http://bpmsg.

com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process (EVM multiple inputs)

K. D. Goepel Version 12.08.2013 http://bpmsg.com
Only input data in the light green fields and worksheets!
n= 4 Number of criteria (3 to 10) Scale: 1 Linear

N= 20 Number of Participants (1 to 20) a: 0.15 Consensus: 67.6%

p= 0 selected Participant (0=consol.) 2 7 #REF!

Objective Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan

Author
Date EVM check: #REF!

Table Criterion Comment Weights Rk

1 PRODUKSI #REF! ###
2 PEMASARAN #REF! ###
3 SDM #REF! ###
4 TEKNOLOGI #REF! ###
5 #REF!
6 #REF!
7 #REF!
8 #REF!
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the #REF!
10 question section ("+" in row 66) #REF!

Result Eigenvalue lambda: #REF!

Consistency Ratio 0.37 GCI: #REF! CR: #REF!
PEMASARAN

TEKNOLOGI
PRODUKSI

Matrix normalized
principal
SDM

Eigenvector
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

PRODUKSI 1 #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!

PEMASARA
N
2 #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!
SDM 3 #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!
TEKNOLOGI 4 #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!
5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!

7
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!

8
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!

9
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!

10
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!

by K. Goepel 422641086.xlsx-Summary
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 1

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 30%
2 PEMASARAN 6%
3 SDM 36%
4 TEKNOLOGI 28%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 1 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
13 1 3 SDM A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI A 7 ### #VALUE! 7.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In1
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 2

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 58%
2 PEMASARAN 26%
3 SDM 12%
4 TEKNOLOGI 5%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 2 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
13 1 3 SDM A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In2
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 3

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 5%
2 PEMASARAN 58%
3 SDM 26%
4 TEKNOLOGI 12%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 3 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
13 1 3 SDM B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In3
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 4

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 58%
2 PEMASARAN 12%
3 SDM 26%
4 TEKNOLOGI 5%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 4 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
13 1 3 SDM A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In4
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 5

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 38%
2 PEMASARAN 14%
3 SDM 24%
4 TEKNOLOGI 24%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 5 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN A 7 ### #VALUE! 7.00
13 1 3 SDM B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI A 7 ### #VALUE! 7.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM A 7 ### #VALUE! 7.00
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In5
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 6

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 18%
2 PEMASARAN 4%
3 SDM 48%
4 TEKNOLOGI 30%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 6 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN A 7 ### #VALUE! 7.00
13 1 3 SDM B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In6
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 7

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 8%
2 PEMASARAN 22%
3 SDM 35%
4 TEKNOLOGI 35%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 7 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
13 1 3 SDM B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In7
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 8

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 7%
2 PEMASARAN 12%
3 SDM 50%
4 TEKNOLOGI 31%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 8 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
13 1 3 SDM B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In8
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 9

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 10%
2 PEMASARAN 4%
3 SDM 44%
4 TEKNOLOGI 41%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 9 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN A 7 ### #VALUE! 7.00
13 1 3 SDM B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In9
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 10

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 62%
2 PEMASARAN 5%
3 SDM 5%
4 TEKNOLOGI 28%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 10 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN A 9 ### #VALUE! 9.00
13 1 3 SDM A 7 ### #VALUE! 7.00
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI B 9 ### #VALUE! 0.11
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In10
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 11

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 6%
2 PEMASARAN 31%
3 SDM 31%
4 TEKNOLOGI 33%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 11 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
13 1 3 SDM B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In11
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 12

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 13%
2 PEMASARAN 13%
3 SDM 13%
4 TEKNOLOGI 63%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 12 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
13 1 3 SDM 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In12
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 13

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 34%
2 PEMASARAN 23%
3 SDM 10%
4 TEKNOLOGI 34%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 13 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
13 1 3 SDM A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In13
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 14

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 25%
2 PEMASARAN 25%
3 SDM 25%
4 TEKNOLOGI 25%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 14 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
13 1 3 SDM 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In14
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 15

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 63%
2 PEMASARAN 3%
3 SDM 9%
4 TEKNOLOGI 24%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 15 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN A 7 ### #VALUE! 7.00
13 1 3 SDM A 7 ### #VALUE! 7.00
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI A 7 ### #VALUE! 7.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In15
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 16

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 41%
2 PEMASARAN 41%
3 SDM 12%
4 TEKNOLOGI 5%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 16 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
13 1 3 SDM A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In16
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 17

