Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FACTS IN ISSUE
Facts which a plaintiff must prove in order to establish his claim and those
facts which the defendant set up by him, but only when the fact alleged by
one party is not admitted by the other
× Facts admitted, impliedly/expressly, are NOT facts in issue
To determine the relevance of the evidence: pleadings must be first looked
into
The party upon whom is cast the burden of proof is obligated to prove his
own case
Party having the burden of proving a fact is not required to introduce
evidence if the necessary proof is introduced by his adversary
Neither is he under any obligation to prove that which is not made an issue
in the case by the pleadings
1
By the amount of evidence required by law
Refers either to constitutional provisions, statutes or rules
Criminal case Proof beyond reasonable doubt
moral certainty only is required
degree of proof which produces conviction in an
unprejudiced mind
Civil case Preponderance of evidence
superior weight of evidence on the issues involved
lies, the court may consider all the facts and
circumstances of the case, the witnesses’ manner
of testifying, their intelligence, their means and
opportunity of knowing the facts to which they are
testifying, the nature of the facts to which they
testify, the probability or improbability of their
testimony, their interest or want of interest, and
also their personal credibility so far as the same
may legitimately appear upon the trial
Administrative case Substantial evidence
amount of relevant evidence which a reasonable
mind might accept as adequate to justify a
conclusion
Other Clear and convincing evidence
2
BURDEN OF EVIDENCE
that logical necessity which rests on a party at any particular time during the
trial to create a prima facie case in favor, or to overthrow one when created
against him
BURDEN OF PROOF BURDEN OF EVIDENCE
Never shifts Shifts to one party when the other has
produced sufficient evidence to be
entitled as a matter of law to a ruling
in his favor
Remains throughout the entire case no necessary connection with the trial;
where the pleadings originally placed determined by the progress of the trial
Party who substantially asserts the rests on the party who has the
affirmative of the issue affirmative of the issue
3
In any proceeding, this lies at first on the party against whom the
judgment of the court would be given
Resort must be had to the allegations of the pleadings in a given case to
determine who affirms
Generally framed that the plaintiff is the affirmant/actor who must prove
the ultimate issue
o Reason: he who seeks to invoke the action of the court in his behalf in
the first instance
5
C. OFFER OF DOCUMENTARY AND OBJECT EVIDENCE
a. Offered after a party’s testimonial evidence
b. Done orally, unless the court allows it to be written; purpose must
be stated
c. After all the witnesses have given their testimonies on the witness
stand, documentary & object evidence are formally offered
d. Whenever a writing is shown to a witness, it may be inspected by
the adverse party
D. Reason for requiring that evidence be formally offered
a. Inform the court what the party making the offer intends to prove
b. Necessary in order to preserve an exception to a ruling of trial
court
c. GR: party offering evidence must show relevancy, materiality and
competency
d. XPN: if evidence does not appear to be relevant/competent or
propounds to witness an interrogatory which appears to call an
irrelevant answer, MUST MAKE A FORMAL OFFER OF PROOF
SHOWING WHAT TESTIMONY HE PROPOSES TO ADDUCE &
INTENTION TO PROVE OTHER FACTOR WHICH WILL
RENDER EVIDENCE RELEVANT
6
e. Purpose for which apparently irrelevant evidence offered must be
disclosed
Functions of offering of evidence:
a. Enable trial judge to know the purpose/s for which the proponent is
presenting evidence
b. Allow opposing parties to examine evidence and object to its
admissibility
c. Facilitate review by the appellate court, which will not be required
to review documents not previously scrutinized by the trial court
E. Reason for requiring that the purpose for which the evidence must
be specified
a. Reason:
a. Evidence may be admissible for special purpose, but not
generally
b. may be admissible for one purpose
c. evidence may be rejected if it is offered for several purposes
d. the court may exclude evidence, although admissible, for which
it is offered and such exclusion is not reversible error: if purpose
is improper
7
b. Rulings:
a. Evidence is inadmissible generally but admissible for a specific
purpose, purpose must be stated, else, the court mat exclude
b. Evidence is composed of several items, may be included, but
not when there are objections
F. Imperfect offer of Evidence
a. Instances:
b. If the fact offered is admissible ONLY for a certain purpose OR when
taken in connection with another fact
c. Two or more facts/ purposes are stated in a single offer (one-
admissible, one-defective) – counsel must make a separation
d. Offer of fact for a specified inadmissible purpose
e. Multiple admissibility: offer for a specified admissible purpose is
sufficient, even though there was an inadmissible purpose not named
G. Formal offer of REJECTED exhibits
a. Unite records which have been rejected, such rejection must be
permitted by the judge a quo to be attached to the record even if
not admitted > court adquem may exhibits such and whether
rejection was erroneous
8
H. Renewal of Offer
a. Where evidence is inadmissible when offered and excluded, but later
becomes admissible, must be re-offered unless such will be declared
useless by the court
b. If once ruled out, must be timely made
I. Failure to renew offer=waiver
a. Court identifies an initially incompetent evidence to be material
and informs the party offering before evidence is closed but the
latter declines=waiver of former exception
J. Withdrawal of evidence
a. Withdrawal is NOT a matter of right
b. May withdraw an offer at any time before the court has passed on
its admissibility
c. Court may refuse to permit a party to withdraw evidence elicited
on cross-examination
d. Party may not complain of withdrawal where he accompanies
objection with declaration that he will not use it
e. May withdraw improper, irrelevant, immaterial
f. May withdraw evidence he has issued when it is not properly
connected
9
K. Tender of excluded evidence (offer of proof)
a. The court may have the list attached as part of record
b. If orally excluded: offeror must state the name & other
circumstances of the proposed testimony
L. Offer of Proof of Documentary/Object Evidence
a. Offeror/party producing the evidence may have the same attached to or
made part of the record
a. Purpose: protect, for purposes of appeal, the party whose evidence is
rejected
M. Offer of Proof of Oral Evidence
