I am going to be talking about that the movie Gravity has Newton’s laws.

But you have to pay close attention for you

could notice it .

My evidence one is going to be connecting with Newton’s first law. Clip number 2( 0:35- 1:55) shows that Sandra was

drifting in space and she doesn’t stop, and that shows that she was in motion. That’s what Newton’s first law says an

object that in motion stays in motion, an object at rest stays at rest unless an unbalanced force. Vocabulary words that are

important to use are force and velocity. Something that I can relate to this that happened in class is that a book was laid

down in the table and the book was a rest. So we used a force which is a push something basic, and that’s an unbalanced

force and that’s the reason why it connects.

My second evidence is going to be connecting with Newton’s second law. Newton’s second law saying that force and

acceleration has a direct relationship. Mass has an inverse relationship with acceleration. Vocabulary words that are

important to use are force,mass, acceleration inverse and direct. Clip number 3 at (1:43) George let’s go of the rope and

he goes into space. Something that I can relate this and that something that happened in class is that we used someone

with a big mass and someone with a less mass. The more mass person pulled each other with the less mass person and

we saw that the less person came closer to the person with more mass. It connects to 2nd law because when George

let’s go of the rope which didn’t make Sandra accelerate.​ ​The person with more mass pulled the other person with lesser

mass which didn’t make the person with less mass went more farther than the person with more mass.
My third evidence is going to be connecting with newton’s 3rd law. Newton’s third law​ ​for every force there is an equal and

opposite force. A clip that relates with newton’s third law is, clip number 5 at (0:56) showing that she was using a fire

extinguisher to move around. Something that I can relate to this that happened in class is that when we were on the carts

and we had a heavy mass and we had to throw it and see how far we go and that was an opposite force.

In conclusion I think that the movie gravity shows newton’s laws. And those where the clips that showed newton’s laws.

1 2 3 4
Claim is not clear and/or is not Claim is clear, but is not Claim is clear and detailed.
No separated from the evidence separated from the evidence Claim is a statement only,
CLAIM Claim and/or reasoning. and/or reasoning. separated from the evidence
and/or reasoning.

Does not provide evidence for all Provides relevant but Provides relevant and
No parts of claim, or only provides insufficient evidence to support sufficient evidence to support
EVIDENCE Evidence irrelevant evidence (evidence claim or also includes some the claim. The evidence has
1 that does not support claim). inappropriate evidence. detailed description

Does not provide reasoning, or Some attempt is made to relate All reasoning is related to the
No only provides reasoning that evidence to claim, but claim for each specific piece
REASON- Reasoning does not link evidence to claim. reasoning is missing some of evidence. Reasoning is
ING 1 Reasoning lacks detail. pieces. Uses some physics detailed and uses plenty of
Reasoning references vocabulary. Reasoning vocabulary. Reasoning
references something from clearly refers to something
 something from class but it is not class and gives a minor from class and makes a full
fully explained analysis of it analysis of it

Unable Proofreading needed. Too many There are minor errors in There are no errors in
to errors in spelling, punctuation, spelling, punctuation, grammar, spelling, punctuation,
CLARITY 1 Understand grammar, and mechanics that and/or mechanics that do not grammar, or mechanics. Well
interfere with the flow of your interfere with the done!
writing. understanding.

Does not provide evidence for all Provides relevant but Provides relevant and
No parts of claim, or only provides insufficient evidence to support sufficient evidence to support
EVIDENCE Evidence irrelevant evidence (evidence claim or also includes some the claim. The evidence has
2 that does not support claim). inappropriate evidence. detailed description

1 2 3 4
Does not provide reasoning, or Some attempt is made to relate All reasoning is related to the
No only provides reasoning that evidence to claim, but claim for each specific piece
REASON- Reasoning does not link evidence to claim. reasoning is missing some of evidence. Reasoning is
ING 2 Reasoning lacks detail. pieces. Uses some physics detailed and uses plenty of
Reasoning references vocabulary. Reasoning vocabulary. Reasoning
something from class but it is not references something from clearly refers to something
fully explained class and gives a minor from class and makes a full
analysis of it analysis of it

Unable Proofreading needed. Too many There are minor errors in There are no errors in
to errors in spelling, punctuation, spelling, punctuation, grammar, spelling, punctuation,
CLARITY 2 Understand grammar, and mechanics that and/or mechanics that do not grammar, or mechanics. Well
interfere with the flow of your interfere with the done!
writing. understanding.
 Does not provide evidence for all Provides relevant but Provides relevant and
No parts of claim, or only provides insufficient evidence to support sufficient evidence to support
EVIDENCE Evidence irrelevant evidence (evidence claim or also includes some the claim. The evidence has
3 that does not support claim). inappropriate evidence. detailed description

Does not provide reasoning, or Some attempt is made to relate All reasoning is related to the
No only provides reasoning that evidence to claim, but claim for each specific piece
REASON- Reasoning does not link evidence to claim. reasoning is missing some of evidence. Reasoning is
ING 3 Reasoning lacks detail. pieces. Uses some physics detailed and uses plenty of
Reasoning references vocabulary. Reasoning vocabulary. Reasoning
something from class but it is not references something from clearly refers to something
fully explained class and gives a minor from class and makes a full
analysis of it analysis of it

1 2 3 4
Unable Proofreading needed. Too many There are minor errors in There are no errors in
to errors in spelling, punctuation, spelling, punctuation, grammar, spelling, punctuation,
CLARITY 3 Understand grammar, and mechanics that and/or mechanics that do not grammar, or mechanics. Well
interfere with the flow of your interfere with the done!
writing. understanding.

Total Points/40= ​ Claim __3____ / 4

Evidence 1 __3____ / 4
Reasoning 1 __2.5____ / 4
Clarity 1 __2.5____ / 4
 Evidence 2 __2.5____ / 4
Reasoning 2 __3____ / 4
Clarity 2 __2.5____ / 4

Evidence 3 __3____ / 4
Reasoning 3 __2.5____ / 4
Clarity 3 __2.5____ / 4

Total __27____ / 40

Comments: ​Juan, I think you did this in a hurry. It would have been a lot better if you took
your time, tried to incorporate some vocabulary, and really gave a more detailed reasoning.
Overall, it’s a pretty bare writing without much detail. Also, you have an issue with Clarity.
You have a lot of misspellings, not capitalizing things, comma problems, and run-ons.
They lowered your score a bit. Next time, put in more time and effort to do a good job.