APM Terminals

Company
Presentation
1st Quarter 2016
Presentation overview
• Company introduction
• Global maritime trade summary
• Trends in port and trade development
• Examples of operational advantage following
APM Terminals’ involvement

Tangier, Morocco
APM Terminals by the Numbers
• Countries: 60
• Employees: 20,600
• Operating Port and
Terminal Interests: 73
• New port projects in
development: 8
• Inland Services operations: 143
• Revenue in 2014: $4.45 billion
• Containers handled in 2014:
38.3 million (weighted by
equity share)
• Size of global container market
in 2014: 679 million TEUs*

(*Source: Drewry Shipping

Consultants 2015)

3
Company overview

4
APM Terminals is one of five primary business units
of the Maersk Group
Maersk Group The Hague, Netherlands
Copenhagen, Denmark

• 2014 Revenue: $47.5b USD

(Shipping, Energy, Ports)
• 89,000 employees in 130
countries.
APM Terminals
The Hague, Netherlands

• 2014 Revenue: $4.45b USD

• 2014 container volume: 38.3m
TEUs (Container Volumes weighted by
equity share)

• 20,600 employees, 58 countries

5
APM Terminals Global Terminal Network Update:
APM Terminals and Grup TCB announce APM Terminals’
acquisition of Grup TCB’s port terminal and Spanish rail
portfolio, including 11 terminal facilities in:

 Spain
 Turkey
 Mexico
 Colombia
 Guatemala
 Brazil

6
 In 2014 Barcelona-based Grup TCB ranked 23rd globally in
terminal container throughput (weighted by equity share) with
2.5 million TEUs handled, and an overall capacity of 6.3 million
TEUs.

Muelle Sur
Terminal in
Barcelona has an
annual throughput
capacity of 1.4
million TEUs, in
Spain’s 3rd-largest
container port.

7
 Spanish terminal operations added to the APM Terminals Global
Terminal Network include:

 Terminal de Contenedores de Barcelona

 TCV Stevedoring Company (Valencia)
 Terminal Polivalente Castellón
 Terminal de Contenedores de Gijón
 Compañía Auxiliar del Puerto, Santa Cruz de Tenerife
 Compañía Auxiliar del Puerto, Santa Cruz de La Palma

8
 Two facilities are located in the Canary Islands;
TCE EGE Konteyner Terminal Istletmeleri is located in Turkey’s
Izmir Port complex, where APM Terminals will also be operating
the new container terminal at Petkim Port.

9
 Joining APM Terminals’ Latin American operations are facilities in
Yucatan, the second facility in Mexico, and a new terminal nearing
completion in Quetzal, Guatemala. A terminal in Buenaventura
will become APM Terminals’ second port location in Colombia.

10
 Terminal de Contêineres de Paranaguá is APM Terminals’
fourth terminal in Brazil, adding annual throughput capacity of
800,000 TEUs at Brazil’s 3rd-largest container port.

11
 APM Terminals Inland Services will add three intermodal rail
operations in Spain.

12
APM Terminals: The world’s only geographically balanced
Global Terminal Network
Port and container terminal development, management and
operation, and associated inland services capabilities.

20,600 73 operating ports 63 inland

employees in: and terminals: services
60 countries 8 new projects; companies with:
5 continents 16 expansion and 143 operations
2014 Revenues of upgrade programs in
$4.45b USD 39 countries

Customer base: Annual container Global market

throughput: share of container
60 shipping 38.3m TEUs throughput:
lines and leading
importers and
exporters
(by equity-
weighted volume) 5.6%
in 2014
13
Protecting our people and the environment:
Safety and sustainability progress and goals in 2015
Lost-Time Injury
Frequency Rate:
22%
To 1.41 per million man
hours worked for 2014
from 2013 (including inland
services)
JOC 2014 Productivity
Study results:
12
Number of APM Terminals
Global Terminal Network
facilities named global
productivity leaders.
14
Reported injuries: MAGNUM advanced
management training:
484 Participation
Continued decline for 55% of the 2013 MAGNUM
combined marine and class came from
inland services operations in emerging
market countries.
CO2 output per TEU:
Workforce diversity
25% 71%
of employees find APM
Terminals’ leadership to
reduction from base be genuinely committed
year 2010 is the goal to attracting, training
by 2020. and retaining a diverse
workforce.
APM Terminals’ leadership team

15
 History: 57 years of progress, innovation and growth
1958 The first dedicated A.P. Moller port facility is a general cargo terminal in Brooklyn, NY.

