Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Some time ago I asked the question in this lecture series as to what
you would do if you were God to make yourself known. Perhaps
one way is that you would take a group of people, a nation, and
make them very different in many many ways, particularly in their
religion, and that is what God has done with the Jewish people.
Perhaps you would enter into the area of literature and cause
some of your prophets to make prophecies that could be fulfilled
only by supernatural intervention, and that’s what God has done
in literature. Perhaps you would send your Son into the world,
and the only way that people could explain His person and work
and His profound influence upon every generation would be by
recognizing that you were there and that your Son was genuinely
your Son. Perhaps you would allow your Son to be crucified, and
then as a great token of supernatural power you would bring Him
forth out of the grave. That’s what God has done. Perhaps you
would cause that in every way in which the word, your Word,
the Bible, would touch history. You would cause it to be an exact
reference that could be demonstrated by archaeology, and that’s
what you have done and that’s what God has done.
Perhaps you would also cause many early Christians to write about
the nature of Christianity in such a way that the truthfulness of
Christianity would be clearly seen and would clearly demonstrate
the supernatural source of biblical Christianity. And now that’s
There are three very simple points that I want to make in this
lecture: first of all, the testimony of some of the early church
fathers to the New Testament. It has been well pointed out that
the quantity of the writings of the Fathers is enormous, and yet
much has been lost in time. A mere fraction has come down to us,
and yet it’s sufficient to make a fairly good-sized library. Much of
the Old Testament and practically all of the New Testament, for
example, could be reproduced from the writings of the Fathers
alone, that is, the writings that we have. If somehow all of the
Bibles in the world would be destroyed, all the manuscripts, all of
the versions, then from the writings of the early church fathers
almost all of the Old and New Testament could be reproduced
simply from their quotations. A person needs only to turn to
that very fine set of books, The Ante-Nicene Fathers, that is, the
Fathers who lived before the Council of Nicea, which was in 325.
[The reference is to The Ante-Nicene Fathers: Translations of the
Writings of the Fathers Down to AD 325, edited by James Donaldson
and Alexander Roberts (reprint ed.; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans,
1987).] When you look at that set of books, The Ante-Nicene
Fathers, you realize how often and copiously the Scriptures are
quoted. Because of the questions which often revolve around the
writing of the New Testament, I want to emphasize some of the
quotations in the material in this lecture.
When you look at charts that have been drawn up, for example,
by a man such as H. S. Miller and his very familiar book General
Biblical Introduction [Houghton, NY: Word-Bearer Press, 1937],
when you look at such charts as he has concerning the many
quotations found in the early church fathers as related to the New
Testament, it causes one to stop and realize that they accepted
the New Testament as their final authority.
Now, a person can throw Christianity out. He can deny that Jesus
Christ is the Son of God. He can deny that the Bible is the Word of
God, but if he’s going to be honest about it, how can he deny the
profound effect that the New Testament had on the very period
when the content of the New Testament could be tested? It’s
interesting that right at the time when the resurrection of our
Savior could easily be checked, the early church believed more
firmly in the resurrection than at any other time in its history.
That’s true with the content of the New Testament. Many of these
that I have referred to lived only a few years after the death of the
apostle John, who died somewhere around AD 100. These men
were living at a time when the content of the New Testament
books could easily be checked out, and yet they believed the
content and preached it as such.
Clement said, “From Him also, that is from God, was descended
our Lord Jesus Christ according to the flesh and we, too, being
called by His will in Christ Jesus are not justified by ourselves nor
by our own wisdom or understanding or godliness or works which
we have wrought in holiness of heart but by that faith through
which from the beginning Almighty God has justified all men to
Whom be glory forever and ever. Amen.”
Now I want to quote from just one of his books, and this is the
book entitled To the Ephesians. When he was on his way to Rome,
he wrote a number of quite lengthy letters, and one of these letters
was sent to the Christians at Ephesus, so let me quote a couple
times: Ignatius said, “The cross of Christ is indeed a stumbling
block to those that do not believe but to the believing it is salvation
and life eternal. Where is the wise man? Where is the dispute?
Where is the boasting of those who are called mighty? For the Son
of God who was begotten before time began and established all
things according to the will of the Father, He was conceived in the
womb of Mary according to the appointment of God of the seed
of David, and by the Holy Ghost. For says the Scripture, ‘Behold a
virgin shall be with child and shall bring forth a son, and he shall
be called Emmanuel,’” and there he ends the quotation from the
book of Isaiah.
