Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Template
You will be completing this portion of the STEP document using the following
link:
STEP Standard 1, Part I
After completing the e-doc portion, submit the PDF you receive into the Learning
Management System (LMS).
You will be completing this portion of the STEP document using the following
link:
STEP Standard 1, Part II
After completing the e-doc portion, submit the PDF you receive into the Learning
Management System (LMS).
Learning Goal
Students will be able to compare and contrast items on a graph.
Measurable Objectives
1.When presented with data students will be able to represent it in a picture graph, tally chart,
and bar graph with 80% accuracy.
2.When presented with a graph student will be able to compare and contrast the data with 80%
accuracy.
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
Sue asked her class what their favorite sport was. Using the answers she got
complete the bar graph.
Soccer
Football
Basketball
Hockey
Favorite Sport
_________________________________________________________
Sara
Liz
Steve
= one sticker
Red
Yellow
Green
Blue
A. 3 B. 6 C. 5 D. 4
10.How many more students picked red as their favorite color than blue?
A. 1 B. 4 C. 2 D. 3
11.Which color did the most students pick as their favorite color?
12.____ number of students picked green and yellow as their favorite color.
A. 4 B. 7 C. 5 D. 8
13._____ number of fewer students picked green as their favorite color than yellow.
A. 4 B. 2 C. 3 D. 4
Each question is worth one point including filling in the data for each category. The first three graphs
they need to apply their knowledge and answer short answer questions, the fourth graph gives answer
choices but because of the scale are more challenging so each are worth the same amount of points. This
makes the assessment worth 21 pts. No points are given for an incorrect answer or a blank.
Pre-Assessment Data: Whole Class - Once you have assessed your students’ knowledge on the topic,
collect and analyze the pre-assessment data to determine if you will need to modify the standards,
learning goal, or measurable objectives that will be addressed during instruction.
Exceeds 0
90%-100%
Meets 1
80%-89%
Approaches 1
70%-79%
Falls Far Below 22
69% and below
Pre-Assessment Analysis: Whole Class
I do not feel any adjustments need to be made to the standards, objective, or learning goals. The majority
of students far fall below this is expected since they have had no prior instruction on graphing. After
analyzing the data, I feel students are very capable of meeting their goal. Students have just had a unit on
comparing and contrasting numbers to 120 so they are strong with numbers. Students will need
instruction on the types of graphs, how to complete a graph, and using the key to read a graph correctly.
This assessment was completed by students shortly after completing a summative assessment on numbers
to 120. Students took the assessment independently while I read each question to them. I made sure they
understood that we have not learned this yet and this would just be used to see what we already know and
what we need to learn. This seemed to put most students at ease.
This group of students has little prior knowledge on graphing. Most of the errors came when it comes to
representing the data on a graph. The majority of students made a picture graph instead of a bar graph, or
filled the graph out starting at the top. They seem to have the right idea so with instruction I will be able
to clean up some misconceptions. Another error was reading the key on a graph in order to correctly
answer the questions. Students are strong at skip counting to 40 which will help when instructing them to
read the key in order to read the graph correctly.
While the scores were low the data is promising that with instruction students will be able to master this
standard. The standard states students are to compare 3 categories but the assessment they will need to
take per the curriculum has students comparing up to six. With knowing students’ abilities, I believe they
will be able to master comparing more than three categories.
There are 2 students will IEP’s and 3 others in the RTI process. These students may need
accommodations with the assessment and during the lessons.
Post-Assessment – Copy and paste the post-assessment you plan to use to assess the students’ knowledge of the
topic after implementing the unit lessons. The post-assessment can be the same as the pre-assessment, a modified
version, or something comparable that measures the same concepts. Include the scoring criteria used to determine
whether the student Exceeds, Meets, Approaches, or Falls Far Below the learning goal and measurable objectives.
Copy and paste, or insert a picture of the post-assessment.
Name: _________________________ Date:___________________
Using the items in the box complete the bar graph below.
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
Sue asked her class what their favorite sport was. Using the answers she got
complete the bar graph.
Soccer
_________________________________________________________
Sara
Liz
Steve
= one sticker
Yellow
Green
Blue
= 2 students
B. 3 B. 6 C. 5 D. 4
23.How many more students picked red as their favorite color than blue?
B. 1 B. 4 C. 2 D. 3
24.Which color did the most students pick as their favorite color?
25.____ number of students picked green and yellow as their favorite color.
B. 4 B. 7 C. 5 D. 8
26._____ number of fewer students picked green as their favorite color than yellow.
B. 4 B. 2 C. 3 D. 4
Each question is worth one point including filling in the data for each category. The first three graphs
they need to apply their knowledge and answer short answer questions, the fourth graph gives answer
choices but because of the scale are more challenging so each are worth the same amount of points. This
makes the assessment worth 21 pts. No points are given for an incorrect answer or a blank.
Exceeds expectations are scores of 19 or more points out of 21 or 90%-100%
Meets expectations are scores of 17 or more points out of 21 or 80%-89%
Approaches are scores of 15 or 16 out of 21 points or 70%-79%
The unit I choose was first-grade graphing. The unit was broken up into five days with a
different component touched each day. It began by introducing picture graphs and going over
vocabulary that students will need to understand for the unit. The following day we learned how
to collect data to make a picture graph. The third day we reviewed reading a picture graph and
understanding the data on them. We compared and contrasted the different data. The next day
we looked at how to make a tally chart and take that information to create a bar graph, pointing
out that all the graphs show the same data just in different was. The last day for students was a
review of the previous days and trying to extend our learning with enrichment.
