Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter is divided into two parts, the first part deals with the profile
of the study district which is situated in South Tamilnadu. The second part
examines the demographic and investment profile of the sample respondents in
the study area.
The study has been made with the sample respondents in Virudhunagar
district. According to the 2011 census, Virudhunagar district has a population of
1,943,309; Virudhunagar has a sex ratio of 1009 females for every 1000 males,
and a literacy rate of 80.75 %. 44.39% are urbanised. The Majority of the
population are involved in Industries and agriculture. Virudhungar district is
known for concentration of multiple enterprises in different part of the district.
Each block is unique in nature. Concentration of industries like Matches,
Fireworks, Printing, Oil Extraction, Readymade Garments, Brick Making,
Surgical cotton, Textile products, Cement, Lime-based products, Rice mill, Paper
products, Food industries, Tin containers, Gold Jewellary making in different
parts of the district and the district has offered multiple intervention for further
development. It attracts the attention of the policy makers and reaches to anchor
93
the industrial development in a balanced matter across the district.Virudhunagar
district has Sivakasi and Aruppukottai as revenue divisions. The major industrial
groups in Virudhunagar District are as follows:
1. TVS Groups
2. RAMCO Groups
3. Jeyavilas Groups
4. Naatchiyar Groups
94
100% employment achieved town (which is among a few towns in India
rather world).
95
small scale sector. The total number of units in Rajapalayam and nearby areas is
2450 having involved 20,000 homes in manufacturing. Out of this, the plain,
semi automatic, automatic and shuttleless looms are 18,000, 1,350, 450 and 200
respectively2. The major varieties being produced in this area are bandage cloth,
saree, lungi and towel. It is observed that there are 120 processing units in
addition to 100 warping and sizing units. About 20-25 manufacturer/master-
weavers operate in Rajapalayam area. Two ISO certified units export surgical
cotton to Italy and to other countries. As cotton is transited to various parts of
state and nations, Rajapalayam and its environs offer a vast potentiality for
marine Insurance.
Three spinning mills, one metal printing industry and a paper cone (used
in textile mills) manufacturing unit function in the town. Chilly is exported to
eastern countries by a large local firm. The magic of the town is that it virtually
controls markets for all agricultural commodities without growing them on its
soil. So, there is no second thought in considering Virudhunagar as a vital area
for the development of marine business by all the four public sector General
Insurance companies.
2
www.textilescommittee.nic.in
96
3.2.4 Sattur Town
In Aruppukottai town giant spinning mills and flour mills are located.
The town is reputed for weaving handloom and power loom products. Those
products are marketed throughout India and outside India.
FIGURE 3.1
97
3.3 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS
It is found that 33 per cent of the respondents belong to the age group of
31-40. It can be concluded that the middle aged respondents in the range of 31-
40 years are highly interested in Securities Market. In a nutshell, youthful
demography dominates the stock market.
3
Anoop Bhaskar, (2008), “Go for Investment, UTI Fund Watch, August, p: 4.
98
3.3.2 Gender
TABLE 3.2
Gender of the respondents
Gender No of Respondents Percentage
Male 174 58
Female 126 42
Total 300 100
Source: Primary Data
It is found out that out of 300 respondents, 58 per cent of the respondents
are male and 42 per cent of the respondents are female. It is found that 58
percent of the respondents are male and it is not much greater than the female
respondents. Hence it can be concluded that the male respondents are
comparatively more than the female respondents.
3.3.3 Education
99
The researcher has studied the educational qualification of the
respondents and found out that out of 300 respondents, 38 per cent of the
respondents are graduates and 23 per cent of the respondents are post graduates
and 20 per cent are professional degree holders. It can be concluded that well
educated persons are much interested in Securities Market.
3.3.4 Occupation
TABLE 3.4
Occupation of the respondents
Occupation No of respondents Percentage
Entrepreneur 60 20.0
Professional 63 21.0
Retired 39 13.0
It is found out that out of 300 respondents, 25 per cent of the respondents
are employers of private concern and 21 per cent are professionals. 13 per cent
of the respondents under study are retired people. It is noteworthy that 20 per
cent of the investors are entrepreneurs. It can be concluded that salaried /regular
income group is actively dealing in securities.
100
3.3.5 Monthly Income
ncome
TABLE 3.5
Monthly Income of the respondents
Monthly Income
ncome No of respondents Percentage
10000/- to 25000
25000/- 81 27.0
25001/to 50000//- 141 47.0
50001/- to 75000//- 33 11.0
Above 75,000/- 45 15.0
Total 300 100
Source: Primary Data
ata
101
TABLE 3.6
Marital Status of the respondents
Marital Status No of Respondents Percentage
Married 204 68.0
Single 96 32.0
Total 300 100
Source: Primary Data
It is found that out of 300 respondents, 68 per cent of the respondents are
married which is a vast majority and only 32 per cent of the respondents are
single. 204 married respondents are aware of Securities Market. This is because
the marital status makes an individual to be more accountable and risk cautious in
spending their earnings.
TABLE 3.7
Type of Family of the respondents
Type of Family No of Respondents Percentage
It is visibly clear that out of 300 respondents, 51 per cent of the investors
live in a joint family. 49 per cent of the respondent’s family is of nuclear family.
So it can be concluded that the traditional joint family is predominant in
Virudhunagar district but the need for investment for a better future for any type
of family is important.
102
3.3.8 Dependents on the Income
TABLE 3.8
Dependents on the income of the respondents
Members No of Respondents Percentage
Up to Three 108 36.0
Four 72 24.0
Five and above 120 40.0
Total 300 100
Source: Primary Data
It is clear from the classification shown in the table that out of 300
respondents, 120 respondents forming 40 per cent, are having more than five
members depending on the income of the respondents. 108 respondents, forming
36 per cent are having three dependents in their family on their income. 72
respondents, forming 24 per cent are having four members in their family. It is
observed that majority of the respondents constituting 40 per cent are having
more than five number of members in the family depending on the income of the
respondents.
