Profile of the Respondents

N=30
Consumers Vendors Residents
Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage
(f) (%) (f) (%) (f) (%)
Sex
Female 5 50 7 70 6 60
Male 5 50 3 30 4 40
Total 10 100 10 100 10 100
Age
below 20 0 0 1 10 1 10
20-30 5 50 2 20 2 20
30-40 3 30 5 30 4 40
above 40 2 20 2 50 3 30

Total 10 100 10 100 10 100

Occupation
Businessman 0 0 6 60 1 10
Vendor 0 0 4 40 0 0
Print Shop Clerk 0 0 0 0 1 10
Public Teacher 0 0 0 0 1 10
Farmer 0 0 0 0 1 10
Seaman 0 0 0 0 1 10
Utility Worker 0 0 0 0 1 10
Salesclerk 1 10 0 0 0 0
Service crew 1 10 0 0 0 0
Tricycle Driver 3 30 0 0 0 0
Government 1 10 0 0 0 0
Employee 1 10 0 0 0 0
Hairdresser 2 20 0 0 0 0
Security Force POSO 0 0 0 0 2 20
Self-employed 1 10 0 0 2 20
None
Total 10 100 10 100 10 100
Educational
Attainment 2 20 4 40 3 30
High School 5 50 4 40 4 40
Graduate 3 30 2 2 3 30
College Graduate
Undergraduate
Total 10 100 10 100 10 100
 Knowledge about the Ordinance
N=30

Consumers Vendors Residents

Source Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage

(f) (%) (f) (%) (f) (%)
Public
Announcement
…Infographics
Posters
Story boards

Total

Mass Media
Newspaper
Magazines
Radio
….Television
Total
Online Source
Online
…..Newspaper
Internet
Total
 Consumers Vendors Residents

WM Interpretation WM Interpretation WM Interpretation

IMPROVEMENT EFFECTS
1. The number of plastics along the
public roads and waterways decreased.
2. Flooding in certain areas happens
seldom after implementing the plastic
ban.
3. The numbers of plastics as waste
materials decreased after
implementing the plastic ban.
4. Paper materials were better to be
considered as waste materials than
plastic materials.
5. Using reusable materials (eco-bags,
paper bags. Paper, non-plastic
materials) were more convenient to
use after the said plastic ban.
6. The use of plastics bags and
Styrofoam for dry goods is prohibited.
7. The Municipality continuously
promote the ordinance through the
conduct of massive information
education and communication
campaign through public
announcement and using media (print,
radio, television and internet).
8. The Municipality monitors the
effective implementation of the
banning of plastic.
9. The use of plastic bags on wet goods
(fresh fish, meat products) is regulated.
10. No business establishment offers or
sells plastic bags to be used as
secondary packaging material or as
primary packaging on dry goods.
Average Weighted Mean
 DIFFICULTIES Frequency (f) Percentage (%)
ENCOUNTERED
Paper bags can be torn easily. 21 70
Lack of maintenance equipment 14 46.67
and materials.
Paper bags were hassle to use. 18 60
IV. Plastic materials (e.g. drinking 7 23.33
straws, plastic spoon & fork)
were not immediately provided
in some fast food chains and
canteens.

Paper bags cannot be used again 23 76.67

after being used compared to
plastic bags
Most of the paper bags were not 23 76.67
“handy” to use.

Lack of awareness on the plastic 15 50

ban implementation.

No cooperation among residents 15 50

and/or barangay officials,
business and educational
establishments.

Lack of personnel to 16 53.33

continuously monitor all entities
within the scope of the
ordinance.

Non-compliance with the 11 33.67

environmental practices
(Reduce, Reuse, Recycle)

Total 163 540.34