Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Background
TEOCO’s predecessor Strategic Technology Group (STG) was founded as a S corporation in 1994
Focus was providing high quality consultancy for IT projects
Name was changed to TEOCO in March 1998
Switched its business to product development and focus on telecommunication industry
Achieved through acquisition of a fledgling software product that processed invoices of telecom
payables
BillTrak Pro became the company’s top selling network cost management software
Changed to a C broad based employee ownership company when the maximum number of
shareholders was reached (75)
Invested substantial amount of capital in three startups: netgenshopper.com (online auctions,
Eventrix (event planning portal) and appreciateyou.com (support employee retention)
Registered its first year of loses in 2000
Made a judicious decision to refocus its activities on its core industry expertise and its largest
clients
Improving its services and developing new products
In 2004 throu R&D the company patent4d XTrak technology the core of the companys invoice
automation solution and migrated to a lucrative software-as -a-service model
In 2006 acquired Vibrant solutions bringing in a cost management business intelligence assets
Aided in the development of TEOCO’s Sonar solution for cost, revenue, and customer analytics
2008 Vero systems was acquired
Portfolio now had 3 major activities: cost management, least cost routing and revenue
assurance
50% of revenues from cost management, 25% from revenue assurance
Cost Management
Help telecom companies determine the optimal route between two customers with regard to
cost, quality of service, and margin targets
Monitor call detail records in real time to identify bottlenecks, reroute traffic, and improve the
quality of services
Revenue Assurance
Competitors
Clients
Growth Strategies
Acquisition Strategy
Atuls view: acquisition and growth financed by external funds represented a risky development
strategy that could dilute a company’s culture
Internal growth through innovation had been slow and limited in scope
Acquisition of Vero (2008) brought the company closer to the network and strengthened its
position in the marketplace
Guidelines for the kinds of companies to target
What does TEOCO bring to the table?
Solid core of business that generated a positive and stable cash flow
Well established strength in cost management
Disciplined approach to the management of human resources
TTI remained an entity that was managed separately
Exposed the business to a pool of larger competitors that compete on a global basis
Blue chip companies with well-organized brands and money were aggressively marketing their
services
Meetings end with a segment on benefits and concerns
All questions are formed on a “I wish I knew” basis
Atul said this protocol ensures concerns are presented in an impersonal and non-offensive
manner
o 12 percent---Principal
o 8 percent---all other employees
o Titles are determined on the employees value to the company
o In 1994 the only ownership vehicle was for employees to purchase stock outright
o Following that traditional stock options were awarded
o Atul believed that option holders are not the same as shareholders, because the
granting of options does not create ownership
o Employee options: making annual bonus in stock up to a max of 60%, the other 40 is for
paying taxes
o Company can repurchase stock with two exceptions
o
o 2007 company replaced their 401 K plan with an ESOP (employees stock ownership
plan)
o Atul believed ownership means wealth and the real benefit would be realized if the
company was sold or went public
o Base salaries should be in the range of 0-10% below the going market rate
o Trade off for a respective and supportive work environment, along with the benefits
of employee ownership
o When employees own company stock, receive annual bonuses, and generous
benefits they feel that they are not underpaid
o Benefits are highly valued and appreciated by employees
o Extra vacation time, a casual work environment, and flexible scheduling were all
seen as non-monetary incentives
o
o Look at p 203 and use table 10.5 in presentation
P 63