0 views

Uploaded by Sh. Hannan Aina

q11

- MIT16_30F10_lec01
- 40. (6SL3243-0BB30-1HA3) CONTROL UNIT CU230P-2
- 103104050
- 76292560 Electric Machines and Drives 163
- AdvancedControlofWindTurbinesBriefSurveyCategorizationandChalengesRezaei2015
- AGC Control Predictivo China
- nacusse2015
- International Journal of Soft Computing Mathematics and Control
- Fuzzy Control of Nonlinear Electromagnetic Suspension Systems
- 2nd Order System
- Robust Control Design of an Induction Motor
- Increasing accuracy and reducing time of face recognition with Euclid norm
- The International Journal of Soft Computing, Mathematics and Control (IJSCMC)
- PRSERV_07E_Using ProToolPro for Troubleshooting
- Reduced Order Observer Based Load Frequency Control Using Pole-Placement Design
- EM-347
- CH02.pdf
- Grundfosliterature-970920.pdf
- The Setpoint Overshoot Method
- A LEVEL TRAINING SET WITH BOTH A COMPUTER- BASED CONTROL AND A COMPACT CONTROLLER

You are on page 1of 8

Proportional (P) Integral (I) Derivative (D)

1 0.05 0.01 0.00

2 0.10 0.01 0.00

3 0.15 0.01 0.00

PV

PV1

PV2

From Table 1, it shows that the Proportional (P) values differ for each set which are P

= 0.05, P = 0.10 and P = 0.15. In studying the effect of controller gain, values for Integral (I)

and Derivative (D) remain fixed for each proportional value. Figure 1 clearly shows that at P

= 0.05, the maximum process variable is at 1.6% compared to P = 0.10 and P = 0.15 where the

process variables is at 1.4% and approximately 1.25%, respectively. At P = 0.05, the controller

action is faster compared to P = 0.10 and P = 0.15 whereby P value at 0.15 reaches set point

the fastest. As the proportional value increasing, the controller action becomes slower and thus,

it will slow down the process response.

The proportional value also affects the stability of the process. From Figure 1, at time

= 100, the process reaches it stability first for P = 0.15 in comparison to P = 0.10 and P = 0.05.

P = 0.05 reaches it stability at time = 500 while P = 0.10 is 300. Hence, it can be said that

At P = 0.05, the max process variable is at 1.6%compared to at P = 0.10 and P = 0.15 where

the process variables is at 1.4% and approximately1.25%, respectively. The proportional

control applies corrective action appropriate to eliminateerror. From the graph, larger value of

controller gain will further decreasing the error from the process.Other than reducing the

oscillates number, larger value of P ensure the stability of the process. As seen in figure, for P

= 0.15 at approximate time = 100, the process already reachedstabilization compared to at P =

0.10 and P = 0.05 where the process reached stabilization at time= 200 and time = 500,

respectively. Larger value of P will reduce the time taken for the processto reached the set point

since the controller action becomes slower and slows down the processresponse

Lab 2: Effect of Integral Time

Proportional (P) Integral (I) Derivative (D)

1 0.05 0.01 0.00

2 0.05 0.05 0.00

3 0.05 0.10 0.00

PV1

PV2

PV

From Table 2, it shows that the Integral (I) values differ for each set which are I = 0.01,

I = 0.05 and I = 0.10. In studying the effect of integral time, values for Proportional (P) and

Derivative (D) remain fixed for each proportional value. Figure 2 shows that at I = 0.10, the

maximum process variable is approximately 1.84% compared to I = 0.05 and I = 0.01 where

the process variables are at 1.8% and 1.6%, respectively. Based on the graph above, it can be

concluded that the higher the value of Integral (I), the higher the number of oscillates.

Besides that, another conclusion could be made is that the lower the value of Integral

(I), the higher the stability of the process. From Figure 2, approximately at time = 420, the

process reaches it stability first for I = 0.01 in comparison I = 0.05 and I = 0.10. I = 0.05 reaches

it stability at time = 500 while I = 0.10 is around 550s. Hence, as the integral values increases,

the controller actions and process response become faster. This will lead to the increasing of

time taken for the process to reach the set point.

Lab 3: Effect of Derivative Time

Proportional (P) Integral (I) Derivative (D)

1 0.05 0.01 0.00

2 0.05 0.01 0.05

3 0.05 0.01 0.10

PV

PV2

PV1

From Table 3, it shows that the Derivative (D) values differ for each set which are D =

0.00, D = 0.05 and D = 0.10. In studying the effect of derivative time, values for Proportional

(P) and Integral (I) remain fixed for each derivative value. Figure 3 shows that at D = 0.00, the

maximum process variables is 1.6% comapred to D = 0.05 and D = 0.10 where the process

variables is 1.58% and 1.56%, respectively. The derivative control depends on the rate of

errorchange. From the graph, smaller value of D, increase the overshoot of the graph but do not

haveany effects on the number of oscillates.

We can see by increasing the values of D, the controller action becomes faster.

Consequently, process rate also becomes faster. The major difference between D= 0, D= 1 and

D= 2 can be observed as the D values doubles. This can be seen where the distance between

the peak to peak of the process response curve doubles for every value of D doubles.