103
TABLE 3.9
Monthly Financial requirements of the respondents
Monthly Financial
No of Respondents Percentage
Requirements
Fluctuate widely 45 15.0
Fluctuate moderately 132 44.0
Stable and fixed 123 41.0
Total 300 100
Source: Primary Data
In the current scenario, people strive hard for income generation and it is
much harder to save. Hence it is an important variable to be dealt with and it is
represented in table 3.10
TABLE 3.10
Percentage of Savings on the income of the respondents
Percentage of savings
No of Respondents Percentage
on the income
Below 10% 64 21.3
Between 10%-15% 78 26.0
Between 15%-20% 90 30.0
Between 20%-25% 68 22.7
Total 300 100
Source: Primary Data
The above analysis brings to light the fact that about 90 respondents
forming 30 per cent are able to save up to 15-20 percentage of their annual
income as savings. 78 respondents forming 26 per cent are able to save between
104
10-15 per cent. 68 respondents forming 22.7 per cent of the investors are able to
save up to 20-25 per cent and 64 respondents forming 21.3 per cent are able to
save below 10 per cent only. It is interesting to note that only 90 respondents are
able to save 15-20 per cent of their hard earned money.
105
TABLE 3.11
Period of Savings of the respondents
Period of savings No of Respondents Percentage
Early Career Period 102 34.0
Mid Career Period 126 42.0
Retirement Stage 72 24.0
Total 300 100
Source: Primary Data
From the above table, it can be concluded that 126 respondents out of 300
which constitutes 42 per cent have started savings in their mid - career period.
102 respondents (i.e.) 34 per cent have started to save in their earlier stage itself.
It is pathetic to note that 72 respondents (24 per cent) are able to save their hard-
earned money at their retirement stage only.
TABLE 3.12
Investment Objectives of the respondents
106
The table 3.12 clearly gives a picture that 141 respondents are investing in
the Securities Market with the objective of quick returns, while 24 per cent
respondents have recorded their objective as capital appreciation. 14 per cent
respondents have preferred dividends/ interest where in they are assured of fixed
returns. 9 per cent respondents have stated that they invest with the objective of
capital security on the other hand only, 6 per cent respondents have preferred
Securities Market with the objective of tax exemption. Hence it is clear that the
majority of the people want to be rich within a short span of time.
Equity as a group class, offers better long - term and superior returns as
compared to the other instruments for investors. For a long- term, horizon equity
is an interesting area to remain invested. Investment in the equity shares of
growth companies can protect the investors' inflation. In general, the investor
should not have more than one-half in equities unless he has strong confidence in
the soundness of his stock position. 50-50 version of this approach makes good
sense for the defensive investor4, suggests “The Intelligent Investor” which is
considered as the stock market bible. Equities have the potential to build
enormous wealth-provided. The portfolio is based on research -backed
recommendations, with a long term perspective. Hence it is essential to study the
per cent of savings allotted towards equity by the respondents of Virudhunagar
district. The researcher has surveyed the percentage of savings invested in Equity
and tabulated in 3.13.
TABLE 3.13
Percentage of Savings Invested in Equity by the respondents
Percentage of savings
No of Respondents Percentage
invested in Equity
Below 5% 85 28.3
5% to 10% 125 41.7
10% to 20% 36 12.0
Above 20% 54 18.0
Total 300 100
Source: Primary Data
4
Benjamin Graham, (1973) “The Intelligent Investor” Fourth Revised edition, HarperCollins
Publishers Inc., New York, pp: 90-91.
107
From the above table it is found that 41.7 per cent of the respondents are
allotting 5 to 10 per cent of their savings towards investment in equity shares.
28.3 per cent of the respondents are allotting below 5 per cent of their savings
towards equity while 18 per cent of the respondents are investing above 20 per
cent in equity and 12 per cent of the respondents are allotting 10 to 20 per cent
towards equity. Hence it can be assumed that the investors who are allotting
above 10 per cent of their savings towards equity are investors do not prefer
trading. They may find it difficult to track and trade.
The three time horizons are short term, medium term and long term based
on the goals. Long term investment should be around seven to 10 years.
Investors should monitor their portfolio at least once on a monthly basis and
profit should be booked as soon as the intended target performance is achieved.
Similarly non-performing investments also need corrective measures based on the
risk appetite. Generally a structured 20% saving over an average work life will
help in accumulating a decent corpus says Anutosh Bose, the Chief operating
officer of LIC Nomura Mutual Fund to Business Line news paper5. Based on his
words, the respondents’ investment period is studied and tabulated in table 3.14.
TABLE 3.14
Time Horizon in Investments
Time Horizon No of Respondents Percentage
Long term 60 20
Medium term 96 32
Short term 144 48
Total 300 100
Source: Primary Data
From the above table it is found that 48 per cent of the respondents are
short term investors while 32 per cent of the respondents are medium term
investors and only 20 per cent of the respondents are long term investors. Hence
it can be assumed that the entry of the respondents may be after 2008 and most of
5
Anutosh Bose, (2014 ),“It’s best to keep your bird in hand”, Business Line, 28th April, p:3.
108
them are reluctant to stay in the market for long term and probably they might
have entered with the attitude of making quick money.