1975 Maersk Line opens its first dedicated container terminal, at Port Newark, New Jersey.

1988 Maersk Line opens its first Far Eastern terminal at the Port of Kobe, Rokko Island, Japan

1999 Maersk Line acquires US-based Sea-Land Services expanding terminal operations globally.

2001 APM Terminals is established as a separate terminal operating unit within Maersk Line.

2004 APM Terminals becomes an independent corporate entity, with HQ in The Hague, Netherlands.

2006 Named Containerisation International’s “Port Operator of the Year”.

2007 APM Terminals reports results separately, with revenue of $2.5 billion; $111 million profit.

2008 Container volume (by equity share) of 34 million TEUs; 26 new terminal or expansion projects.

2009 Named Lloyd's List Global Awards’ "Port Operator of the Year"; Revenue of $3 billion.
Named “International Terminal Operator of the Year” at the Containerisation
2010 APM Terminals assumes Inland Services businesses; combined revenue of $4.2 billion
International 2012 Awards
2011 APM Terminals named winner of Lloyd’s List Global Safety Award; Revenue of $4.6 billion.
Named Containerisation International 2012 “International Terminal Operator of the Year”
2012 and Lloyd's List Global Awards’ "Port Operator of the Year“; Revenue of $4.8 billion.
2013 Named Containerisation International 2013 “International Terminal Operator of the Year”, and
Winner of the Lloyd’s List Asia 2013 “Port Operator Award”.
2014 APM Terminals Yokohama once again named world’s most productive container terminal;
Lloyd’s List North American Port Operator of the Year; revenue of $4.45 billion.
APM Terminals’ container throughput: 2004-2014

38.3
36.3
35.4
34 33.5
31.4 30.9 31.5
(Equity Share Weighted)

28.4
TEUs (Millions)

24.1

20.6

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

17
Global terminal operator comparison:
APM Terminals ranks 3rd globally in container throughput by
equity-weighted market share:

TEU millions 2014 2013 2012

(Equity
weighted) Volumes Market Volumes Market Volumes Market
Share Share Share
PSA 55.1 8.1% 52.9 8.2% 50.9 8.2%

Hutchison 45.9 6.8% 45.0 7.0% 44.8 7.2%

APM 37.0 5.5% 35.0 5.5% 33.7 5.4%

Terminals
DP World 35.8 5.3% 32.8 5.1% 33.4 5.4%

Total top 4 173.8 25.6% 165.7 25.8% 163.9 26.5%

operators
All other 505.6 74.4% 476.8 74.2% 454.1 73.5%
operators
Total 679.4 100.0% 642.5 100.0% 621.6 100.0%

(Source: Drewry, August 2015)

18
Our port facilities: A balanced global network
serving all major markets
Port facilities: North America

20
Port facilities: Latin America

21
Port facilities: Europe

22
Port facilities: Russia-Baltics

23
Port facilities: Africa-Middle East

24
Port facilities: Asia-Pacific

25
Current Projects
New Terminal Development: (8)
• Abidjan, Ivory Coast
• Izmir, Turkey
• Lázaro Cárdenas, Mexico
• Moin, Costa Rica
• Ningbo, China
• Savona-Vado, Italy
• Tema, Ghana
• Quetzal, Guatemala
Terminal Expansions/Upgrades: (15)
• Algeciras, Spain • Pecém, Brazil
• Apapa, Nigeria • Pipavav, India
• Buenos Aires, Argentina • Pointe-Noire, Republic of the Congo
• Callao, Peru • Poti, Georgia
• Gothenburg, Sweden • Qingdao, China
• Itajaí, Brazil • Salalah, Oman
• Monrovia, Liberia • Tema, Ghana
• Onne, Nigeria

