Liberi V Taitz Appendice II Exb J PT 1 - PT 5 - Opt

Case: 10-3000 Document: 003110340427 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/07/2010
EXHIBIT "J"
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
2 Date Page
Filed: 111/07/2010
of 26
Law Offices of:

PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Attorney for: Plaintiffs’
Identification No. 09867
(610) 825-3134
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LISA LIBERI, et al, :

Plaintiffs, :
:
vs. : Case No.: 09-cv-01898-ECR
:
ORLY TAITZ, et al, :
Defendants. :
: Assigned to Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno
:
:
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT ORLY TAITZ’S

FRIVOLOUS FILING ENTITLED “60B MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION”
NOW COME Plaintiffs’, Lisa Liberi [hereinafter “Liberi”]; Philip J. Berg, Esquire
[hereinafter “Berg”], the Law Offices of Philip J. Berg; Evelyn Adams a/k/a Momma E
[hereinafter “Adams”]; Lisa Ostella [hereinafter “Ostella”]; and Go Excel Global by and through
their undersigned counsel, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, and hereby files Plaintiffs’ Response in
Opposition to Defendant Orly Taitz’s Motion for Missing Documents / Rule 60B Motion for
Reconsideration filed September 9, 2010, appearing as Docket Entry No. 143. In support hereof,
Plaintiffs aver as follows:
 Defendant Taitz Motion is FRIVOLOUS.
 Defendant Taitz failed to serve the undersigned with this filing.
Liberi\Opp. to Def. Taitz’s Motion for Plaintiff Liberi’s D.L.

Page1 J1
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
3 Date Page
Filed: 211/07/2010
of 26
 Defendant Orly Taitz’s Motion is frivolous and filed for improper purposes, Defendant
Taitz failed to cite any proper jurisdictional law. The issues raised in Defendant Taitz’s
Motion have been litigated and ruled upon.
 Orly Taitz has published all over the Internet; by mass emailing; mass mailing and other
distribution the following private identifying information of Lisa Liberi:
A. Lisa Liberi’s full Social Security number;

B. Lisa Liberi’s Spouse’s Social Security number;
C. Date of births;
D. Mother’s maiden name;
E. Place of Birth;
F. Address which Orly Taitz believes Lisa Liberi resides;
G. Family Picture; and
H. Plaintiff Liberi’s spouses Social Security number and date of birth.
Now Defendant Taitz is attempting to procure Plaintiff Liberi’s driver’s license, which
she is not privy to.
 There is NO permissible purpose for Defendant Orly Taitz to obtain Lisa Liberi’s
driver’s license, nor is there any legal basis entitling Defendant Taitz to Lisa Liberi’s
driver’s license.
 Orly Taitz has falsely stated and manipulated this Court’s findings and what was
presented and filed with this Court.
 Defendant Orly Taitz has been stalking Lisa Liberi and her son; and Lisa Ostella and her
children.
 Due to the facts that Defendant Taitz’s behaviors have now escalated to an extremely
dangerous level against the Plaintiffs, their husbands and children, e.g. Felony Stalking
across state lines and what appears to be Defendant Taitz’s attempt to hire an individual
with a violent background to physically harm Lisa Liberi, her son and husband; as well as
Lisa Ostella and her children, it is imperative that this Court refer this matter to the
United States Attorney’s Office or the United States Department of Justice immediately,
before one of the Plaintiffs’ are physically hurt and/or killed.
 Plaintiff Liberi is not a resident or citizen of the State of California as Defendant Orly
Taitz falsely claims, nor is Plaintiff Liberi a resident or citizen of the State of Texas.
 Defendants Orly Taitz and Neil Sankey only want verification of Plaintiff Liberi’s actual
residency in order to carry out their violent, serious threats to destroy and get rid of
Plaintiff Liberi. The entire docketing system of this case gets published all over the
Internet by Defendant Taitz.

Page2 J2
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
4 Date Page
Filed: 311/07/2010
of 26
 This Case is supposed to be transferred to the Central District of California, Southern

Division and to the Western District of Texas; however, to date it has not been
transferred and Defendant Taitz is Obstructing Justice.
A. FACTS:
Since this Court entered its Order severing and transferring the within Case, Defendant
Taitz has continued obstructing justice by filing frivolous motions.
The newest filing of Defendant Taitz’s is this Request for Missing Documents / Motion
for Reconsideration, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 60B claiming new
evidence. Defendant Taitz is now claiming she has entitlement to Plaintiff Liberi’s Driver’s
License based on many false assertions. Defendant Taitz’s Motion fails on its face.
It appears Defendant Taitz sent copies of this filing to everyone in the world, however,
neglected AGAIN to serve the undersigned. Defendant Taitz loves to play with the minds of her
readers and followers. It appears that she wants to manipulate her followers into believing that
she is again the victim whose rights are being trampled upon, instead of the fact that is proven by
a preponderance of evidence filed with this Honorable Court that she is indeed the perpetrator
and the within Plaintiffs are the actual victims.
Defendant Taitz demands a copy of Lisa Liberi’s driver’s license claiming it was filed on
August 7, 2009 and Plaintiffs committed a fraud upon the Court by the fact Lisa Liberi showed
this Court a Pennsylvania driver’s license. Orly Taitz had every opportunity to appear for this
Court hearing, however, refused, instead going on a publicity tour. No one has ever disclosed
what state issued Plaintiff Liberi’s driver’s license. Just another made up allegation by
Defendant Orly Taitz attempting to further manipulate this Court.
This Court may recall Orly Taitz first screamed Plaintiff Liberi resided in New Mexico
and that the case should be transferred to California. Once this Court gave Defendant Orly

Page3 J3
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
5 Date Page
Filed: 411/07/2010
of 26
Taitz’s her wishes, Defendant Taitz changed her story screaming Plaintiff Liberi resided in
California, then had letters of Linda Sue Belcher filed, which Defendant Taitz created, with this
Court claiming Plaintiff Liberi resides in New Mexico.
This Court found and ruled that Plaintiff Liberi did NOT reside in California or Texas,
which was correct and thereby amended this Court’s Order transferring Defendants Taitz;
Defend our Freedoms Foundations, Inc.; Sankey; the Sankey Firm, Inc. a/k/a the Sankey Firm;
and Sankey Investigation, Inc. to the U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Southern
Division and the Texas Defendants, Edgar and Caren Hale, Linda Sue Belcher, Plains Radio, and
KPRN to the Western District of Texas, again giving the Defendants exactly what they wanted.
Even if this Court had inadvertently made a mistake regarding jurisdiction or diversity,
which it did not, the Court did not err, the Court would have still severed and transferred the
case, if in fact a deficiency existed, which again it did not. See Jumara v. State Farm Ins. Co.,
55 F.3d 873, 878 (3d Cir. 1995); 17A Moore's Federal Practice, § 111.02 (Matthew Bender 3d
ed. 2006); Lafferty v. Gito St. Riel, 495 F.3d 72 (3d Cir. 2007).
Another concern is the fact this Court has Ordered Transfer of this Case to United States
District Court, Central District of California, Southern Division as well as an Amended Order on
June 22, 2010. After this Court’s Order to Sever and Transfer the case to the U.S. District Court,
Central District of California, Southern Division, Defendant Taitz has taken steps which
constitute “Obstruction of Justice”. Defendant Taitz’s filing of July 29, 2010, appearing on the
Docket as Docket Entry No. 136, Page Thirty [38] and her filing of September 8, 2010 appearing
on the Docket as Docket Entry No. 143, Page Fourteen [14], these filings containing falsified
allegations pertaining to the Plaintiffs were sent by Defendant Orly Taitz to Judge David O.
Carter and Chief Judge Audrey B. Collins, U.S. District Court, Central District of California,

Page4 J4
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
6 Date Page
Filed: 511/07/2010
of 26
Southern Division, the same Court this Court Ordered Transfer of the within action for no
permissible purpose. Defendant Taitz is attempting to prejudice the Court against the Plaintiffs
and conflict out these two Judges in California and make it difficult for the Court to handle
Plaintiffs’ case. Moreover, this case could be assigned to either of these Judges; therefore, these
actions of Defendant Orly Taitz clearly meet the criminal elements of Obstruction of Justice. See
Affidavit of K. Strebel attached hereto and incorporated in by reference as EXHIBIT “1” and
the Affidavit of Evelyn Adams attached as EXHIBIT “2”.
Obstruction of Justice is a broad concept that extends to any effort to prevent the
execution of lawful process or the administration of justice in either a criminal or civil matter.
Obstructive conduct may include the destruction of evidence; the intimidation of potential
witnesses or retaliation against actual witnesses; willfully withholds, misrepresents, alters or
falsify any documentary material; the preparation of false testimony or other evidence, or the
interference with jurors or other Court personnel. The purpose of criminal obstruction statutes is
to help protect the integrity of legal proceedings and, at the same time, protect those individuals
who participate in such proceedings. Prosecutors use the statutes against obstructive efforts that
merely had a reasonable tendency to impede a legal proceeding. Whether or not the effort was
successful does not matter. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1501-1507.
Defendant Taitz’s continues publications of private data of Plaintiff Liberi claiming
Plaintiff Liberi is a “career document forger”, which is completely untrue. Moreover, Defendant
Taitz’s continues telling this Court, that the public has a right to know as a result of Defendant
Taitz false allegation that Plaintiff Liberi fundraises and has access to credit cards, all of which is
untrue. Plaintiff Liberi does not fundraise at all, instead, Plaintiff Evelyn Adams is who assisted
Mr. Berg with his fundraising efforts. Defendant Taitz’s reasoning and explanations to this

