Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
1.3 You supply products to? : OEMs Tier I companies Tier II companies
1.4 How would you categorize the product mix of the company in terms of Volume-Variety?
High Volume-More Variety High Volume-Less Variety
Low Volume-High Variety Low Volume-Low Variety
1.6 Do you agree that implementing Lean manufacturing techniques has organizational benefits?
Yes No
1.8 What is the growth percentage of the company compared to last year?
0-5% 6-10% 11-15% > 15% < 0% (negative)
Section 2: How do you rate the following external factors are important that it is necessary to
practice Lean techniques?
Extremely
Important
Important
Important
Important
Very
Not
External Factors
Strongly Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Neutral
Agree
Product Characteristics
Strongly Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Neutral
Agree
Implementation Challenges
Section 5: How do you rate the Production & Inventory Management practices in your company?
(Pl. in the box)
Strongly Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Neutral
Strongly Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Neutral
Agree
Total Quality Management
Section 7: How do you rate the extent of Total Organisational Buy-in, TOB practices in your
company? (Pl. in the box)
Strongly Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Neutral
Agree
Total Organizational Buy-in
targets
Best performer announcements are made regularly
Sign Boards are very effective and displayed at appropriate positions
Department problems are solved as a team exercise
Employees are rewarded whenever an improvement is made
At least 25 % of employees suggestions are implemented
There is lack of financial support for effective implementation of lean
Most of the suggestions will come from managers rather than
operators
Most of the employees are not ready to change to a new method
Safety is a major problem in the departments
Employees are ready to stay back and work whenever need arises
Atleast 60% of the employees have attended training programmes
Section 8: How do you rate the extent of the following techniques implemented in the company?
(Pl. in the box)
NI Not Implemented, 1 Just started implementing, 2 Implemented but very less,
3 Implemented partially, 4 Implemented well, 5 Achieved Full implementation
Techniques Implemented NI 1 2 3 4 5
5S
QC Circles
Poke Yoke
Kaizen
Just-in-time
Line Balancing
Set-up Time Reduction
Group Technology
Visual Controls
Value Stream Mapping
Cellular Layout
Takt Time
Single Piece flow
Quick Change-overs
Total Productive Maintenance, TPM
Jidoka (Autonomation)
Standard Operating Procedure, SOP
Machine reliability
Section 9: How do you rate the benefits achieved by the company in the past two years?
(Pl. in the box)
Strongly Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Neutral
Agree
Competitive Advantage
No. of orders
New Customers
Production Cost
Market Share
No. of Products
Sales Turnover
No. of Employees
Export Orders (if applicable)
Asset Value
Sales Return
Cost Control
Iteration Historya
Change in Cluster Centers
Iteration 1 2
1 1.919 1.493
2 .018 .023
3 .000 .000
4 1.657E-6 5.435E-6
5 1.578E-8 8.362E-8
6 1.503E-10 1.286E-9
7 1.431E-12 1.979E-11
8 1.394E-14 3.051E-13
9 .000 3.801E-15
10 .000 .000
Variables Entered/Removeda,b,c,d
Wilks' Lambda
Step Entered Exact F
Statistic df1 df2 df3
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
1 LMTMean .213 1 1 166.000 612.031 1 166.000 .000
2 TQMMean .182 2 1 166.000 369.875 2 165.000 .000
3 TOBMean .148 3 1 166.000 315.439 3 164.000 .000
4 PIMMean .143 4 1 166.000 243.870 4 163.000 .000
At each step, the variable that minimizes the overall Wilks' Lambda is entered.
a. Maximum number of steps is 8.
b. Minimum partial F to enter is 3.84.
c. Maximum partial F to remove is 2.71.
d. F level, tolerance, or VIN insufficient for further computation.
Wilks' Lambda
Number of Exact F
Step Lambda df1 df2 df3
Variables Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
1 1 .213 1 1 166 612.031 1 166.000 .000
2 2 .182 2 1 166 369.875 2 165.000 .000
3 3 .148 3 1 166 315.439 3 164.000 .000
4 4 .143 4 1 166 243.870 4 163.000 .000
Eigenvalues
Canonical
Function Eigenvalue % of Variance Cumulative %
Correlation
1 5.985a 100.0 100.0 .926
a. First 1 canonical discriminant functions were used in the analysis.
Wilks' Lambda
Test of
Wilks' Lambda Chi-square df Sig.
Function(s)
1 .143 318.766 4 .000
Structure Matrix
Function
1
LMT Mean .785
TQM Mean .376
PIM Mean .297
TOB Mean .205
Classification Resultsa
Balanced or Predicted Group Membership
Total
Unbalanced Balanced Unbalanced
Balanced 104 0 104
Count
Unbalanced 0 64 64
Original
Balanced 100.0 .0 100.0
%
Unbalanced .0 100.0 100.0
a. 100.0% of original grouped cases correctly classified.
APPENDIX 4
Composite
Construct AVE Cronbach Alpha
Reliability
LE 0.929862 0.769200 0.898954
BA1 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000
CP1 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000
CA1 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Entire
Mean of Standard
Sample T-Statistic
Subsamples error
estimate
Entire
Mean of Standard
Sample T-Statistic
Subsamples error
estimate
Distribution cutouts
Fuses, electric
Power connectors
Regulators, power
Armatures, industrial
Dynamotors
Motor housings
Power generators
Railway motors and control equipment, electric
Resolvers
Servomotors
Synchros