Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Heavy metals in slag affect inorganic N dynamics and soil bacterial community
structure and function
PII: S0269-7491(18)31036-4
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.024
Reference: ENPO 11566
Please cite this article as: Oka, M., Uchida, Y., Heavy metals in slag affect inorganic N dynamics
and soil bacterial community structure and function, Environmental Pollution (2018), doi: 10.1016/
j.envpol.2018.09.024.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
1
5 School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Kita 9, Nishi 9, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido
RI
6 060-8589, Japan.
2
7 Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Kita 9, Nishi 9, Kita-ku, Sapporo,
SC
8 Hokkaido 060-8589, Japan.
U
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
10 Abstract
11 Heavy metal contamination of soil in the vicinity of mining sites is a serious environmental
12 problem around the world when mining residue (slag) is dispersed as dust. We conducted an
13 incubation experiment to investigate the effect of a slag containing high levels of Pb and Zn
(62.2 and 33.6 g kg−1 slag as PbO and ZnO, respectively, sampled from a site formerly used
PT
14
15 as a lead and zinc mine) on the nitrogen cycle when mixed with soil (0–0.048 g slag g−1 soil).
RI
16 The nitrogen cycle provides many life supporting-functions. To assess the quality of the soil
17 in terms of the nitrogen cycle we focused on the dynamics of nitrate and ammonium, and
SC
18 bacterial community structure and functions within the soil. After two weeks of pre-
U
19 incubation, 15N-labeled urea (500 mg N kg−1) was added to the soil. Changes in soil pH, the
AN
15
20 concentration and N ratio of nitrate (NO3−-N) and ammonium, and bacterial relative
21 abundance and community structure were measured. Results indicated that increasing the
M
22 ratio of slag to soil had a stronger negative effect on nitrification than ammonification, as
23 suggested by slower nitrate accumulation rates as the slag:soil ratio increased. In the
D
24 treatment with the highest amount of slag, the concentration of NO3−-N was 50% of that in
TE
25 the controls at the end of the incubation. Regarding the bacterial community, Firmicutes had
EP
27 Bacterial community functional analysis showed the proportion of bacterial DNA sequences
C
28 related to nitrogen metabolism was depressed with increasing slag, from 0.68 to 0.65. We
AC
29 concluded that the slag impacted the soil bacterial community structure, and consequently
30 influenced nitrogen dynamics. This study could form the basis of further investigation into
31 the resistance of the nitrogen cycle to contamination in relation to soil bacterial community.
32
33 Keywords: Slag; Heavy metal; Nitrogen cycle; Bacterial community structure; Bacterial
34 community function
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
35
36 Capsule: Slag containing heavy metals impacted the soil bacterial community structure,
38
PT
39 1. Introduction
RI
40 Soil contamination caused by the slag produced during mining for metals is one of the most
SC
41 serious global environmental issues. The slag often contains hazardous components including
42 heavy metals such as Pb and Zn. In contaminated sites, plant biomass and diversity decrease
U
43 (Nagajyoti et al., 2010, Hernández and Pastor, 2008). When plant biomass decreases, some of
AN
44 the benefits provided by the plants to soils (e.g., the formation of aggregates and retention of
45 moisture) may decline or cease. This results in reduced soil stability, and may lead to the
M
46 spread of contaminated soils further into the surrounding environment through wind and
D
47 water erosion (Zuazo and Pleguezuelo, 2009). In fact, around areas contaminated by heavy
TE
48 metals the damage caused to human health by ingestion of dust is a significant problem (Zhao
49 et al., 2012, Taylor et al., 2014). To minimize the spread of contaminants into residential
EP
50 areas, the importance of plant cover has been discussed previously (Wong, 2003).
51
C
52 One of the reasons for the decrease in plant biomass is insufficient nutrient supply, a prime
AC
53 example being inorganic nitrogen (N) (Bååth, 1989). Nitrogen is a major growth-limiting
54 factor for plants in the natural environment. Available N, including ammonium (NH4+) and
55 nitrate (NO3−), is supplied from the residues of plants, animals, and microorganisms, or
56 dinitrogen gas in the air. For sufficient N to be available to plants, soil microbial activities
58 factors inhibiting soil microbial activity, such as presence of contaminants, can result in
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
59 reduced plant growth and biomass production. In soils bearing a high concentration of heavy
60 metals, the diversity and biomass of soil microorganisms is decreased (Bååth, 1989, Giller et
61 al., 1998). Heavy metals affect the growth, morphology, and metabolism of soil
62 microorganisms (Leita et al., 1995). This stagnates N cycling and decreases the abundance
63 and diversity of plant species able to grow in the area (Giller et al., 1998).
PT
64
RI
65 Several studies have examined the N cycle and microbial activity in soils contaminated with
66 Pb, Zn or other risk elements. Some of these have shown that contaminants influence
SC
67 mineralization (Vásquez-Murrieta et al., 2006), while others have shown that heavy metals
68 had only a small effect on ammonification but a larger effect on nitrification (Rother et al.,
69
U
1982; Ueda et al., 1988). Contrastingly, another report suggested that Pb and Cd
AN
70 contamination of soil had no effect on nitrification (Cela et al., 2002).
M
71
72 Additionally, many studies have been conducted focusing on soil bacterial community
D
73 structure and activity in contaminated sites, revealing that these parameters are changed in the
TE
74 presence of heavy metals (Ellis et al., 2003, Wang et al 2007, Gołębiewski, M et al., 2014).
75
EP
76 Although the effects of slag containing high levels of risk elements, including heavy metals,
C
77 on the N cycle and soil microbes have been investigated, few studies have shown the
AC
78 relationship between them. Better understanding of the impacts of slag on soil bacterial
79 community and function related to the N cycle will provide basic information to assist in
80 more efficient recovery of soil N and plants as vegetation cover in the contaminated sites,
82
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
83 Our study focused on the relationship between the supply of inorganic N, bacterial abundance,
84 and community structure and function. We evaluated the N cycle in soil contaminated with a
85 slag containing Pb and Zn, using the nitrogen-15 (15N) tracing technique. By comparing the N
87 attempted to link changes in biological properties of a contaminated soil with the N cycle.
PT
88 2. Materials & methods
RI
89 2.1. Soil sampling and physicochemical properties of soil and slag
SC
90 Soil (0‒10 cm depth) was collected from the experimental corn (Zea mays) farm of Hokkaido
U
91 University, Sapporo, Japan (43°3′N, 141°20′E) in May 2017. The sampled soil was air dried
AN
92 and sieved through a 2 mm mesh. The pH of the soil was 5.77 ± 0.33 (s.d., n = 3), and total C
93 and N were 42.3 ± 0.85 g kg−1 and 3.60 ± 0.21 g kg−1, respectively. To measure soil pH, 3 g
M
94 of dry soil was mixed with 7.5 ml Milli-Q water and shaken for 30 minutes, followed by pH
D
95 measurement using a pH meter (AS800, AS ONE Corporation, Osaka, Japan). Total C and N
TE
96 content of the soil samples were determined using an elemental analyzer (EA 2400 Series;
98
99 A Zn-leaching residue (slag) was sampled in February 2017 from the surface of the former
C
100 mining site in Kabwe, Zambia (14°27′19″S, 28°26′0″E) and sieved to retain particles ≤7 µm.