Indian stock market, in terms of return has performed very well during the
post reform period. In most of the years it was able to produce positive returns to
its investors. Every alternate year from 2003-04, the market had delivered terrific
returns and its return profile during those years is abnormally higher than that of
just previous years. Highest market growth (85.11 per cent) was observed in
2003-04. Since then, the stock market of the country was able to produce return
for investors and the same trend continued until 2008-09. But the year 2008-09
brought in relentless distress to the investors by causing a loss of more than one-
third of the value of their wealth which they would have hold at the beginning of
the year. But the financial year 2009-10 again saw the market delivering
amazing returns (71.51 per cent) which enable the investors to earn twice of their
capital which they lost in the previous year.
Depending upon the stock cycle where in there is a boom for every 8
years, the year of dealing into the Securities Market is classified into three
periods Before 2000, 2004-2008 and After 2008. Year of entry into the Securities
Market is very important variable so as to analyze the risk and returns of the
respondents which is tabulated in table 3.15.
TABLE 3.15
Year of Dealing in the Securities Market by the respondents
Year of dealing in the
No of Respondents Percentage
Securities Market
Before 2000 27 9.0
2000-2008 156 52.0
After 2008 117 39.0
Total 300 100
Source: Primary Data
From the above table, it can be inferred that 156 respondents forming 52
per cent have stepped into the stock market in the year 2000-2008. 117
respondents forming 39 per cent have made their entry into the stock market after
109
2008 and only 27 respondents forming 9 per cent have made their debut into the
stock market before the year 2000 itself. Hence it is crystal clear that the
awareness regarding Securities Market is increasing.
TABLE 3.16
Investment Mechanism in the Securities Market
Investment Mechanism in No of
Percentage
the Securities Market Respondents
Investor 96 32.0
Trader 60 20.0
From the table 3.16, it is inferred that 144 respondents forming 48 per
cent are both investor and trader. 96 respondents forming 32 per cent are
investors, while 60 respondents forming 20 per cent are traders. It can be
concluded that 48 per cent (144) respondents are willing to take risk as both
investor and trader.
110
mouse. Online trading sounds like an instant way to mint money.6 There are
obviously some advantages and some disadvantages of both these form of
trading. Online trading requires the investors to pay lower brokerage. There is
no middle man involved. In case of online trading there is no paper work
involved. Investors can deal with different stock exchanges with single online
trading account. Even though there are many advantages, online trading too has
some disadvantages like investors can't set customized expert advice, whereas in
offline the broker gives suggestions according to investors strategy either Short
term or Long term. The paradigm change of Securities Market from offline to
online is commented by NSE’s Chief for Business Development Ravi Varanasi
to the Business line reporters that Trading on the NSE cash market by investors
through the use of internet has seen a 12 per cent rise over the last few years.
Citing the penetration of mobile phones including the smart phones, Varanasi has
added that the use of this medium for trading on NSE has seen a 100 per cent
jump in the past one year.7 As stock market is functioning in electronic platform
which is dynamic and complicated, the Mode preferred by the respondents is very
important to know whether they are adoptable to the changes and it is presented
in table 3.17.
TABLE 3.17
Mode Preferred for Investments
Mode No of Respondents Percentage
Both 36 12.0
6
Ibid5
7
Ravi Varanasi, (2014) “NSE sees rise in trading through internet,mobile phones” Business
Line, 22nd February, p:5.
111
From the table 3.17, it is clear that 156 respondents prefer to invest /
trade in stock market by Adoption of the dial and trade method, mainly through
intermediaries/ Sub brokers. Self online trading mode is adopted by 108
respondents. 36 respondents adopt both the method. Hence it is inferred that
though 36 per cent of the respondents are doing online trading they can be
considered as tech-savvy but 52 per cent of respondents goes under the umbrella
of the intermediaries. As said by Mr. Ravi Varanasi, it can be concluded that the
usage of mobile devices has increased considerably among Virudhunagar
respondents.
TABLE 3.18
Number of Demat Accounts
Number of Demat No of
Percentage
Accounts Respondents
One 159 53.0
Two 60 20.0
More than Two 81 27.0
Total 300 100
Source: Primary Data
From the above table, it is clear that 159 respondents forming 53 per cent
are having only one demat account, while 81 respondent forming 27 per cent are
having more than two. Respondents having two demat account numbers to 60
forms 20 per cent. Respondents having one demat account may feel easy to track
the performance of his financial investments. Respondents having more than one
demat account may operate in the name of their spouse or children or for
sentimental reasons as sentiment plays a dominant role is stock market.
112
3.4.9 Adoption of SIP in investments (Systematic Investment Plan)
“Little drops of water make a mighty ocean” is a famous saying and this
is true if an investor adopts Systematic Investment Plan (SIP) for investment.
Under this plan investors invest a specific amount for a continuous period, at
regular intervals. By doing this, the investor has the advantage of rupee cost
averaging and it also helps him save a fixed amount each month, compulsorily.
When the investor opts for SIP, he /she automatically participates in the market
swings. The amount of investment remains the same but the number of shares
purchased varies or buy more number of units in a declining market and less
number of units in a rising market, so that the investor does not panic in turbulent
market conditions. SIP results in rupee cost averaging and it means investing
consistently. Periodic investment based on one's convenience by investing the
same amount at regular intervals, then the average cost per share always remains
lower than the average market price, irrespective of how the market is - rising,
falling or fluctuating. An SIP investor gets phenomenal rate of return compared
to a one-time investor. The following table 3.19 provides a picture of the
investors profile relating to the adoption of SIP.
TABLE 3.19
Adoption of SIP
Adopt SIP No of Respondents Percentage
Yes 144 48.0
No 156 52.0
Total 300 100
Source: Primary Data
Investing in Securities Market is not a magic box, where one can put his
or her money which gets multiplied over a period. But one can take exposure to
equity by investing systematically via SIP’s route, which reduces the timing risk.
But from the above table, it is crystal clear that 52 per cent of the respondents are
not aware of the benefits of SIP. Only 48 per cent of the respondents are aware
of SIP method.