a. If orally excluded: offeror must state the name & other circumstances of
the proposed testimony and what counsel expects to prove by such
evidence
N. Presence of witness necessary
a. Requisites:
a. Offer to prove
b. Witnesses must be present
10
O. When statement of what counsel expects to prove unnecessary
Offer of proof is NOT necessary where the question is proper in form and
clearly admits of an answer relative to the issue and favorable to the
party who called such witness
11
II. OBJECTION TO EVIDENCE
A. Rule on Objection
To stop an answer to a question put to a witness
Prevent the receipt of a document in evidence until the court has ruled
as to its admissibility
Function:
a. Signify that there is an issue of law
b. Give notice to the terms of the issue
B. Time for interposing objection
Evidence offered orally/in writing
Objection must be made immediately after the offer is made,
stating the grounds
In writing: objected within 3 days after notice of offer, unless
otherwise stated
Question propounded during oral examination
Made as soon as the grounds therefore shall become
reasonably apparent
From the question addressed/ answered by the witness OR
from the presentation of proof of inadmissibility of evidence
Purpose: so that the party propounding it may have the
opportunity to amend it if the same is open to objection made
12
An objection to the form of a question as leading must be
interposed before the question is answered
C. Right of party’s counsel to object
TC is without power to deprive the counsel to make objections
Initiative is left to the counsel
If party has 2 counsels, examination in chief of a witness done by the
other does not warrant the court in refusing to receive objections by the
other on cross-examination
D. Objection by trial judge not commendable
Objection of a TC judge in objecting a question on CE and then
sustaining the same = not commendable
E. Mode of making objections
State the grounds for objection. Specified
Purpose: judge may rule without searching for possible objections
a) General Objection – incompetent, illegal, irrelevant, improper
Will not avail if part of the evidence objected to is
admissible
Sufficient if ground is so manifest
Evidence en bloc – objection of the same without pointing out specifically
the portion claimed to be inadmissible = properly overruled
13
If party fails to object to evidence which is partially admissible is deemed
to have waived his right to object
b) Specific Objection – states how/why the evidence is irrelevant/
incompetent
A specific objection overrules will be effective to the extent of grounds
specified
F. Waiver of objections
Objections may be waived expressly
Implied waiver = failure to make objection on time
Failure to object will render admissible an incompetent evidence
Failure to object is not a waiver of the right to question legal effect of
evidence
G. Striking out answer
Witness answers before the adverse party objects; and if objection is
meritorious, court shall sustain the objection and order the answer be
stricken off
On proper motion, court may also order the striking out of answers
which are incompetent/irrelevant/improper
Failure to interpose timely objection = waiver of right
14
H. When motion to strike out improper
A party cannot insist that competent/relevant evidence be stricken out
for the ff reasons:
Weight
Sufficiency
Credibility
Because it proves unfavorable the statement of a witness
The court may, upon motion, strike out an answer where meaning of
the part left is not changed
But cannot strike out qualifying words in the answer which will change
the same into a positive statement, or to strike out part of answer so as
to leave it unintelligible
I. Time for motion to strike
Inexcusable delay in moving to strike out objection is a ground for
denying the motion
When the court may strike out:
on its own: Incompetent/irrelevant evidence, even though the
same had been previously admitted without objection
upon its motion: strike out evidence improperly admitted at any
time during or before close of trial or during the closing of
argument of counsel
15
J. Form of motion to strike
A motion to strike out evidence is properly denied if it is not sufficiently
definite.
Must be specific as to what evidence is to strike out
But where the party is not misled as to the evidence objected to, may be
made in general motion
Motion to strike out consists of 2 sheets of paper, 1 is admissible =
motion denied
Where only part is admissible, without specifying the particular part =
general motion to strike is denied
o This rule is INAPPLICABLE where the admissible portion is
preliminary or mere incident of the testimony and not
controverted
K. When repetition of objection is unnecessary
GR: Single objection to a CLASS OF EVIDENCE when first offered =
sufficient
XPN: Where subsequent evidence is not of the same kind as that
previously admitted over objection
16
L. Where evidence admitted on condition
And its competency is to be proved by further evidence and condition is
not fulfilled =
a) objection formerly imposed must be repeated or
b) motion to strike out evidence must be made
where the court admits documents over objection, with a statement
that the objection might be renewed if materiality is not shown,
subsequently other evidence bearing materiality of such documents is
offered, objecting party waives objection unless renewed.
M. Where the same evidence is re-offered
At the last stage of the trial, it must be renewed
If offered under new developments and admitted without objection,
failure to object was waiver of any ground of objection
N. Ruling of the court
Must be given immediately after objection is made
Unless the court may desire to take time to be informed on the question
asked
Ruling shall always be made during trial and at such time as will give
the party against whom it is made an opportunity to meet the situation
presented by the ruling
17
If the court reserves it ruling on an objection, objecting party must
request a ruling, otherwise he would be deemed to have waived the
objection
Ruling must be clear and definite
Reason for the exclusion is unclear, counsel may request the court for its
reason
Ruling of the court on the objection does not preclude the counsel from
securing reconsideration
Court need not state the reason for sustaining/overruling an objection
If based on 2/more grounds, a ruling sustaining the objection on
1/some of them must specify the ground/s
O. New trial not generally allowed on improper admission or rejection
of evidence
If it shall appear to the court which such objection is raised that,
independently of the evidence objected to and admitted, there was
sufficient evidence to justify the decision OR if rejected evidence
has been received, it ought not have varied the decision
Otherwise, new trial should be granted.
18