AC
101 The pH of the slag was 6.03 ± 0.04 (s.d., n = 3), and total C and N were 3.55 ± 0.33 g kg−1
102 and 1.68 ± 0.85 g kg−1 (s.d., n = 4), respectively. The same methods and devices as the soil
103 samples (AS800 and EA 2400) were used to measure these slag characteristics. The chemical
104 composition of the sieved slag was analyzed with Cartesian geometry energy dispersive X-
105 ray fluorescence spectrometer (NEX CG; Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). As risk
106 elements, the slag contained 6.22% PbO, 3.36% ZnO, 0.07% As2O3 and 0.0003% HgO. The
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
107 levels of water-soluble Pb and Zn in the slag were 0.78 and 1.18 mg g−1 slag (measured after
108 3 g of the slag was shaken in 120 ml water for 4 hours). The soil collected from the farm in
PT
111 To test the effect of the slag on the sampled soil, 45 g of the soil and varying amounts of the
112 slag were mixed and packed in separate 120 ml plastic cups. Four different contamination
RI
113 levels for Pb and Zn were created, equating to 0, 100, 500 and 3000 mg Pb and 0, 54, 270,
SC
114 and 1620 mg Zn kg−1 dry soil, and these were designated as Control (C), and Low (L),
115 Middle (M) and High (H) concentrations of heavy metals (Table 1). The range of slag:soil
116
U
ratios was determined based on previously performed field experiments (Ikenaka et al. 2010).
AN
117
118 Three replicates for each treatment were prepared on five sampling occasions. In total, 60 (=
M
119 4 treatments * 3 replicates * 5 sampling days) cores were arranged. The samples were
D
120 compressed to 0.9 g cm−3, and Milli-Q water was added to achieve a water-filled pore space
TE
121 (WFPS) of 60%. To avoid excess soil moisture loss the cups were closed with plastic lids into
122 which six holes (diameter 1 mm) had been perforated. The moisture content was maintained
EP
123 at 60% WFPS by adding Milli-Q water every 2 days. The particle density of the soil was
124 taken as 2.65 g cm−3 for the calculation of the WFPS. Thus, the soil porosity was 1 − (0.9 g
C
126
15
127 The soil samples were incubated for two weeks and then three atom% N-labeled urea was
128 applied (500 mg N kg−1 dry soil–slag mixture). The soil was sampled destructively on the day
129 of urea application (immediately after the urea application, day 0), and at 1, 6, 14 and 28 days
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
130 after urea application. The samples were divided for the measurement of pH (using the
132
PT
134 For the determination of inorganic N (NO3–-N and NH4+-N) concentration, three grams of the
135 sampled fresh soil was extracted with 2M KCl (15 ml). After shaking the mixture for 30
RI
136 minutes, the suspension was filtered through a filter paper (Grade 5C, <5 mm; Advantec,
SC
137 Tokyo, Japan). The extracted solution was stored at 4 °C until measurement. For the
138 measurement, a colorimetric method was employed with a flow injection analyzer (AQLA-
U
139 700; Aqualab, Tokyo, Japan) as described previously (Hamamoto and Uchida 2015).
AN
140
141 In brief the methods used were: for NO3–-N, the cadmium reduction and N-(1-
M
142 Naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride method; and for NH4+-N, the indophenol blue
D
144
EP
converted into NO2− using spongy cadmium and further reduced to N2O with sodium azide in
AC
147
148 acetic acid according to methods previously described (McIlvin and Altabet, 2005). KCl
149 solution (1 ml) was placed in a 20 ml glass vial with 4 ml buffer solution containing NaCl
150 (final concentration 0.5M) and NaHCO3 to make the solution around pH 8. Then, 0.2 g of
151 spongy cadmium was added and the vial was shaken for 18 hours. After shaking, the
152 supernatant was moved to another vial. The azide/acetic acid buffer was prepared on the day
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
153 of use. NaN2 (0.65 g) was dissolved in 9 ml Milli-Q water and mixed with 1 ml acetic acid.
154 The buffer was purged with He for 20 minutes to remove N2O in the solution. Using a
155 syringe, 0.2 ml buffer solution was injected and mixed with the sample in the vial closed with
156 a rubber and plastic lid. After 30 minutes shaking, 0.1 ml NaOH (ca. 6M) was added to stop
157 the reaction. The N2O produced was preserved in the vial at room temperature until
PT
158 measurement.
RI
159
160 The isotopic N ratio of NH4+-N was measured by oxidizing to N2O using NaOBr according to
SC
161 the method of Laughlin et al. (1997). To prepare the NaOBr, first 50 g NaOH was dissolved
162 in 400 ml Milli-Q water and preserved at 4 °C overnight. Then, 16 ml of Br2 was added to the
163
U
prepared NaOH solution on ice over a period of 30 minutes. The solution was then diluted to
AN
164 500 ml total and stored at 4 °C until use. An aliquot (1 ml) of the extracted KCl solution was
M
165 placed in a 20 ml vial, the vial was sealed with a rubber and plastic lid, and its headspace was
166 replaced with He. NaOBr purged with He was then injected into the vial using a syringe and
D
167 in another syringe, the produced N2O was collected. The N2O was preserved in a new vial at
TE
169
EP
170 The N2O was diluted with zero air to increase the gas volume and to reduce the N2O
concentration to about 100 µl l−1 for NH4+-derived N2O, and to between 300 and 5000 µl l-1
C
171
for NO3−-derived N2O. An Isotopic Nitrous Oxide Analyzer (Model 914-0027, Los Gatos
AC
172
174 dividing 14N15NO by total N2O since the NO3−-N in the original solution bonds in the middle
175 position (α site) of the N2O. The 15N ratio of NH4+-N was calculated by dividing total isotopic
177
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
178 2.5. Measurement of bacterial abundance
179 On each sampling day, DNA was extracted from the fresh soil with PowerSoil DNA Isolation
180 Kit (MoBio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
181 The extracted DNA was purified with Agencourt AMPure XP (Beckman Coulter) according
182 to a predetermined protocol. The concentration of the purified DNA was measured with
PT
183 Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Invitrogen, USA). The purified DNA was then diluted 100
RI
184 times with nuclease-free water for qPCR. A standard curve was prepared with a DNA sample
185 from the control treatment on day 0 to determine the relative bacterial abundance among
SC
186 different treatments at different timings. We used the QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR kit
187 (Qiagen, Mississauga, ON, Canada) and Mx3000P/Mx3005P QPCR Systems (Agilent). For
188
U
primers, 27F/519R (Abujabhah et al. 2017) were chosen for bacterial (16S rRNA)
AN
189 quantitative analysis. The initial denaturation temperature was 95 °C with an annealing
M
190 temperature of 95 °C, and the extension was conducted for 1 min at 58 °C for 35 cycles. The
191 final extension was done at 72 °C for 30 s. The relative abundance was expressed based on
D
192 the abundance of the 16S rRNA genes of the control treatment at day 0.