113
3.4.10 Portfolio Allocation
TABLE 3.20
Portfolio Allocation
Portfolio allocation No of Respondents Percentage
Blue-chip stocks 51 17.0
Midcap stocks 102 34.0
Small cap stocks 33 11.0
Mixture of all 114 38.0
Total 300 100.0
Source: Primary Data
114
Portfolio allocation is all about investing in a range of funds viz.,
Blue-chip Stocks, Midcap stocks, Small cap stocks or a combination of all range
of stocks that work together to create an investment solution for investors. While
building an investment portfolio investor must be aware of the fact that “Putting
all the eggs in a single basket may lead to loss” From the above table, it is clear
that 38 per cent of investors forming 114 respondents’ portfolio comprises of all
range of stocks. 34 per cent of investors invest in Midcap stocks. 17 per cent of
investors alone invest in Blue-chip stocks on the other hand only 11 per cent of
investors concentrate on small cap stocks. Hence it can be concluded that most
of the investors are aware of their investment objectives and invest in stocks
which they find suitable.
115
TABLE 3.21
Portfolio Alteration
Portfolio alteration No of Respondents Percentage
Never 57 19.0
Often 156 52.0
Rarely 87 29.0
Total 300 100
Source: Primary Data
The stock market can be an excellent place to invest over the long term to
create wealth. But in order to reap the benefits of investing in the stock market,
the investors should learn as much as possible about the market before investing.
Stock market tips rolled out to the hands of the investors will help to succeed in
the market.
116
like Money control which can be installed in a smart phone to have a regular
track of the portfolio performance.
TABLE 3.22
Subscription of Market Alerts
Subscription of
No of Respondents Percentage
market alerts
Yes 96 32.0
No 204 68.0
Total 300 100
Source: Primary Data
From the table 3.22, it is understood that the majority of the respondents
forming 68 per cent are not aware of the latest technological applications which
enhances market track. Only 32 per cent of the respondents are aware of the
market alerts. Hence it can be concluded that the online traders are aware of the
latest technology and they are tech-savvy so they may have subscribed market
investment alerts.
All investment choices are made at points of time in accordance with the
personal investment ends and in observation of a tentative future. One of the key
characteristics that govern investor behaviour is the optimism or pessimism of the
investors. The link between holding or sticking on to a particular stock and
investor sentiment has been the subject of survey as there is a famous saying
“Don’t marry a stock”. The reason for holding a particular stock or stock
sentiment is categorized as highly rewarding Reputed Company and Blue-chip
stock. Stock sentiment of the study respondents is studied and tabulated in 3.23.
TABLE 3.23
Stock Sentiment
Stock sentiment No of Respondents Percentage
Highly rewarding 54 18.0
Reputed company 75 25.0
Blue-chip stock 171 57.0
Total 300 100
Source: Primary Data
117
From the table 3.23, it is noted that 57 per cent of the respondents are
holding a particular stock as it is a blue chip stock. 25 per cent of the respondents
stick on to a stock as it is a reputed company while 18 per cent of the investors
are highly optimistic as it has yielded huge returns in the previous years. It is
evident that most of the respondents are followers of index stocks.
“No pain No gain” is the basic concept of Securities Market. Profit is the
reward for risk taking. The retail investors take into consideration their
investment needs, goals, Objectives and constraints before making investment
decisions. However, it is not possible to make a successful investment decision
at all times. They have to cautiously watch the market conditions and change
their investment options in accordance with their Risk Tolerance Level. The Risk
taking attitude of the respondents are categorized as high risk, moderate risk, low
risk and risk adverse. Hence Risk taking attitude of the respondents is also
studied and presented in table 3.24.
TABLE 3.24
Risk Taking Attitude
Risk taking attitude No of Respondents Percentage
High risk 80 26
Low risk 56 19
Risk Averse 56 19
From the above table 3.24, it is found that 36 per cent of the respondents
are moderate risk takers and only 26 per cent of the respondents constitute high
risk taking attitude. 19 per cent of the respondents are of low risk takers and
another 19 per cent of the investors are having risk averse attitude.
118
3.5 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE AND
INVESTMENT PROFILE OF THE INVESTORS
TABLE 3.25
Age group and Investment Profile of the respondents
Investment profile variables r value p value Result
Period of savings 0.391 0.000 Significant
Investment Mechanism -0.046 0.425 Not significant
Mode preferred for investments -0.170 0.003 Significant
Objectives for investments 0.008 0.896 Not significant
Time Horizon -0.165 0.004 Significant
Adoption of SIP in investments -0.036 0.536 Not significant
Portfolio Allocation 0.072 0.215 Not significant
Portfolio alteration -0.076 0.188 Not significant
Risk Taking Attitude -0.146 0.011 Significant
Source: Computed Data
119
From the table 3.25, it is revealed that ‘p’ value is less than 0.05 in respect
of the investment variables namely Period of savings (p = 0.000), Mode preferred
(p = 0.003), Time horizon (p = 0.004) and Risk taking attitude (p = 0.011), hence
the null hypothesis is rejected. It can be concluded that there is significant
relationship between the investment factors namely Period of savings, Mode
preferred, Time horizon and Risk taking attitude.
It also reveals that ‘p’ value is more than 0.05 in respect of variable
namely Investment Mechanism (p = 0.425), Objectives (p = 0.896), Adoption of
SIP (p = 0.536), Portfolio allocation (p = 0.215) and Portfolio alteration
(p=0.188), hence the null hypothesis is accepted. Age does not have any
significant relationship with the investment factors namely Investment
Mechanism, Objectives Adoption of SIP, Portfolio allocation and Portfolio
alteration.
Ho2: There is no significant relationship between the gender and the investment
profile of the respondents.
