Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Publish Date:
Revision Number:
UP2-2016-003(05/18)-MJ
In the newest edition of University Physics Volume 2, there is a 2 page count decrease
when compared to the last version. This is attributed to padding changes in the
document as well as errata revisions.
Errata: Below is a table containing submitted errata, and the resolutions that OpenStax
has provided for this latest text.
Resolution
Location Detail Notes Error Type
Our reviewers
accepted this
Preface Update contributor list. change. Other
In chapter 2 of university
physics, Figure 2:15 The
Ch 2: The Kinetic Maxwell-Boltzmann
Theory of Gases, distribution...
Sec 4: Distribution The figure has a wrong Thank you for
of Molecular label. The x-axis should be the feedback! Other factual
Speeds, Figure labeled speed rather than We've corrected inaccuracy in
2.15 velocity. this error. content
Ch 2: The Kinetic
Theory of Gases,
Sec 4: Distribution
of Molecular The x label for figure 2.16 Our reviewers Other factual
Speeds, Figure should be speed instead of accepted this inaccuracy in
2.16 velocity change. content
Again in Volume 2, pg. 111, Revise the 3rd
the textbook states, “We sentence in the
will see that the first law of 2nd paragraph
thermodynamics puts a of the
limit on the amount of work Introduction as
that can be delivered by the follows:
Ch 3: The First Law system when the amount of
of internal energy change or "...affect how
Thermodynamics, heat transfer is work is done by Incorrect calculation
Introduction constrained.” This the system in or solution
statement is confusing. The that process.
First law alone does not We will see that
constrain the amount of the first law of
work that can be delivered thermodynamics
by a system. The first law explains that a
tells us that the change in change in the
the internal energy of a internal energy
system can be in the form of a system
of heat and work, but it is comes from
the second law that tells us changes in heat
that heat cannot be zero. It or work.
is the combination of both Understanding
the first and second law the laws... "
that constrains the amount
of work that a system can
be delivered.
In Volume 2, chapter 3 (pg.
111), the textbook states
“Heat is energy in transit,
and it can be used to do
work. It can also be Revise the 1st
converted into any other two sentences
form of energy.” Heat is the of the
transfer of energy due to a Introduction as
temperature difference follows:
between two systems. Heat
cannot do work. The "Heat is the
change in the internal transfer of
energy of a system can be energy due to a
in the form of heat and temperature
work or just heat, but it difference
does not make sense to between two
say heat can be used to do systems. Heat
work. Heat describes the describes the
process of converting from process of
one form of energy into converting from
Ch 3: The First Law another; it does not make one form of
of sense to say heat is energy into Other factual
Thermodynamics, converted into another form another. A car inaccuracy in
Introduction of energy. engine, ... " content
I found the following errors
Ch 3: The First Law in the online textbook's
of answer key: Ch 3: #97, part
Thermodynamics, (b) should be 0.026m^3, Thank you for
Challenge 0.074m^3, part (c) should the feedback!
Problems, Exercise be 1220K, 430K, part (d) We've corrected
97 should be 30.5KJ. this error. None
Ch 4: The Second Volume 2, Chapter 4, Revise exercise
Law of Problem 27, Page 176 This 27 as follows: Incorrect calculation
Thermodynamics, question is in Section 4.2, or solution
End of Chapter Heat Engines. To answer An engine
Exercises this question, you must absorbs three
assume that the engine is a times as much
Carnot engine, but the heat as it
Carnot cycle isnt discharges. The
introduced until Section work done by
4.5. We recommend adding the engine per
the word Carnot before cycle is 50 J.
engine and moving the Calculate (a) the
question to section 4.5. efficiency of the
Also, a more general issue engine, (b) the
for many problems in heat absorbed
volume 2 chapter 4: per cycle, and
Questions involving heat (c) the heat
engines, heat pumps, and discharged per
refrigerators use the verb cycle.
reject and its various forms
to refer to the process of Revise "reject"
heat leaving the system to "discharge"
into a heat reservoir. The thoughout.
text of Chapter 4 doesnt
use this word at all, instead
using exhaust, discharge,
and dump (and their
various forms). After some
cursory searching, our
team found that that the
verb reject is used to refer
to this process primarily by
mechanical engineers. You
may want to consider
rewording these questions.