TE
193
EP
195 Bacterial community analysis was performed on all DNA samples extracted from soil on day
C
196 0 and 28. The first polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was conducted using primers to amplify
AC
197 the V4 region of 16S rRNA (amplicon size ~250 bp, forward primer = 515F: 5′-
200 AmpliTaq Gold® 360 Master Mix (Applied BiosystemsTM, Foster City, U.S.A.), 0.4 µL of
201 forward primer, 0.4 µL of reverse primer and 1–2 µL of DNA extract. Nuclease-free water
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
202 was added to make up to a final volume of 20 µL. The first PCR cycle was 95 °C for 10 min,
203 then 20 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min, followed by 72 °C for 7
204 min. The first PCR products were then purified with Agencourt AMPure XP (Beckman
206
PT
207 Using the amplicon obtained from the first PCR procedure, another PCR was performed to
RI
208 make it Ion Torrent sequencing sample-specific. To achieve this, a forward primer of 515F
209 attached with the sequence of Ion Xpress Barcode Adapters 19–42 Kit (Life Technologies),
SC
210 and reverse primer of 806F attached with the sequence of Ion P1 adaptor (Ion Torrent; Life
211 Technologies) were used (Table S1). The PCR sample contained 10 µL of AmpliTaq Gold®
212
U
360 Master Mix (Applied BiosystemsTM, Foster City, U.S.A.), 0.4 µL of forward primer, 0.4
AN
213 µL of reverse primer and 4 µL of purified first PCR product. Nuclease-free water was added
M
214 to make up to a final volume of 20 µL. The second PCR cycle was 95 °C for 10 min, then 5
215 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min, followed by 72 °C for 7 min.
D
216 The second PCR products were purified with the same method as above. The concentration
TE
217 of purified DNA was measured using Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Invitrogen, USA). The
218 final length and concentration of the amplicons were confirmed using a Bioanalyzer High
EP
219 Sensitivity DNA Kit (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA).
C
220
AC
221 The library was diluted to 50 pM using Low TE (Tris-EDTA; 10 mM Tris base, 0.1 mM
222 EDTA, Ion Torrent; Life Technologies). Ion Chef Instruments (Ion Torrent Life
223 Technologies, USA) with the Ion PGM Hi-Q Chef kit was used for the loading of the library
224 into the Ion 318 chip (Ion Torrent Life Technologies, USA).
225
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
226 2.7. Analyses of the 16S rRNA based bacterial community structures
227 The obtained sequences were analyzed through Metagenomics 16S w1.1 in Ion Reporter.
228 Then, to analyze the changes in microbial community structure and their interactions with
229 soil environments, Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) was conducted using the
230 diversity data at phylum or family level and environmental factors, including slag
PT
231 concentration (g slag g−1 soil), pH, concentration of NH4+-N and NO3−-N, and bacterial
RI
232 abundance. The importance of phyla or families that constituted <5% of each sample was
233 down-weighted. The value of DCA1 was less than 2.0 in each case, indicating that linear
SC
234 relationships existed between microbial abundance and environmental factors. Based on this
U
235 result, Redundancy Analysis (RDA) was conducted using the square root-converted data of
AN
236 species proportions. The result of RDA is shown in a tri-plot.
237
M
238 Heatmaps were constructed with the metagenomics data at phylum and family levels. Phyla
239 or families whose relative abundance was <1% on average are not shown on the heatmaps.
D
240
TE
241 For the functional analysis of microbiota from 16S rRNA data, Phylogenetic Investigation of
243 (Langille et al., 2013). The analysis was conducted following the tutorial. Operational
C
244 Taxonomic Units (OTUs) were prepared by eliminating all the OTUs that matched the
AC
245 GreenGenes 13_5 reference sequence with 97% similarity. The functions of each sample
246 were predicted from the normalized OTU tables referencing KEGG orthology values level 3.
247
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
248 2.8. Statistical Analysis
249 For the concentrations and isotopic ratios of inorganic N, and the relative amounts of soil
250 bacterial DNA, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the effects of
251 the amount of heavy metal and the sampling date. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test was
252 performed for the analysis of significant differences among samples on each date or for each
PT
253 treatment. For microbial diversity analysis, the Shannon–Wiener index was calculated, and
RI
254 the significant effect of day and treatment was also investigated in the same way. All data are
255 presented as mean ± s.d. Statistical analysis was performed using R ver. 3.1.2 (R Foundation
SC
256 for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
257
U
AN
258 3. Results
M
As shown in Fig. 1a, NH4+-N concentration peaked on day 6 in the control treatment and on
D
260
day 14 in the slag-treated variants. By day 28, NH4+-N concentration had decreased to 220
TE
261
262 mg N kg−1 dry soil in C and L and to around 310 mg N kg−1 dry soil in M and H. Statistically
EP
263 significant effects (p < 0.05) of the slag application rates were seen on all sampling days
264 except for day 0 (Table 2). The isotopic ratios of NH4+-N remained constant at about 3.0 ±
C
265 0.7% in all samples and there were no significant differences throughout the incubation
AC
267
268 In all treatments, the extracted NO3−-N concentrations increased throughout the incubation
269 period (Fig. 1c). On all sampling days, treatment C contained the highest and the treatment H
270 contained the lowest level of NO3−-N. In contrast, there were no clear differences in the
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
271 isotopic ratios in NO3−-N among the four treatments (Fig. 1d). However, the treatments with
15
272 a higher concentration of slag (M and H) tended to have a lower N ratio compared to the
273 control.
274
275 No significant differences were seen in total inorganic N concentration among the four
PT
276 treatments on all sampling days except on days 1 and 6 (Fig. S1, Table S2). On day 14, total
RI
277 inorganic N concentration reached a peak at about 600 mg N kg−1 in all treatments. The total
278 concentration decreased to about 440 mg N kg−1 on day 28. While concentrations were
SC
279 similar, the NO3−-N to NH4+-N ratio showed significant differences on days 14 and 28.
U
280 AN
281 There were no significant effects on pH from the treatments or the soil sampling times (Fig.
282 S2), although soil pH tended to decrease with increasing slag concentration. At the beginning
M
283 of the incubation, soil pH ranged from 4.1 to 4.4 in all treatments. On day 6, the effect of the
284 slag was clearest; pH was about 5.2 in treatments C and L and 4.7 in M and H. In all
D
285 treatments, pH rose to its highest on day 6 and decreased to around 4.2 by the end of the
TE
286 incubation.
287
EP
289 The relative abundance of soil bacteria tended to decrease with increasing slag concentration.
AC
290 However, this trend was only seen in the first 2 weeks and there was no difference among the
292
293 In the control treatment, on day 1, the relative abundance of bacteria was the highest among
294 all samples, after which abundance decreased continuously until the end of the experiment. In
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
295 treatment L, bacterial DNA was highest on day 0 and then decreased over time. There were
296 peaks for treatments M and H on day 6. By day 28, the relative quantity of DNA was almost
298
PT
299 3.3. Bacterial community structures
300 On average, 67,267 reads were mapped per sample for 16S rRNA. The following diversity
RI
301 and community analyses were conducted at phylum and family levels.
