Professional Documents
Culture Documents
bone
&
Biology of fracture
healing
2
3
Sharpey’s fibers
Thick bundles of collagenous fibers that pass from the periosteum
into the basic external circumferential lamellae. They fix the periosteum
firmly to the surface of the bone especially at the junction of epiphysis &
shaft of the long bones.
3
4
Nutrient foramina of limb bones are directed according to the rhyme ‘To the
elbow I go, from the knee I flee’. (Reverse situation to start with, reversal
due to selective growth pattern)
A. Periosteal-diaphyseal-metaphyseal system
a. Diaphyses & metaphyses of have three sources of blood supply:
1. Nutrient Artery
2. Arteries penetrating epi- & metaphysis
3. Periosteal arteries
Together these vessels form ‘medullary vascular system’ and thus
supplies most of periosteum covered bone (centrifugal blood flow)
b. Periosteum also has an elaborate vascular system. A vascular
plexus lies over the surface of the outer fibrous layer &
anastamose with vessels in skeletal muscles and with vessels in
cambium layer. In children these vessels communicate with intra-
osseous vessels. Under certain circumstances periosteal vessels
form an important source of blood supply to skeletal muscle.
Thus crush injuries of muscle are less likely to cause ischemic
damage if muscle- periosteal vascular connections remain intact.
The anastomosis b/w the medullary vascular and periosteal system gives the
diaphysis & metaphysic a ‘Dual blood supply’. This is important in various
clinical conditions (bone /soft tissue injuries, reaming of medullary canal
etc.).
B. Epiphyseal- Physeal blood supply
4
5
5
6
Woven & lamellar bone differs with regard to their formation, composition,
organization and mechanical properties.
Because of its irregular collagen fibril orientation, relatively high cell and
water content and irregular pattern of mineralization, woven bone is more
flexible, more easily deformed, and weaker than lamellar bone. The almost
random alignment of the collagen fibrils makes the mechanical properties of
woven bone similar regardless of the orientation of the applied forces i.e. it
behaves isotropically when loaded. In contrast, lamellar bone behaves
anisotropically; its mechanical properties differ depending on the orientation
of the applied forces.
Bone cells
They originate from two cell lines: a mesenchymal stem cell line and
a hematopoietic stem cell line.
1. Mesenchymal stem cell line
a. Undifferentiated cells (Pre-osteoblasts)
b. Osteoblasts
c. Bone linig cells
6
7
d. Osteocytes
2. Hematopoietic stem cell line
a. Circulating or marrow monocytes
b. Pre-osteoclasts
c. Osteoclasts
7
8
Bone matrix
It has great durability and stability. Matrix makes up > 90% of total
volume of the lamellar bone (remainder is cells, cell processes, blood
8
9
Organic matrix
- Collagens, mainly Type I ( small amounts of type V & XII)…90%
- Non collagenous glycoproteins & proteoglycans……………..10%
- Also contain growth factors like TGF-Beta, FGF, IGF & BMP’s
- These proteins & growth factors incorporated into the matrix of bone are
responsible for the maintenance of normal bone remodeling process & they
give bone matrix its osteogenic potential which make bone grafting possible
- Heritable abnormalities of Type I collagen leads to Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Inorganic matrix
- Consists of hydroxyapatite, a crystal form of calcium & phosphate and water
- Constitutes 8-9% of bone
- 99% Ca, 85% Ph., 40-60% Na and Mg are associated with bone mineral
crystals
- Hydroxyapatite crystals are deposited in the ‘hole zones’ formed within
overlapping regions of type I collagen molecules & later are spread along the
fibers by secondary nucleation
- Osteonectin (glycopr. in org. matrix) binds hydroxyapatite to the collagen
- Osteopontin (phosphopr. in org. matrix) binds cells to bone
- Osteocalcin (glycopr. in org. matrix) is involved in osteoclast recruitment for
resorption of bone matrix
- Function: Ion reservoir & give bone its strength and stiffness
9
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
cavities that are visible on plain radiographs as lucent areas within the
cortical bone. Cement line mark the sites where resorption by a cutting
cone stopped & new bone formation began. Within the cutting cone,
group of spindle cells, osteoblasts & small blood vessels follow the
advancing group of osteoclasts.
Examination of cutting cone cell population suggest that
approximately 50 osteoblasts are required to replace the amount of
bone resorbed by one osteoclast in one day.
Gap healing: Gaps present b/w the fracture surfaces are invaded by
new capillaries & OPC’s grow in from the edges and new bone is laid
down on the exposed surface. Where the crevices are very narrow (less
than 200 micrometers) osteogenesis produce lamellar bone; wider gaps
are filled first by woven bone which is then remodeled to lamellar bone.
