Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Private
public
A privately held company has fewer shareholders and its owners don’t have to
disclose much information about the company. Most small businesses are
privately held, with no exceptions that large companies can be private too,
like Domino’s Pizza and Hallmark Cards being privately held. Shares of private
companies can be reached through the owners only and that also at their
discretion. On the other hand, public companies have sold at least a portion of
their business to the public and thereby trade on an a stock exchange. This is why
doing an IPO is referred to going public.
Why go public?
The main reason for going public is to raise the good amount of cash through the
various financial avenues that are offered. Besides, the other factors include:
Public companies usually get better rates when they issue debt due to
increased scrutiny.
As long as there is market demand, a public company can always issue
more stock.
Trading in the open markets means liquidity.
Being Public makes it possible to implement things like employee stock
ownership plans, which help to attract top talent of the industry.
The historical record of the firm providing the Initial Public Offerings
Promoters, their reliability, and past records
Products offered by the firm and their potential going forward
Whether the firm has entered into a collaboration with the technological
firm
Project value and various techniques of sponsoring the plan
Productivity estimates of the project
Risk aspects engaged in the execution of the plan
The process involved in IPO:
UNDERWRITING:
IPO is done through the process called underwriting. Underwriting is the process
of raising money through debt or equity.
The first step towards doing an IPO is to appoint an investment banker. Although
theoretically a company can sell its shares on its own, on realistic terms, the
investment bank is the prime requisite. The underwriters are the middlemen
between the company and the public. There is a deal negotiated between the
two.
E.g. of underwriters: Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley to
mention a few.
The different factors that are considered with the investment bankers include:
The deal could be a firm commitment where the underwriter guarantees that a
certain amount will be raised by buying the entire offer and then reselling to the
public, or best efforts agreement, where the underwriter sells securities for the
company but doesn’t guarantee the amount raised. Also to off shoulder the risk in
the offering, there is a syndicate of underwriters that is formed led by one and
the others in the syndicate sell a part of the issue.
FILING WITH THE SEBI:
Once the deal is agreed upon, the investment bank puts together a registration
statement to be filed with the SEBI. This document contains information about
the offering as well as company information such as financial statements,
management background, any legal problems, where the money is to be used etc.
The SEBI then requires cooling off period, in which they investigate and make sure
all material information has been disclosed. Once the SEBI approves the offering,
a date (the effective date) is set when the stock will be offered to the public.
RED HERRING:
During the cooling off period, the underwriter puts together there herring. This is
an initial prospectus that contains all the information about the company except
for the offer price and the effective date. With the red herring in hand, the
underwriter and company attempt to hype and build up interest for the issue.
With the red herring, efforts are made where the big institutional investors are
targeted (also called the dog and pony show).
As the effective date approaches, the underwriter and the company decide on the
price of the issue. This depends on the company, the success of the various
promotional activities and most importantly the current market conditions. The
crux is to get the maximum in the interest of both parties.
Finally, the securities are sold on the stock market and the money is collected
from investors.
Factors of an IPO Price
Speculators can experience lucrative returns, as well as substantial losses, with
initial public stock offerings (IPOs). Before buying, experts suggest researching the
factors used determine the initial price range and then the circumstances that
cause the offering to settle at its final price. When researching the investments,
analysts also recommend examining the risks associated with the issuing firm’s
leadership pool as well as how the firm and its shareholders conduct business.
Several Factors Determine Pricing
Several key components determine IPO prices. These offerings are inherently
riskier than regular stock purchases. Speculators should deeply research firms
before committing their funds and clearly understand how an enterprise intends
to use the raised capital. By investigating company executives, potential stock
buyers can try to predict how those leaders will perform in their current positions.
The company’s financial history is also a key indicator of future performance.
Complex Dynamics Determine the Initial Price Range
To evaluate an IPO’s initial price range, stakeholders should research the facts
that the underwriter – a separate entity that helps firms manage trades – used to
set the rate. The underwriter evaluates complex metrics to arrive at the initial
price. Investors can learn the criteria used to determine this price by reviewing
the preliminary prospectus.
Investors should also consider how much company executives have financially
invested in the enterprise and whether there is room for the company to capture
more market share. Ideally, the firm will detail these plans in the prospectus. As a
loose guide, speculators can also compare the stock value of similar companies to
the IPO. A final factor for investors to consider is general stock market
performance during the offering.
Investor Sentiment Can Set the Final Price
Other factors can increase or decrease an IPOs final price. Once the issuing firm
publishes the preliminary prospectus with the initial IPO price, they will attempt
to increase the offering’s value. Firms traditionally promote their IPOs to
institutional investment companies and large investors. The underwriter will then
use the outcome to determine the IPO final price. If the issuing companies can
generate enough interest in the offering, the demand can increase the final price.
