/conversion/tmp/scratch/420774563.

doc

House Construction On Plot 430 Sector 21 B, NCR India,

Faridabad

Construction Synopsis
Construction commenced 12.11.2008
Structure completed 9.7.2009

Please refer to the plates from 1 to 26 giving entire views of the structural
construction.

Cost on RCC 500 rupees per square foot

Figures 1 to 8 below give certain details for your reference.

Purpose of this file is an exclusive information exchange.

Structural
772
450
level
2472
5750 1000
1250
level
800 150 200
150
5750 750
1250
150 150
600
1789 600
1600 1661 300143 600 150
300
385 200 1677 300
714 1494
2500 200
H all Entry Left Side balcony 464 1494
Right Side balcony

Stair rail on beam

C 200 x 300 D
A B 200 x 300

1783 200 x 300 200

1500 200 x 300 200 x 300
300 x
1 1000
200
600 F2
200
200 x 300
300

47 49 51 53 55 57 59
1400
2472
200 x 300

1800
2 F2 1000 772
72 70 66 64 62 60 200 x 400
F2 upstand
200 x 300
300
300 x 300 x
600 600
800 F11
F9 1400
1800 200 x 300 2300
Balcony link/Railing

1000 3 200 x 300

1000 600
200
300 x 300
200 x 300
200
300 x 300
1000
578
3977 F12
200 x 300
F9 200 1200 2777

4 300 x
200 x 300

F4 600
F4 589 400
200 x 300 300

F9 F9 F13
200 200 x 300 2499
200 x 300
200 x 300 300 x 200 300 x
5 F5 600 600 F5

1000 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8
1800 1720 1720 1850 1900 1851 1800
200 x 300 200 x 300 200 x 300 200 x 300
200 x 300
200 200 200 200 200 200

1178 3591 6051

150
300
1378 1000 450

F1, F2, F4, F5/300 x 600 mm deep, F3 do not exist

F6, F7, F8, F9/200 x 300 mm deep
F10, F11, F 12, F13/200 x 300 mm deep
First Structural Framing Level Hall Portion
400 400400 400 400400400400400
400 400

200

I nternal Balcony/Railing
400

Balcony passage/Railing

Figure 1
Plot Size 420 sqm
Basement below drawing room hall portion
Ground coverage 55 %
Total coverage added 540 sqm
/conversion/tmp/scratch/420774563.doc

Structural
772
450
level
2472
5750 1000
1250
level
800 150
150
5750 750
1250
200 150 150
600
1789 600
1600 1661 300143 600 150
300
385 200 1677 300
714 1494
2500 200
H all Entry Left Side balcony 464 1494
Right Side balcony

beams
C 200 x 300 mm D
A B 200 x 300 200 x 300

1783 200 x 300 200

1500 200 x 300 200 x 300
300 x
1 1000
200
600 F2
200
200 x 300
300

47 49 51 53 55 57 59
1400
2472

200 x 300
1000 1800
F2 772
72 70 66 64 62 60 200 x 400
2 F2 upstand
200 x 300
300
300 x 300 x
600 600
800 F11
F9 1400
1800 200 x 300 2300
1000 3 200 x 300
1000 600
200

200 x 300
200
1000 300 x 300
578
3977 F12
200 x 300
F9 200 1200 2777
200 x 300
4 300 x
F4 F4 589
600
200 x 300 300

F9 F9 F13
200 200 x 300 2499
200 x 300
200 x 300 300 x 200 300 x
5 F5 600 600 F5

1000 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8
1800 1720 1720 1850 1900 1851 1800
200 x 300 200 x 300 200 x 300 200 x 300
200 x 300
200 200 200 200 200 200

1178 3591 6051

150
300
1378 450
1000
F1, F2, F 4, F5/300 x 600 mm deep, F3 do not exist

F6, F7, F8, F9/200 x 300 mm deep

F10, F11, F12, F13/200 x 300 mm deep
First Structural Framing Level Hall Portion

Figure 2

Salient features of construction carried out:

1 Front portion double height drawing room or hall

2 Rear portion Bed Room area in three storeys
3 Ground floor portion 75 sqm previously constructed in 2000
4 Soil Silty Clay with high affinity to water & white ants.
5 Depth of formation level (-3.4 m) for basement.

6 Excavation carried out by JCB partly & then used donkey stock for
a total excavation quantity of 550 cum. Soil removed from the site.

Soil improvement below formation level as defined below:

1 Soil improvement by filling 40 mm graded aggregate 250 mm thick,

followed by placing 10 mm graded aggregate & then on that placed
graded machine dust. Above mix compacted dry as well as wet to densify
the mix & to enhance the bearing capacity & to reduce the settlement.

2 I had observed one pit 1 m x 1 m x 2 M deep for about six months.

There was no problem in excavation & there was no need of any shoring
during excavation that indicates that the soil was self supporting due to
having no angle of friction but due to possessing the high value of
cohesion. The substrata did not have any water table but certain moisture
very nominal. It appears that the land was used for the purpose of
agriculture in the long past & for the development of the area, the
development authority acquired the land for urbanisation around Delhi.
The soil definitely contained certain organic chemicals that had to be
/conversion/tmp/scratch/420774563.doc

avoided to impart adverse affect to the building.