Page5 J5
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
7 Date Page
Filed: 611/07/2010
of 26
Court are a complete fabrication. See the Affidavit of Evelyn Adams attached hereto as
EXHIBIT “2”.
Defendant Taitz has employed volunteers, most of who have felony criminal convictions,
which Defendant Taitz has failed to disclose. Several have many different convictions
throughout the years with multi prison terms. Most of the felonies are forgery and theft type
crimes; however, a few of Defendant Taitz past and/or present volunteers have criminal
convictions for violent crimes. Some have severe psychiatric issues with a history of violence
and hospitalization in mental institutions. A few had a "falling out with Defendant Taitz" due to
Defendant Taitz asking them to lie or perjure themselves in Federal Court about several matters.
They provided Affidavits to Federal Judges about Defendant Taitz's attempt, and to the
California Bar. One Affidavit also included information regarding Taitz's adulterous affair with
Charles Lincoln III. It is obvious Defendant Taitz’s statements are false, and her intent is to
further carry out her threat to get rid of Plaintiff Liberi. See the Affidavit of K. Strebel attached
as EXHIBIT “1” and Affidavit of Shirley Waddell attached as EXHIBIT “3.
Moreover, Defendant Taitz all through her filings and exhibits falsely claim Plaintiffs
accused Pamela Barnett of stealing Defendant Linda Belcher’s identity and forging her name.
This is completely untrue and this Court can verify the statements with what is on file with this
Court. See Plaintiffs Reply filed July 30, 2010, appearing as Docket Entry No. 137, Page Eight
[8]. What Plaintiffs stated was:
“It is important for this Court to note, Orly Taitz orchestrated the letter from Linda Belcher. In
fact, Defendant Taitz and/or her employee Pamela Barnett on behalf of Defendant Taitz
prepared the letter for Linda Belcher to sign. When you prepare a document, there are
properties to the specific document, the properties is like a “finger-print” as it shows who the
software is registered to; the version of the software; and the date the software was
manufactured, created or updated. A copy of the screen shots showing Defendant Belcher’s
letter posted on Defendant Taitz’s website; and the properties of Linda Belcher’s letter are
attached hereto as EXHIBIT “3”. Defendant Taitz then posted her filings which were made

Page6 J6
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
8 Date Page
Filed: 711/07/2010
of 26
with this Court July 28, 2010, appearing as Docket Entry No. 136 on her website July 30, 2010,
a copy of the screen shots showing Defendant Taitz’s filings with this Court posted on her
(Defendant Taitz’s) website; and the properties of Defendant Taitz documents are attached
hereto as EXHIBIT “4”. As you can clearly see, the properties of Defendant Belcher’s letter
and Defendant Taitz’s filings match identically, except for the creation date.”
Plaintiffs did make a mistake however, it was not Pamela Barnett who created the
documents on behalf of Defendant Orly Taitz to have Defendant Belcher sign, it was in fact
Norman B. Murray, Defendant Taitz’s assistant, as demonstrated by the screen shots in Docket
Entry No. 137.
Defendant Taitz has been stalking Plaintiff Liberi and her son, having her supporter’s
Neil Turner (Neil Turner is also Defendant Taitz’s Plaintiff in a dismissed case) and Defendant
Linda Belcher send out to all the Militia and White Supremacy groups, Plaintiff Liberi’s picture1,
which Defendant Taitz illegally obtained, along with the address in which Defendant Taitz
believes Plaintiff Liberi resides, calling Plaintiff Liberi a “Blood-Red Herring”.2 Defendant
Taitz continues claiming the Plaintiffs have not substantiated their allegation of harassment and
that Plaintiffs have lied. See the Affidavit of K. Strebel attached as EXHIBIT “1”; the Affidavit
of Evelyn Adams attached as EXHIBIT “2”; and the Affidavit of Shirley Waddell attached as
EXHIBIT "3”. The Plaintiffs have not; harassment is an element in the crimes of Stalking and
Cyber-Stalking. See below:
The Legal Definition of Criminal Harassment is:

“The act of systematic and/or continued unwanted and annoying actions of one party or
a group, including threats and demands. The purposes may vary, including racial
1
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12692 posted July 30, 2010; http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?attachment_id=12691
Posted July 30, 2010; http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12783 posted August 3, 2010;
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=13505 posted August 31, 2010; http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=13737 posted
September 6, 2010 and http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12845 posted August 7, 2010 and sent out by mass email on
August 1, 2010 and September 6, 2010
2
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12774 posted August 1, 2010; http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=13737 posted
September 6, 2010 and http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12845 posted August 7, 2010 and sent out by mass email on
August 1, 2010 and September 6, 2010

Page7 J7
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
9 Date Page
Filed: 811/07/2010
of 26
prejudice, personal malice…or merely gain sadistic pleasure from making someone
anxious or fearful…”3
The Legal Definition of Stalking is:

“A person who intentionally and repeatedly follows or harasses another person and who
makes a credible threat, either expressed or implied, with the intent to place that person
in reasonable fear of death or serious bodily harm is guilty of the crime of stalking.”4
The Legal Definition of Cyber-Stalking is:

“Cyber-stalkers often do not threaten their victims, at least not directly;5 they are more
likely to use tactics that harass and threaten their victims, such as posting the victim’s
name and address on the Internet along with false claims.”6 The U.S. Department
of Justice also points out the fact that, “as with physical stalking, online harassment and
threats may be a prelude to more serious behavior, including physical violence.” The
United States Department of Justice also found that our “Courts need to recognize the
serious nature of cyberstalking.”
Defendant Taitz’s continued publication of information pertaining to the Plaintiffs and
the constant harassment and fear the publications have placed the Plaintiffs and their families in,
meets the elements of Harassment; Stalking; and Cyber-Stalking. Plaintiffs have copies of all of
Defendant Orly Taitz’s publications. Defendant Taitz has a habit, once Plaintiffs file proof or
evidence of her distorted publications, Defendant Taitz immediately deletes them. Not only is
this destruction and/or spoliation of evidence, but also copies of all her postings to date have
been provided to the proper law enforcement entities, including the Federal Bureau of
3
http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=853
4
http://definitions.uslegal.com/s/stalking
5
See 1999 Revision of Model State Computer Crimes Code § 2.02.2 - Commentary, available at
http://www.cybercrimes.net/99MSCCC/MSCCC/Article2/2.02.2.html.
6
See, e.g., Petherick, supra note 130. See also U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Cyberstalking: A New Challenge for Law
Enforcement and Industry (August 1999), available at:
http://www.justice.gov/criminal/cybercrime/cyberstalking.htm.

Page8 J8
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 10
09/14/10
DatePage
Filed:911/07/2010
of 26
Investigation. See also the Affidavit of K. Strebel, attached hereto as EXHIBIT “1”; Affidavit of
Evelyn Adams attached as EXHIBIT “2”; and Affidavit of Shirley Waddell attached as
EXHIBIT “3”.
In fact, since May 5, 2009, Defendant Taitz was well aware that Plaintiff Liberi was
protected from John Mark Allen. Despite this, Defendants Taitz and Sankey sought out John
Allen giving all of Plaintiff Liberi’s information to him. Defendants Taitz and Sankey then
attempted to defraud this Court into believing John Allen gave them the picture they have been
posting all over the place, a picture John Allen never had possession of. As a result, Plaintiffs
hired a Private Investigator who investigates on behalf of the Orange County District Attorney’s
Office in California where John Mark Allen resides to have John Mark Allen interviewed. John
Mark Allen has hidden from the Private Investigator, even refused to come out at work when the
Private investigator appeared to question him, so the undersigned sent Mr. Allen an email stating
he would seek his deposition, by Court Order if necessary. See Affidavit of K. Strebel attached
as EXHIBIT “1” and Affidavit of Shirley Waddell attached as EXHIBIT “3”;
The next event was Defendant Orly Taitz contacted Plaintiffs Private Investigator,
harassing him and his staff. Defendant Taitz then contacted the undersigned claiming she
needed verification of an email sent to Mr. Allen before she filed Court papers. Thus, Defendant
Taitz is interfering with Plaintiffs rights to have John Allen interviewed. If Defendant Taitz and
Sankey weren’t lying to this Court, and obtained the picture from John Allen, who would have
been in violation of a Protective Order, then why is Defendant Taitz interfering with Plaintiffs
interviewing John Mark Allen? As a result, Plaintiffs also need to seek an Order of the Court for
John Allen to appear for a deposition, but again, which Court do the Plaintiffs petition since the
case has NOT been transferred?