SC
302
303 The average Shannon–Wiener diversity index of each sample is shown in Table 3. No
U
304 interaction effects of sampling day and treatment were seen (two-way ANOVA). There were
AN
305 no significant effects of slag application on diversity at either phylum level (p > 0.05) or
306 family level (p > 0.1). Treatment H had the lowest, and L the highest, diversity indexes while
M
308
TE
310 Fig. S4 shows the percentage of each phylum in all DNA samples. Proteobacteria or
EP
311 Firmicutes were either the first or second largest phylum in all samples.
C
312
AC
313 The result of RDA is shown in Fig. 2. The first component (RDA1) accounted for 62.7% of
314 the variation in the data and the second (RDA2) and third component (RDA3) accounted for
315 15.9% and 2.5%, respectively. Overall, RDA1 was positively correlated with the amount of
316 NH4+-N, and RDA2 was negatively correlated with the contamination level of slag containing
317 heavy metals. Using RDA with stepwise regression, slag concentration, pH, and NH4+-N
320 The bacterial communities in soil contaminated with >8.0 g slag kg−1 dry soil (M and H)
321 tended to have similar community structures, with relatively higher proportions of Firmicutes
322 (28% to 42%) and Actinobacteria (5.6% to 9.3%), and lower percentages of Planctomycetes
323 (<5.9%, except 28M2 (7.36%)). When sampling days were compared, the abundance of
PT
324 Bacteroidetes was relatively higher in samples taken on day 28. The samples lacking or with
RI
325 low amounts of slag (C and L) measured on day 0 were clustered into the same group (based
SC
327
328 Heatmaps were constructed based on the relative abundance of each phylum and family (Fig.
329
U
S5). Regarding community structure at phylum level, samples were clustered into three major
AN
330 groups; (1) C and L on day 0, (2) M and H on day 0, and (3) all groups on day 28. The
M
331 patterns for each phylum indicated four major groups, with Firmicutes and Proteobacteria
332 clustered alone. Firmicutes appeared more frequently in treatments M and H than in C and L.
D
333 The relative abundance of Proteobacteria was higher in samples on day 0. Other phyla were
TE
334 better represented on day 28, except for Armatimonadetes and Verrucomicrobia.
335
EP
336 At the family level, the effect of the slag was clearer than at phylum level. Treatments C and
C
338 Thermoanaerobacteraceae (Firmicutes) was the only family that showed a positive
340 appeared more often on day 0 (although the proportion of the former decreased in treatments
341 M and H on day 28). Planctomycetaceae was clustered as the family that showed the clearest
343
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
344 3.3.2. Community functional analysis
345 Fig. S6 shows bacterial functional features with significant differences (p < 0.05) between
346 control and slag-containing treatments (those with sequence proportions <0.5% are omitted).
347 On days 0 and 28, the functions related to bacterial motility (“Bacterial motility,” “Flagellar
348 assembly”) were decreased in the slag-containing treatments. In contrast, “General functions,”
PT
349 “Pyruvate metabolism,” “Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis” and “Protein export”
RI
350 were increased in the slag-containing treatments. Some functions only featured in the results
351 on days 0 and 28. For example, on day 0, “Bacterial chemotaxis” and “Two-component
SC
352 system” were considerably lower in the contaminated samples, while the metabolism of some
353 amino acids and sugars (“Histidine metabolism,” “Starch and sucrose metabolism,” “Cysteine
354
U
and methionine metabolism,” and “Galactose metabolism”) was higher in the slag treatments.
AN
355 On day 28, functions related to the metabolism of carboxylic acids (“Fatty acid metabolism,”
M
356 “Propanoate metabolism,” and “Butanoate metabolism”) and carboxylates (“Glyoxylate and
358
TE
359 The proportions of sequences of N metabolism are shown in Fig. 3. Nitrogen metabolism
361 fixation, nitrification, and anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox). Both on day 0 and 28,
C
362 the relative abundance of bacteria that have genes related to N metabolism tended to decrease
AC
363 in the slag-contaminated soil. The impact was clearer on day 0 and there was a negative
364 correlation of relative abundance with slag concentration. On day 28, the differences between
366
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
367
368 4. Discussion
PT
370 The appearance of the peak concentration of NH4+-N was delayed in the slag-containing
371 treatments (L, M, and H) compared to the control treatment (Fig. 1a). This might be the result
RI
372 of the slag depressing urease activity through which NH4+ is released from urea added to the
SC
373 soil. Yang et al. (2006) investigated the effects of Cd, Zn, and Pb (in concentrations of 0–50,
374 0–800, and 0–1000 mg kg−1, respectively) on soil urease activity and reported that these
U
375 heavy metals decreased urease activity. Heavy metal ions are known to react with the
AN
376 sulfhydryl groups on the active site of urease (Shaw, 1954) and metal ions including Mn2+,
377 Pb2+, Co2+, Cd2+, Ni2+, and Cu2+ have been reported to be urease inhibitors (Upadhyay, 2012).
M
378 There is a possibility that urea was adsorbed by the slag, but the slag used in the current
D
379 experiment contained very low levels of C (0.36%), so the urea adsorption capacity of the
TE
380 slag could be considered low. It has been reported for a variety of soils that C levels
381 positively influence urea adsorption capacity (Chin and Kroontje, 1962).
EP
382
383 We were unable to identify the substance or element within the slag that had impacted the N
C
384 cycle in the current experiment. The slag contained various metals (Section 2.1). Several
AC
385 preliminary experiments were performed to test the impact of pure heavy metal compounds,
386 such as PbNO3 and Pb(CH3COO)2, on N cycle activities in soils. However, we concluded that
387 the presence of C and N in the test compounds influenced N cycle activities. Thus, the pure
388 heavy metals were not used in the current study and this study aimed to identify the potential
389 effect of the slag accumulating in the open air, and the mixing ratios of slag to soil were
392 In the current study, most of the extracted NH4+-N was derived from the applied urea since
15
393 the isotopic ratio was constant at around 3 atom%, the same value as the N levels of the
394 added urea (Fig. 1b). Thus, soil N was not contributing to the soil NH4+-N pool, and it was
395 urea hydrolysis that was likely controlling the increase of NH4+-N. If so, urea hydrolysis
PT
396 might have been delayed due to inhibition of urease activity by the slag treatments in this
experiment. The amount of NH4+-N was 200–300 mg N kg−1 soil even at the end of the
RI
397
398 current experiment, whereas the original concentration of soil NH4+-N was <20 mg N kg−1
SC
15
399 soil (Table 2, day 0). The relatively constant N ratio of NH4+-N in the current experiment
400 may simply have been due to the relative excess of NH4+-N from the applied urea compared
401
U
to NH4+-N from soil N. Also, the soil was pre-incubated for two weeks, and the active
AN
402 mineralization of soil N might have ceased before the commencement of the experiment.
M
403 Previous studies have reported soil N mineralization during urea hydrolysis due to increasing
404 soil pH (e.g., Tong and Xu, 2012) but we did not observe an increase in soil pH during the
D
405 current experiment, probably due to the buffering capacity of the soil.