3 I judged the SBC of the soil to be somewhere 5 to 10 T/sqm based

on my experience yet it did not meet the building requirement due to
unforeseen behaviour of the clays that could have minerals like
Montmorillonite or illonite or some others, that could help the soil to swell
while being in contact with water or loosen the entire shear resistance.
The proposal was to include one equal size basement that caused me a
concern. I had decided to avoid the formation of the foundations on the
existing soil even at the cost of additional expenses.

4 Fortunately, I have experienced during my career extensively on

the RCC building projects as well on the industrial on shore projects both
in office engineering as well as field engineering. Based on my experience
earning, I could solve the proposal easily which I did comfortably with full
confidence successfully. A decision was made to apply soil improvement
technique in the easiest way so that the bearing capacity as well as the
permeability of the soil below the formation is sustainable. The water
should not effect the foundation if water is allowed to move beneath the
foundation structures. The clay soil had to be isolated from the building
sub structures for the purpose of RCC protection.

5 To meet the requirement, I decided to form a road type structure

below the foundation formation without involving any cementing material
but to be included just water bound. Some person suggested to use lime
also but it did not convince me as the lime is not a reliable material in
moist environment. I went ahead to excavate about 300 mm additional
depth to accommodate the proposed soil improvement to a minimal
meeting. It could be more but I did not intend to take risk more than that
due to excessive depth of excavation where on two sides, existing building
up to three storey are located.

6 The formation was prepared & 40m aggregate which is called

Vapisi in Delhi term, was used to be placed first. 10 mm aggregate was
placed on the 40 mm layer so that the voids within the 40 mm aggregate
be filled with 10 mm aggregates. Later, the additional layer of machine
graded dust was placed so that the voids within the 10 mm aggregate be
filled with the mechanically produced dust. All was watered & compacted
just as it is done on a water bound macadem road structure formation. I
noticed after compaction that the formation was very strong & there was
much improvement on the SBC.

7 The foregoing fill has to respond to work as a permeable medium

also for the down flowing water as well as to allow a break for the upward
flowing water in future that could be a result of heavy rains or whatsoever
reason. This provision has also affected as a barricade for the clay soil to
/conversion/tmp/scratch/420774563.doc

be in contact with the foundations.

8 In addition to the above, on the sides of the fixed retaining RCC

walls built between the main columns, the fill material used is river sand so
that it allows water to permeability since the clay does not possess this
property but considerable porosity. Virtually, the foundations built are soil
contact free & the portions between all the RCC beams foundations
joining the columns in both directions, exclusively river sand was used as
a filling material to avoid cumbersome work on compaction of the soils
either to be taken from site or to be imported.

9 I think the work has been done economically in all respects

inducing to the foundation what it necessitated from practical engineering
construction viewpoints.

Structural:
1 On the prepared soil improvement base, a 50 mm thick layer of
blinding concrete was laid.

2 The surface of the blinding concrete waterproofed using CICO

Tapecrete coating protected by plastering on the coating.

3 Analysis of the structures done using Kani’s Rotation Contribution

Method.

4 Analysis of the foundation framed matting done by purpose made

worksheets.

5 The sketch shows the details of the foundation section 400 x 1200
mm beam with 800 wide spreader embedded in full 200 mm thick
RCC matting under all the beams in both directions. Columns were
revealed from the beams. One 16000 litres capacity water storage
tank has also been provided between the foundation beams.

6 Between the beams, river sand filling provided in place of soil.

7 Externally, 450 mm wide portion filled with river sand while

remaining soil butts with the 450 mm line. There is no contact
between the soil & the foundations anywhere.
/conversion/tmp/scratch/420774563.doc

400.00
Foundation Beam
1000.00

200.00
300.00

Soil I mprovement

Figure 3

8 Retaining walls 200 mm thick provided around the foundations to

hold the fill. The wall reinforced with 8 mm rebars @ 200 centres
both ways.
9 Main hall portion allowed 12 columns. 1000 x 400 mm 4 columns
while 600 x 400 mm 8 columns.
10 Span between the columns 11 m in two frames while 8 m in three
frames.
11 Certain frames are located in the double height area.
12 Front allows 1800 mm wide balconies while sides 1000 mm.
13 Six beams provided in the front balconies at both levels.
14 Main beams permitted 300 mm x 600 mm section for stability
resolution.
15 Cross beams included 200 x 300 mm section.
16 Stair waste provided 200 mm thick with rebar meshing in top &
bottom layers.
17 All suspended slabs included with 8 mm rebars @ 200 mm centres
both top & bottom.
18 ear bed rooms’ portion constructed with 11 columns 300 mm x 450
mm sections for spans do not exceed 5m.
19 A quantity of 250 cum RCC constructed using M 30/25.
All site mixing done.
20 Form support systems employed using rented props.
21 Form material employed 12 mm thick ply & timber
scantlings/battens 50 mm x 75 mm & 50 mm x 100 mm.
22 A total quantity of rebars used 22000 kg.
Up to ground level 8000 kg & above ground 14000 kg.
23 Labour contractor did not include curing element consequently I
had to do this part myself. I did not find any problem for the
/conversion/tmp/scratch/420774563.doc

suspended slab curing but for the columns & brick walls, I faced the
hard job.