26
Our inland services
• 143 local operations in 39 countries
• Four main businesses areas: Cargo support, inland
transportation/depots, equipment maintenance & repair, and
container lifecycle management
• Achieve synergies with a broader scope of products and services:
- Greater value proposition to our customers
- Increased efficiencies
- Lower transportation costs
- More access to all global markets
- Seamless container handling to final destination
- More opportunity for growth

27
 Our inland services

Cargo support Equipment maintenance

Terminal Gensets Rubber-tire Powerpacks Equipment

Handling Packing Fumigation Customs Storage Cargo
handling gantries leasing
clearance inspections
equipment

Inland transportation Container lifecycle management

Trucking Shunts Store Intermodal Rail Repairs Reefer care Modifications Container Sales
door engineering inspections

28
Inland Services Network

29
Inland Services: Latin America

30
Inland Services: Europe

31
Inland Services: Russia-Baltics

32
Inland services: Africa-Middle East

33
Inland Services: Asia-Pacific

34
Inland Services: South Asia

35
Inland services: China

36
Inland services: Well-known transportation names
around the world ...

PACIFIC CONTAINER TRANSPORT S.A.

(P.C.T.)

37
Drivers of Global Trade:
Economic Development and Population Growth
Economically emerging areas of the world, particularly Africa,
will also lead in population growth over the next decades.

38
Global merchandise import growth 1970-2013
Billion USD
(Current Value)

$20,000

$18,000

$16,000

$14,000

$12,000

$10,000

$8,000

$6,000

$4,000

$2,000

$0
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
(Source: World Trade Organization Data 2015)

39
Global container throughput growth 1979-2014
Million TEUs

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0
1980 1990 2000 2010
(Source: Drewry Shipping Consultants December 2014)

40
Key Container Shipping Industry Concerns of 2016:
Global container fleet overcapacity
• Fleet capacity net increase of 8.8%;
• Projected demand increase of 6:5 to 7%.
Shipping line consolidation
• Response to overcapacity and fuel costs;
• Example: Hapag-Lloyd and CSAV merger announcement.
Port congestion
• Increasingly significant problem in 2015;
• Introduction of larger vessels adding to terminal demands.
Freight rate instability
• Downward rate pressure from need to fill larger vessels;
• Congestion and other surcharges increase costs.
Vessel size trend
• New standard is MSC Oscar at 19,224 TEUs;
• Theoretical limit as high as 24,000 TEUs.
Liner service ships’ speed
• Higher fuel prices helped cause slowdown to 22 knots;
• Current lower oil prices may see return to express services.

41
World Trade projected growth rates 2015-2017

World Trade Growth Forecast (By Volume)

6%

5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%
2012 2013 2014e 2015f 2016f 2017f
(Source: World Bank Global Economic Prospects 2015, June 2015)

42
Seaborne trade is growing faster than Global GDP
Indices for world GDP, the OECD Industrial Production Index, world merchandise
trade and world seaborne trade 1975-2014 (1990=100)

43
The global economy relies upon the global
shipping fleet for growth…

World trade World merchandise Total number of

transported by ship: trade by value merchant ships in
(2014) : service in 2015:

9.8
Billion tons
$19 89,464
Trillion USD

World seaborne Developing countries represent the

trade (value) moving largest share of global seaborne trade;

60%
in containers:

52%
of all goods loaded

58% of all goods unloaded

(Sources: World Shipping Council 2015; UNCTAD Review of Maritime Transport 2015; World Trade Organization 2014)

44
Global shipping requires a global port network

Over 400 liner 6,085 vessels call Total global

services: liner trade routes: container fleet
capacity:
10,000 5,152 19.6
are containerships
Port calls weekly million TEUS

482 container Top 3 Lines: Top 5 Lines:

vessels on order: Nearly two-fifths Nearly half

4.01 38.2% 47.9%

million TEUs of the total global of the total global
new capacity container fleet container fleet

(Sources: World Shipping Council 2014; Alphaliner, October 2015)

45
Shipping Alliances’ Industry Impact
“Bigger consortia and alliances among container carriers will allow
carriers to use assets more efficiently”
In 2014, industry analysts Drewry Maritime Research projected
that the four major shipping alliances combined control 98.5% of
the container volume on the Far East/Europe trade lane; the
world’s busiest;