TE
406
407
EP
408 Increasing amounts of slag negatively influenced the accumulation of NO3−-N in the soils
C
409 (Fig. 1c, Table 2). Compared to the effects of slag on NH4+-N concentration, the effect on
AC
410 NO3−-N was more significant, suggesting that the slag influenced nitrification more than
411 ammonification. This inference is in agreement with the study by Rother et al (1982) who
412 reported that nitrification was considerably more sensitive than ammonification to Cd, Zn and
413 Pb. They studied the effects on soil of Cd, Zn and Pb at concentrations of 1000‒5000, 1000‒
414 5000 and 10,000‒20,000 mg kg−1, respectively. Ueda et al (1988) investigated the effects of
415 anionic heavy metals, such as CrO42−, MoO42−, WO42−, and VO3−, on ammonification and
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
416 nitrification and found similar tendencies. This study suggested that the different sensitivities
417 of the two processes to heavy metals may be due to the difference in the number of reaction
418 steps between nitrification and ammonification. One chemical reaction step is needed to
419 convert urea to NH4+-N whereas two steps are required to nitrify NH4+-N to NO3−-N (NH4+
420 → NO2− → NO3−). Heavy metal inhibition of nitrification in wastewater treatment plants has
PT
421 been well studied and it is reported that the oxidation of NH4+ to NO2− by ammonia oxidizing
RI
422 bacteria is thought to be the most sensitive step in the process (EPA, 1993). Stephen et al
423 (1999) showed ammonia and NH4+ accumulated in the presence of toxic metals (Cd, Co, Cs
SC
424 and Sr) in soil and referred to the negative influence of these metals on ammonia oxidation.
425 Radniecki and Ely (2008) investigated both ammonia-dependent and hydrazine-dependent
426
U
specific oxygen uptake rate in cell suspensions of an ammonia oxidizing bacteria species and
AN
427 reported that an increase in Zn2+ inhibited ammonia oxidation, the first step of nitrification.
M
428 On this basis we concluded that the slow accumulation of NH4+-N and the reduced
429 concentration of NO3−-N in the slag-containing treatments seen in the current study were due
D
430 to relatively stronger inhibition of ammonia oxidation by heavy metals compared to that of
TE
432
EP
433 In the slag-contaminated soils, the ratio of NH4+-N to NO3−-N rose compared to the control.
C
434 However, the total amount of inorganic N decreased in all of the treatments to a similar level
AC
435 from day 14 to 28 (Fig. S1). Since the total amount of inorganic N (NO3−-N plus NH4+-N)
436 was the same in all treatments for each day (day 14 and 28), the mechanism behind the loss
437 of inorganic N during this period was apparently different between the less contaminated
438 soils (soil C and L) and the heavily contaminated soils (soil M and H). Processes such as
439 denitrification and immobilization, related to the loss of inorganic N from soils, is a topic
442 The concentration of NH4+-N can decrease as a result of immobilization. Yet, as described
443 below, bacterial relative abundance decreased in the treatments with higher slag
444 concentrations, indicating that the NH4+-N might not have been actively immobilized in the
445 presence of the slag. The loss of NH4+-N in the slag-contaminated treatments in the current
PT
446 experiment was more likely due to NH3 volatilization rather than immobilization. Kim et al.
RI
447 (2012) reported that nitrification inhibitor application increased the NH3 loss from soil. It is
448 probable that the heavy metals in slag inhibited nitrification and that accumulated NH4+-N
SC
449 volatilized as NH3 rather than becoming NO3−-N and remaining in the soil. From this, we
450 conclude that the mechanism for the loss of inorganic N was different in contaminated and
451
U
uncontaminated soils although further studies are needed to confirm this.
AN
452
M
453 There was a tendency for the isotopic ratio of NO3−-N to be lower in slag-treated variants
454 (especially H), though the differences were not statistically significant (Fig. 1d). The decrease
D
455 in isotopic ratio was correlated to the decrease in concentration of NO3−-N in general. Dai et
TE
456 al (2004) reported that net N mineralization was lower in the presence of elevated levels of
457 risk elements in a pasture soil. In the current study, the contribution made by mineralized soil
EP
458 organic N to increase the inorganic N pool was small, even in the control soil. Thus, a
C
459 negative effect of slag on soil N mineralization was not clearly demonstrated in the current
AC
460 study.
461
463 A marked increase in the relative abundance of bacterial DNA was observed from day 0 to 1
464 only in the control treatment (Fig. S3). Thus, in the absence of slag, soil bacteria responded
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
465 positively to the urea application over a short period. Previous reports have stated that the soil
466 microbial population tends to decrease with an increase in heavy metal concentration (Bååth,
467 1989). This is due to a decrease in substrate utilization efficiency as a result of a high energy
468 cost metabolism against metal stress (Chander and Joergensen, 2001). The relatively lower
469 abundance of bacteria in the control treatment on day 0 might be due to nutrient deficiency
PT
470 caused by higher microbial activity during the pre-incubation period.
RI
471
SC
472 4.3. The explanation from the change in bacterial community structure
474
U
Slag application did not change bacterial diversity significantly at either phylum or family
AN
475 level (Table 3). Microbial diversity in the sample with a low amount of slag (L, about 0.2%
M
476 by weight) was the highest among all treatments; as the amount of slag increased in
477 treatments M and H, the bacterial diversity tended to decrease. This result is consistent with a
D
478 previous study in which a low application rate of biosolids (containing heavy metals)
TE
479 increased soil microbial diversity while at high rates diversity decreased (Mossa et al., 2017).
480 This increase in microbial diversity with a low level of biosolid application was due to the
EP
481 high organic matter content of the biosolid. In the current study, in treatment L, the bacteria
C
482 present in the applied slag might have grown in the soil to produce the relatively higher
AC
483 diversity compared to the control. The presence of a low level of slag might also act as a
484 moderate environmental stress, decreasing competitive exclusion, and leading to the observed
485 increase in diversity (Giller et al., 1998). As the concentration of heavy metals in the soil
486 increased (treatments M and H), more bacterial species might have died due to greater stress.
488 result of the death of some intolerant species and the prospering of more tolerant species
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
489 (Atlas, 1984). This is consistent with many previous studies reporting that bacterial diversity
490 tends to be lower in heavy metal-contaminated soil (Sandaa et al., 1999, Xie et al., 2016).
491
492 Bacterial diversity tended to be higher on day 28 than on day 0 in all treatments. The
493 application of urea, from which NH4+-N is easily released, might have improved the growth
PT
494 of bacterial species that were depressed due to substrate depletion.
RI
495
496
SC
4.3.2. Community structure analysis
497 RDA showed that pH, the amount of NH4+-N, and slag concentration were the environmental
U
498 factors that most influenced bacterial community structure. However, the pH fluctuation
AN
499 observed during the incubation period ranged from 4.1–5.3, thus other potential factors
500 influenced by the addition of the slag have to be investigated in future, such as changes in
M
501 physical properties of the soil. Also, it is possible that microbes were introduced with the slag,
thereby influencing the microbial communities in the soil. The high levels of NH4+-N
D
502
503 released from urea on day 28 might explain why all samples (except 28C1) taken on day 28
TE
504 had high RDA1 values (Fig. 2). The relative increase of Crenarchaeota, Chloroflexi,