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 31%
2 PEMASARAN 35%
3 SDM 27%
4 TEKNOLOGI 6%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 17 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN A 3 ### #VALUE! 3.00
13 1 3 SDM B 3 ### #VALUE! 0.33
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In17
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 18

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 41%
2 PEMASARAN 41%
3 SDM 12%
4 TEKNOLOGI 5%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 18 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
13 1 3 SDM A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In18
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 19

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 52%
2 PEMASARAN 30%
3 SDM 12%
4 TEKNOLOGI 5%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 19 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN A 3 ### #VALUE! 3.00
13 1 3 SDM A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In19
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 20

Objective: Bidang perlu ditingkatkan dalam produksi pangan
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 PRODUKSI 48%
2 PEMASARAN 21%
3 SDM 10%
4 TEKNOLOGI 21%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 20 1 a: 0.15 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 PRODUKSI PEMASARAN 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
13 1 3 SDM A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
14 1 4 TEKNOLOGI A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
0 1 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 PEMASARAN SDM 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
24 2 4 TEKNOLOGI 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 SDM TEKNOLOGI B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
0 3 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00

of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

422641086.xlsx-In20
http://bpmsg.com AHPMultiple Input Sheet 05/29/2019

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process

bpmsg.com Multiple Input Summary Sheet

20 = k number of participants
Consolidated = Weighted geometric mean off participants 4 = n number of criteria

C Consolidated 1 #REF! ### #REF!

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 5 1/5 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1/5 1 1/7 1/5 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1/5 7 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 5 1/7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

2 #REF! ### #REF! 3 #REF! ### #REF!

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1/5 1/5 1/5 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1/5 1 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 1 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 1/5 1/5 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 1/5 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 1/5 1/5 1/5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 1/5 1/5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

4 #REF! ### #REF! 5 #REF! ### #REF!

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 7 1/7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1/5 1 1/5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1/7 1 7 1/7 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 1/5 5 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 1/7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 1/5 1/5 1/5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1/7 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

6 #REF! ### #REF! 7 #REF! ### #REF!

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 7 1/7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1/7 1/7 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1/7 1 1/7 1/7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 7 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 1 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

8 #REF! ### #REF! 9 #REF! ### #REF!

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 1/7 1/7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 7 1/7 1/7 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 1/7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1/7 1 1/7 1/5 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 7 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 7 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

10 #REF! ### #REF! 11 #REF! ### #REF!

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 9 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1/5 1/5 1/7 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1/9 1 1 1/7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 1/7 1 1 1/9 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 1/5 7 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

22 of 24 422641086.xlsx-multInp
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process (10x10 Matrix) 4
Power Method (Dominant Eigenvalue)
Iterations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 12
1 1.00 #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
2 #REF! 1.00 #REF! #REF! - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
3 #REF! #REF! 1.00 #REF! - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
4 #REF! #REF! #REF! 1.00 - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
5 - - - - 1.00 - - - - - 0.10 #REF!
6 - - - - - 1.00 - - - - 0.10 #REF!
7 - - - - - - 1.00 - - - 0.10 #REF!
8 - - - - - - - 1.00 - - 0.10 #REF!
9 - - - - - - - - 1.00 - 0.10 #REF!
10 - - - - - - - - - 1.00 0.10 #REF!
Sum (col) #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scaling
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF!
Normalization
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - - - - - - #REF! #REF!
Eigenvalue: #REF!
Check #REF!
http://bpmsg.com

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial

3.0 Singapore License.
(You need to give credit to the author)
To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/sg/
or send a letter to Creative Commons,
171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.

Author: Klaus D. Goepel

http://bpmsg.com

Revisions
Date Comment
3/5/2012 1st draft based on AHPcalc vers 27.8.11 (single input);
allows input from max. 7 participants

11.12.2012 Algorithm of Power Method to solve Eigenvalue was modified

released (new sheet 8x8) resulting in much higher accuracy. By
default 12 iterations
08.02.2013
released final tests
2/19/2013 corrected formatting problem of weights in summary sheet
5/7/2013 Introduced weights for individual participants (weighted
geometric mean) in sheet multInp
Extend to 20 participants
5/8/2013 Consensus calculation in sheet Summary adapted to 20
participants, calculation of CR in summary sheet using
Alonso.
5/31/2013 In4 cell K17 was not referring to alpha in summary sheet,
cell F17 (weight of individual participants) was partly locked in
input sheets
8/12/2013 Values for different scales are calculated in the input sheets.
Input sheets allow decimal figure instead of 1-9 integer. Sheet
"tables" deleted