24 Though the proposed use of the building is for the residential

purpose as per local authority, yet the visitors put the building not
as residential in look but either commercial or any office.

Right Elevation

Elevation
Architectural
500

2125
8.85 sqm 1.56
525 595
297297297297
594 475 475 475 475 300

738
3250

3250
738

738
3.0
737 300

3.24
525
3250
3250
738 3.4
1.37
437
100 300
1625
750

2.35 OWNE RS- SURAJ SI NGH & SUM ITRA

2500
FOR Submission
875
PLOT 430/1A, SECTOR 21B, FARI DABAD-HUDA AREA

Figure 4

Elevation
Architectural
500
PLOT 430/1A, SECTOR 21B, FARI DABAD-HUDA AREA

3250
1000
OWNERS- SURAJ SI NGH & SUM I TRA

3250
3250
FOR Submission

3250

3750
300

1250

3250
2000 2000

Left Elevation
/conversion/tmp/scratch/420774563.doc

Figure 5

200 400 250 400 250 400 200

1378 800 1200 935 935 1200 1200 935 935 1200 800

PLOT 430/1A, SECTOR 21B, FARI DABAD-HUDA AREA

800

200
349 300
349 698 228

1.82

OWNERS- SURAJ SI NGH & SUMI TRA

1.82

FOR Submission
349
349
228 2000
666

667

650
650

Architectural
Front Elevation
Elevation

Figure 6

FOR Submission
OWNERS- SURAJ SI NGH & SUMI TRA
PLOT 430/1A, SECTOR 21B, FARI DABAD-HUDA AREA
1371 3759
V1
803

Architectural D1
BED
5559
W1
2450 3507 4764
D2
D
900 850 900 900
V
V3 W
W2
524 D5 900 D4 D3
300

prayer SFL+12' 0"

Bath

4499
4200 BED

1000 850
D8 D10 W4
V5 900 2052
650
W15 750
1200 D11 1200
1180
250
927 802
W5 47 49 51 53 55 57 59
1070 V6
72 70
927 66 64 62 60

2000

W6 800
1000 W14 1500
W7
1000

Double Height
2000 W8 W132000

SFL +14'-6"
1500
W9
800 W12 1500

D13
2791 2000
W10 W11 1800

First Floor plan Scale 1 : 50

/conversion/tmp/scratch/420774563.doc

Figure 7

A B C 400

300

200
D
Typical 200

200
200

1
100
200

1000
800

6 / 16 Ø each in 3 layers 4 Legged/8 Ø rings @200 c/c 6 / 16 Ø in 1 layer, 4 other layer

6 / 12 Ø in 1 layer, 4 other layer

6 / 12 Ø in 1 layer
2472

2 4 / 12 Ø each in 2 layers 6 / 12 Ø each in 3 layers 4 Legged/8 Ø rings @200 c/c 6 / 12 Ø each in 3 layers

6 / 16 Ø each in 3 layers
2300
6 / 12 Ø in 1 layer

6 / 16 Ø each in 3 layers
3 4 / 12 Ø each in 2 layers 6 / 12 Ø each in 2 layers 4 L egged/8 Ø rings @200 c/c 6 / 12 Ø

6 / 16 Ø each in 3 layers
6 / 12 Ø in 1 layer, 4 in anotherr

6 / 16 Ø each in 4 layers
2777
4 6 / 12 Ø 6 / 16 Ø each in 3 layers 4 Legged/8 Ø rings @200 c/c 4 / 12 Ø in 2 layers

6 / 12 Ø each in 3 layers

6 / 12 Ø each in 3 layers
2499
4 / 12 Ø in 1 layer

5 6 / 12 Ø 6 / 16 Ø each in 3 layers 4 Legged/8 Ø rings @200 c/c 4 / 12 Ø in 2 layers

Foundations Beams Rebars Plan

/conversion/tmp/scratch/420774563.doc

Figure 8

OWNERS- SURAJ SI NGH & SUMI TRA

Select objects:
Area = 156403737, Length = 53010 PLOT 430/1A, SECTOR 21B, FARI DABAD-H UDA AREA
8851
A B C 29'0"
D
8'2" 1000
1 2472
1000
15'8"
4768
4'6" 1378 3390 11'2"
2472

2
4'6"1378
2300
31000
12848
17'0" 42'1.5"
Excavation Level -3.125 M
103765177 2777
34'0" 4

2499

5 2699
8'10"
1000

12241
40'2"
13619
44'8"

Foundations Excavations Plan

Hall portion Area 156 sqm