Page9 J9
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
11 DatePage
Filed:
1011/07/2010
of 26
Plaintiffs Liberi and Ostella have been receiving death threats and harassment from
Defendant Taitz supporters, demanding the lawsuit against Defendant Taitz be dropped and
threatening Plaintiffs Liberi and Ostella if it is not dropped. See the post by Defendant Taitz on
her website requesting her supporters to call Philip J. Berg, Esquire’s office, but instead they are
calling the private homes of Plaintiffs Liberi and Ostella threatening their lives.7
As if this is not enough, August 31, 2010, Defendant Orly Taitz went on the Andrea Shea
King radio program and again falsely accused Plaintiffs Liberi and Berg of complete untruths;
again making statements about Plaintiff Liberi’s son8, the most concerning Defendant Taitz
asked if something happened to Plaintiff Liberi’s son. This is extremely concerning as
Defendant Orly Taitz “projects” what ever she is doing, she accuses her victims of. So the
question is, what has Defendant Taitz’s arranged to have happen to Plaintiff Liberi’s son?
During this same radio program, Defendant Taitz stated as she is talking about Plaintiff Liberi,
“And I have provided directions, I have provided the pictures…” Again, talking about Plaintiff
Lisa Liberi. What directions has Defendant Taitz provided? As this Court is aware, directions
can be instructions to commit an act or instructions to locate a place.
On September 1, 2010, Defendant Taitz interviewed with a hired actor, by the name
David Acton, and had a video produced, using this Actor’s name as an endorsement to give
credibility to her false claims against Plaintiffs. In particular, claiming Plaintiff Liberi is
handling all of the credit cards for the Law Offices of Philip J. Berg, knowing the information is
false. Moreover, Defendant Taitz used this actor to endorse and give credibility to Defendant
Taitz’s false accusations that the undersigned had one of her accounts on the Internet shut down
7
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=13499
8
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/askshow/2010/08/31/the-andrea-shea-king-show.mp3

Page10 J10
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
12 DatePage
Filed:
1111/07/2010
of 26
as well as other false accusations.9 This video was placed all over the Internet and it is further
unknown to the Plaintiffs where else this broadcast has been played to date (cable, satellite feeds,
radio programs, etc.). See the Affidavit of K. Strebel attached as EXHIBIT “1”; Affidavit of
Shirley Waddell attached as EXHIBIT “3” and Affidavit of Lisa Ostella attached as EXHIBIT
“4”. Defendant Orly Taitz “projects” what ever she is doing onto her victims. In fact, it was
Defendant Orly Taitz and her volunteer who were collecting credit cards for a “Convention” in
Texas set-up by Defendant Taitz. See the Affidavit of Lisa Ostella attached hereto as EXHIBIT
“4”. This “Convention” never took place.
Defendant Taitz has also put a “call out” to her supporters to harass State Agencies
demanding the arrest of Lisa Liberi10.
There is a lot more that Defendant Taitz has continued doing to ensure Plaintiffs Liberi,
Ostella and their families are severely harmed, injured or even killed. All of this information has
been turned over to law enforcement, who recently turned it over to the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) as all the crimes Defendant Taitz continues committing against Plaintiffs
Liberi and Ostella have crossed state lines, thereby making them Federal.
Since this Court’s Order to sever and transfer the case in June, this Court has closed this
case in this jurisdiction. The case, to date, has NOT been transferred, and therefore, Plaintiffs
need to know where to file for Protective Orders while the case is in limbo.
For the reasons stated herein, Defendant Orly Taitz’s Motion must be denied and
Plaintiffs’ must be informed on which Court to file their request for Protective Order to stop the
harassing and stalking behaviors of Defendant Orly Taitz and Request for a Court Order to
depose John Mark Allen.
9
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7jWiYVVYvY&feature=player_embedded
10

Page11J11
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
13 DatePage
Filed:
1211/07/2010
of 26
B. DEFENDANT TAITZ’S MOTION MUST BE DENIED AS THE ISSUES

HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED; IT IS UNTIMELY and VIOLATES THE
FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE:
Defendant Taitz basis her frivolous motion on new information, claiming she needs a
copy of Plaintiff Liberi’s driver’s license, because in Plaintiffs Reply filed July 29, 2010,
Plaintiffs state on page five (5) of the reply, “Defendant Taitz all through her frivolous filing
claims Plaintiff Liberi has not proven where she resides. To the contrary, during the August 17,
2009 [sic] Hearing, Plaintiff Liberi had her driver’s license, safe at home cards, birth
certificate; marriage certificate; and Social Security [sic] card with her in court, which she
offered to the court for review” This is not new evidence, Defendant Taitz has been well aware
of this since July 29, 2010, and had ample time to file within the ten (10) day period outlined for
Motions for Reconsideration. Moreover, where in the quoted statement does it say what state
Plaintiff Liberi’s license was issued; it does not, and, where does it say copies of Plaintiff
Liberi’s license were filed in the Court, it does not. It states the information was offered to the
Court to review. Defendant Taitz is doing nothing more than attempting to box Plaintiff Liberi
into a corner to force her to verify her address, so that Defendant Taitz can carry out her threats.
This case is not a game, nor is it a game as to the damages Plaintiffs have suffered and continue
suffering as a result of the Defendants unlawful actions, especially those of Defendant Taitz.
As this Court is aware and as outlined in Broadcast Music, Inc. v. La Trattoria E., Inc.,
No. CIV.A. 95-1784, 1995 WL 552881, at *1 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 15, 1995), it is unsettled among the
Courts how to treat Motions to Reconsider, the Court found:
“The [United States] Supreme Court has noted that “[s]uch a motion is not recognized
by any of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Third Circuit has sometimes ruled
on such motions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) and at other times under
Rule 60(b). A motion to reconsider may, therefore, be treated as a Rule 59(e) motion
for amendment of judgment or a Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment or order.”

Page12 J12
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
14 DatePage
Filed:
1311/07/2010
of 26
Motions for Reconsideration must be filed with ten (10) days. See Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, Rule 59(e); Broadcast Music, Inc. v. La Trattoria E., Inc., No. CIV.A. 95-1784, 1995
WL 552881, at *1 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 15, 1995); Choi v. Kim, 258 Fed. App’x 413, 416 (3d Cir.
2007) (citing North River Ins. Co. v. CIGNA Reinsurance Co., 52 F.3d 1194, 1218 (3d Cir.
1995)); Max’s Seafood Café ex rel. Lou-Ann, Inc. v. Quinteros, 176 F.3d 669, 677 (3d Cir.
1999); In re Loewen Group Inc. Sec. Litig., 2006 WL 27286, at *1 (E.D.Pa. Jan. 5, 2006).
Defendant Orly Taitz admits in her own pleadings she was aware since July 29, 2010, of the
statement in Plaintiffs Reply that Plaintiff Liberi made all her identifying documentation
available to the Court.
Even if this Court chooses to treat Defendant Taitz’s Motion, pursuant to Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure 60(b), motions must be brought within a reasonable time, and based on: (1)
mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence that, with
reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule
59(b); (3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation or conduct
by an opposing party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released or
discharged; it is based on an earlier judgment that has been reversed or vacated; or applying it
prospectively is no longer equitable; or (6) any other reason that justifies relief. See Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 60(b). None of the factors apply here. Defendant Taitz admitted
she was aware that Plaintiff Liberi had her identifying documents with her in Court on August 9,
2009 and offered them to the Court; thus, there is no new discovered evidence as Defendant
Taitz was aware of the information since July 29, 2010, in time to file a Motion for
Reconsideration within the ten (10) day period of time; there was no fraud, contrary to
Defendant Taitz’s false claims in her Motion, no one has ever stated what State Plaintiff Liberi’s

