Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4 Department of Accounting at the Federal University of Espírito Santo, UFES – Vitória/ES, BRA
5 Center for Social and Applied Sciences at the Mackenzie Presbiterian University, M – São Paulo/SP, BRA
Abstract — The choice of an ideal location for a dry port are related to space occupation. These authors point out
is a complex decision, in which the impacts generated that due to this occupation, cargo movement activities to
lead to the need to consider multiple criterion, and from the port are being increasingly directed to the
subcriterion and points of view, creating group decision interior (secondary zone), using dry ports and
problems. In such complex problems and decisions transportation corridors to attend these activities.
uncertainty is often present. Therefore, this study employs The dry ports are inserted in this context as a link
the Fuzzy-AHP hybrid method in order to minimize the between the port and its hinterlands (areas of commercial
uncertainties arising from the judgments and operation of influence of a port), assisting the operationalization,
the multicriterion method. The study involved in its movement and distribution of cargoes, being an extension
approach companies and municipalities of the region of of port activities in the interior, acting in the legalization
Greater Vitória in the State of Espírito Santo (ES) and its and nationalization of loads with the consenting and
potential hinterlands. The results indicate that the intervening agencies (RODRIGUE et al., 2013).
planning of actions and policies aimed at regional In this sense, the location of facilities is an important
development and organization of space can benefit from decision for the companies, because they have high costs,
this study, because the approach proposed is adaptable to and once implemented, poorly performed investments are
different contexts and particularities. difficult to reverse (CHEN; NOTTEBOOM, 2014). The
Keywords— Dry port; Location of facilities; location of dry ports may be associated with the need to
Multicriterion method. form clusters with load-carrying activities, which must
meet and be close to the hinterlands (VAN DEN BERG;
I. INTRODUCTION LANGEN, 2011).
The logistics of cargo handling and distribution has The decision process on the location of facilities
represented a growing challenge for organizations in covers the identification, analysis, evaluation and
recent years due to difficulties in the operationalization of selection among the alternatives (BENTALEB et al.,
deliveries in urban centers (BONTEMPO et al., 2014). 2016). Because of the complexity involved in analyzing
For Nguyen and Notteboom (2016), accessibility stakeholder judgments, based on the definition of
constraints influence the performance of the cargo flow, criterion and subcriterion, it is necessary to use multi-
as well as restrict meeting the needs of stakeholders. criterion methods that collect and measure these
In this sense, Bask et al. (2014) emphasize that the judgments (SAATY, 1977).
evolution of the means of commercialization of products, Conventional approaches to facility location
has demanded solutions of movement that consider problems, such as the Varignon mechanical model,
multiple objectives in the distribution of loads. According Hakimi method, p-median problem, multi-product
to Chen and Notteboom (2014), cargo handling activities enabled plant problem, and the center of gravity method,
have become an important part of the transportation tend to be less effective in dealing with the imprecise or
system. According to Feng et al. (2013), these activities vague nature of the linguistic estimate (BENTALEB et
contribute directly to regional development because they al., 2016, NGUYEN, NOTTEBOOM, 2016, KOLAR,
25.53%
observe that the respondents consider the subcriterion OPE 5
25.38%
accessibility (GEO 1) more relevant compared to the
subcriterion geographical limitations (GEO 2). São Mateus Linhares Aracruz Colatina
42.1% 29.8% 17% 11.1%
Tab. 4: Sum of the rows and columns of the sub criterion
Fig. 4: Result by FAHP method
of the Geographic criterion (GEO)
Sum lines
These changes indicate how important and important
l m u
it is to adjust inaccuracies, such as changing the priority
0.74 1.25 1.76
between economic and social criterion, suggests that
2.32 5 -2.85
planning and action should occur initially to people, not
Sum of column sums
investment. This type of information is necessary to not
2.32 5 -2.85
only guide what should be done when planning a dry port
deployment, but what should be done in the short,
Tab. 5: Vector of results by normalized subcriterion
medium and long term in order to keep the business
Normalized W’ viable, and can serve needs of the hinterlands.
GEO 1 GEO 2
0.7685 0.6397 VIII. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
In this way, all the elements obtained by the AHP The evolution of cargo distribution into hinterlands
(Figure 3), presented a value between 0 and 1, these can be seen as a cycle in the ongoing developments in
values indicate an acceptable degree of pertinence. intermodal transport, since dry ports are necessarily an
However, it was possible to verify and verify that the extension of some port activities. For this reason, the
respondents evaluated the s ocial criterion (SOC) as the geographical characteristics linked to the modal
most important, in contrast to the result presented by the availability and the capacity of service of the transport
AHP, in which the Economic criterion was elected. corridors have an important role to play in defining this
Núñez (2016) attests to these results, affirming in his development.
study that the social criterion directly influences the
productivity of the dry port, and that the labor, therefore,