Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sir:
We have the honor to submit this Survey Team Report with the following particulars:
Team Leader
Part I. ACCREDITATION TEAM/TASK FORCE COUNTERPARTS
AACCUP SUC
Accreditation Area
Team of Accreditors Local Counterparts
Carla L. Bulacan
I – Vision, Mission,
Dr. Gaspar B. Hilotin
Goals and Objectives
Overall
Dr. Rodrigo P. Palla Coordinator/Cluster Dr. Romeo L. Patual
Coordinator/Coordinator
Part II. SURVEY/RESURVEY ACTIVITIES
(List the major activities only)
Date Activities
Arrival of accreditors.
Pre-Survey
Organizational meeting
Oct. 1, 2017
(Sunday) General briefing
Continuation of accreditation
Ocular inspection of physical facilities and laboratories
Visit to extension sites
Day 2
Observation of classes
Oct. 3,2017
(Tuesday) Report on final findings and team rating for the program
Review on rating entries on the instrument by the team
Review of the summary of findings and recommendations by the
team
Day 3
Oct. 4, 2017 Final review of the instrument and summary of findings with the
(Wednesday) Team Leader/Coordinator
Packaging of the final report by the team leader
Submission of the report to the Overall Coordinator
Part III. PROGRAM RESUME
Majors/Components/Specialization Areas:
1. English 5._________________
2. Mathematics 6. ________________
3. _________ 7. ________________
4. _________ 8. ________________
______________________________________________________
6. Duration of Validity of Current Accreditation Status: December 16, 2015 to
December 15, 2018
7. Special information on This Program, if any:
Part IV. HISTORICAL SKETCH
(To be accomplished by the Host SUC)
Legal basis (e.g. Board Resolution, etc.): BOT Resolution No. 123 s.2001 and
BOT Resolution NO. 08, s. 2009
Date: 2001-2002
Incumbent Dean/Director/Head: Prof. Mark Anthony Dipad
Weighted
AREA Weight Area Mean
Mean
I. Vision, Mission,
Goals and =
Objectives
II. Faculty
8
III. Curriculum and
8
Instruction
IV. Support to
8
Students
V. Research 5
VI. Extension and
Community 4
Involvement
VII. Library 5
VIII. Physical Plant
3
and Facilities
IX. Laboratories 4
X. Administration 5
Total 50
Grand Mean
Descriptive
Rating
Part VI. TEAM RECOMMENDATION
1. If the program meets the minimum grand mean required to pass for the particular
type of accreditation survey, and all areas meet the minimum area mean, award:
2. If the program meets the minimum grand mean required to pass for the particular
type of survey, but one (1) or more areas fail to meet the required minimum area
mean, defer the award of accreditation status and revisit the affected are/s only.
3. If the program fails to meet the minimum grand mean required to pass for the
particular type of survey defer the award of accreditation status, and another
survey to revisit all areas except those areas that passed the required grand
mean.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the preceding standards, guideline and data, and considering the
overall findings, the Team recommends:
________ 3. Deferment. (Assessment on-going). Conduct another survey and revisit all
areas except those that passed the required grand mean.
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________