EP
505 Gemmatimonadetes, and Bacteroidetes on this day was due to this NH4+-N abundance.
506 Among these phyla there were some containing species known to conduct ammonium
C
507 oxidation (e.g., Crenarchaeota) (Nicol et al., 2006) or nitrite oxidation (e.g., Chloroflexi)
AC
508 (Udert et al., 2005). The abundance of NH4+-N in the environment might have favored those
510
511 The abundance of Firmicutes was positively correlated with slag concentration while that of
512 Planctomycetes was negatively correlated (Fig. 2). Ellis et al (2003) reported that Firmicutes
513 (mainly Bacillus spp.) exhibit high relative abundance in slag-contaminated sites. Liu et al
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
514 (2018) also found that this phylum is among the five most abundant phyla in sediment
515 polluted with heavy metals. In the current study, the high proportion of
517 explains the increase in abundance of Firmicutes (Fig. S7a). This family is mainly isolated
518 from hot springs and is known for its strictly anaerobic, rod-shaped, spore-forming character
PT
519 (Stackebrandt, 2014). There are few other studies published to date about the environments
RI
520 occupied by this bacterial family. The ability to form spores might be an advantage for these
521 microbes, enabling them to survive in environments with heavy metal stress. A study by
SC
522 Šmejkalová et al (2003) showing an increase in spore-forming bacteria in heavy metal-
523 contaminated soil supports this hypothesis. Another factor potentially influencing bacterial
524
U
survival under heavy metal stress is sequestration ability. Previous studies suggest that in
AN
525 heavy metal-contaminated sites, gram-negative bacteria are more widespread than gram-
M
526 positive bacteria because the cell walls of gram-positive bacteria are better able to bind metal
527 cations (Evans and Furlong, 2003, Çolak et al., 2011). Also, Bacillus spp seen in metal-
D
528 stressed environments can act as a biosorbent (Volesky and Holan, 1995). The mechanism of
TE
530 investigation.
EP
531
C
532 The major proportion of extracted 16S rRNA originated from Planctomycetes, and RDA
AC
533 results showed that they were negatively affected by the heavy metals. Fuerst and Sagulenko
534 (2011) reported several unique features of this phylum, such as peptidoglycan-lacking
535 proteinaceous cell walls, and intracellular membranes that form separate compartments
536 within the cell cytoplasm. These unique features might make this phylum especially sensitive
537 to heavy metals. Bacterial resistance mechanisms, such as the excretion of metals out of the
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
538 cell (Silver et al., 1996), have been previously reported, but further study is needed to
540
541 In Planctomycetes, there are families that conduct anaerobic NH4+-N oxidation (anammox)
542 and which possess distinctive cell structure, for example Candidatus. Anammox is known to
PT
543 be inhibited in the presence of heavy metals (Jin et al., 2012). Hu et al. (2011) and Xi et al.
RI
544 (2016) investigated anammox bacteria in agricultural soil and forest soil, respectively, and
545 reported Candidatus Brocadia fulgida and Candidatus Jettenia asiatica as being the
SC
546 dominant anammox phylotypes. In the current study, it was found that Candidatus
547 Brocadiaceae tended to decrease as the proportion of slag in the soil increased (Fig. S7b).
548
U
Thus, it could be expected that the presence of heavy metals decreased the proportion of this
AN
549 phylum and family and, although the total amount of N removed by their anammox activity
M
550 would not have been large, this could have had an influence in the slag-contaminated soil.
551
D
552 Both environmental factors and species relationships may change the proportion of a species
TE
553 in the community (Perez-Garcia et al., 2016), therefore it is important to further investigate
554 the reasons behind these changes, and to ask whether they are the direct result of the effects
EP
556
AC
558 There were influences of both the treatments and the sampling days on the bacterial
559 community functions. Some previous studies reported that the motility of specific bacterial
560 species was inhibited in the presence of heavy metals (Adler and Templeton, 1967, Singh et
561 al., 2014). In their study, Singh et al concluded that the presence of Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions
562 prevented flagella development of a metal-resistant bacterium (strain CM100B). This agrees
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
563 with the current results that showed a decrease in DNA sequences related to bacterial motility
565
566 The current study demonstrated that some general metabolic functions, such as pyruvate
567 metabolism, were relatively high in the slag-containing samples both on day 0 and day 28
PT
568 (Fig. S6). Bacteria resistant to heavy metals have various detoxification strategies, such as
RI
569 intra- or extracellular sequestration, export and permeability barriers (Rouch et al., 1995).
570 These mechanisms involve special biochemical processes seen only under metal stress, for
SC
571 example membrane transport protein expression and increased ATP consumption (Nies,
572 1999). The relatively active functions seen in the contaminated treatments in this study may
575 On day 0, very significant differences between the control and the slag-treated samples were
576 found especially in bacterial functions related to motility (such as "Bacterial chemotaxis" and
D
577 "Bacterial motility proteins") and repair ("DNA repair and recombination protein"). In
TE
578 contrast, on day 28, the functions showing significant differences between the control and the
579 slag-treated samples were related to fatty acid metabolism ("Fatty acid metabolism,"
EP
580 "Butanoate metabolism," "Propanoate metabolism") (Fig S6). One reason for the difference
C
581 might be due to the application of urea. On day 28, with a high level of inorganic N, bacterial
AC
582 groups favoring high N conditions might have become active and the effect of the slag on
583 these groups was different from that on microbes present at the beginning of the experiment.
584
585 The functional analysis also suggested negative impacts of the slag on N metabolism by
586 bacteria (Fig. 3). From the results, we cannot determine which particular reaction(s) within
587 the N cycle were more sensitive than others. Yet, the proportion of N metabolizing bacteria
26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
588 tended to decrease in the slag-containing treatment, even in the presence of a high level of
590
591 Kandeler et al (2000) examined the impact of heavy metals on soil microbial biomass,
592 enzyme activity (urease, alkaline phosphatase, and xylanase), and microbial community
PT
593 structure, concluding that microbial community structure was the least affected of the three.
RI
594 In our study, we found that the slag containing heavy metals influenced the bacterial
595 community structure, as well as the N dynamics and the relative abundance of bacteria. The
SC
596 slag did not affect the bacterial diversity significantly, but it influenced the bacterial
597 community structure and functions. This is consistent with the study by Li et al (2017) that
598
U
concluded long-term heavy metal (Cd, As, Pb, and Zn) contamination had a greater effect on
AN
599 microbial composition than on diversity, although in our study, no significant tolerance by
M
600 archaea (ex. Crenarchaeota) was seen. Changes in bacterial community structure may
601 influence bacterial functions in N cycling. Nutrient cycling in slag-contaminated sites may be
D
603
EP
604 5. Conclusion
605 This study suggests that slag from a mining site containing heavy metals (Pb and Zn) had a
C
606 strong negative impact on nitrification, more so than on ammonification. Due to the
AC
607 disturbance of the nitrification process, the accumulation rate of NO3−-N was slower in slag-
608 contaminated soils. Slag applied to soil at 4.9% by weight caused a ~50% reduction in the
609 accumulation of NO3−-N compared to the control four weeks after the application of urea, an
610 outcome that could limit the growth of plants dependent on NO3−-N. Soil bacterial abundance
611 tended to be lower with increasing slag concentration. Soil bacterial community structure was
27
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
612 significantly influenced by the slag; as the slag to soil ratio increased, the relative abundance
614 Planctomycetes that conduct anammox also considerably decreased. The change in microbial
615 community structure affected community functions including N metabolism. Our study
616 suggests that slag mixed with soil influences soil microbial community structure, and
PT
617 consequently the N cycle-related soil functions. Future research on the effect of slag on
RI
618 microbial community structure, the N cycle in the soil, and their relationships and
SC
620
U
621 Acknowledgement
AN
622 This work was supported by Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable
625
TE
626 References
EP
627 Abujabhah, I.S., Doyle, R.B., Bound, S.A., Bowman, J.P., 2018. Assessment of bacterial
628 community composition, methanotrophic and nitrogen-cycling bacteria in three soils with
C
629 different biochar application rates. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 18(1), 148-158.