2M: 35.4%
CKYHE: 25%
Ocean Three: 19.7%
G6: 18.4%
(Source: Drewry, July 2014)

46
Shipping Alliances’ Industry Impact
The two largest shipping company alliances carry more than half of
the Europe/Fear East containerized cargo:

2M:
Maersk Line and
Mediterranean Shipping

Ocean Three:
CMA-CGM, China Shipping
and United Arab Shipping

47
Shipping Alliances’ Industry Impact
Two other major alliances represent the combined shipping assets
of 11 global shipping lines:

G6:
APL, Hapag-Lloyd, Hyundai, Mitsui-OSK, NYK and OOCL

CKYHE:
COSCO, K-Line, Yang Ming, Hanjin and Evergreen

48
 Top 20 Container Lines Ranked by Fleet Capacity
Fleet Capacity in TEUS

3,000,000

2,500,000

2,000,000

1,500,000

1,000,000

500,000

(Source: Alphaliner, October 2015)

49
Top 15 Container Lines Ranked by Number of Ships
Global Containership Fleet Size: October 2015

36

54
603 505 31
Number of Vessels

474

31
201 21 5
165 8 7
176 7 10 8 7 4
137 132 111 106 103 102 101 11
89 56

Current Fleet Vessels On Order

(Source: Alphaliner, October 2015)

50
2014 Rankings: The World’s Top Container Ports
Rank Port Tangier, Morocco
TEUs (Millions) Rank Port TEUs (Millions)

1 Shanghai (China) 35.2 16 Hamburg (Germany) 9.7

2 Singapore 33.8 17 Antwerp (Belgium) 8.9
3 Shenzhen (China) 24.0 18 Xiamen (China) 8.5
4 Hong Kong 22.2 19 Tanjung Pelepas (Malaysia) 8.5
5 Ningbo (China)* 19.4 20 Laem Chabang (Thailand) 6.5
6 Busan (Korea) 18.6 21 Jakarta (Indonesia) 6.0
7 Qingdao (China) 16.6 22 Bremerhaven (Germany) 5.7
8 Guangzhou (China) 16.1 23 NY/New Jersey (USA) 5.7
9 Dubai 15.2 24 Yingkou (China) 5.7
10 LA/Long Beach (USA) 15.1 25 Lianyungang (China) 5.0
11 Tianjin (China) 14.0 26 Colombo (Sri Lanka) 4.9
12 Rotterdam (Netherlands) 12.2 27 Tokyo (Japan) 4.5
13 Port Kelang (Malaysia) 10.9 28 Algeciras (Spain) 4.5
14 Kaohsiung (Taiwan) 10.5 29 Mumbai (India) 4.4
15 Dalian (China) 10.1 30 Valencia (Spain) 4.4

(APM Terminals’ port interest locations listed in bold italic)

(*APM Terminals facility in development) (Source: Alphaliner, May 2014)

51
 2014 Productivity Rankings: The World’s Top Terminals
VESSEL PRODUCTIVITY: TOP TERMINALS WORLDWIDE
2014

Terminal Name Port Name Country Berth Productivity

Tangier, Morocco
APM Terminals Yokohama Yokohama Japan 186
Tianjin Port Pacific International Container Terminal (TPCT) Tianjin China 142
Qingdao Qianwan Container Terminal (QQCT) Qingdao China 136
Tianjin Port Alliance International Container Terminal (TACT) Tianjin China 136
DP World-Jebel Ali Terminal Jebel Ali United Arab Emirates 131
Ningbo Beilun Second Container Terminal (NBSCT) Ningbo China 129
Tianjin Five Continents International Container Terminal Tianjin China 124
Xiamen Songyu Container Terminal (XSCT) Xiamen China 124
Tianjin Port Euroasia International Container Terminal (TECT) Tianjin China 121
Yantian International Container Terminals (YICT) Yantian China 119
Pusan Newport Co Ltd (PNC) Busan Republic of Korea 118
Guangzhou South China Oceangate Container Terminal Nansha China 117
South Asia Gateway Terminal (SAGT) Colombo Sri Lanka 111
Tianjin Port Container Terminal (TCT) Tianjin China 111
Dalian Port Container Terminal (DPCM) Dalian China 108
Yangshan Deepwater Port Phases 1/2 Shanghai China 107
Korea Express Kwangyang Container Terminal Gwangyang Republic of Korea 107
Hyundai Pusan Newport Terminal (HPNT) Busan Republic of Korea 107
Ningbo Gangji (Yining) Terminal Ningbo China 107
Xiamen International Container Terminals (XICT) Xiamen China 104
Yangshan Deepwater Port Phases 3/4 Shanghai China 104
Busan New Port Container Terminal (BNCT) Busan Republic of Korea 102
APM Terminals Rotterdam Rotterdam Netherlands 101
MSC Gate Container Terminal Bremerhaven Germany 101
Shanghai Mingdong Container Terminal (SMCT) Shanghai China 101
Source: JOC Group Inc. Port Productivity Data