Page 13J13
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
15 DatePage
Filed:
1411/07/2010
of 26
driver’s license was issued out of, except for the fact Plaintiff Liberi does not reside in California
or Texas, which she doesn’t, see the Affidavit of Kelly Strebel attached as EXHIBIT “1” and
the Affidavit of Evelyn Adams attached as EXHIBIT “2”; therefore, Defendant Taitz’s Motion
fails; and terms four (4), five (5) and six (6) do not apply to Defendant Taitz’s Motion.
Defendant Taitz Motion is nothing more than Frivolous.
Generally, a Motion for Reconsideration will only be granted if: (1) there has been an
intervening change in controlling law; (2) new evidence, which was not previously available, has
become available; or (3) it is necessary to correct a clear error of law or to prevent manifest
injustice. Reich v. Compton, 834 F. Supp. 753, 755 (E.D. Pa. 1993) (citing Dodge v.
Susquehanna Univ., 796 F. Supp., 829, 830 (M.D. Pa. 1992)), aff’d in part, rev’d in part, 57 F.3d
270 (3d Cir. 1995); McDowell Oil Serv., Inc. v. Interstate Fire & Cas. Co., 817 F. Supp. 538,
541 (M.D. Pa. 1993). Furthermore, “With regard to the third ground...any litigant considering
bringing a motion to reconsider based upon that ground should evaluate whether what may seem
to be a clear error of law is in fact simply a disagreement between the Court and the litigant.”
Again, Defendant Taitz fails to meet any of the required grounds.
The Supreme Court has stated that Rule 59(e) is generally invoked "only to support
reconsideration of matters properly encompassed in a decision on the merits." White v. New
Hampshire Dep't of Employment Sec., 455 U.S. 445, 451, 102 S. Ct. 1162, 71 L. Ed. 2d 325
(1982).
Moreover, Defendant Taitz fails to cite to any Judgment or Order she is requesting
reconsideration of, or what judgment or Order she is seeking relief of. Defendant Taitz also
claims that the “sealed documents” were not supplied to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
There is absolutely no way for Defendant Taitz to know what documents were transmitted and

Page14J14
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
16 DatePage
Filed:
1511/07/2010
of 26
what documents were not transmitted. The record and appropriate documents are transmitted
from this very Court, as outlined in the Docket. If documents are “under seal”, you can not call
and obtain the information over the phone nor can you obtain copies of the “sealed” documents
without a Court Order.
Defendant Taitz’s filings are filled with nothing more than hearsay statements,
conclusions of law, and speculation. Defendant Taitz only filed her frivolous filings with this
Court to use this Court and its docketing system to further publish false allegations about the
Plaintiffs; Plaintiff Liberi’s family picture which she obtained illegally; and to further publish
private data of the Plaintiffs, or what she believes to be data of the Plaintiffs.
Defendant Taitz is just further harassing this Court, attempting to delay the transfer, and
attempting to obtain Plaintiff Liberi’s driver’s license to further carry out her threats and to
publish it on her website. Defendant Taitz’s has absolutely no entitlement or valid reason to ask
said request. More importantly, Defendant Taitz quoted Plaintiffs Reply with false statements,
no where does it state Plaintiff Liberi gave a copy of her driver’s license to this Court, as she
didn’t. No where does it even mention the State of issuance of Plaintiff Liberi’s driver’s license;
Nor is there anywhere that states the Court filed Plaintiff Liberi's driver’s license under seal.
Plaintiff Liberi made her identification documents available to the Court for review.
Moreover, in Defendant Taitz’s filings, she misquotes what this lawsuit is about, is
attempting to change what this lawsuit is about, mis-states what the Plaintiffs and this Court have
stated and/or testified to and mis-states the events which have taken place. The issues Defendant
Taitz is attempting to claim is pertinent do not pertain, but even if they did, it would be reserved
for Trial, not a Motion for Reconsideration. Defendant Taitz filing is frivolous.
Liberi\Opp. to Def. Taitz’s Motion for Plaintiff Liberi’s D.L. Page 15J15
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
17 DatePage
Filed:
1611/07/2010
of 26
As stated to this Court when Plaintiffs were attempting to maintain the August 7, 2009
transcript sealed, Orly Taitz would publish the transcript on her website. Defendant Taitz did
just that and published the August 7, 2009 transcript on her website August 4, 2010 with a
heading “Evidence of fraud on the court, perjury by Berg, Liberi Ostella, fabrication of
evidence and vicious attacks on me by Berg”11 Plaintiffs Liberi, Ostella or Berg perjured their
testimony nor did Plaintiffs Liberi, Ostella or Berg commit any type of fraud upon the Court. It
is interesting that when the Plaintiffs file posts and publications made by Defendant Taitz on her
website, which were obtained directly from her website, she accuses the Plaintiffs of forgery;
fabrication; fraud; vicious attacks; and “that Plaintiffs filed thousands of pages of prejudicial,
inflammatory and defamatory material” when it is Defendant Taitz’s very own writings and
publications filed with the Court. Especially when it has been the Defendants forging and
altering documents in the name of Plaintiffs Liberi and Ostella, which evidence and proof of
Defendant Taitz’s and the other Defendants forgery and alterations of emails and chat logs in the
name of Plaintiffs Liberi and Ostella have been filed with this Court. See the Affidavit of K.
Strebel attached as EXHIBIT “1”.
What Defendant Taitz does not seem to understand and to quote Judge Clay D. Land,
“Like Alice in Wonderland, just saying it is so, doesn’t make it so”12. [Emphasis added].
For the reasons stated herein, Defendant Orly Taitz’s Motion for Reconsideration must be
denied.
11
12
Rhodes v. MacDonald, 670 F. Supp. 2d 1363 (M.D. Ga. 2009)

Page16J16
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
18 DatePage
Filed:
1711/07/2010
of 26
C. SANCTIONS and ATTORNEY FEES AGAINST DEFENDANT ORLY

TAITZ are WARRANTED:
Plaintiffs have brought to this Court’s attention the fact Defendant Taitz will not stop her
barrage of filings until this Court takes action to put a stop to it. Therefore, Plaintiffs should be
reimbursed their Attorney Fees and Defendant Taitz must be sanctioned. The Motion for
Reconsideration filed by Defendant Orly Taitz, appearing as Docket Entry No. 143, is
incompliant with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Commonwealth’s laws and is
frivolous.
Defendant Taitz also claims the transcript is incomplete however fails to state how the
Transcript is incomplete. Defendant Taitz further states that she did not have the transcript
before, which is a complete lie to this Court. Defendant Taitz published the August 7, 2009
transcript on her website August 4, 2010, over a month ago. A copy of Defendant Taitz’s post
with the August 7, 2009 Transcript is attached as an Exhibit to the Affidavit of K. Strebel
attached hereto as EXHIBIT “1”. Defendant Taitz’s further states that the documents provided
in Court on August 7, 2009 were never released to the Defendants. Again, another lie to this
Court. The Defendants present were handed copies of everything the Plaintiffs filed with the
Court in Court before Your Honor. Defendant Taitz’s were emailed as she chose to go on a
publicity tour instead of attending the hearing.
Defendant Taitz then states “In spite of the fact that Plaintiffs filed thousands of pages of
prejudicial, inflammatory and defamatory material, this court did not buy those arguments and
refused the Plaintiffs demand for injunctive relief.” [Defendant Taitz’s Motion, page 4].
Defendant Taitz statements are not true. The Requests for a Temporary Injunction or
Restraining Order were based on the publication of Plaintiff Liberi’s Social Security number by
Defendant Taitz and other private data, the damage had been done, that is why the request was
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
19 DatePage
Filed:
1811/07/2010
of 26
denied. Further, the only things Plaintiffs have filed are affidavits and Defendant Taitz’s own
creations and publications. But on another page of Defendant Taitz’s filings, she claims
Plaintiffs have not filed any proof.
It is also apparent from Defendant Taitz’s filing, although she is an attorney licensed to
practice law, she fails to realize this Court is not bound by Court’s in other states rulings.
Defendant Taitz’s fails to cite one [1] Pennsylvania case in support of her frivolous motion.
Defendant Taitz continues blaming and falsely accusing the undersigned of fraud on the
Court for stating the August 7, 2009 transcript was sealed. It was this very Court’s staff that
stated the transcript was sealed. In fact, Joan Carr, Supervisor in this Court, filed a letter with the
Third Circuit Court of Appeals stating the transcript was sealed. Defendant Taitz then claims
that the Defendants and her are “whistleblowers”. Whistleblowers of what? This suit is about
the invasion of privacy; publication of full Social Security numbers; false statements made about
the Plaintiffs; right to be let alone; harassment by the Defendants, etc. However, Defendant
Taitz is just attempting to convolute this lawsuit and confuse the Judges. Defendant Taitz also
falsely accuses Plaintiffs of filing eleven [11] Motions with the Appellate Court along with
Requests for Judicial Notice. Plaintiffs never filed eleven [11] Motions with the Appellate
Court, and that is easily verified by the Docket. Just another fabrication by Defendant Taitz.
Defendant Taitz then purposefully lies to this Court again claiming, “Plaintiffs have filed
numerous motions and emergency motions with this Court and the Court of Appeals to keep
Liberi’s vital records sealed.” Defendant Taitz or any of the other Defendants have any type of
entitlement to Plaintiff Liberi’s vital records. In fact, one of the reasons for this lawsuit is due to
the illegal access by Defendants Taitz and Neil Sankey to Plaintiff Liberi’s vital records.