120
TABLE 3.26
Gender and Investment Profile of the respondents
Investment Profile Variables r value p value Result
Period of savings -0.048 0.404 Not significant
Investment Mechanism 0.360 0.000 Significant
Mode preferred for investments 0.140 0.015 Significant
Objectives for investments 0.131 0.023 Significant
Time Horizon 0.052 0.387 Not significant
Adoption of SIP in investments 0.047 0.487 Not significant
Portfolio Allocation -0.078 0.178 Not significant
Portfolio alteration 0.349 0.000 Significant
Risk Taking Attitude -0.167 0.004 Significant
Source: Computed Data
The ‘p’ value is greater than 0.05 in case of the investment profile
variables such as Period of savings (p = 0.000), Time horizon (p = 0.000),
Adoption of SIP (p = 0.003) and Portfolio allocation (p= 0.000). Hence the null
hypothesis framed is accepted in the above cases and it can be concluded that
there is no significant relationship between gender with regard to investment
profile variables such as Period of savings, time horizon, adoption of SIP and
Portfolio allocation.
121
Ho3: There is no significant relationship between the education of the
respondents and their investment profile.
TABLE 3.27
Education and Investment Profile of the respondents
The ‘p’ value is greater than 0.05 in case of the investment profile
variables such as Investment Mechanism of the respondents (p = 0.639), Mode
preferred (p = 0.066), Objectives (p = 0.951), Time horizon (p = 0.609) and
Portfolio alteration (p = 0.487). As the ‘p’ value is greater than 0.05, the null
hypothesis framed is accepted in the above cases and it can be concluded that
there is no significant correlation between educational qualification and
investment profile variables such as Investment Mechanism, Mode preferred,
Objectives, Time horizon and Portfolio alteration as these are the basic
knowledge required before stepping into the Securities Market.
122
3.5.4 Occupation and Investment Profile of the respondents
TABLE 3.28
Occupation and Investment Profile of the respondents
Investment Profile Variables r value p value Result
Period of savings 0.172 0.003 Significant
Investment Mechanism 0.042 0.465 Not Significant
Mode preferred for investments -0.228 0.000 Significant
Objectives for investments 0.036 0.534 Not Significant
Time Horizon 0.211 0.000 Significant
Adoption of SIP in investments 0.115 0.046 Significant
Portfolio Allocation 0.153 0.008 Significant
Portfolio alteration 0.140 0.015 Significant
Risk Taking Attitude 0.114 0.049 Significant
Source: Computed Data
The ‘p’ value is less than 0.05 in case of the investment profile variables
such as Period of savings of the respondents (p = 0.003), Mode preferred by the
respondents (p = 0.000), Time horizon (p = 0.000), Adoption of SIP (p = 0.046),
Portfolio allocation(p = 0.008), Portfolio alteration (p = 0.015) and Risk taking
123
attitude (p = 0.049). Hence the null hypothesis framed is rejected in the above
cases and it can be concluded that there is significant correlation between
occupation and investment profile variables such as Period of savings of the
respondents, Mode preferred by the respondents, Time horizon, Adoption of SIP,
Portfolio allocation, Portfolio alteration and Risk taking attitude. It can be
inferred that occupation and the timings available to them determine the
investment time horizon. Occupation nature decides whether to do investment or
trading and that too through online or through intermediaries.
TABLE 3.29
Monthly income and Investment Profile of the respondents
Investment profile variables r value p value Result
Period of savings -0.035 0.544 Not significant
Investment Mechanism 0.055 0.341 Not significant
Mode preferred for investments 0.006 0.919 Not significant
Objectives for investments 0.004 0.940 Not significant
Time Horizon -0.223 0.000 Significant
Adoption of SIP in investments -0.190 0.001 Significant
Portfolio Allocation 0.096 0.096 Not significant
Portfolio alteration 0.051 0.382 Not significant
Risk Taking Attitude 0.076 0.187 Not significant
Source: Computed data
124
The table 3.29 unfolds that there is a significant correlation between
Monthly income of the respondents and the investment profile variable named
Adoption of SIP (p = 0.001) and Time horizon (p = 0.000) as the ‘p’ values is
less than 0.05 and hence the null hypothesis is rejected.
The ‘p’value is greater than 0.05 in all other cases of the investment
profile variables such as Period of savings (p = 0.544), Objectives (p = 0.940),
Investment Mechanism of the respondents (p = 0.341), Portfolio allocation
(p= 0.096), Portfolio alteration (p = 0.382) and Risk taking attitude (p = 0.187) as
the ‘p’ value is greater than 0.05. Hence the null hypothesis framed is accepted
in the above cases and it can be concluded that there is no significant correlation
between monthly income and investment profile variables such as Period of
savings, Objectives, Mode preferred, and Investment Mechanism, Portfolio
allocation, Portfolio alteration and Risk taking attitude of the respondents. Based
on the monthly income the respondents decide how long they can stay invested in
the market, buy stocks and construct a portfolio that does not burn their hands.
125
TABLE 3.30
Marital Status and Investment Profile of the respondents
Investment Profile Variables r value p value Result
Period of savings 0.062 0.281 Not Significant
Investment Mechanism 0.192 0.001 Significant
Mode preferred for investments -0.006 0.915 Not Significant
Objectives for investments 0.192 0.001 Significant
Time Horizon 0.306 0.000 Significant
Adoption of SIP in investments -0.027 0.636 Not significant
Portfolio Allocation -0.026 0.651 Not Significant
Portfolio alteration 0.400 0.000 Significant
Risk Taking Attitude 0.026 0.654 Not significant
Source: Computed Data
126
Ho7: There is no significant relationship between the type of family of the
respondents and their investment profile.
