Search Upload EN

The world’s largest digital library

Home

0 0 RELATED TITLES
13 views
Saved

When Lending Becomes

a Question of Good
Bestsellers
Faith
Books Uploaded by jeffdelacruz on Jan 03,
2018
Property Digest yuliengco Stat Con
Audiobooks
01032018 Full description

Magazines
Save Embed Share Print

Documents

Download Search document

Sheet Music

When lending becomes a question of good

faith
( Article published in the April 23, 2002 issue of TODAY, B usiness Section)

The business of lending is becoming more difficult these days not only because the regulatory
authorities, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas and the Security and Exchange Commission, have
been tightening the screws lately. It is also because the courts seem to be imposing on banks
a standard of good faith more stringent than before. This was the painful lesson learned by
The Malayan Bank (formerly Republic Planters Bank) in the case it lost to the Lagramas on
April 27, 2001 (The Malayan Bank v Lagrama, et al. G.R. 144884 ).

Sometime in 1987 when it decided on Saint Dominic Corp. v. Intermediate Appellate Court ,
151 SCRA 577, the Supreme Court had pronounced that the foreclosure sale of mortgaged
property retroacts to the date of the registration of the mortgage. Moreover, a person who
takes the mortgage in good faith, and for valuable consideration which is the record showing
clear title to the mortgagor, will be protected against equitable claims on the title in favor of
third parties of which he had no actual or constructive notice.

When the Republic Planters Bank (now The Malayan Bank) accepted a mortgage on land to
secure the debt of a certain Demetrio Llego in 1982, it did not seem to know of the claim of
This document is...
Lagrama on the land. But because it did not make the right moves after it became aware of
the cloud on Demetrio’s ownership, its rights as buyer in the subsequent foreclosure sale was
Read books, audiobooks, and more
Related titles Useful Not useful
not protected by the ruling in Saint Dominic. It’s claim of good faith was in effect undermined
by Scribd View
subsequent acts that, in my view, showed tints of negligence as well as opportunism.
½
GET — On the App Store
The case started innocently enough in 1976 when Demetrio, together with his mother and his
siblings, inherited from his father a parcel of land located in Lucena City. The heirs apportioned
the land among themselves, but did not execute the proper extrajudicial partition nor bring
the correct judicial action for partition of the estate. Hence, the land remained in the name of
Demetrio’s father.

Demetrio sold his portion of the land to his uncle Agustin Lagrama and aunt Paz Abastillas on
installments. No deed of sale was executed because the land was still in the father’s name,
but Agustin and Paz took possession of the land. Demetrio promised to execute the appropriate
deed of absolute sale as soon as the title of his portion was issued in his name.

Three years later, Demetrio and his coheirs executed an extrajudicial partition of the estate. A
title was issued to Demetrio for his share, which had been previously sold to Agustin and Paz
who had by then fully paid. But Demetrio did not transfer the title to his uncle and aunt.
Instead, in 1982, through his attorney-in-fact Ceferino Tan, he mortgaged the land to Republic
Planters Bank. Demetrio failed to pay. The property was foreclosed with the bank as highest
bidder. Demetrio failed to redeem.
Property Digest yuliengco Stat Con Cases City Council Statcon (Aids
Agenda Februar… Construction
In 1983 the Lagramas went to court to compel the execution of a deed of sale in their favor.
Impleaded, in addition to Demetrio, were Republic Planters Bank and the attorney-in-fact, Tan.
10,
Demetrio did not answer and was defaulted. The bank claimed that it 2009
was a mortgagee in good

You're reading a preview. Unlock full access with a free trial. Download
Page 2 is not shown in this preview. With Free
Trial

faith. Tan said he only acted to accommodate Demetrio. The court ordered Demetrio to execute
the deed of absolute sale in favor of the Lagramas.

Republic Planters Bank appealed, but the appeal was dismissed because the appeal brief was
not filed on time. The decision of the lower court became final; but to the court’s surprise, it
could not be executed because while the case was pending, Republic Planters Bank foreclosed
on the mortgage. Furthermore, the bank emerged as the highest bidder and consolidated the
title to itself after Demetrio failed to redeem.