Page18J18
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
20 DatePage
Filed:
1911/07/2010
of 26
Defendant Taitz next states, “Liberi and Berg tried to justify their requests with insane,
absolutely untrue and bizarre [sic] allegation, claiming that a licensed doctor and attorney Dr.
Taitz, who was never in trouble with the law, attempted to make a deal with some criminal to
kidnap and kill Liberi and her family. Plaintiffs did not provide any shred of evidence with such
slanderous accusation and neither this court nor the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ever found
any merit to such accusations and neither one of the motions for injunctive relief were granted.”
This is another lie by Defendant Taitz. Defendant Taitz is speaking of Plaintiffs July 29, 2010
Reply when they pointed out a convicted felon, Ruben Nieto, attempted to get paid through
Defendants Orly Taitz and DOFF Twenty-Five Thousand [$25,000.00] Dollars on May 25, 2009
and May 29, 2009 (copies were supplied to this Court) and the payment requests were submitted
in three [3] simultaneous requests all of which were under Ten Thousand [$10,000.00] Dollars to
avoid reporting pursuant to the Patriot Act. Plaintiffs also pointed out that Ruben Nieto was
convicted of Aggravated Assault Crimes, he was dangerous. July 29, 2010 was the first time this
evidence was provided to the Court and had nothing to do with Plaintiffs Motions for a
Temporary Injunction or Restraining Order. The Court was also notified by Plaintiffs that the
payment requests were turned over to the proper law enforcement agencies. See the Affidavit of
K. Strebel attached as EXHIBIT “1” and Affidavit of Shirley Waddell attached as EXHIBIT
“3”.
Defendant again lies to this Court, Defendant Taitz states, “In their July 29th reply to the
Defendants response Plaintiffs claimed that judge [sic] Robreno assumed jurisdiction and issued
his order not to dismiss the case, but rather to sever and transfer the case, where he stated
“Liberi is a resident of Pennsylvania”, based on the documents provided by Liberi”. [emphasis
added] No where in Plaintiffs Reply did Plaintiffs or the undersigned ever state where he stated
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
21 DatePage
Filed:
2011/07/2010
of 26
“Liberi is a resident of Pennsylvania”, based on the documents provided by Liberi”. This is
clearly a fraud upon the Court by Defendant Taitz. Plaintiffs incorporate their July 29, 2010
Reply herein by reference as if fully set forth herewith. Plaintiffs also request this Court to take
Judicial Notice of their July 29, 2010 Reply.
Defendant Taitz’s entire motion is based on lies, false statements, mis-quotations of
testimony and manipulated events. Your Honor, Defendant Taitz MUST be sanctioned,
otherwise this will never stop.
The issues of Diversity Jurisdiction have been litigated several times. Moreover,
Defendant Taitz has Appealed this Court’s rulings, although they are not Appealable Orders as
they are proper Orders. Now, Defendant Taitz is attempting to re-litigate the matters for the
fourth or fifth time, while her Appeal is pending.
This Court has the inherent power to issue Sanctions and Attorney Fees against
Defendant Taitz, especially when false statements are filed with the Court and the pleading is
filed for improper purposes. See Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 11. Sanctions are used
to deter false statements; improper filings and unbecoming behaviors of an Attorney. See Walsh
v. Schering-Plough Corp., 758 F.2d 889, 895 (3d Cir. 1985) The Court Held, (“Undoubtedly, it
was just such considerations that gave rise to the recent amendment to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11. That
Rule, promulgated to keep attorneys "honest" in their pleading practice, now authorizes
sanctions to be imposed when an attorney violates his certificate that good grounds support his
pleading and that the pleading is not interposed for delay).
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 11 states in pertinent part:
”…it is well grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law or a good faith
argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, and that it is not
interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay
or needless increase in the cost of litigation…If a pleading, motion, or other paper is

Page20J20
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
22 DatePage
Filed:
2111/07/2010
of 26
signed in violation of this rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, shall
impose upon the person who signed it, a represented party, or both, an appropriate
sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other party or parties the amount of
the reasonable expenses incurred because of the filing of the pleading, motion, or other
paper, including a reasonable attorney's fee.”
The Court in Walsh v. Schering-Plough Corp., 758 F.2d at 896-897 went on further
stating:
“If we take no steps to resolve the issue which these affidavits have now presented to us,
we run the risk not only of losing the respect of the bar, but of damaging the
professional standards that lawyers look to us to uphold. Every member of the bar has
had his character and fitness tested and reviewed before obtaining a license to practice.
We, together, with other courts, are charged with maintaining at least that level of
honesty and professionalism in the conduct of those who, once having obtained the right
to practice, continue to exercise that right before us.”
“...So too, as each instance of charged professional misconduct is ignored by us or

deemed unworthy of our attention, our professional tapestry will imperceptibly, but
surely, lose its form, its structure and its shape.”
“Thus, in my opinion it is no answer to characterize the issue before us as one not

worth our consideration. If we do not require strict adherence to principles which
mandate candor and truthfulness, and if we refuse to decide and enforce claimed
violations of those fundamental precepts, we will have only ourselves to blame if
intolerable and proscribed practices of the bar become the rule rather than the
exception.”
Defendant Taitz has a known history for inciting violence and harm against those who do
not agree with her. See Rhodes v. MacDonald, 670 F. Supp. 2d 1363 (M.D. Ga. 2009) aff’d in
Rhodes v. MacDonald, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5340 (11th Cir. Ga. Mar. 15, 2010). Until this
Court takes action against Defendant Taitz, her barrage of false frivolous filings and her illegal
and dangerous behaviors will not stop.
For the reasons stated herein, Defendant Orly Taitz must be Sanctioned and Ordered to
pay Ten Thousand Dollars [$10,000.00] for Plaintiffs Attorney Fees. Plaintiffs also request this
Court to submit Defendant Orly Taitz falsified motion to the State Bar of California for full

Page 21J21
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
23 DatePage
Filed:
2211/07/2010
of 26
investigation. Attorney’s are held to a higher standard, and the many lies and falsified
statements made by Defendant Taitz in her filing, must be reported.
D. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST THIS COURT TO TRANSFER THE CASE

PURSUANT TO THIS COURT’S ORDER or REOPEN THIS CASE and
ALLOW PLAINTIFFS TO FILE FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
ORDER TO STOP DEFENDANT ORLY TAITZ’S CRIMINAL
ACTIVITIES TOWARDS PLAINTIFFS’:
Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all the previous paragraphs as if fully set forth here.
Plaintiffs also incorporate by reference as if fully set forth herein, Plaintiffs Reply filed July 30,
2010 appearing as Docket Entry No. 137.
This Court on June 22, 2010 Ordered the within action severed and transferred to the
Central District of California, Southern Division and the Western District of Texas. The case has
not been transferred to California or Texas. Even if this Court decided to stay the transfer
pending the appeal, the Texas Defendants have absolutely nothing to do with the pending
Appeal. Meanwhile, Defendant Taitz has been attempting to conflict out the Judges in the U.S.
District Court, Central District of California, Southern Division, the very Court this case is being
transferred.
Meanwhile, Defendant Orly Taitz has continued her illegal conduct, but this time has
escalated her tactics to further harassing, stalking and cyber-stalking Plaintiffs Liberi, Ostella and
their families. As a result, Plaintiffs’ Liberi and Ostella have been receiving death threats and
threats that the individuals were going to show up at their homes, all on behalf of Defendant
Taitz. Moreover, Attorney Philip J. Berg, Esquire has also been receiving death threats.
Most recently, on two (2) separate occasions, Defendant Taitz’s supporter and a Plaintiff
in one of her dismissed actions as well as Defendant Linda Belcher sent out a mass email to all