AC
630 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1733-1
631 Adler, J., Templeton, B., 1967. The effect of environmental conditions on the motility of
633 Atlas, R.N., 1984. Use of microbial diversity measurements to assess environmental stress.
637 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279331
638 Cela, S., Sumner, M.E., 2002. Critical concentrations of copper, nickel, lead, and cadmium in
639 soils based on nitrification. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 33(1-2), 19-
PT
640 30.
RI
641 Çolak, F., Atar, N., Yazıcıoğlu, D., Olgun, A., 2011. Biosorption of lead from aqueous
SC
643 Journal, 173(2), 422-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.07.084
644 Chander, K., Joergensen, R.G., 2001. Decomposition of 14 C glucose in two soils with
645
U
different amounts of heavy metal contamination. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33(12),
AN
646 1811-1816. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0038-0717(01)00108-0
M
647 Chin, W-T., Kroontje, W., 1962. Mechanisms of urea adsorption by soils. Soil Science
649 https://doi:10.2136/sssaj1962.03615995002600050021x
TE
650 Dai, J., Becquer, T., Rouiller, J.H., Reversat, G., Bernhard-Reversat, F., Lavelle, P., 2004.
651 Influence of heavy metals on C and N mineralisation and microbial biomass in Zn-, Pb-, Cu-,
EP
653 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2003.09.003
AC
654 Ellis, R.J., Morgan, P., Weightman, A.J., Fry, J.C., 2003. Cultivation-dependent and-
657 https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.6.3223-3230.2003
661 Fuerst, J.A., Sagulenko, E., 2011. Beyond the bacterium: planctomycetes challenge our
662 concepts of microbial structure and function. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 9(6), 403-413.
663 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2578
PT
664 Giller, K.E., Witter, E., Mcgrath, S.P., 1998. Toxicity of heavy metals to microorganisms and
RI
665 microbial processes in agricultural soils: a review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30(10),
SC
667 Gołębiewski, M., Deja-Sikora, E., Cichosz, M., Tretyn, A., Wróbel, B., 2014. 16S rDNA
668 pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial community in heavy metals polluted soils. Microbial
669
U
Ecology, 67(3), 635-647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-013-0344-7
AN
670 Hamamoto, T., Uchida, Y., 2015. Sodium contents in dairy cow urine and soil aggregate
M
671 sizes influence the amount of nitrogen lost from soil. Applied and Environmental Soil
673 Hernández, A.J., Pastor, J., 2008. Relationship between plant biodiversity and heavy metal
TE
676 Hu, B. L., Rush, D., van der Biezen, E., Zheng, P., van Mullekom, M., Schouten, S., Damsté,
C
677 J.S.S., Smolders, A.J.P., Jetten, M.S.M., Kartal, B., 2011. New anaerobic, ammonium-
AC
678 oxidizing community enriched from peat soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,
680 Ikenaka, Y., Nakayama, S.M., Muzandu, K., Choongo, K., Teraoka, H., Mizuno, N., Ishizuka,
681 M., 2010. Heavy metal contamination of soil and sediment in Zambia. African Journal of
685 Kandeler, E., Tscherko, D., Bruce, K.D., Stemmer, M., Hobbs, P.J., Bardgett, R.D., Amelung,
686 W., 2000. Structure and function of the soil microbial community in microhabitats of a heavy
687 metal polluted soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 32(5), 390-400.
PT
688 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740000268
RI
689 Kim, D.G., Saggar, S., Roudier, P., 2012. The effect of nitrification inhibitors on soil
SC
691 Agroecosystems, 93(1), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-012-9498-9
692 Langille, M.G., Zaneveld, J., Caporaso, J.G., McDonald, D., Knights, D., Reyes, J.A.,
693
U
Clemente, J.C., Burkepile, D.E., Thurber, R.L.V., Knight, R., Beiko, R. G., Huttenhower, C.,
AN
694 2013. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene
M
696 Laughlin, R.J., Stevens, R.J., Zhuo, S., 1997. Determining nitrogen-15 in ammonium by
D
697 producing nitrous oxide. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61(2), 462-465.
TE
698 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100020013x
699 Leita, L., Nobili, M.D., Muhlbachova, G., Mondini, C., Marchiol, L., Zerbi, G., 1995.
EP
700 Bioavailability and effects of heavy metals on soil microbial biomass survival during
C
702 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336144
703 Li, X., Meng, D., Li, J., Yin, H., Liu, H., Liu, X., Cheng, C., Xiao, Y., Liu, Z., Yan, M., 2017.
704 Response of soil microbial communities and microbial interactions to long-term heavy metal
706 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.057
31
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
707 Liu, J., Chen, X., Shu, H.Y., Lin, X.R., Zhou, Q.X., Bramryd, T., Shu, W.S., Huang, L.N.,
708 2018. Microbial community structure and function in sediments from e-waste contaminated
710 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.008
711 McIlvin, M.R., Altabet, M.A., 2005. Chemical conversion of nitrate and nitrite to nitrous
PT
712 oxide for nitrogen and oxygen isotopic analysis in freshwater and seawater. Analytical
RI
713 Chemistry, 77(17), 5589-5595. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac050528s
714 Mossa, A.W., Dickinson, M.J., West, H.M., Young, S.D., Crout, N.M., 2017. The response of
SC
715 soil microbial diversity and abundance to long-term application of biosolids. Environmental
717
U
Nagajyoti, P.C., Lee, K.D., Sreekanth, T.V.M., 2010. Heavy metals, occurrence and toxicity
AN
718 for plants: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 8(3), 199-216.
M
719 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-010-0297-8
720 Nicol, G.W., Schleper, C., 2006. Ammonia-oxidising Crenarchaeota: important players in the
D
722 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2006.03.004
723 Nies, D.H., 1999. Microbial heavy-metal resistance. Applied Microbiology and
EP
725 Perez-Garcia, O., Lear, G., Singhal, N., 2016. Metabolic network modeling of microbial
AC
727 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00673
728 Radniecki, T.S., Ely, R.L., 2008. Zinc chloride inhibition of Nitrosococcus mobilis.
731 ammonification and nitrification in soils contaminated with cadmium, lead and zinc. Plant
733 Rouch, D.A., Lee, B.T., Morby, A.P., 1995. Understanding cellular responses to toxic agents:
PT
735 Microbiology, 14(2), 132-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01569895
RI
736 Sandaa, R. A., Torsvik, V., Enger, Ø., Daae, F. L., Castberg, T., Hahn, D., 1999. Analysis of
SC
738 FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 30(3), 237-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-6496(99)00062-
739 8
740
U
Shaw, W.H., 1954. The inhibition of urease by various metal ions. Journal of the American
AN
741 Chemical Society, 76(8), 2160-2163. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01637a034
M
742 Smejkalova, M., Mikanova, O., Boruvka, L., 2003. Effects of heavy metal concentrations on
743 biological activity of soil micro-organisms. Plant Soil and Environment, 49(7), 321-326.
D
744 https://doi.org/10.17221/4131-pse
TE
745 Silver, S., Phung, L.T., 1996. Bacterial heavy metal resistance: new surprises. Annual
747 Singh, A.K., Dhanjal, S., Cameotra, S.S., 2014. Surfactin restores and enhances swarming
C
748 motility under heavy metal stress. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 116, 26-31.