52 (Source: JOC Group, November 2014)

 2014 Productivity Rankings: The Americas’ Top Terminals

VESSEL PRODUCTIVITY: TOP TERMINALS AMERICAS

Tangier,
January - June Morocco
2014

Berth
Terminal Name Port Name Country
Productivity
Panama Ports Company (PPC) Balboa Balboa Panama 99
APM Terminals Los Angeles Los Angeles United States of America 92
West Basin Container Terminal Los Angeles United States of America 88
Seagirt Marine Terminal Baltimore United States of America 84
Evergreen Container Terminal-Los Angeles Los Angeles United States of America 82
Lázaro Cárdenas Terminal Portuaria de Contenedores (LCTPC) Lázaro Cárdenas Mexico 82
Le terminal de Jarry Pointe-à-Pitre Guadeloupe 80
Pierce County Terminal Tacoma United States of America 77
North Charleston Terminal (NCT) Charleston United States of America 76
Prince Rupert Fairview Container Terminal Prince Rupert Canada 74
Source: JOC Group Inc. Port Productivity Data

(Source: JOC Group, June 2014)

53
 2014 Productivity Rankings: Europe, Middle East, Africa

VESSEL PRODUCTIVITY: TOP TERMINALS EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST, AFRICA

Tangier, Morocco
JANUARY - JUNE 2014

Terminal Name Port Name Country Berth Productivity

DP World-Jebel Ali Terminal Jebel Ali United Arab Emirates 131

APM Terminals Rotterdam Rotterdam Netherlands 101

MSC Gate Container Terminal Bremerhaven Germany 101

Khorfakkan Container Terminal (KCT) Khor al Fakkan United Arab Emirates 100

Red Sea Gateway Terminal (RSGT) Jeddah Saudi Arabia 97

Khalifa Port Container Terminal Mina Khalifa/Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates 97

Salalah Container Terminal Salalah Oman 96

NTB North Sea Terminal Bremerhaven Bremerhaven Germany 96

Euromax Terminal Rotterdam - ECT Rotterdam Netherlands 93

ECT Delta Dedicated West Terminal Rotterdam Netherlands 88

(Source: JOC Group, November 2014)

54
Trends in port and trade development
Vessel and port size respond to economic and population growth

55
 Long-term attractiveness of the port industry is driven by
ongoing globalization, containerization and privatization
World container port handling demand
(TEU million)
• 10% CAGR from 1990 - 2008
Fundamental drivers
• (9.1% ) global volume loss for 2009 of port demand
• Recovery in 2010 with 14.8% growth
• Global economic growth.
• 40% projected rise 2013-2020
• Increased regional trade
1400 (e.g. Intra-Asia).
• Increased containerization
1200 of commodities (e.g. grain,
reefer).
• Necessity to upgrade existing
1000
capacity (e.g. larger vessels,
deep draft and larger crane
800 requirements).
• Privatization opportunities.
600 • Growing consumer demand in
developing countries.
400

200

0 Forecasted figures based on

5.5% average annual growth
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024

56 (Source: Drewry Shipping Consultants, January 2014)

 Global Container Fleet Capacity Growth Continues:
Liner Container Capacity now exceeds 19 million TEUs
Million TEUs Global Container Capacity Growth 1996-2015
20

18

16

14

12

10

0
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
(Source: Alphaliner: October 2015)

57
Panama Canal Locks Widened for 2016

Source: Panama Canal Authority

58
Suez Canal Expansion Completed

A new planned 9.5 km side channel between

the Canal and Port Said East will allow 24-
hour access to vessels calling the Suez Canal
Container Terminal, increasing vessel traffic
and annual volume capacity significantly.

Source: Suez Canal Authority

59
 Current global population:
Most Populous Countries: 2015 (millions)
1,400

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

Source: United Nations World Population Prospects;

The 2015 Revision (2015)
 Future global population leaders:
Most Populous Countries: 2050 (millions)
1,800

1,600

1,400

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

Source: United Nations World Population Prospects:

The 2015 Revision (2015)
 New larger vessels – raising bar for port operators
World Container Fleet
Breakdown by Vessel Capacity
2012 to 2016
22
Fleet Capacity - Million Teu Nominal

20

18

16

14

12

10
2012 2016

>10,000 teu 7,500 - 9,999 TEU < 7,500 TEU

62 Source: Alphaliner November 2014

Port industry needs to respond
Demand on land space Inland infrastructure and connectivity
APM Terminals Maasvlakte II, Rotterdam

Itajai, Brazil

Sustainability- Safety and Environment

Rotterdam, Netherlands

63
The latest ULCS capacity record: 19,224 TEUs

Mediterranean Shipping launched the 19,224 TEU capacity MSC Oscar in

January 2015.
The Oscar was the first of six vessels of this configuration to be joining the
global fleet. Four MSC Oscar-class vessels are currently in service.

64
Current Operating ULCS Comparisons:

Vessel Class Length (m) Width (m) Draft (m) Capacity (TEUs)

MSC Oscar 395.4 59 16 19,224

CSCL Globe 400 58.6 16 19,100

Maersk EEE 400 59 14.5 18,270

(Chart Source: Alphaliner)

18,270 TEU Maersk EEE-Class Vessel

65
Evolution of Port design

Brooklyn, New York, USA Maasvlakte

Port
2, Elizabeth,
Rotterdam, New
TheJersey,
Netherlands
USA

The effects of containerization on port design and operations illustrated by a

comparison of port operations and activities separated by several decades.

66
The evolution of crane sizes...
 ...and the evolution of crane concepts

From bigger cranes … … to smarter cranes

Innovation: A Path to Improved Productivity
For the first phase of the Maasvlakte II terminal, the current
fleet consists of 37 battery-powered Lift-AGVs in combination with
128 storage racks.
Lift Automated Guided Vehicles at the new Maasvlakte II terminal
in Rotterdam are projected to increase productivity by an
estimated 25% to 50% over conventional terminal design.

69
Investment in underserved markets

70
Africa: A huge emerging market in need of
infrastructure investment and global logistics access

 The population of Africa has been

projected to increase from 1.1
billion today to 1.6 billion in
2030;

 This increase is equivalent to the

current population of the EU.

 New APM Terminals projects in

Africa include:
 A second Terminal in
Abidjan, Ivory Coast;
 A new mega-port in
Badagry, Nigeria;
 A $1 billion expansion of
Tema Port, Ghana.

71
Central America: Moin, Costa Rica

Project: Moin Container Terminal (MCT)

• Investment: $992 million USD over the 33-year concession
• Phase I: 2 berths and 6 Post-Panamax cranes (Completion 2018)
• Proximity to Panama Canal
• APM Terminals’ ownership: 100%
72
Mexico: Lázaro Cárdenas

Project: Lázaro Cárdenas Terminal 2 (TEC2)

• $900 million USD investment over the term of the concession
• Phase I: 650 meter quay; 43 hectare (106 acre) yard (Completion 2016)
• 5 Super-Post Panamax Cranes with 23-container reach
• APM Terminals’ ownership: 95%

73
South American West Coast: Callao, Peru

Project: APM Terminals

Callao Expansion and
Upgrade
• Investment: $749
million USD over the
30-year concession
• Capacity: 2.9 million
TEUs (Completion 2016)
• Non–containerized cargo
capacity: 9.9 million tons
APM Terminals’ share: 51%