What did Ignatius believe? What did the early church of that day
believe? They believed in the crucifixion and resurrection of the
Lord Jesus Christ. They believed that Jesus Christ was the Son of
God. Ignatius says, “That He was begotten before time, conceived
in the womb of Mary according to the seed of David and by the
Holy Spirit.” He refers to Jesus Christ as the only begotten Son.
He speaks of the structure of the church: bishop and presbyter.
He speaks of the Lord’s Table, and he calls it the medicine of
immortality. Again, Ignatius died in 107. He died only a few years
after the apostle John. Here again we have a letter that shows that
the early church believed the doctrines that we had referred to
from the New Testament earlier in this lecture series. A person
can reject Christianity if he desires, but here within early church
literature we have a very early reference to almost all of the
doctrines found in the New Testament. How are we going to
account for this if we deny the truthfulness of Christianity?
Let me refer again to Justin the Martyr. Justin was born about AD
100, and he died as a martyr in 165. He was one of the earliest
and best known of the apologists for Christianity. It was seen
that Justin was born into a wealthy family. After an extensive
education he was recognized as a philosopher. In about 130 he
was converted to Christianity through the personal work of an
aged Christian. You will find his testimony in the book entitled
Dialogue with Trypho, which is also in the first volume of The
Ante-Nicene Fathers.
Again, I want to say here was a man who was converted at middle
age, and here is a man who had a good training as a philosopher
and was teaching in one of the schools as a philosopher; even after
becoming a Christian, he continued to wear the philosopher’s
cloak in that period of time. What did he believe about the Lord
Jesus Christ? He believed that He was born of a virgin, that He
was crucified, and that He rose again from the dead, and that
Jesus Christ was verily the Son of God. Then there’s a quotation.
This is an interesting one because he speaks of the early churches
worshiping on the Lord’s Day, or Sunday. He states, “And on the
day called Sunday all who live in cities or in the country gather
together in one place and the memoirs of the apostles [that’s
the Gospels] or the writing of the prophets [some of the Old
Testament] are read and as long as time permits then when the
reader has ceased, the president verbally instructs, and exhorts
to the imitation of these good things.” That sounds like a good
gospel service, doesn’t it?
And then again the writings of Aristides and his apology. Not
very much is known of Aristides. He was a Christian philosopher
in Athens, and he addressed a defense for Christianity to the
Emperor Antonides. This apology is generally dated about AD
140, again, a very, very early record of the early church. Allow me
to quote from his apology. This is found in volume 10 of The Ante-
Nicene Fathers. He states, “The Christians traced their origin from
the Lord Jesus Christ and He is acknowledged by the Holy Spirit to
be the Son of the Most High God who came down from heaven for
the salvation of men and was born of a pure virgin unbegotten and
immaculate, He assumed flesh and revealed Himself among men
that he might recall them to Himself from their wanderings after
many gods and having accomplished his wonderful dispensation
by a voluntary choice he tasted death on the cross fulfilling an
Auguste dispensation, and after three days He came to life again
and ascended into heaven and if you’ll would read, O King, you
may judge the glory of His presence from the holy gospel writings
as it is called among yourselves.”
the more necessary to find out from two maidservants who were
called deaconesses and that by torture what was the truth, and
I found nothing else then a perverse and excessive superstition.
I therefore adjourned the examination and hastened to consult
you. The matter seems to me to be worth deliberation especially
on account of the number of those in danger for many of every
rank, every age, and even of both sexes are brought into danger
and will be in the future. The contagion of that superstition [that
is, he calls the gospel superstition] has penetrated not only the
cities but also the villages and the country places.”
Let me quote a bit now from the emperor Trajan, who wrote
back to Pliny. Emperor Trajan said, “You have followed, my dear
Secundus, the proper course of procedure in examining the cases
of those who are accused to you as Christians. They are not to
be sought out. If they are accused and convicted they are to be
punished. Papers, however, which are presented anonymously,
ought not to be admitted in any accusation.”
You will find this in the fine book edited by Anne Fremantle
entitled A Treasury of Early Christianity [New York: Viking, 1953].
You’ll find it in almost any edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica.
You can reject Christianity if you want to, but how can you explain
away the letters written by these two important non-Christians
in AD 111? All of this material stands as a testimony to the
genuineness of the early church and the truthfulness of the Word
of God.