AC
749 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.12.035
750 Stackebrandt, E., 2014. The family Thermoanaerobacteraceae. In The Prokaryotes (pp. 413-
752 Stephen, J.R., Chang, Y.J., Macnaughton, S.J., Kowalchuk, G.A., Leung, K.T., Flemming,
753 C.A., White, D.C., 1999. Effect of toxic metals on indigenous soil β-subgroup
33
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
754 proteobacterium ammonia oxidizer community structure and protection against toxicity by
755 inoculated metal-resistant bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65(1), 95-101.
756 Taylor, M.P., Mould, S.A., Kristensen, L.J., Rouillon, M., 2014. Environmental arsenic,
757 cadmium and lead dust emissions from metal mine operations: Implications for
758 environmental management, monitoring and human health. Environmental Research, 135,
PT
759 296-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.08.036
RI
760 Tong, D., Xu, R., 2012. Effects of urea and (NH4)2SO4 on nitrification and acidification of
761 Ultisols from Southern China. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 24, 682-689.
SC
762 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60832-2
763 Udert, K.M., Larsen, T.A., Gujer, W., 2005. Chemical nitrite oxidation in acid solutions as a
764
U
consequence of microbial ammonium oxidation. Environmental Science and Technology,
AN
765 39(11), 4066-4075. https://doi.org/10.1021/es048422m
M
766 Ueda, K., Kobayashi, M., Takahashi, E., 1988. Effect of anionic heavy metals on
767 ammonification and nitrification in soil. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 34(1), 139-146.
D
768 https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.1988.10415587
TE
769 Upadhyay, L.S.B., 2012. Urease inhibitors: A review. Indian Journal of Biotechnology, 11,
770 381-388.
EP
772 Dendooven, L., 2006. C and N mineralization and microbial biomass in heavy-metal
AC
774 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2005.10.002
775 Volesky, B., Holan, Z.R., 1995. Biosorption of heavy metals. Biotechnology Progress, 11(3),
777 Wang, Y., Shi, J., Wang, H., Lin, Q., Chen, X., Chen, Y., 2007. The influence of soil heavy
778 metals pollution on soil microbial biomass, enzyme activity, and community composition
34
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
779 near a copper smelter. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 67(1), 75-81.
780 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2006.03.007
781 Wong, M.H., 2003. Ecological restoration of mine degraded soils, with emphasis on metal
783 6535(02)00232-1
PT
784 Xi, D., Bai, R., Zhang, L., Fang, Y., 2016. Contribution of anammox to nitrogen removal in
RI
785 two temperate forest soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 82(15), 4602-4612.
786 https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00888-16
SC
787 Xie, Y., Fan, J., Zhu, W., Amombo, E., Lou, Y., Chen, L., Fu, J., 2016. Effect of heavy
788 metals pollution on soil microbial diversity and bermudagrass genetic variation. Frontiers in
789
U
Plant Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00755
AN
790 Yang, Z., Liu, S., Zheng, D., Feng, S., 2006. Effects of cadmium, zinc and lead on soil
M
792 https://doi.org/10.1016/s1001-0742(06)60051-x
D
793 Zhao, H., Xia, B., Fan, C., Zhao, P., Shen, S., 2012. Human health risk from soil heavy metal
TE
794 contamination under different land uses near Dabaoshan Mine, Southern China. Science of
796 Zuazo, V.H.D., Pleguezuelo, C.R.R., 2009. Soil-erosion and runoff prevention by plant
C
798 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_48
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 1
Incubation setup C L M H
Dry soil (g) 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0
Slag (g) 0.0 0.1 0.4 2.2
Pb (mg/kg) 0.0 100.0 500.0 3000.0
Zn (mg/kg) 0.0 54.0 270.1 1620.6
PT
Volume (cm3) 50.0 50.1 50.4 52.4
WFPS (%) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0
Urea (mg) 48.2 48.3 48.6 50.5
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 2
PT
H 15.6 (1.0) a 86.1 (2.4) b 446.9 (16.3) b 520.2 (9.5) b 305.8 (3.7) b
ANOVA n.s * * * ***
−
NO3 -N C 16.4 (0.4) a 17.6 (0.5) a 72.1 (3.4) a 140.7 (2.0) a 221.0 (7.0) a
RI
L 16.0 (0.1) ab 17.6 (1.0) a 57.3 (4.6) ab 96.3 (2.5) b 208.7 (1.6) a
M 14.6 (0.7) ab 15.4 (0.4) a 47.2 (3.8) b 124.8 (1.8) c 146.3 (0.7) b
SC
H 13.3 (0.5) b 15.1 (0.4) a 44.4 (0.5) b 67.3 (2.4) d 124.6 (5.4) c
ANOVA * n.s ** *** ***
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05
U
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 3
PT
M 1.63 (0.02) 1.80 (0.02) 3.24 (0.02) 3.23 (0.07) ab
H 1.56 (0.02) 1.78 (0.03) 2.97 (0.05) 3.20 (0.10) b
RI
Day *** *
Treatment *** *
SC
Day:Treatment *** *
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05
U
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
(a) (b)
6.0
5.0
4.0
C
3.0 L
M
2.0
H
AC
Day *** Day ***
15N
Day:Treatment *** Day:Treatment n.s
0.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
EP
Days
TE
(c) D (d)
M
AN
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
U SC
Day *** Day n.s
Treatment *** Treatment n.s
Day:Treatment *** Day:Treatment n.s
RI
PT
Figure 1. The time course changes of the concentration and 15N ratio of ammonium (a and b) and nitrate (c and d). The x axis represents days
after the application of slag on the soil. C, L, M and H stand for the control, low, medium, high amount of slag mixed into the soils,
respectively. The results from two-way ANOVA were shown on the right bottom of each figure. “***” and “n.s.” stand for the significance
level of p<0.001 and not significant, respectively.
AC
C EP
TE
D
M
AN
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
U SC
RI
Figure 2. RDA plot of the bacterial community structures. Blue arrows are influential environmental factors
PT
and the red letters were phylum names. The black letters were the sample names. The sample names represent
sampling days, treatment, and the replicate number. For example, "0L2" is the sample taken from the soil of
replicate number 2 with low Pb concentration (100 mg-Pb/kg dry soil) on day 0. Similarly, C, M and H
represent the soil samples received control, medium and high levels of the slag, respectively.
(a) (b)
AC
C EP
TE
D
M
AN
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
U SC
Figure 3. The proportion of the sequences (%) of N metabolism (dissimilatory NO3--N reduction, assimilatory NO3
RI
--N reduction, denitrification, N fixation, nitrification, and anammox) within the soil bacterial community, on day 0
PT
(a) and 28 (b). The treatment (x axis) C, L, M and H stand for the control, low, medium and high level of slag
application rates to the soils, respectively.
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 Highlight
2 ● Nitrification was inhibited in the soil contaminated with slag containing Pb and Zn.
3 ● Slag did not alter bacterial diversity but changed community structure and function.
PT
5 ● Bacterial DNA related to nitrogen metabolism was decreased in the presence of slag.
6 ● Bacterial community structure may influence the N cycle in the sites with slag.
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC