Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IN THE
INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
KAY KIM )
CHARLES CHUANG, )
)
Appellants/ Plaintiffs ) Appeal from the Marion County
) Pike Township Small Claims Court
)
v. )
) Cause No. 49K05-1811-SC-004090
)
VILLAGE AT EAGLE HOME OWNERS )
ASSOCIATION [VECHOA] )
MUHAMMED JAVED, OWNER OF 4260 UNIT 6)
ANDLEEB JAVED, OWNER OF 4260 UNIT 6 )
)
Appellees/ Defendants. ) The Honorable A. Douglas Stephens, Judge
VOLUME II OF II
NOTICE OF APPEAL
STATE OF INDIANA )
IN THE PIKE TOWNSHIP OF
)
MARION COUNTY
COUNTY OF MARION ) ss:
SMALL CLAIMS COURT
)
CAUSE NO. 49K05-1811-SC-004090
KAY KIM )
CHARLES CHUANG )
Plaintiffs. )
)
vs )
)
VILLAGE AT EAGLE HOME OWNERS )
ASSOCIATION [VECHOA] )
MUHAMMED JAVED, OWNER OF 4260 UNIT 6 )
ANDLEEB JAVED, OWNER OF 4260 UNIT 6 )
Defendants. )
NOTICE OF APPEAL
[FROM MARION COUNTY PIKE TOWNSHIP SMALL CLAIMS COURT]
Plaintiffs Charles Chuang and Kay Kim Pro se, pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 9(A),
respectfully gives notice of an appeal from the following judgment(s) entered by the Marion
This appeal is from a final judgment order on April 26, 2019 as defined by Appellate
This appeal will be taken to the Indiana Court of Appeals pursuant to Ind. App Rules 4, 5.
Pursuant to Appellate Rule 10, 11, or 14.1(C), the clerk of Marion County Pike Township
Small Claims Court or Administrative Agency is requested to assemble the Clerk’s Record, as
2
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
Pursuant to Appellate Rule 11 or 14.1(C), the Court Reporter of the [Pike Township
Plaintiffs’ STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE.], certify, and file with the clerk of the [Pike
Township Small Claims Court or Administrative Agency] the following hearings of record,
including exhibits: [Pike Township Small Claims Court Judge A. Douglas Stephens refused to
take Exhibits from the Plaintiffs. Judge told us (Appellants/Plaintiffs) that because, this case is
not on trial; so, he will not accept the Exhibit; thus, there is no Exhibits on file. However,
Respectfully submitted,
3
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
VERIFICATION
I sworn, state, under penalties of perjury, that I, Charles Chuang and Kay Kim Plaintiff
Pro Se, in the above-entitled case; being duly sworn, stated the representations contained herein
is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
4
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on April 29, 2019, I electronically filed the foregoing document
using the Indiana E-Filing system (IEFS).
I certify that on April 29, 2019, the foregoing document was served to following via
IEFS.
5
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
6
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
7
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
8
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
9
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
STATE OF INDIANA )
IN THE PIKE TOWNSHIP OF
)
MARION COUNTY
COUNTY OF MARION ) ss:
SMALL CLAIMS COURT
)
CAUSE NO. 49K05-1811-SC-004090
KAY KIM )
CHARLES CHUANG )
Plaintiffs. )
)
vs )
)
VILLAGE AT EAGLE HOME OWNERS )
ASSOCIATION [VECHOA] )
MUHAMMED JAVED, OWNER OF 4260 UNIT 6 )
ANDLEEB JAVED, OWNER OF 4260 UNIT 6 )
Defendants. )
Plaintiffs Charles Chuang and Kay Kim Pro se filed Statement of Evidence on this 29th
Plaintiffs waive attachment of transcript in its entirety and/or portion of pertaining to this
appeal.
Respectfully submitted,
10
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
VERIFICATION
I sworn, state, under penalties of perjury, that I, Charles Chuang and Kay Kim Plaintiff
Pro Se, in the above-entitled case; being duly sworn, stated the representations contained herein
is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on April 29, 2019, I electronically filed the foregoing document
using the Indiana E-Filing system (IEFS).
I certify that on April 29, 2019, the foregoing document was served to following via
IEFS.
11
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
Notice of Completion of Clerk's Record will be provided by Court Clerk and not available as of today.
…
…
…
12
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
PARTY INFORMATION
Attorneys
Defendant (VEC HOA) Owner of the 4260 Unit #6 Steven St. John
c/o OMNI Management Service Retained
212 W. 10th St. Suite B300 150 East Market Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202 Suite 200
Indianapolis, IN 46204
317-321-2404(W)
Defendant Village at Eagle Creek Homeowners Association (VEC HOA) David Edward Jacuk
c/o OMNI Management Service Retained
212 W. 10th St. Suite B300 Tanner Law Group
Indianapolis, IN 46202 6125 S East Street
Suite A
Indianapolis, IN 46227
317-536-7435(H)
CCS Page 1 of 9
13
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
CCS Page 2 of 9
14
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
CCS Page 3 of 9
15
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
CCS Page 4 of 9
16
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
plaintiff and def file various motions/pleadings. The letters plaintiff files do
not need a response from Ct nor does the itemization of damages SEE
SCANNED RJO for full details remains set for 2-6-19 at 9:30am
Order Signed: 01/04/2019
01/07/2019 RJO Entry
plaintif and def have made filings relating tto subpoena's and
sanctions/fees that Ct previous ruling disposes of and makes def motion to
quash and response to fees/judgment moot
Order Signed: 01/04/2019
01/07/2019 Certified Mail Returned
signed and returned served on 1/2/19.
Date Signed: 01/02/2019
01/07/2019 Certified Mail Returned
signed and dated 1/2/19 received.
Date Signed: 01/02/2019
01/16/2019 Motion Filed
Motion to Designate a Mediation Panel
Filed By: Village at Eagle Creek Homeowners Association (VEC HOA)
File Stamp: 01/16/2019
01/16/2019 RJO Entry
def villages request ct to appoint panel/ct notes def's Javed have not
appeared and hearing set on them for 01-30-19 crt reserves setting panel
until 1-30-19, unless def appear wuth or withour counsel prior to 1-30-19
Order Signed: 01/16/2019
01/17/2019 Amended Pleading Filed
Plaintiffs' 1st Supplement Claims 17Jan19
Filed By: Chuang, Charles
Filed By: Kim, Kay
File Stamp: 01/17/2019
01/17/2019 Amended Pleading Filed
Plaintiffs' Notice to Court to Update Defendant's Info 17Jan19
Filed By: Chuang, Charles
Filed By: Kim, Kay
File Stamp: 01/17/2019
01/17/2019 Answer Filed
Notice to Court to Update Defendant-Owner of 4260 Unit 6 as Mr & Mrs
Javed 17Jan19
Filed By: Chuang, Charles
Filed By: Kim, Kay
File Stamp: 01/17/2019
01/18/2019 RJO Entry
plaintiff files 1st supplemental claim & updated def information/ CT strikes
supplemental claim/ ct strikes supplemental claim as stay is in effect .
Court does direct clerk to update Def's info as provided by plaintiff
Order Signed: 01/17/2019
01/18/2019 Answer Filed
CCS Page 5 of 9
17
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
CCS Page 6 of 9
18
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
CCS Page 7 of 9
19
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
CCS Page 8 of 9
20
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
CCS Page 9 of 9
21
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
Plaintiffs' COMPLAINT
49K05-1811-SC-004090
22
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
THIS COMMUNICATION IS
FROM A DEBT COLLECTOR. Constable
23
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
24
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
Noah_BamBam's Diagnose
25
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
26
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
27
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
28
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
29
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
30
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
31
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
32
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
Dr. FOSTER and SMITH $8.80
33
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
4260-6 Tenant will pay VET BILL 10/30/18_signed
34
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
I have nothing to do with anything you are referring to that is something you yourself made
sure of
4260-6 TEXT by Rico 3176676523p418_Friday, November 02, 2018
Do not call or text my phone for that matter anymore that is something you have deal with
with the owner now because of you going to the association about the matter
4260-6 TEXT by Rico 3176676523 p421_Friday, November 02, 2018-U deal w_owner&HOA
Lol IG the courts decided u wasn't gone get nothing u can thank yourself
for that goodnight
35
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
Update Status & Umbrella Insurance Claim Requested
36
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
VECHOA Gia to kk_Claim under Homeowner Ins & info or q to Omni Property Mgmt
37
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
PHOTO OF DOG-BamBam INJURY
38
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
39
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
40
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
41
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
42
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
43
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
44
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
PHOTO OF DOGBam Bie's INJURY
45
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
46
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
47
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
48
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
49
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
50
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
51
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
52
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
VECHOA Gia-Consault w_Attorney NO FURTHER ACTION 29Oct18
53
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
kk to VECHOA Property mgt Richard Meza: Pls, RESPOND TO T#465-6702 & 466-0539
54
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
55
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
56
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
57
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
58
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
59
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
60
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
61
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
62
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
63
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
64
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
65
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
66
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
67
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
68
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
69
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
70
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
71
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
72
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
73
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
VECHOA Bylaw_Ownership of Common Area
74
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
75
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
76
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
77
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
78
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT TO DEFENDANTS
Come now, Plaintiffs Kay Kim and Charles Chuang Pro Se, filed Plaintiffs’ Notice of
1. The following proposed settlement were emailed to defendants prior to this Court
filing.
2. Plaintiffs will settle for total of $732.:
$591 (vet bill) + $115 (court cost) + $26. (additional court processing fee) = $732.
3. Plaintiffs will claim additional cost & expense for mediation if/when all parties
79
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on January 29, 2019, I electronically filed the foregoing document
using the Indiana E-Filing system (IEFS).
I certify that on January 29, 2019 the foregoing document was served to the Defendants
via IEFS of email (if not register with IEFS).
Attorney for 4260 unit 6 owners of Muhammed Javed and Andleeb Javed
Steven St. John Steven St. John
SKILES DETRUDE
150 East Market Street, Suite 200
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Direct: (317) 321-2404
FAX: (317) 321-2414
sstjohn@skilesdetrude.com
80
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
Respectfully submitted,
VERIFICATION
I sworn, state, under penalties of perjury, that I, Charles Chuang and Kay Kim Plaintiff
Pro Se, in the above-entitled case; being duly sworn, stated the representations contained herein
is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
81
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
Come now, Plaintiffs Kay Kim and Charles Chuang Pro Se, filed Plaintiffs’ Notice The
Defendants to Strike Mediator as per Court Order issued on January 28, 2019 as follows:
82
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
5. Plaintiffs will set up/arrange meeting-date, time, & place with survived mediator
Respectfully submitted,
83
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
VERIFICATION
I sworn, state, under penalties of perjury, that I, Charles Chuang and Kay Kim Plaintiff
Pro Se, in the above-entitled case; being duly sworn, stated the representations contained herein
is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on January 29, 2019, I electronically filed the foregoing document
using the Indiana E-Filing system (IEFS).
I certify that on January 29, 2019 the foregoing document was served to the Defendants
via IEFS of email (if not register with IEFS).
Attorney for 4260 unit 6 owners of Muhammed Javed and Andleeb Javed
Steven St. John Steven St. John
SKILES DETRUDE
150 East Market Street, Suite 200
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Direct: (317) 321-2404
FAX: (317) 321-2414
sstjohn@skilesdetrude.com
84
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
85
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
Filed: 2/24/2019 6:22 PM
Judge
Pike Township of Marion County Small Claims Court
Comes now, Plaintiffs Kay Kim and Charles Chuang Pro Se, moves the Court to grant
summary judgment in favor of Plaintiffs on this February 24, 2019 as follows and not limited to:
2. On February 24, 2019, Defendants did not respond to Court’s RJO [Plaintiffs’
3. On December 17, 2018, Plaintiffs filed the 114 pages Appendix to show the Court
beyond reasonable doubt that the incident (Pitbull bite another small dogs in the VECHOA
Page 1 of 5
86
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
5, The following copy of Bam Bam’s full report is Appendix page 4 of 114.
5-1. Bam Bam’s Initial consultant vet bill was over $1,200. and another special
care would adds over $1,000. I, Plaintiff Kay Kim asked the clinic to limit the treatment up to
$400. and that’s all I can afford; regardless, who is responsible for the vet bill.
5-2. It happened on Saturday closed business. Bam Bie’s coat color was
copper color which disguise blood color and we did not noticed until late Sunday. We drove
5-3. We take care of dogs ourselves for cleaning and dressing; so, we can save
money for vet bills; but, we had to purchase whatever it needs to take care of the wounds.
Page 2 of 5
87
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
6. As we/Plaintiffs filed in the Appendix, $591. was less than what we actually spent
and does not include driving over 100 miles round trips three (3) times (Initial visit, follow up,
removing stitch.)
besides, VECHOA Board of Director authorized the residents/tenants to have Pitbulls in the
condo. Also, VECHOA have criminal and civil insurance to cover/protect the victim.
8. I/Plaintiff Kay Kim got the following cell phone text from person-Rico who had
Lol IG the courts decided u wasn't gone get nothing u can thank yourself
for that goodnight
9. I/Plaintiff Kay Kim contacted the VECHOA Board of Directors and Property
Manager for them to pay $591. repeatedly to settle the incident without going to Court; but, they
never contacted me/Plaintiff Kay Kim back and ignored until we/Plaintiffs filed the lawsuit.
10. Plaintiffs prepared the list of mediator for the Defendants to strike; but, still non-
11. The Court’s initial docket entry shows who is responsible for Plaintiffs’ vet bills.
12. It is dangerous for us/Plaintiffs to collect directly from whoever is responsible for
vet bills.
Page 3 of 5
88
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
13. Under the circumstances, our vet bills are incredibly reasonable. Despite that,
what we have to collect the money back is insult to injury. It is not nice for Defendants to
$591. plus Court cost for all other relief just and proper in the premises for the Plaintiffs.
Respectfully submitted,
VERIFICATION
I sworn, state, under penalties of perjury, that I, Charles Chuang and Kay Kim Plaintiff
Pro Se, in the above-entitled case; being duly sworn, stated the representations contained herein
is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Page 4 of 5
89
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on February 24, 2019, I electronically filed the foregoing document
using the Indiana E-Filing system (IEFS).
I certify that on February 24, 2019 the foregoing document was served to following via
IEFS.
Page 5 of 5
90
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
+ + <chang2597@gmail.com>
I have been chosen as your court mediator. The first thing I would like to let you
know is that I have done a conflicts check, so I can serve as your mediator.
My rate for mediation is $200 per hour, split equally between the parties, unless
otherwise agreed.
If we need to go into May, 2019, we may do so, but my dates in May are also limited.
Once we have agreed on a date, I will send out engagement letters to both parties,
along with a retainer agreement. I expect a $300 retainer from both sides, and if
we go over three hours, the remainder of the fee must be paid on the date of
mediation.
Marc Matheny
Marc W. Matheny
Attorney at Law
244 N. College Avenue
Indianapolis, IN 46202
USA
Tel: (317) 639-3315
Fax: (317) 639-3318
mmatheny@ameritech.net
mmatheny@oblawindy.com
91
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
Mr. Matheny,
With all due respect, the Mediation fee $200. per hour must split among three parties.
Thus, my fee should not exceeds more than $70. per hour at the most.
The following are the all involved parties:
I already filed with the Court and sent to all counsel that I demand $ 591. (vet
bills) + Court Cost + Mediation Cost.
My $demand is not a negotiable.
My comply to mediation meeting is because the Judge order. I am going to pay
you $70.00 for one hour of mediation.
You have to refund me 1/2 if/when we don't stay at the mediation more than 1/2
hour which I have no intention to stay more than 1/2 hour of mediation.
No matter what you or anyone say, my $demand will not change.
I will pay you $70.00 check (or money order if you wish) when we go to your
office for mediation.
I can adjust our schedule any day or time after April 03, 2019; so, you and
opposing counsels
agrees to time and date and let me know. Unless, we have life of death
situation, we will be at the meeting.
Sincerely,
kay kim
92
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
Mr. Matheny,
Like I said, my attending of mediation will be definitely less than one hour.
I will not pay you more than $70.00 for mediation.
Again, let me reiterate that I will walk out of your mediation meeting within
1st 1/2 hour (30 minutes); so, we both don't have to argue about for my mediation
fee payment to you more than $70.00. More likely, you have to refund me $35.00
Sincerely,
kay kim
Mr. Matheny,
I write you two checks of $35.00; so, you can return my one check $35.0 back to me
when I am done with mediation within 1/2 hour. Thanks.
Sincerely,
kay kim
93
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
Comes now, Marc W. Matheny, the court-appointed mediator in this cause of action, who
1. That he has been contact with all of the parties or their counsel in this cause and
has attempted to begin the mediation process by exchanging possible dates and sending out terms
2. That the Plaintiff, Kay Kim, has indicated that she would not be participating in
the mediation under the terms set forth in the mediator’s Agreement to Mediate.
3. That due to the correspondence between the Plaintiff and the mediator, the
mediator feels that he is now in an adversarial relationship with the Plaintiff and can no longer
act as mediator in this cause of action and would tender his resignation as mediator.
4. That no mediation has taken place, no mediation has been scheduled, nor have the
94
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
Respectfully submitted,
s/Marc W. Matheny
Marc W. Matheny, #9849-49
Mediator
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was served by the court’s electronic filing
system and/or first class mail on the 18th day of March 2019 upon:
Kay Kim
Charles Chuang
4250 Village Parkway Circle #2
Indianapolis, IN 46254
s/Marc W. Matheny
Marc W. Matheny
Marc W. Matheny
Attorney at Law
244 N. College Avenue
Indianapolis, IN 46202
317-639-3315
95
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
96
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
97
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
Filed: 3/21/2019 5:11 AM
Judge
Pike Township of Marion County Small Claims Court
STATE OF INDIANA )
IN THE PIKE TOWNSHIP OF
)
MARION COUNTY
COUNTY OF MARION ) ss:
SMALL CLAIMS COURT
)
CAUSE NO. 49K05-1811-SC-004090
KAY KIM )
CHARLES CHUANG )
Plaintiffs. )
)
vs )
)
VILLAGE AT EAGLE HOME OWNERS )
ASSOCIATION [VECHOA] )
MUHAMMED JAVED, OWNER OF 4260 UNIT 6 )
ANDLEEB JAVED, OWNER OF 4260 UNIT 6 )
Defendants. )
Comes now, Plaintiffs Kay Kim and Charles Chuang Pro Se, filed Answer to Court’s
1. Mediator demanded retainer fee of three hundred (300) dollars from us/Plaintiffs.
2. Mediator stated that it will start with half (1/2) day of mediation. Sounded like,
3. Plaintiffs are willing to attend mediation if the Mediator’s fees are acceptable and
reasonable.
4. As it is stands, unless, Your Honor appoint a pro bono mediator or the Defendants
agree to pay the cost of mediation, the Plaintiffs will not be able to attend the mediation due to its
cost.
5. Are two (2) Defendants paying $300.00 each total of $600.00 retainer fees for the
mediation? Mediator and all parties have open email correspondence. No Defendant ever
replied to mediator’s demand whether any or all Defendant will pay the $300.00 retainer fee +
98
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
hourly mediation fees. Have your Honor ask the Defendants whether they will pay $300.00
each?
6. Your Honor, if the Defendant are willing to pay $300.00 each for mediation, why
don’t they pay $400.00 each to us/Plaintiffs to resolve the lawsuit? OR,
demand/collect $300.00 only from the us/Plaintiffs? Maybe the mediator is waving the retainer's
8. Plaintiff told the mediator that we/Plaintiffs will only pay two checks $35.00 each
total of $70.00 because, his hourly rate is $200.00 divide by 3 i.e. $70.00/per party as a formality
9. Plaintiffs told the mediator what we/Plaintiffs told the Court and the Defendants
that our amount of demands are vet bills $591.00+Court Cost+Mediation (if we/Plaintiffs
pays+etc.(cost of appeals) is not negotiable. So, we/Plaintiffs will more likely attend and
10. Unless, this case is set for jury trial; there is no legal authority for your Honor to
11. Plaintiffs stated clearly to Court and the Defendants that no mediator will change
our mind on the amount of judgement we are seeking which is vet bills $591.+ Court Cost +
12. Our demand of vet bill $591. is less than what we actually spent for the injuries to
my dogs. The initial bills asked by the vet is more than $2,000. When we cannot afford to pay
for the treatment, the vet recommended the euthanasia of the dog. We/Plaintiffs brought our male
dog home to die and had to be awake the whole night to take care and comfort my dogs.
99
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
13. The Plaintiffs had to borrow $300.00 to pay for the vet bill.
14. We/Plaintiffs were eager to pay off the debt; so, we asked VECHOA to pay
$591.00 The Defendants ignored and remain silent on the matter. We had no choice; but, to file
a lawsuit.
15. We respectively ask Your Honor to review if the order to force the Plaintiffs to
17. The Plaintiffs are waiting your final order of judgment so, Plaintiffs can appeal
the case.
Respectfully submitted,
VERIFICATION
I sworn, state, under penalties of perjury, that I, Charles Chuang and Kay Kim Plaintiff
Pro Se, in the above-entitled case; being duly sworn, stated the representations contained herein
is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
100
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on March 21, 2019, I electronically filed the foregoing document
using the Indiana E-Filing system (IEFS).
I certify that on February March 21, 2019, the foregoing document was served to
following via IEFS.
101
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
VECHOA BYLAW
102
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
103
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
104
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
105
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
106
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
107
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
108
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
109
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
110
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
111
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
112
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
113
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
114
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
115
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
116
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
117
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
118
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
119
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
120
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
121
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
122
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
123
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
124
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
125
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
126
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
127
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
128
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
129
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
130
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
131
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
132
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
133
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
134
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
135
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
136
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
137
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
138
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
139
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
140
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
141
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
142
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
143
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
144
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
145
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
146
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
147
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
148
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
149
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
150
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
151
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
152
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
153
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
154
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
155
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
VERIFICATION OF ACCURACY
I verify under penalties of perjury that the documents in this Appendix are accurate
copies of parts of the Record on Appeal.
VERIFICATION
I sworn, state, under penalties of perjury, that I, Charles Chuang and Kay Kim Plaintiff
Pro Se, in the above-entitled case; being duly sworn, stated the representations contained herein
is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
156
APPENDIX to Appellants Charles Chuang and Kay Kim's Brief: Vol. II of II.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on May 10, 2019, I electronically filed the foregoing document using
the Indiana E-Filing system (IEFS).
I certify that on May 10, 2019, the foregoing document was served to following via IEFS.
157