Lab 4: Effect of Deadtime

Proportional (P) Integral (I) Derivative (D) Time Delay

1 0.02 0.01 0.00 5

2 0.02 0.01 0.00 7

3 0.02 0.01 0.00 9

Table 4 presents studying impact of dead time at various Time Delay values through 5,

7 and 9 at fixed values of Proportional, Integral and Derivative. Dead time is the delay from

when a controller output (CO) signal is issued until when the measured process variable (PV)

first begins to respond. (Dead Time Is The "How Much Delay" Variable, 2015). In a PID

Control, the impact of a dead time is critical and is unfavorable in a control loop. At TD = 5,

the maximum process variable is at 2.3% compared to at TD = 7 and TD = 9 where the process

variables is at approximately 1.8% and 1.5%, respectively. As as the dead time increases, the

controller action turns out to be slower. Thus, the process rate also turns out to be slower.

Expanding dead time prompts more overshoot and oscillations. Increasing value of time delay,

increases the time taken for the process to reached its set point. This is because of the more

extended time taken for the reaction to achieve half of its final value from the zero instant. For

this situation, the controller gain must be adjusted.

- MIT16_30F10_lec01Uploaded byNizar Tayem
- 40. (6SL3243-0BB30-1HA3) CONTROL UNIT CU230P-2Uploaded byRyan Torres
- 103104050Uploaded byHoàng Thành
- 76292560 Electric Machines and Drives 163Uploaded byablbabybb
- AdvancedControlofWindTurbinesBriefSurveyCategorizationandChalengesRezaei2015Uploaded bySergio M. Junior
- AGC Control Predictivo ChinaUploaded bycastrojp
- nacusse2015Uploaded byGS Productions
- International Journal of Soft Computing Mathematics and ControlUploaded byijscmc
- Fuzzy Control of Nonlinear Electromagnetic Suspension SystemsUploaded byMuhammad Agung
- 2nd Order SystemUploaded byMuhidin Arifin
- Robust Control Design of an Induction MotorUploaded byranaateeq
- Increasing accuracy and reducing time of face recognition with Euclid normUploaded byEditor IJRITCC
- The International Journal of Soft Computing, Mathematics and Control (IJSCMC)Uploaded byijscmc
- PRSERV_07E_Using ProToolPro for TroubleshootingUploaded byNeagoe Cristian
- Reduced Order Observer Based Load Frequency Control Using Pole-Placement DesignUploaded byInternational Organization of Scientific Research (IOSR)
- EM-347Uploaded bysaravanan
- CH02.pdfUploaded byjack
- Grundfosliterature-970920.pdfUploaded byMiguel Ruivo Almeida
- The Setpoint Overshoot MethodUploaded byShams Uzzoha
- A LEVEL TRAINING SET WITH BOTH A COMPUTER- BASED CONTROL AND A COMPACT CONTROLLERUploaded byijesajournal
- gudUploaded byFikree Fikryy
- MariaUploaded bykupra4
- Feedback control system CharacteristicsUploaded byunnvishnu
- 300394279 Honasan vs DOJ DigestUploaded byDexper King
- Feedback Control of SubstrateUploaded byAkash Deep
- Wp Best Practices TuningUploaded byWERMERM
- MAE_476_Mech Control Systems IUploaded byTyler Griesinger
- Towardsplug and Control Self-tuning TempUploaded byBassel Almouie
- 0711Uploaded byrohaan87
- Intro Block Diag TopicUploaded byBobb Ketter

- Parallel Computer ArchitectureUploaded byJeena Mol Abraham
- rutter toby cvUploaded byapi-330447919
- Ekahau RFID Over WiFi RTLS SolutionsUploaded byPhil Nguyen
- 6.9.2 Wireless Networking FactsUploaded byfapperForReal
- 8085 Assembly Language Programs & Explanations 1.Uploaded byarunesh198
- draft-ietf-rohc-over-ppp-04Uploaded byfaroukious
- Using Elan's U111-M SRAM and ATA Flash PCMCIA PC Card Reader with Unix-like Systems [first draft]Uploaded byeverythinghereplus
- Garmin Fenix 5X Sapphire Edition Multi-Sport Training GPS Watch (Slate Gray with Black Band)Uploaded byWebAntics.com Online Shopping Store
- IES Electrical Engineering Topic Wise Questions PDF UploadUploaded bySivaranjani
- Vacancy in CAP IIUploaded bypankajdharmadhikari
- Accuracy of simplified printed circuit board finite element modelsUploaded byAnand Ras
- DESP-C_A_Discrete-Event_Simulation_Packa.pdfUploaded byMário de Freitas
- SAP SD Consultant in ImplemlentationUploaded byKaran Mathur
- ITIL v3 Overview AssessmentUploaded byMohammad Faisal AbdulRab
- 3.2-arithUploaded byBhagya Raju
- Retrofit nulec.pdfUploaded byNhat Nguyen Van
- How to Use VLOOKUP or HLOOKUP to Find an Exact MatchUploaded bySoumya Ramanan
- ReadmeUploaded bysubharaj_mohanty
- R48-2900U_Datasheet_Rev1.0_20050511Uploaded bydukst
- project hunger defined organizedUploaded byapi-306005647
- IMS 1000 ManualUploaded byCraig_leez
- Providence Cooperative Survival Communications FAQ Ver 1.12Uploaded byha5611
- Paul Barsch Teradata Solutions MethodologyUploaded byPaul Barsch
- Home Automation SystemUploaded byIRJET Journal
- Manual Book UPSUploaded bynailulfalah17
- Companies EmailsUploaded bymennaya
- lojkinjk werfkjbkewf sdfssd : Mxcsfe fwrgUploaded byvb8376cjpegcom
- Afaf Shallan - Offer for iDirect in Erbil Apr 09Uploaded bygohdar
- EPE Curriculum_Electrical and Allied Disciplines, FinalUploaded byUlugh Baig
- Gfk1668 - Cimplicity Hmi Webview Operation ManualUploaded byEduardo Nascimento