Page 22J22
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
24 DatePage
Filed:
2311/07/2010
of 26
the white supremacy and militia groups, again with the address she believed Plaintiff Liberi
resided at and Plaintiff Liberi’s family photo, calling Plaintiff a “Blood-Red Herring”. In
addition, Defendant Taitz posted Neil Turner and Defendant Linda Belcher’s publications on her
website.
Defendant Taitz has gone on recent radio shows stating that Plaintiff Liberi is a convicted
career document forger, that she has provided pictures of Plaintiff Liberi and directions. As this
Court is aware, directions can be instructions to commit an act or instructions to locate a place.
On September 1, 2010, Defendant Taitz interviewed with a hired actor, by the name of
David Acton, using this Actor’s name as an endorsement to give credibility to her false claims.
In particular, claiming Plaintiff Liberi is handling all of the credit cards for the Law Offices of
Philip J. Berg, knowing the information to be false. Moreover, Defendant Taitz used this actor to
endorse and give credibility to Defendant Taitz false accusations that the undersigned had one of
her accounts on the Internet shut down. See the Affidavit of Shirley Waddell attached as
EXHIBIT “3” and the Affidavit of Lisa Ostella attached as EXHIBIT “4”.
Although, all criminal acts have been reported to the proper law enforcement agencies,
and even been forwarded to the Federal Bureau of Investigation as Defendant Taitz’s actions
have crossed state lines, including internationally, law enforcement has continued strong
recommendations for Plaintiffs Liberi and Ostella to obtain Restraining Orders to protect
themselves and families and to stop all the stalking and harassment by Defendant Orly Taitz.
Law enforcement’s hands are tied and cannot automatically issue restraining orders due to the
jurisdictional issues. However, Law Enforcement continues to question why the Court’s are not
assisting the Plaintiffs in protection from Defendant Orly Taitz, Neil Sankey, Linda Belcher and
all parties on their behalf.
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
25 DatePage
Filed:
2411/07/2010
of 26
E. CONCLUSION:
For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs respectfully Request this Court to Deny
Defendant Orly Taitz’s Motion Request for Document / Motion for Reconsideration; Sanction
Defendant Taitz for the Frivolous Filings; Order Defendant Taitz to pay the undersigned Ten
Thousand [$10,000.00] Dollars in Attorney Fees; Transfer the case pursuant to this Court’s
Order of June 22, 2010 or in the alternative allow Plaintiffs to file an Emergency Motion for a
Temporary Restraining Order. Plaintiffs also respectfully request this Court to refer this Case to
the U.S. Attorney’s Office for full investigation into the crimes committed by Defendant Orly
Taitz and Neil Sankey. Plaintiffs’ also respectfully request this Court to send Defendant Orly
Taitz’s falsified statements and lies filed with this Court to the State Bar of California for full
investigation.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: September 14, 2010 s/ Philip J. Berg

______________________________
Philip J. Berg, Esquire
Attorney for Plaintiffs’

Page 24J24
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
26 DatePage
Filed:
2511/07/2010
of 26
Law Offices of:

Philip J. Berg, Esquire
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
(610) 825-3134 Attorney for Plaintiffs


Plaintiffs, :
vs. :
:
: Case No.: 09-cv-01898-ECR
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, hereby certify that a copy of Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition
to Defendant Orly Taitz’s Motion Request for Documents Missing from an Incomplete
Transcript/Motion for Reconsideration; Affidavit of K. Strebel; Affidavit of Shirley Waddell;
Affidavit of Evelyn Adams; and Affidavit of Lisa Ostella were served this 14th day of
September 2010 electronically upon the following:
Orly Taitz
Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc. (unrepresented)
26302 La Paz Ste 211
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Email: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Neil Sankey
Sankey Investigations, Inc. (unrepresented)
Post Office Box 8298 Mission Hills, CA 91346
By USPS with Postage fully prepaid
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340427
Document 144 Page:
Filed 09/14/10
27 DatePage
Filed:
2611/07/2010
of 26
The Sankey Firm, Inc. a/k/a The Sankey Firm (unrepresented)

2470 Stearns Street #162 Simi Valley, CA 93063
By USPS with Postage fully prepaid
Linda Sue Belcher

201 Paris
Castroville, Texas 78009
Email: Newwomensparty@aol.com and
Email: starrbuzz@sbcglobal.net
Ed Hale
Caren Hale
Plains Radio
KPRN
Bar H Farms
1401 Bowie Street
Wellington, Texas 79095
Email: plains.radio@yahoo.com; barhfarms@gmail.com;
ed@barhfarnet; and ed@plainsradio.com
s/ Philip J. Berg
________________________

Page26J26
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340428
Document 144-1 Page:
Filed 109/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
1 of 14
EXHIBIT “1”
Page J27
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340428
Filed 209/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
2 of 14
Law Offices of:

Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Attorney for: Plaintiffs
(610) 825-3134


:
Plaintiffs, : Assigned to Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno
:
vs. :
: Case No.: 09-cv-01898-ECR
:
:
:
Defendants. :
:
AFFIDAVIT OF K. STREBEL
I, K. Strebel am over the age of eighteen (18) and not a party to the within action. I have
personal knowledge of the facts herein and if called to do so, I could and would competently
testify under oath.
I declare as follows:
1. This Honorable Court continues to be paper bombed by Orly Taitz and the rest of
the defendants in this case for the simple fact of Diversity Jurisdiction. As a witness in the case,
Mr. Berg was asking your honor to rule that the Plaintiffs and their witnesses did not have to
disclose their full names and addresses. Your Honor ruled to protect the parties. I am quoting
Liberi\Affidavit of K. Strebel 09.14.2010 1
Page J28
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340428
Filed 309/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
3 of 14
from page 19 of the August 7th, Hearing Transcript that shows what occurred after Mr. Berg’s
requests.
August 7, 2009 Hearing Transcript – Page 19, Lines 2-16
The Court: Well, we know who she is. How are you going to be able to deny
that? She doesn’t have to disclose her social security number?
Mr. Berg: No, but her actual address I think would be detrimental.
The Court: Well, the actual address we could do without it.
Mr. Berg: Okay. Could that be on other people, too, or just on Ms. Liberi?
The Court: Well, you could disclose it and file it with the Court under seal.
Mr. Berg: Thank you. With all of my witnesses today?