74
South American East Coast: Santos, Brazil

Project: Brasil Terminal

Portuário (BTP)
• Development of new
Berths 3,4 and 5
• 50-year concession
JV with TIL/MSC Group
• Capacity: 1.2 million
TEUs (2014)
• APM Terminals’
ownership: 50%

75
Middle East: Port Said East, Egypt

Project: Suez Canal Container

Terminal Phase II
• 1200 meters of additional berth
to 2400 meters
• 12 new Super-PostPanamax
Cranes for a total of 24
• Annual throughput capacity
doubled to 5.4 million TEUs
• New access channel project has
been approved to allow 24-
hour vessel access.
• APM Terminals’
ownership: 55%

76
Middle East: Salalah, Oman

Project: Port of Salalah Expansion

• $143 million USD investment to double general cargo handling capacity
• 1200 meters of quay; 18 meter depth
• New annual capacities: 20 million tons dry bulk; 6 million tons liquid bulk
• APM Terminals’ ownership: 30%

77
India: Pipavav, Gujarat

Project: APM Terminals

Pipavav expansion
• $200 million USD investment
to expand both bulk and
container capacity
• Container berth doubled
to 735 meters (2 post-
Panamax vessels)
• 3 new Super-Post Panamax
Cranes and 10 new RTGs
• APM Terminals’
ownership: 43%

78
Southeast Asia: Tanjung Pelepas, Malaysia
Project: Port of Tanjung Pelepas Expansion
• $470 million USD investment
• 2 New Container Berths; 8 Super-Post Panamax Cranes; 32 E-RTGs
• Annual container capacity: 8.4 million TEUs
• APM Terminals’
ownership: 30%

79
Southeast Asia: Cai Mep, Vietnam

Project: Cai Mep International

Terminal (CMIT)
• $260 million USD investment;
terminal opened in March 2011
• 6 Super-Post Panamax Cranes;
Vietnam’s only deep-water facility
• Annual Container Capacity:
1.1 million TEUs
• APM Terminals’ ownership: 49%

80
Turkey: Izmir

Project: APM Terminals Izmir

• $400 million USD investment by APM Terminals and local partner;
• Deep-water facility capable of handling 18,000 TEU capacity vessels
• Initial Annual Container Throughput Capacity: 1.3 million TEUs
• APM Terminals’ ownership: 100%
81
China: Port of Ningbo

Project: Meishan Container

Terminal Expansion
• Development of new
Berths 3,4 and 5
• 50-year concession signed
in JV with Ningbo Port
Group
• Capacity: 2.8 million
TEUs (2014)
• APM Terminals’
ownership: 25%

82
Demonstrated performance and progress
Port productivity & infrastructure investment

83
 Apapa, Nigeria: Productivity Improvement
Since assuming operational
control of Apapa Container
Terminal in 2006:
• Container volume has grown from
200,000 TEUs to 700,000 TEUs;

• Waiting time to berth has fallen from

14 days to less than one day;

• USD $350 million in equipment and

infrastructure improvements.
Before takeover After takeover

84
 Aqaba, Jordan: An Economic Development Engine
Since assuming operational
control of Aqaba Container
Terminal in 2006:
• 704 predominantly (99%) local staff
hired, with 33,820 indirect jobs
supported;

• 88% of procurement spending goes to

local suppliers and contractors;

• 75% increase in expenditure on

employee wages and benefits (2007-
2011);

• 66% increase in training and

development budget from 2008;

• Overall revenue has grown from

USD $46 million to $82.5 million;

• USD $284 million has been invested in

expansion raising annual throughput
capacity to 1.5 million TEUs.

85
Luanda, Angola: Inland Logistics Park and
Improved Operations
• 2007: Sogester assumes
responsibility for operations of
Luanda Container Terminal;
expansion and refurbishment begin;

• USD $86 million invested in new

equipment and expansion of
capacity to 330,000 TEUs yearly;

• 2009: construction of USD $56

million dedicated inland container
depot (ICD) 30 km from port
begins;

• 2010: 200,000 TEU yearly capacity

ICD opens with empty container
storage, reefer capacity and pre-
designated customs scanning areas.