After the callus formation, bone resorption & formation, the process of
modeling starts on endosteal & periosteal surfaces of the compact bone
thus recontours its gross shape towards normal. This process of reshaping
or sculpturing can reach completion in young children and nearly so in
young adolescents but never in adults.
The process requires one or more years and goes on concurrently with the
remodeling process.
13
14
RAP doesn’t seem to provide new processes but by increasing the rapidity
but by increasing the rapidity of other healing stages it makes healing occur
2-10 times quickly than otherwise. RAP is not well appreciated as it
normally occurs after fractures, arthrodesis, osteotomies or bone graft
procedures and it is not exhibited in < 3% of fracture cases (rarely absent).
Also RAP due to its bone density effects is usually dismissed as disuse
osteoporosis roentgenographically.
It begins within few days of the fracture, peaks at 1-2 months and may
take 6 to > 24 months to subside. The increased intracortical bone
remodeling it causes produces tunneling within the cortex.
14
15
Ability
Tolerance Tolerance Importance
to
S No. Type of healing Speed of of total of external
bridge
movements rigidity* soft tissues
gaps
Primary callus
1. ++++ + ++++ ++++ --
healing
External bridging
2. +++ +++ +++ -- ++++
callus
It is likely that all the above processes are involved to a greater or lesser
extent in the healing of every fracture, the special circumstances imposed by
particular methods of clinical management usually means that one or other
of them will preponderate. Thus the treatment should be planned in such a
way as to facilitate a particular mechanism or more importantly not interfere
with it.
15
16
2. Tensile stress
Intramembranous ossification
16
17
Technical failures
Biologic failures
17
18
another 20%. They occur mostly in cortical bone and seldom in spongy
bone.
a. Failure to make callus: This involves malfunctioning of the
mediator mechanisms that produce the callus. Such a
malfunction occurs in about 80% of all biologic failures. The
underlying cause is either inability of local biology to produce
adequate callus or a systemic metabolic abnormality preventing
chondral & bone matrices from mineralization or both.
Therapeutic radiation, cytotoxins, regional denervation and
some NSAID’s can cause this failure.
Treatment: Fresh autogenous cancellous bone is an excellent
graft material in this problem as it delivers varied labile
biologic messangers to the tissues & mediator mechanisms in
the recipient site.
18
19
19
20
2. The second injury should occur more than a few days but less
than 2-3 months after the first one.
20
21
References
1. Mc Kibbin B. The biology of fracture healing in long bones; JBJS
Vol. 60-B, No 2, May 1978 (150-162).
2. Buckwalter, J.A. et al. Bone biology. Part I: Structure, blood
supply, cells, matrix and mineralization; JBJS Vol 77-A(8), Aug
1995 (1256-1275)
3. Buckwalter, J.A. et al. Bone biology. Part II: Formation, form,
modeling, remodeling, and regulation of cell function; JBJS Vol
77-A(8), Aug 1995 (1276-1289)
4. Frost H.M. The biology of fracture healing; an overview for
clinicians. Part I. CORR No 248, Nov 1989 (283-293)
5. Frost H.M. The biology of fracture healing; an overview for
clinicians. Part II. CORR No 248, Nov 1989 (294-306)
6. Hulth Anders. Current concepts of fracture healing; CORR No
249, Dec 1989 (265-283)
7. Edmund Y.S. et al. Enhancement of fracture healing by
mechanical and surgical intervention. CORR No 355S, Oct
1998 (S163-S178)
8. Edmund Y.S. et al. The effect of rigidity on fracture healing in
external fixation. CORR No 241, April 1989 (24-35)
9. Perren S.M. Physical and biological aspects of fracture healing
with special reference to internal fixation. CORR No 138, Jan-
Feb 1979 (175-195)
10. Simmons D.J. Fracture healing perspectives. CORR No 200,
Nov 1985 (100-113)
11. Hannouche D. et al. Current trends in the enhancement of
fracture healing. JBJS (Br.) 2001; 83-B (157-64)
12. Giannoudis P.V. Accelerated bone healing and excessive
callus formation in patients with femoral fracture and head
injury. Injury (2006) 375, S18-S24
13. Solomon Louis et al. Apley’s system of orthopaedics and
fractures, Eighth Ed. Pg. 540-543
21
22
14. Watson- Jones. Fractures and joint injuries. Sixth Ed. Pg. 14-
28
15. Campbell’s operative orthopaedics Tenth Ed. Vol. 3. Pg. 2686-
2687
16. Turek S.L. Orthopaedics, principles & their applications.
Fourth Ed. Vol. 1. Pg. 30-59
17. Schwartz . Principles of surgery. Seventh Ed. Vol. 2. Pg. 1938-
1941,1955-1958
22