The Court: Yes
2. As your Honor is aware, I was the first witness called. The only identification
documents I was asked if I had seen was Plaintiff Lisa Liberi’s Social Security card, which I
testified yes, I had seen. I was not asked about any other identification documents, however, I
would like to testify herein to all of the documents I saw pertaining to Plaintiff Lisa Liberi. Lisa
Liberi willingly showed me her driver’s license, both her old and new Social Security cards, both
of which were located in an envelope from the Social Security Administration. The envelope
had the post mark showing mailed from the State of Maryland. (Lisa Liberi was issued a new
Social Security number as a result of being a victim of crimes, at the same time she was placed
into the Safe at Home program and given a confidential address). Also in this envelope were 3
Cards entitled Safe at Home which had the names of Lisa Liberi, Her Husband and her Son, all
of which she provided to you during the August 7th Hearing for you to verify for yourself. I also
was able to view her Marriage License to her Husband.
Page J29
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340428
Filed 409/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
4 of 14
3. All of the above information shown to both me and the Court on August 7, 2009
and the fact I talk to Lisa Liberi almost on a daily basis proves that Lisa Liberi does NOT reside
within the States of California or Texas, which I believe the Defendants are well aware of. Any
further attempt of Orly Taitz or Neil Sankey and the remaining Defendants to place her residency
as such is dishonest and simply wasting your time Your Honor and the valuable recourses of the
Court that can be better served elsewhere. Defendant Taitz continues stating Plaintiff Liberi
showed a Pennsylvania Driver’s License. Defendant Taitz was not present for Court on August
7, 2009, and at NO time has it been filed or testified to, the State of issuance of Plaintiff Lisa
Liberi’s driver’s license.
4. Plaintiff Lisa Liberi and her son are victims of Domestic Violence type crimes
from one John Mark Allen, father of Lisa Liberi's son. For this reason alone, I hope this Court,
as it should, denies Defendant Orly Taitz’s Motion for the driver’s license of Plaintiff Liberi, and
deny Defendant Taitz any type of access to Plaintiff Liberi and her family’s residence.
Defendant Orly Taitz will continue to publish all the private data of Lisa Liberi and her family,
as she continues to do along with Plaintiff Lisa Liberi’s family picture.
5. Since the August 7th, 2009 Hearing Defendant Taitz and John Mark Allen have
colluded to further bring harm to Lisa Liberi. According to Defendant Orly Taitz and Defendant
Neil Sankey's claim that John Mark Allen provided the photograph, filed in this Court several
times and posted all over the Internet by Defendant Orly Taitz. The truth of the matter is
Plaintiff Liberi’s family picture was obtained from Lisa Liberi’s computer illegally, where this
photograph was stored. No one in the Liberi family provided the picture to John Mark Allen yet
he confirms the picture to be that of Lisa Liberi, Her Husband and Son with the picture of her
son blacked out. Defendant Orly Taitz has sent Plaintiff Liberi’s picture, which she (Taitz)
Page J30
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340428
Filed 509/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
5 of 14
illegally obtained, over the Internet numerous times, and posted it all over her website in
approximately 6 different locations. And, Defendant Taitz again posted Plaintiff Liberi’s family
picture this September 10th, 2010 Weekend on two (2) separate documents posted on her
website1. With this, Defendant Taitz has again violated Lisa Liberi and her family's First and
Fourteenth Amendment rights, not to mention the fact that Defendant Orly Taitz is not only
harassing Plaintiff Liberi, she is cyber-stalking Lisa Liberi and her family.
6. Defendant Orly Taitz continues to spew her falsified rhetoric regarding Plaintiff
Philip J. Berg, Esquire’s nationwide fundraising falsely claiming Plaintiff Liberi has access to
Credit Cards for those who would donate to help Mr. Berg. It is true that Mr. Berg has a PayPal
account on his website, and the truth of the matter is when you click onto PayPal, you enter
PayPal’s private server. The person donating the money fills out his or her own information.
PayPal then sends a receipt to the PayPal owner who received the donation, showing a donation
made, the date of the donation, the amount of the donation, and the person’s. Defendant Orly
Taitz is well aware of this as she too has a PayPal Account. Defendant Orly Taitz has lied to this
Court, the public and law enforcement attempting to have Plaintiffs Lisa Liberi and Lisa Ostella
falsely arrested. Defendant Taitz is again wasting the Courts time with her continued lies and
further distortion of the truth.
7. Defendant Orly Taitz continues to accuse Plaintiffs Liberi, Ostella and Berg of the
crimes in which she (Taitz) is actually committing (“Projection”). For instance, Defendant Taitz
was sanctioned $20,000.00 by Judge Clay D. Land, U.S. District Court, Middle District of
Georgia. Defendant Taitz has been begging her supporters for money to cover the sanctions. As
of September 12, 2010, Defendant Taitz’s claims she has collected $6,701 and needs to collect
1
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=13878 and http://www.orlytaitzesq.com
Page J31
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340428
Filed 609/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
6 of 14
an additional $13,299.00 to make a full $20,000.00.2 What Defendant Taitz failed to tell her
supporters is that the sanctions have been paid. A deception to the general public in order to be
able to reimburse herself (Taitz).
8. This Court should also be aware that Defendant Taitz continues her California
Secretary of State fundraising on her website at www.orlytaitzesq.com, even though she is not
the Republican Nominee, and not on the ballot for California Secretary of State. See EXHIBIT
“A”.
9. I would like to address Defendant Orly Taitz’s statement that she is a Dentist,
Lawyer and never been convicted of any crimes. This is completely false. A simple search of
only the Orange County Superior Court returns seven (7) convictions for traffic violations; bail
forfeitures; and a failure to appear3:
10. In addition, as I’m sure this Court may have noticed, the past few filings in this
Court by Defendant Orly Taitz that are filled with untruthful and false allegations, Defendant
Taitz has sent to Judge David O. Carter, and Chief Judge Audrey B. Collins of the U.S. District
Court, Central District of California, Southern Division for absolutely no permissible purpose,
other than to prejudice the Judges and/or to force the Judges in this District to recuse themselves,
as this is the Court Your Honor Ordered transfer of the within matter to. This is documented on
the Certificate of Service on the filings made by Defendant Taitz. Defendant Taitz’s actions
interfere with the proper administration of justice and therefore, constitutes criminal Obstruction
of Justice. The definition of Obstruction of Justice is “the crime or act of willfully interfering
with the process of justice and law esp. by influencing, threatening, harming, or impeding a
2
3
https://ocapps.occourts.org/Vision_Public/DisplayCaseInfo.do?caseobjid=1284188012325&src=case_src
Page J32
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340428
Filed 709/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
7 of 14
witness, potential witness, juror, or judicial or legal officer or by furnishing false information
in or otherwise impeding an investigation or legal process”4 [emphasis added] See
Defendant Orly Taitz’s Certificate of Service pages on file with this Court attached as EXHIBIT
“B” and “C”.
11. It is my understanding that the Federal Courts in California are assigned based on
the alphabet split. Meaning it appears that Judge David O. Carter has the alpha split J, K, L,
which means this case would be assigned to him.
12. Defendant Taitz has also stated that she continues putting out Plaintiff Liberi’s
information because she is a career document forger , which is not true, and the public has a
right to know. Defendant Taitz further states she does not associate with any criminals. This is
a complete lie to this Court. Defendant Taitz has employed (volunteers) and called for
witnesses, all of which have criminal records. Just to name a few:
Pamela R. Feldman, (1957) a/k/a Heaven Feldman a/k/a Pamella Rowlette and other aka’s.
Convicted Felon.
Volunteer of Defendant Orly Taitz. Also one of the people threatening Plaintiffs Liberi, Ostella
and Berg on the Internet
Florida Court Report for Pamela Feldman;
08/15/1994 Homicde-wilful Kill
07/25/1994 Criminal Solicitation to commit Aggravated Battery
03/01/2007 Aggravated Battery.
Cody Robert Judy (1965) also used birth year 1966.

Worked with Taitz on Barnett vs. Obama and attempted to file a joinder
On Feb. 7, 1993, Cody Judy interrupted a BYU fireside where LDS apostle Howard W. Hunter
was speaking. Judy held a briefcase containing what he said was a bomb, and in his other hand
he held what he said was a detonator. There were 14,000 – 17,000 people in attendance during
this event. He served 8 years in prison. He went back to prison in 2001 for aggravated
Burglary.
Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III, (1952)

Worked with Defendant Orly Taitz , re: Implementation of Citizen Grand Jury’s
4
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/obstruction+of+justice
Page J33
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340428
Filed 809/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
8 of 14
There are many, many convictions throughout the years: Approx. 6 convictions of Harassment,
assault, coercion by use of threat, approx. 2 convictions of fraud, theft, and many more.
Fitzpatrick is currently up on more criminal charges, as he was indicted on the following:
Rioting; Disrupting a Meeting; Disorderly Conduct; Resisting Arrest; Retaliation for Past Action
(felony); and Civil Rights Intimidation (felony)
State of TN v. Walter F. Fitzpatrick, III, In the Criminal Court for Monroe County, at
Madisonville, TN Case No. 10213
Charles Edward Lincoln, III, (1960).

Part of Defendant Taitz’s Legal team. Worked as Orly Taitz’s Legal Assistant, prepared
documents; signed Orly Taitz’s name to documents and filed them with the Courts, was even
introduced to Your Honor on June 25, 2009 as Defendant Taitz Legal Assistant
Deemed a Domestic/Paper Terrorist. Convicted Felon (convicted in Texas) – convicted of using
a false Social Security number to open Bank account and was accused of forging a Federal
Court Receipt and attempting to pay off the witnesses. See
http://members.calbar.ca.gov/fal/Member/Detail/171793 Mr. Lincoln gave up his law license in
Texas as part of the plea agreement and was disbarred from Florida and California. Mr. Lincoln
had a falling out with Taitz when Lucas Daniel Smith made public the adulterous affair between
Lincoln and Defendant Orly Taitz.
Lucas Daniel Smith – (1980)

Convicted Felon
Witness and Employee of Orly Taitz. Had a falling out with Taitz when Taitz wanted him to lie
about some matters in Court. Smith refused and wrote affidavit to Federal Judge Carter
regarding the matter. Also swore that according to an email he received originating from Yosef
Taitz, Defendant Orly Taitz’s husband, Mr. Smith believed Yosef Taitz was who created the
forged Kenyan Registration of Birth bearing the name Barack H. Obama, which Defendant Taitz
filed in the Federal Court in California, the same document Defendant Taitz wanted Lucas D.
Smith to give false testimony claiming he (Smith) obtained the Kenyan Registration of Birth for
Defendant Taitz, which he did not.
State of Iowa v. Lucas Daniel Smith - Convictions: 3 or 4 convictions of Forgery by making
false licenses, ID forms or blank forms; approximately 4 convictions of theft.
06571 FECR 23705; 05771 FECR 144901; 05501 FECR 007084; 06521 FECR 054329.
Larry Sinclair
Convicted Felon
Witness of Orly Taitz. Orly Taitz asked him to lie in court on several matters. Mr. Sinclair
refused to perjure himself, went home and sent affidavit to Federal Judge Carter about Taitz
asking him to lie in court. Mr. Sinclair also mentioned in his affidavit filed with this Court that
Defendant Orly Taitz admitted she was aware the two (2) Kenyan birth documents she filed in
Court as genuine, were forged and altered.
Leo Patrick Haffey,

