenant to the Jews and non-Jews if they
believed that Jesus was both human and divine and followed his teachings. Muslims have
both biological and theological claim to the covenant and the title of the chosen people.
They claim that the god of Abraham revealed to Muhammed that the Jews were wrong in
that that Ismael was they figure and not Isaac thus his descendants (Arabs) were the
chosen people and heirs of the covenant. Muslim claimed that the god of Abraham
10. What truths do Hebrew myths convey about the god of Abraham?
The Hebrew myths convey the truths that the god of Abraham was an immaterial god
meaning that he had no substance. This truth is demonstrated by their lack of representing
him in material form. As such there was only one Temple for their god which was located
near today's Jerusalem and it did not bear any representation of the god. Furthermore,
according to the Jews, the god of Abraham is the Holy of holies such that no one is
allowed to mention its name, and only the High priest was allowed to enter the Temple to
7
invoke their god's name on the day of the atonement. Due to their god's immaterial
nature, their sacrifices differed from other societies in that they were meant to publicly
recognize that their god was the provider rather than satiating their immaterial god who
did not need material nourishment. They also forbade trying to manipulate the god of
Abraham through sacrifice as the covenant was based on their obedience to their god and
its love for them. While Hebrews participates in sacrificial practices under their god's
command these activities were not the most important. In addition, Jews and Hebrews did
not see human failure and suffering as tests from their god thus did not renounce their