Professional Documents
Culture Documents
beyond topology
---
On the use of optimization in Power Electronics
JL.Schanen
University Grenoble Alps – CNRS - G-INP
Experimental Experimental
Validation Validation
Components
Layout EMC
• Is it the good choice
one ? • Switching • Meeting
frequency Standards
• Component • Filter design
Topology & design Cooling
Mechanics
Control System
Experimental
Validation
Experimental
Experimental Validation
Validation
Components
Layout EMC
• Is it the good choice
one ? • Switching • Meeting
frequency Standards
• Component • Filter design
Topology & design Cooling
Mechanics
Control System
Yes
Specifications Inputs Model Outputs OK?
No
HBC CFC
Final solution
Decreases
Requirements passives’
weight
Analysis of all interactions
Defining the constraints
Defining one objective function
• Multiobjective optimization: Pareto fronts
Providing models
Defining an optimization strategy
Functional Material
Material A unified framework for
Component Database
models computationally efficient power
Component level
converter design optimisation [Univ
Database
Bristol-Manchester]
Material An Optimization Approach for
Advanced
Wires Designing Multilevel Converters
Component
Core [University of British Columbia
level 1
Database Vancouver]
An advanced tool for optimized
design of power electronic circuits
ISP3D - March 16, 2017 [Aalborg University]
…
2.1. DbO Principle
Discussion
Practical issues:
• Optimization time, number of variables
• time simulation in the loop + convergence…
• Coherence of different descriptions: 3D geometries in different physics, electrical values, …
More complexity, less accuracy
%error
• Finding the best level of description
• Keep all phenomenon at equivalent
level of accuracy
Formulation of constraints
• Design constraints are huge: limits of
Nb parameters describing the phenomenon
parameters, physical limits –saturation,
max temperature, voltage, …
• Stochastics algorithms have limited ability to handle constrained problems (penalty in the
objective function)
Rds_on = f(Id)
350
Id à 25°C
300
Rds_on (mΩ)
Switching Energy (mJ)
Stratobus
3 month PHD student to develop and implement the models in a
dedicated framework, CADES
Optimization problem summary:
• Several set of specifications often evolving (≈10 versions)
• 1 objective function
• 15 design parameters
• 62 design constraints
≈10s each optimization
Ongoing project,
some improvements needed
7,2
MPP 26 Discontinue 155 kHz 146 gr 80 % Température self, rendement, THD
kW/kg
7,5
MPP 60 Discontinue 125 kHz 91,1 gr 76 % Température self, rendement, THD
kW/kg
7
KoolMu 60 Discontinue 115 kHz 105 gr 78 % Température self, rendement
kW/kg
7,4
KoolMu 125 Continue 230 kHz 226 gr 83 % Température self, rendement
kW/kg
6,4
HighFlux 147 Continue 230 kHz 279 gr 86 % Température self, rendement
kW/kg
50
_40, NPC _40, Half Bridge
Coût
Cost
40
30
20
150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Losses