86
Pipavav, India: Financial Performance and
Profitablity
• 2005: APM Terminals assumed a
majority shareholding in full-service
Pipavav Port and began to invest in
equipment and infrastructure;

• 2010: Port Pipavav has achieved the

financial stability to become listed on
the Indian Stock Exchange as
container volumes grow by 45% to
470,000 TEUs;

• 2012: Pipavav is profitable, with

volume of 570,000 TEUs, and further
expansion plans.

• 2014: Volume of 780,000 TEUs; new

liquid bulk facility opens.

• 2015: Ro/Ro terminal and service

opens to handle Indian passenger car
exports.

87
Industry-recognized excellence
2015 Awards:
• Lloyd’s List Global Awards “Port Operator of the Year”

• Lloyd’s List North American Maritime Awards “Port Operator of the Year”
• Containerisation International “Innovation of the Year” (APM Terminals Rotterdam Maasvlakte II)
• Lloyds List Middle East and Indian Subcontinent Awards “Logistics Award” (APM Terminals Inland Services South Asia)
• NAVIS “Customer Impact Award of Excellence/Hub Partnership”
(APM Terminals Algeciras and APM Terminals Tangier)
• Pacific Maritime Association “Coast Accident Prevention Award” (APM Terminals Pier 400 Los Angeles)
• Pacific Maritime Association “Southern California Container Terminal Safety Award (APM Terminals Pier 400 Los Angeles)
• Nigerian Port Authority “Most Environmentally Conscious Port Operator” (APM Terminals Apapa)
• All India Maritime & Logistics Awards “Container Terminal of the Year” (APM Terminals Mumbai)

2014 Awards:
• New York Shipper’s Association “Greatest Reduction in Lost-Time Accident Frequency Award”
• Green Economy Forum “Global Green Award”

2013 Awards:
• Lloyd’s List Asia Awards “Port Operator Award”
• Containerisation International “International Terminal
Operator of the Year”
• Express, Logistics & Supply Chain Leadership Awards “Best Inland Services Provider”
• (APM Terminals India)
• MALA “Container Terminal Operator of the Year” (APM Terminals Mumbai)
• MALA “Health, Safety and Quality Award” (APM Terminals Pipavav)
• Exim India “Container Freight Station of the Year-Private” (Chennai CFS)
• Volkswagen India “Supplier Appreciation Award” (APM Terminals Mumbai CFS)
• “National Quality Award” [Morocco] (APM Terminals Tangier)
• “Best Employer” Award” [Morocco] (APM Terminals Tangier)
Industry-recognized excellence
2012 Awards:
• Lloyd’s List Global Awards “Port Operator of the Year”
• Containerisation International “International Terminal Operator of the Year”
• Containerisation International “Corporate Social Responsibility” Award (Salalah)
• Nigeria Maritime Excellence Awards “Best Terminal Operator of the Year” (Apapa)
• All-India Maritime and Logistics Awards “Container Terminal of the Year” (APM Terminals Mumbai)
• 2011 Social Security Excellence Award for Occupational
Health and Safety (Aqaba)
• Pacific Maritime Association Safety Awards (Pier 400; Tacoma)
• The Signal Mutual Gerald H. Halpin Safety Excellence Award
• The Signal Mutual Industry Leader Safety Award
• Gateway Award of Excellence (APM Terminals Chennai CFS)

2011 Awards:
• Lloyd’s List Middle East and Indian Subcontinent
Safety Award (Port of Salalah, Oman)
• Lloyd’s List 2011 Global Safety Award
• Best Port Operator in Africa, Transport Africa Awards 2011
• Seatrade 2011 Innovation in Ship Operations Award
• Pacific Maritime Association Safety Awards
• Ecoval Trophy

2010 Awards:
• Special Jury Award, Oman Green Awards
• Safety at Sea International Award
• Rotterdam Port Community Award
• Pacific Maritime Association Safety Awards
• New York Shipping Association Safety Award
• Moroccan National “Safety at Work Award”
Follow us on Social Media

90
www.apmterminals.com