TABLE 3.31
Type of Family and Investment Profile of the respondents
Investment Profile Variables r value p value Result
The above table clearly depicts that the hypothesis framed is rejected in
case of investment profile variables such as Period of savings (p = 0.007),
Investment Mechanism (p = 0.000), Adoption of SIP (p = 0.000) and Portfolio
alteration (p = 0.013) as the ‘p’ value is less than 0.05. It is evident that the
family of the respondents whether it is a joint family or nuclear family decides
the Percentage to be saved, Investment Mechanism, Objectives of investment and
Portfolio alteration. This is due to the reason that the joint family financial
commitment is quite high and the respondents of nuclear family have low
financial commitment and there are rare chances of consulting with the family
members as far as investment is considered.
Null hypothesis is accepted as the ‘p’ value is greater than 0.05 in case of
Objectives (p = 0.396), Time horizon (p = 0.278), Mode preferred (p = 0.090),
Portfolio allocation (p = 0.833) and Risk taking attitude (p = 0.522) and it can be
concluded that the type of family does not decides the mode preferred, time
horizon, portfolio allocation and risk taking attitude.
127
3.5.8 Number of Dependents on the Income
TABLE 3.32
Number of dependents on the Income and Investment Profile
of the respondents
Investment profile variables r value p value Result
Period of savings 0.006 0.916 Not significant
Investment Mechanism 0.122 0.034 Significant
Mode preferred for investments -0.073 0.208 Not Significant
Objectives for investments 0.068 0.237 Not significant
Time Horizon -0.121 0.036 Significant
Adoption of SIP in investments -0.201 0.000 Significant
Portfolio Allocation 0.152 0.008 Significant
Portfolio alteration 0.144 0.013 Significant
Risk Taking Attitude -0.049 0.397 Not significant
Source: Computed Data
128
Investment Mechanism of the respondents, Objectives, Time horizon, Adoption
of SIP, Portfolio allocation and Portfolio alteration and it is understood that an
increase in the number of dependents on the income drive them for more
financial commitment.
129
Objectives, Mode preferred, Investment Mechanism, Time horizon, Adoption of
SIP, Portfolio allocation and it is the monthly financial requirement that plays a
predominant role in deciding the investment profile of the respondents.
TABLE 3.34
Percentage of Savings and Investment Profile of the respondents
Investment Profile Variables r value p value Result
Period of savings 0.242 0.000 Significant
Investment Mechanism 0.047 0.421 Not Significant
Mode preferred for investments -0.046 0.425 Not Significant
Objectives for investments 0.129 0.026 Significant
Time Horizon -0.042 0.464 Not Significant
Adoption of SIP in investments 0.171 0.003 Significant
Portfolio Allocation 0.051 0.379 Not Significant
Portfolio alteration 0.104 0.071 Not Significant
Risk Taking Attitude -0.049 0.397 Not Significant
Source: Computed Data
130
the respondents and the investment profile variables such as Objectives mode
preferred Investment Mechanism, Time horizon Adoption of SIP, Portfolio
allocation and it is the percentage of savings that plays a predominant role in
deciding the investment profile of the respondents.
TABLE 3.35
Preference towards Investment Avenues
Strongly Strongly Mean
Investment Avenues Agree Neutral Disagree
Agree disagree score
131
In order to identify the most preferred investment avenue by the investors,
weighted average technique is used. The results are revealed based on the
weighted average score, Gold (4.20) is the most preferred investment avenue. It
is followed by the Securities Market (4.18), bank deposits (4.01), Real estate
(3.97), and Insurance (3.59), and Chit funds (2.75). It can be concluded that the
respondents prefer Gold as the best investment avenue. Respondents prefer the
Securities Market next to Gold, as the best investment avenue and at the same
time they are aware of fly by night Chit funds hence they have ranked it as last.
The investment pattern differs from investor to investor. The risk bearing
capacity, their perception towards the return from each investment pattern may
differ according to the demographic profile variables of the investors. The choice
towards various investment avenues namely Securities, Gold, Real estate, Bank
deposits, Insurance and Chit funds are collected and marked in a five point scale.
5 points were allotted for strongly agree and 4 points for agree, 3 points for no
idea, 3 points for disagree and 1 point for strongly disagree. The association
between various demographic profile variables and the choice of investment
avenues are analyzed using Oneway analysis of variance.
The choice of investment avenues may vary with the different age groups.
For example people above the age of 50 may be reluctant to take risk hence they
may prefer a safer avenue. So it is essential to study whether age determines the
choice towards investment avenues.
Ho10: Choice of investment avenues do not vary with age group of the
respondents.
132
TABLE 3.36
Age Group and Choice of Investment Avenues
Age Group in years
Investment F p
Result
Avenues 51 & value value
20-30 31-40 41-50
above
The above table 3.36 clearly exhibits that the ‘p’ value is greater than 0.05
for the Bank deposit (p = 0.648) alone. But for all other investment avenues like
Securities Market (p = 0.000), Gold (p = 0.003), Real estate (p = 0.000),
Insurance (p = 0.018) and Chit funds (p = 0.000), the null hypothesis is rejected
as the ‘p’ value is less than 0.05. Hence it can be concluded that the choice of the
respondents towards investment avenues returns vary with age of the
respondents. Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT) reveals that the opinion of
the respondents of all age group do not vary in case of bank deposits.
Respondents aged from 20-30 years, 31-41 years, 41-50 years, 51 and above
differ significantly with each other age groups in case of their preference towards
investment avenues such as Securities Market, Gold, Real estate, Insurance and
Chit funds.
