Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • CTCS 2019 - Reviewer Form

    Uploaded by

    hram_phd
    7 views2 pages
    The document is a reviewer decision sheet for a paper submission. It includes fields for the paper title, ID, reviewer name, and an overall recommendation to accept the paper as is. There are also several categories rated on a scale from 1-100 or yes/no, assessing the paper's scope, originality, language, abstract, keywords, presentation, illustrations, references, and overall grading. Sections for comments to the authors and editor are also included.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    CTCS 2019- reviewer form.docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a reviewer decision sheet for a paper submission. It includes fields for the paper title, ID, reviewer name, and an overall recommendation to accept the paper as is. There are also several categories rated on a scale from 1-100 or yes/no, assessing the paper's scope, originality, language, abstract, keywords, presentation, illustrations, references, and overall grading. Sections for comments to the authors and editor are also included.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    CTCS 2019 - Reviewer Form

    Uploaded by

    hram_phd
    The document is a reviewer decision sheet for a paper submission. It includes fields for the paper title, ID, reviewer name, and an overall recommendation to accept the paper as is. There are also several categories rated on a scale from 1-100 or yes/no, assessing the paper's scope, originality, language, abstract, keywords, presentation, illustrations, references, and overall grading. Sections for comments to the authors and editor are also included.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Reviewers Decision Sheet

    Title of the paper :

    Paper ID :

    Name of the
    Reviewer:

    Recommendation Accept as it is

    Overall Manuscript Rating (1 - 100)

    Technical Comments on the paper

    1 Subject matter Within the scope

    2 Originality Original

    3 General Assessment Excellent

    4 Title Accurately reflects

    5 Language Grammatically good

    6 Abstract Clear and adequate

    7 Are the key words appropriate and useful? Yes


    8 Presentation Good

    9 Illustrations Good

    10 References Appropriate

    11 Grading of paper Excellent

    Comments to Authors:

    Comments to Editor:

    Reviewer Name and Signature

    You might also like