Clearly, it acquired the land knowing of the accusation that the land Demetrio mortgaged to
the bank was no longer his. Since the bank acquired, from Demetrio, title to the land during
the pendency of the case, it merely stepped into Demetrio’s shoes.

The Supreme Court took pains to explain why the mortgagee in the case of Saint Dominic was
protected by his good faith and Republic Planters Bank was not. The crucial difference is that
in Saint Dominic, the mortgagee and its subsequent transferees did not have actual or
constructive knowledge
faith. Tan said of the
he only acted to flaw in thedate
accommo mortgagor’s
Demetrio.title
Theall the way
court to the
ordered time the
Demetrio toproperty
execute
was transferred
the deed to them.
of absolute saleInin the case
favor of of
theRepublic Planters Bank, it became aware one year after
Lagramas.
the mortgage that the Lagramas were claiming the property. The bank was impleaded in the
case. ThePlanters
Republic bank lost in the
Bank lower court
appealed, andappeal
but the also lost
wasitsdismissed
appeal for, of all reasons,
because failure
the appeal towas
brief file
an appeal brief on time.
not filed on time. The decision of the lower court became final; but to the court’s surprise, it

Whatever
on the mortgage.
You're Reading a Preview
could not be executed because while the case was pending, Republic Planters Bank foreclosed
benefit Furthermore,
the bank could thehave
bank derived
emergedfrom its highest
as the good faith at and
bidder the consolidated
inception of the
mortgage was
title to itself forfeited
after when
Demetrio it failed
failed to pursue its appeal and tried to short-circuit the judicial
to redeem.
process by foreclosing on the mortgage, buying the property and consolidating title on itself
and, to boot, without
Unlock full access with a acts
free are
trial.
Clearly, it acquired thetelling the courts
land knowing about
of the it. Such that
accusation not consistent
the land with being to
Demetrio mortgaged in
good faith. For good faith to be a good defense, one must be really good
the bank was no longer his. Since the bank acquired, from Demetrio, title to the land during and remain
consistently
the pendency good
of the case, it merely stepped into Demetrio’s shoes.

Download With Free Trial

The Supreme Court took pains to explain why the mortgagee in the case of Saint Dominic was
protected by his good faith and Republic Planters Bank was not. The crucial difference is that
in Saint Dominic, the mortgagee and its subsequent transferees did not have actual or
constructive knowledge of the flaw in the mortgagor’s title all the way to the time the property
was transferred to them. In the case of Republic Planters Bank, it became aware one year after
the mortgage that the Lagramas were claiming the property. The bank was impleaded in the
case. The bank lost in the lower court and also lost its appeal for, of all reasons, failure to file
an appeal brief on time.

Whatever benefit the bank could have derived from its good faith at the inception of the
mortgage was forfeited when it failed to pursue its appeal and tried to short-circuit the judicial
process by foreclosing on the mortgage, buying the property and consolidating title on itself
and, to boot, without telling the courts about it. Such acts are not consistent with being in
good faith. For good faith to be a good defense, one must be really good and remain
consistently good

Reward Your Curiosity

Everything you want to read.
Anytime. Anywhere. Any device.

Read Free For 30 Days

No Commitment. Cancel anytime.

Share this document

Related Interests

Mortgage Law Foreclosure Government Politics

Government Information

Documents Similar To When Lending Becomes a Qu…

Property Digest yuliengco Stat Con Cases City Coun

UPLOADED BY UPLOADED BY UPLOADED BY February
Chris Maño abbiemedina sdfsdfdffrfe UPLOADED
Medfor

More From jeffdelacruz

MCAT Sample Special- What is Russian My Paren

Questions- Verbal… Proceeding_Reviewer_Regalado.pdf.pdf
Formalism, And Wh… Analysis
Reasoning
UPLOADED BY UPLOADED BY Was Its Effect
UPLOADED BY on UPLOADED
jeffdelacruz jeffdelacruz Literature
jeffdelacruz jeffdela

ABOUT SUPPORT LEGAL

About Scribd Help / FAQ Terms

Press Accessibility Privacy

Our blog Purchase help Copyright

Join our team! AdChoices

Contact Us Publishers

Invite Friends

Gifts

Copyright © 2019 Scribd Inc. . Browse Books . Site Directory . Site Language: English