133
3.5.1.2 Education
TABLE 3.37
Education and Choice of Investment Avenues
Education
Investment
High Post Professio F value p value Result
Avenues Graduate Others
School Graduate nal
Securities 4.00 4.29 4.35 4.00 3.75
3.936 0.004 Significant
Market (.522) (0.725) (0.703) (1.008) (0.452)
The ‘p’ value is less than 0.05 in case of investment avenues such as bank
deposits (p = 0.326), Gold (p = 0.177), Real estate (p = 0.761) and Insurance
(p = 0.194). Hence the null hypothesis is rejected and concluded that the choice
of investment avenues does not vary with the educational qualification of the
respondents and moreover everyone is aware of savings in bank. For Securities
Market (p = 0.004) and Chit funds (p = 0.004) the null hypothesis framed is
accepted as the ‘p’ value is greater than the significant level of 0.05.
134
3.5.1.3 Occupation
TABLE 3.38
Occupation and Choice of Investment Avenues
Occupation
Investment F
pValue Result
Avenues Entrepre- Profes- House Employed Employed Value
Retired
neur sional wife in Govt in Pvt
The ‘p’ value is less than 0.05, hence the null hypothesis is rejected in
case of respondent’s choice towards investment in Securities Market (p = 0.000)
and Insurance (p = 0.007) and it is concluded that occupation decides their choice
towards investment in the above avenues. The hypothesis framed is accepted in
case of respondents choice towards investment in Gold (p = 0.112), Real estate
(p = 0.436), bank deposits (p = 0.180) and Chit funds (p = 0.063) as the ‘p’ value
is greater than the significant value of 0.05. The occupation of the respondents
does not play a dominant role in deciding their choice of investment in Gold,
Real estate and Bank deposits as it forms the basic ambition of a man.
135
3.5.1.4 Monthly Income
Based on the monthly income of the respondents, the choice towards the
investment avenues may vary, hence it is essential to study the association of
monthly income with that of various investment avenues.
TABLE 3.39
Monthly Income and Choice of Investment Avenues
Monthly Income
Investment F p
Above Result
Avenues 10000- 25001- 50001- Value value
50000 75000 75,000
25000
Securities 4.11 4.23 4.18 4.13 Not
0.503 0.680
Market (0.791) (0.723) (0.584) (0.968) significant
136
3.5.1.5 Financial Requirement
TABLE 3.40
Financial Requirement and Choice of Investment Avenues
Financial requirement
Investment F p
Fluctuate Fluctuate Stable Result
Avenues Value value
widely moderately & fixed
The ‘p’ values are less than 0.05, hence the null hypothesis is rejected for
the respondents choice towards the investment avenues namely Securities Market
(p= 0.180), Bank deposits (p = 0.711), Insurance (p = 0.219) and Chit funds
(p = 0.710). The ‘p’ value is greater than 0.05 in case of Gold (p = 0.008) and
Real estate (p = 0.011) and the hypothesis framed is accepted and hence the
financial requirement of the respondents does not determine their choice of
investment towards Gold and Real estate.
137
3.5.1.6 Percentage of Savings on the Income
Ho15: Choice of investment avenues do not vary with the percentage of savings
on the income
TABLE 3.41
Percentage of Savings on the Income and Choice of Investment Avenues
Percentage of savings on the income
Investme p
Betwee Betwee Between F
nt Below valu Result
n 10% n 15% 20% to- Value
Avenues 10% e
to15% to 20% 25%
The ‘p’ value is less than the significant level of 0.05 for the investment
avenues such as Securities Market (p = 0.000), Gold (p =0.001), Insurance
(p = 0.025), Real estate (p = 0.000) and Chit funds (p = 0.000) hence the null
hypothesis is rejected for the respondents choice towards the above investment
avenues. The ‘p’ value is greater than 0.05 in case of Bank deposits (p = 0.066)
alone and the hypothesis framed is accepted. It is concluded that percentage of
savings does not determine the choice of investment in bank as they are popular
among common man.
138
3.5.1.7 Social Status
TABLE 3.42
t test – Social Status and the Choice of Investment Avenues
Investment Gender
t value p value Result
Avenues Male Female
Securities Market 4.21 (0.762) 4.14 (0.777) 0.002 0.961 Not significant
Bank deposits 3.91 (1.058) 4.14 (0.994) 0.068 0.795 Not significant
Insurance 3.59 (1.193) 3.60 (1.241) 0.009 0.923 Not significant
Chit funds 2.48 (1.307) 1.78 (1.100) 18.237 0.000 Significant
Marital Status
Married Single
Securities Market 4.19 (0.735) 4.16 (0.838) 1.862 0.173 Not significant
Real estate 3.83 (0.996) 4.10 (1.018) 0.236 0.627 Not significant
Bank deposits 3.98 (1.023) 4.04 (1.051) 1.578 0.210 Not significant
139
For Gender, the above table 3.42 clearly exhibits that the ‘p’ value is less
than 0.05 in case of Real estate (p = 0.020)and Chit funds (p = 0.000) and it
signifies that the gender variation plays a dominant role in deciding the
investment in Real estate and Chit funds. The null hypothesis is rejected
at significant level of 0.05 for the choice of investment in Securities Market
(p = 0.961), Gold (p = 0.067), Bank deposits (p = 0.795) and Insurance
(p = 0.923), hence it can be concluded that men and women do not vary in
choosing the investment avenues namely Securities Market, Gold, bank deposits
and Insurance.
140
It can be concluded that the demographic variables age, academic
background, occupation of the respondents have significant influence on their
investment in Securities Market as their significant values are 0.001, 0.004 ,0.001
which is less than 0.005. But in the case of all the other investment avenues, the
variables may or may not have significant relationship with the demographic
profile of the investors.