Conversely, if there is not enough interest, the underwriter will devalue the IPO
price.
As a result, investor sentiment – which is not necessarily logic-based – can overly
inflate an offering. Because an enterprise hires a star performer to sit on its board
of directors does not guarantee that the organization is actually under competent
management. These are the types of complex factors that investors must analyze
when deciding whether an IPO’s final price is warranted.
Risk Is an Important Factor
It is also important to valuate a company’s risk profile. Firms publish this
information in the prospectus risk factor section. Experts strongly caution
potential investors to balance risk and earnings potential when considering a buy
in. Political instability at a firm’s primary locale can signal trouble in the near
future, and lack of supplier diversity can cause production problems. Legislators
require each firm issuing an initial public offering to include a detailed risk factor
disclosure in their prospectus. Extensive financial obligations and costly, time-
consuming litigation can indicate future trouble for a firm and its IPO stock.
Some experts suggest observing how a company’s stock performs once the
excitement over the initial IPO announcement subsides. This can prevent
investors from waiting indefinitely to break even if the stock devalues quickly.
Leadership Can Also Make a Difference
Potential IPO buyers should know who runs the company behind the offering.
Executive biographies can provide an accurate performance indicator. If an
executive’s former company filed for bankruptcy, there is a good chance that the
individual is not fiscally adept. Additionally, executive legal histories can suggest
potential pitfalls such as whether the company heads follow compliance
guidelines. Investors should also research a company’s majority shareholders to
gain insight into the firm’s corporate culture and ethics.
Overall, Risk Is the Determining Factor
Failure to actively review and refine corporate governance is an increased
investment risk. An incompetent board of directors can fail to manage company
controls, which then do not suit current operations. Additionally, if a firm does
not indicate corporate governance policies in the prospectus, this can indicate
subversion and, in effect, a high-risk investment. Another warning sign is if a firm
underrepresents its minority shareholders.
Corporate governance is critical for several reasons. Proper controls make it
easier to obtain needed funding and reduces the cost of borrowing. It also
improves an organization’s status and increases a firm’s standard operating
efficiency. Most importantly, enterprises that practice appropriate corporate
governance are more attentive to shareholder concerns.
Investors can win or lose big with an initial public offering. Consequently, financial
experts recommend exercising due diligence before committing funds to an IPO.
To do this, speculators can determine an IPO’s initial price range by reviewing the
preliminary prospectus and then using that information to make sure that the
underwriter’s final appraisal accurately represents the offering’s worth.
Leadership traits as well as a company’s ownership culture can also help investors
identify winners and mitigate risks.
How to identify good, bad IPO
According to CRISIL research for fiscal 2018, Polycab had a market share of
approximately 18 per cent of the organized wires and cables industry and
approximately 12 per cent of the total wires and cables industry in India. The
company has 24 manufacturing facilities, including their 2 joint ventures with Techno
Electromech and Trafigura located across the states of Gujarat, Maharashtra and
Uttarakhand and the union territory of Daman and Diu.
PIL has pan India presence with distribution network comprises over 2,800 authorized
dealers and distributors and 30 warehouses as of December 31, 2018. The company's
customers include institutional clients such as L&T Construction and government
clients such as Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. Exports account for around 3.4 per
cent of the total revenue for the company as on December 2018 and the company
exports to more than 40 countries in the world, mostly to the US, EU and Gulf region.
The following table summarises the valuation of the company against its different
peers.
Details ( As
per FY18 )
Company Market Cap Total Mcap/Sale P/B P/E
(Rs Cr) Revenue s Ratio Ratio
(Cr)
Polycab Limited 7997 6,986.13 1.14 2.17 21.42
Havells India Limited 47898 8,269.01 5.79 12.6 59.3
Bajaj Electrical Limited 5564 4,695.96 1.18 5.74 35.16
Crompton Greaves 14615 4,105.12 3.56 16.83 39.51
Consumer Electrical Limited
KEI Industries Limited 3247 3,503.12 0.93 5.01 19.61
V-Guard Industries Limited 9480 2,335.26 4.06 11.82 70.61
No of Shares
Promoters GeneralPublic FinancialInstitutions
NBanksMutualFunds ForeignInstitutions Others
3% 2% 2%
11%
13%
69%
About the company
NCL is engaged into manufacturing of bromine and lithium-based specialty
chemicals. It started its business operations in 1991, at Mahape, Navi Mumbai with a
few bromine-based compounds and lithium salts. Over the years company has
expanded its range of products to 198 comprising of 181 organic chemicals and 17
inorganic chemicals.
The company’s product can be broadly divided into two categories that are organic
chemicals and inorganic chemicals.
Profit for the year/period 12.22 10.50 7.68 5.18 5.09 3.64
Earnings per equity share 6.09* 5.25 3.84 2.59 11.30 8.10
(In INR)
14%
66%