Charles-Augustin de
Coulomb's name has two
Ch 5: Electric errors: the hyphen is Thank you for
Charges and missing and an e has been the feedback.
Fields, Sec 1: added to the end of We've corrected
Electric Charge "Augustin". this error. Typo
As I was reading the Revise the
physics volume 2 textbook, solution to
I noticed in chapter 5 exercise 43 as
section 5.2 (conductors, follows:
Ch 5: Electric insulators, and charging by
Charges and induction) the solution to 5.00 × 10^-9 C
Fields, Sec 2: one of the practice problem (6.242 × 10^18
Conductors, is wrong. e/C) = 3.121 ×
Insulators, and 10^10 e;
Charging by I did the calculations and 3.121 × 10^10 e
Induction, Exercise the amount of excess +1.0000 × Incorrect calculation
43 electrons should be 10^12 e = or solution
3.12*10^10 1.0312 × 10^12
and the total electrons e
should be 1.0312*10^12.
The problem is the
miscalculations of 5*10^-9
C (6.242*10^18 e/C). The
answer should be
3.12*10^10 electrons
instead of 3.12*10^19
electrons.
Ch 5: Electric
Charges and
Fields, Sec 3: Answer for part C should Our reviewers
Coulomb's Law, be -3.84E-5i - 88.3E- accepted this
Exercise 49 5j. See attached file. change. None
The variable r is used to
represent a ratio. This can
be confusing to students,
as when they see r in a
Ch 5: Electric formula concerning
Charges and Coulomb's Law, they will Thank you for
Fields, Sec 3: associate r with a distance. the feedback! General/pedagogical
Coulomb's Law, Please pick another We've corrected suggestion or
Exercise 57 symbol. this error. question
Just before Eq. (5.5) and
again just before Eq. (5.6)
there is a typo. The
quantity in the denominator
Ch 5: Electric is squared when it should
Charges and not be. Specifically [ z^2 + Thank you for
Fields, Sec 4: (d/2)^2 ]^2 should be [ z^2 the feedback!
Electric Field, + (d/2)^2 ] without the We've corrected
Example 5.4 square after the bracket. this error. Typo
Ch 5: Electric
Charges and Thank you for
Fields, Sec 4: Answers to both part A and the feedback!
Electric Field, B are incorrect, see We've corrected Incorrect calculation
Exercise 65 attached file. this error. or solution
Ch 5: Electric
Charges and Just before Eq. (5.12), the Thank you for
Fields, Sec 5: lower limit (0) placed the feedback.
Calculating Electric outside the square bracket This equation
Fields of Charge should be typeset lower, appears
Distributions, near the bottom corner of correctly in
Example 5.5 the bracket. webview. Typo
Ch 5: Electric The distances a and b are Thank you for
Charges and switched in the stated the feedback!
Fields, Sec 5: answer. Please see We've corrected Incorrect calculation
Calculating Electric attached file. this error. or solution
Fields of Charge
Distributions,
Exercise 89
Figure 5.34 and
accompanying text
regarding the net electric
field of a dipole in a uniform
external electric field are
confusing, if not wrong. At
the very least, the dipole
moment is drawn pointing
the wrong way in the
diagram, and should be
fixed.
In terms of suggested
corrections, I confess I
don't know what to make of
all this. At the bare
minimum, the arrow
representing the dipole
moment needs to be
reversed to point from -q to
+q. I would like to see the
caption expanded to better
describe exactly what the
diagram is trying to show
us. The contradictions in
the text should be
corrected, but since I'm
uncertain what the diagram
is trying to convey or how it
was generated, I can't
really suggest a fix. Finally,
the implication that the
equation given is the
electric field of a dipole IN
GENERAL is incorrect, and
the text needs to be revised
to clarify that the equation
given only applies along
the perpendicular bisector
of the line between the
charges.