TABLE 3.43
Descriptive Variables - Overall Attitude towards Securities Market
p value
Overall Attitude towards t
S.No. Mean S.D Significant
Securities Market value
(2-tailed)
141
p value
Overall Attitude towards t
S.No. Mean S.D Significant
Securities Market value
(2-tailed)
Availability of adequate
7. information for evaluating the 4.31 0.761 98.289 0.000
securities
Screen based trading and rolling
8. settlement makes the trading 2.52 1.279 34.088 0.000
process easy
Services of intermediaries in
9. 2.16 1.130 33.064 0.000
Securities Market is remarkable
Securities Market analysis needs
10. experience and expertise 2.25 0.985 39.554 0.000
knowledge
Securities Market paves path for
11. 2.45 1.309 32.421 0.000
wealth creation.
Maximum profit at a minimum
12. 3.19 1.327 41.651 0.000
risk.
Participating in Securities Market
13. 4.06 1.049 67.047 0.000
is a pride
Opportunity to make money
14. 3.87 0.914 73.316 0.000
within the four walls.
Securities promotes
15. 3.44 1.354 44.015 0.000
entrepreneurship
Supports economical growth of
16. 4.11 1.114 63.876 0.000
the country
Trading in Securities ensures
17 2.07 .805 44.565 0.000
profit booking
Trading in Securities is a hedge
18 2.82 1.341 36.468 0.000
against inflation
Table 3.43, shows that the mean score for the 20 variables formulated for
finding the attitude towards the Securities Market by the respondents clearly
indicates that all the investors are having positive attitude towards the Securities
Market as the mean scores are not less than 3 for majority statements. It is
inferred from the table that the variable, “Regulations of SEBI is remarkable”
gained the highest mean score of 4.36 followed by “Existence of fairness and
transparency of securities trading” with a mean score of 4.32. “Availability of
142
adequate information for evaluating the securities” follows next with a mean
score of 4.31. The variables that scored least mean scores are “Trading in
Securities ensures profit booking” (2.07), Services of intermediaries in Securities
Market is remarkable (2.16), Securities Market analysis needs experience and
expertise knowledge (2.25). Moreover from the above table it is found that 13
statements out of 20 statements are having a mean score greater than 3.Hence it
can be concluded that the investors are having positive attitude towards their
Securities Market as majority of the statements are positive. It denotes that they
are interested in dealing in securities for satisfactory yields.
TABLE 3.44
Score on Overall Attitude towards Securities Market
Attitude level No of Investors Percent
High 81 27
Medium 144 48
Low 75 25
It is inferred from the table 3.44 that 48 per cent of the investors attitude
about the securities market is at medium level while 27 percent of the investors
are having high attitude about the securities market. 25 percent of investors are
having low attitude towards securities market. Hence it can be concluded that
investors are having medium level of positive attitude towards securities market.
143
3.6.2 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF THE INVESTORS AND OVERALL
ATTITUDE TOWARDS SECURITIES MARKET
The relationship between the demographic profile and the overall attitude
of the respondents needs to be analysed using correlation. To analyze the attitude
of the investors in the study area towards Securities Market, the null hypothesis
framed for the purpose is.
TABLE 3.45
Demographic Profile Variables and Overall Attitude towards
Securities Market
Demographic Profile Variables r value p value Result
Age group 0.028 0.625 Not Significant
Gender 0.150 0.009 Significant
Education 0.014 0.809 Not Significant
Occupation -0.142 0.013 Significant
Monthly income 0.247 0.000 Significant
Marital status 0.065 0.258 Not Significant
Type of family 0.255 0.000 Significant
Dependents on the income 0.209 0.000 Significant
Monthly Financial Requirements -0.247 0.000 Significant
Percentage of savings on income 0.092 0.111 Not Significant
Source: Primary Data
Age group: The ‘p’ value 0 .625 is greater than the 0.05. If it is less than or
equal to 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected. In this present analysis ‘p’ value is
greater than 0.05 hence the null hypothesis is accepted. It can be concluded that
age does not have significant relation towards the overall attitude towards the
Securities Market
Gender: The ‘p’ value 0 .009 is less than the 0.05. Hence the null hypothesis is
rejected. Male and female varies in the overall attitude towards the Securities
Market.
144
Education: The ‘p’ value is 0.089, which is greater than the significant level of
0.05 and hence the null hypothesis is accepted. There is no significant
relationship between educational qualification of the respondents and their
overall attitude towards Securities Market.
Occupation: The computed ‘p’ value 0. 013 is less than 0.05. Hence the null
hypothesis is rejected and there is difference of opinion among different
occupation of the investors about the Securities Market. All the investors
irrespective of their designation are not having same attitude towards the
Securities Market.
Monthly Income: The ‘p’ value 0.000 is less than 0.05. Hence the null
hypothesis is rejected and there is significant relationship between the monthly
income of the respondents and their overall attitude towards the Securities
Market.
Marital Status: The ‘p’ value 0.258 is greater than 0.05 hence the null
hypothesis is accepted. There is no significant relation between the marital status
of the investors and their overall attitude towards the Securities Market.
Type of family: The ‘p’ value is 0.000, which is less than the significant level of
0.05 and hence the null hypothesis is rejected. There is significant relationship
between the family size of the respondents and their overall attitude towards
Securities Market.
Dependents on the income: The ‘p’ value is 0.000, which is less than the
significant level of 0.05 and hence the null hypothesis is rejected. There is
significant relationship between the number of dependents on the income of the
respondents and their overall attitude towards Securities Market.
Monthly financial requirement - The ‘p ‘value 0.000 is less than the significant
value 0.05, hence the null hypothesis is rejected and there is significant relation in
the level of attitude towards Securities Market among the respondents of different
financial requirement. Hence it can be concluded that the financial requirement of
the respondents decides their level of attitude towards Securities Market.
145
Percentage of savings: The p value 0.111 is greater than the significant value
0.05, hence the null hypothesis is accepted. The respondents whose percentage
of savings differ do not differ in their level of attitude towards Securities Market.
3.7 SUMMARY
146