Execution
Execution of the unit went well. Students responded to instruction and the activities as I
thought they would. I kept direct instruction short giving mini lessons in order to allow students
Strategies
Strategies in this lesson were direct instruction, hands-on activities, and collaborative.
Each day lessons began with direct instruction and students sat at their desks looking at the
graphs projected on the board while we discussed the different parts and answered questions
activity graphing. Students also had independent work on their traditional worksheet from the
curriculum.
Effectiveness
The unit seems as though it was effective in teaching students to graph and read graphs.
While I do feel I could have made the direct instruction more engaging I followed the curriculum
Prior to teaching the unit on graphing students had an idea what they were and how to read
them but not how to create a graph on their own. They also did not have an understanding that there
are different types of graphs. Students made academic growth in the ability to create a graph and to read
the information on one provided. They also understand the three types of graphs we had instruction on.
Students responded to the lesson as I thought they would. The only area that came to my attention as a
struggle was when students had to determine how many more of one item than another. This surprised
me since students just had a unit on comparing and contrasting numbers to 120 and did extremely well.
this from time to time as a reflection aid. There were many things I noticed that I do and do not do.
After watching the recording, I was surprised by the fact that I speak to the class with my back to them
on a couple occasions. This to me is not an engaging practice. I also was surprised by how monotoned
the lesson comes across. I feel there was not much expression in my voice or face. It also allowed me to
see just how wiggly the class really is. Watching the video helped me see a way to rearrange the room
Some areas I think I need to improve on our my engagement strategies. I feel I could do many things
differently in order to better engage the students. I think I can do this and still follow the required
curriculum.
Post-Test Data: Whole Class - Once you have assessed your students’ learning on the topic, collect and
analyze the post-test data to determine the effectiveness of your instruction and assessment.
Number of Students Number of Students
Pre-Test Post-Test
Highly Proficient
(90%-100%) 0 9
Proficient
(80%-89%) 1 5
Partially
Proficient
1 2
(70%-79%)
Minimally
Proficient
22 5
(69% and below)
The Majority of students were able to master their learning objectives and a couple were very
close. All students were able to show growth in their understanding of graphing.
After assessing my post-tests for my lesson’s effectiveness, it became apparent that I should have
differentiated the assessment for my students with academic needs. The worksheets they needed
to complete throughout the week were differentiated by academic levels. I see the same should
have been done with the assessment. I feel my lesson was successful overall. All students
showed growth in the area of creating and reading a graph. I had more students that mastered the
content than not. Two of them were close to mastery.
One of the students that was in the highly proficient category scored 100% on the post-assessment
after receiving a 43% on the pre-assessment. This student participated in the direct instruction
and engaged in the learning activities.
Post-Assessment Analysis: Subgroup Selection
One of the students in the subgroup Behavior or “Cognitive Needs Receiving No Service” was
unable to take the post assessment. I was very intrigued by their results. Two scored proficient
and the other two minimally proficient.
Post-Assessment Data: Subgroup (Gender, ELL population, Gifted, students on IEPs or 504s, etc.)
Meets 0 2
Approaches 0 1
I was very pleased two of the students were able to score proficient on the post assessment.
These two students are responding to interventions in the classroom and showed great academic
growth. The results would have been much different if I did not read the assessment to the class,
math is their stronger area. One of the students did not show any growth on the assessment which
came as little surprise since he refuses to participate in any lessons or activities. The last students
received a 76% and I was happy about this as well. While it was not mastery, math is very
difficult for her and she put in the effort and tried her best. This is also very close to mastery. I
feel if she was given just a little bit longer, she would master reading and creating graphs.
Based on the subgroup class post-test data, write one paragraph analyzing the effectiveness of
your instruction and assessment and effect on student learning. If there is a student or group of
students who have not mastered the objectives, discuss what you will do in future days to aid
students' understanding with respect to the unit’s objectives. Cite examples and provide evidence
of student misconceptions to support this analysis.
Meets 1 3
Approaches 1 1
After looking at the data I feel my lesson was effective. Students with academic needs not being
met were able to show academic gains as well as the rest of the class. I would have liked to see
no students in the Falls Far Below category but there are students with IEPs who need more time
on content before mastering it.
I feel students did well on graphing and as a whole group do not need to spend more time with
whole group instruction on it. I do feel there are some students that could use additional practice
in small groups. All students will get review practice in centers as well as occasionally in other
lessons.
Objective:
When presented with data students will be able to represent it in a picture graph, tally chart, and
bar graph with 80% continued growth.
2.When presented with a graph student will be able to compare and contrast the data with
continued growth.
2. I will heighten the level of questioning I will begin to heighten the level of
starting with math instruction to DOK questioning by looking at the curriculums
level by the end of the year lesson questions as well as double checking
the standards. I will then check the districts
scope and sequence to see if that standards
data bank has any higher level DOK
questions for the lessons. If there is not, I
will check with my mentor teacher as well as
searching online for suggestions.