Works with Orly Taitz drafting legal documents.
Assault’; May 17, 2010 Aggravated Assault; May 17, 2010
Page J34
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340428
Filed 909/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
9 of 14
Arrested in May 2009 (warrant issued 5/12/2009) for aggravated assault (Serious Bodily injury
or weapon) upon the prosecutor, prosecuting the case against Haffey.
Arrested in May 2009 (warrant issued 5/12/2009) for Assault upon another prosecutor,
prosecuting Haffey. May 17, 2010, Violation of protective order; May 17, 2010 convicted of
domestic offense:
John Mark Allen (1956) – lives close to Taitz in South Orange County, Southern California
Convicted of burglary of Lisa Liberi’s home
Protective Orders for stalking Lisa Liberi and violence against son. Lisa Liberi was placed in the
safe at home project, given a confidential address, and new SSN.
Defendants Orly Taitz and Neil Sankey sought out John Mark Allen, gave the personal
information of Lisa Liberi to him, knowing Lisa Liberi was protected from this man, as it was
plead in the Complaint against the Defendants.
L.S. (Initials replaced actual name to protect this party), Conviction or convictions in theft.
Works with Orly Taitz. Orly Taitz advertised that people email their credit card information to
her and L.S. for an event in Texas.
11. This Court should note, Defendant Taitz continues falsely claiming Plaintiff
Liberi is taking all the credit cards for donations into the Law Offices of Philip J. Berg, Esq. that
is completely false. But, as you can see, and this party’s name will be provided to the court
under seal, if needed, it was in fact Defendant Orly Taitz and her supporters taking credit cards
over the phone and via email for an event in Texas.
12. I have also included below Opinions from other Court’s in which Defendant Orly
Taitz has appeared, to show the pattern of Defendant Orly Taitz for deception and additional
criminal intent, which has been noted in the followoing cases regarding Defendant Orly Taitz:
Barnett, et al v. Obama - U.S. District Court, Central District of CA, Southern

Division, Case #09-cv-00082-DOC
California Federal Judge David O. Carter received several affidavits from

witnesses, which claimed Orly Taitz wanted them to lie on the stand. Judge
Carter found, and stated “...Plaintiffs’ counsel has favored rhetoric seeking to
arouse the emotions and prejudices of her followers her witnesses...” [Judge
Carter’s Opinion and Order of Oct. 29, 2009, Para. “F”, pg. 28, ll 4-5]. Judge
Carter further found “Additionally, the Court has received several sworn
affidavits that Taitz asked potential witnesses that she planned to call before this
Court to perjure themselves. This Court is deeply concerned that Taitz may have
Page J35
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340428
Filed 10
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:10
11/07/2010
of 14
suborned perjury through witnesses she intended to bring before this Court.”
[Judge Carter’s Opinion and Order of Oct. 29, 2009, pg. 29, ll 1-4].
Rhodes v. McDonald, et al, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Georgia,

Case No. 4:09-cv-106 (CDL).
Federal Judge Clay D. Land of Georgia sanctions Orly Taitz for unethical
behavior and sends complaint to State Bar of California.
Judge Clay D. Land sanctioned Orly Taitz $20,000.00 for her inappropriate
actions, in so doing, Judge Land found “The Court concludes from this conduct
that counsel did have an intent to injure anyone associated with the litigation who
did not agree with her.” [Judge Land Opinion and Order of Oct. 13, 2009, pg. 34]
Judge Land further ordered “The Court further directs the Clerk of this Court to
send a copy of this Order to the State Bar of California, 180 Howard Street, San
Francisco, CA 94105, for whatever use it deems appropriate.” [Judge Land
Opinion and Order of Oct. 13, 2009, pg. 42]
13. Further, a convicted felon by the name of Ruben Nieto attempted to receive
payment from Defendant Taitz with 3 simultaneous money requests, one in the amount of $9,000
and two (2) in the amount of $8,000, totaling $25,000.00 on two (2) separate occasions, May 25,
2009 and May 29, 2009. Interesting the amounts being requested were each under $10,000,
under the limits of reporting pursuant to the Patriot Act. Ruben Nieto, according to Court
Records, was convicted of Aggravated Assault. It is believed Defendant Taitz was hiring Ruben
Nieto to harm Plaintiffs Liberi, Ostella and their families.
14. Defendant Orly Taitz threatened to take Philip J. Berg, Esquire down, and to do
so she stated she was going to destroy his paralegal, Lisa Liberi, and get rid of her. The only
reason, I can think of, that Defendant Taitz’s wants Plaintiff Liberi’s driver’s license, is for
confirmation of Plaintiff Liberi’s address, to post all over the Internet and to carry out the
balance of her threat, to get rid of Plaintiff Liberi. Defendant Taitz has already destroyed
Plaintiffs Liberi and Ostella.
Page J36
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340428
Filed 11
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:11
11/07/2010
of 14
15. Defendant Taitz also claims in her filing that Plaintiffs have failed to file any
evidence or proof. Plaintiffs have filed thousands of pages, most of which were Defendant Taitz
very own posts published by Defendant Taitz on her own website and taken directly from
Defendant Taitz’s website. It is Defendant Taitz who continues falsely accusing Plaintiffs
Liberi, Ostella and Berg of falsified criminal activities, and fails to file any type of collaborating
evidence whatsoever, as demonstrated by Defendant Taitz’s own Court filings. This is clearly
because Defendant Taitz knows her stories are falsified. It should also be noted, and it was filed
in this Court, it was Defendants Taitz, Sankey and Linda Belcher who were forging and altering
the Plaintiffs Emails and a chat logs, again the proof was filed with this Court.
16. Defendant Taitz next contends that the Plaintiffs, especially Plaintiff Liberi, have
lied to the Court claiming harassment and stalking, as they have never been harassed. This is
also untrue. Again, all of Defendant Taitz’s publications on her website show continued
harassment, stalking and cyber-stalking. The definition of harassment is “1). to disturb
persistently; torment, as with troubles or cares; bother continually; pester; persecute. 2). to
trouble by repeated attacks, incursions, etc., as in war or hostilities; harry; raid.”5 The definition
of Stalking is “the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person
in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death esp. because of
express or implied threats; broadly a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a
person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that
5
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/harassment
Page J37
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340428
Filed 12
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:12
11/07/2010
of 14
person”6 And, the crime of cyber-stalking is “using tactics that harass and threaten their victims,
such as posting the victim’s name and address on the Internet along with false claims.”7
17. Your Honor, it is true that irreparable damage has already been done to Plaintiff
Liberi and her husband with Identity Theft, however, each time Defendant Taitz publishes a post
with Plaintiff Liberi’s information and picture, or a video about the Plaintiffs with false
information that is posted and circulated by Defendant Taitz, the chances increase that
individuals who suffer mental illnesses or violent tendencies, will react with violence toward the
Plaintiffs. According to affidavits filed with the Courts and Complaints filed with the State Bar
of California, Defendant Taitz has asked “her people” to lie or perjure themselves in Federal
Court. Thus, Defendant Taitz is certainly capable of demanding violence towards the Plaintiffs
from “her people”, which it appears she has already done.
18. PayPal records already show a violent convicted felon, Ruben Nieto, attempted to
get paid in increments of $8,000 and $9,000, totaling $25,000 from Orly Taitz on two separate
occasions. To date, this Honorable Court has not taken steps to stop Defendant Orly Taitz, and I
pray that the Court does not assist Defendant Taitz’s further by allowing her to continue her daily
distribution through the Internet by posting her falsified allegations, Plaintiffs private data and
her falsified video tapes regarding the Plaintiffs.
19. In addition, Defendant Taitz has her “supporter” and Plaintiff in cases which were
dismissed, sent out by mass email Plaintiff Liberi’s picture and the address which Defendant
6
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/stalking (Legal Dictionary)
7
Wayne Petherick, Cyber-Stalking: Obsessional Pursuit and the Digital Criminal, The Crime Library, (cyber-
stalking is “an extension” of “real world” stalking in which “electronic mediums such as the Internet” are used to
“pursue, harass or contact another in an unsolicited fashion”). See i-safe America, Cyber Stalking.
Page J38
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340428
Filed 13
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:13
11/07/2010
of 14
Taitz believes is Plaintiff Liberi’s home address. In addition, Defendant Taitz posts these on her
website, see EXHIBITS “D” and “E”. Your Honor, these two (2) emails were also sent to
Militia and White Supremacy Groups.
20. Defendant Taitz has continually published Plaintiff Liberi’s Social Security
number, date of birth, place of birth, mother’s maiden name, the address which Defendant Taitz
believes is Plaintiff Liberi’s home address, Plaintiff Liberi’s family picture, A phone number
which Defendant Taitz’s believes is Plaintiff Liberi’s telephone number, and many false
allegations about Plaintiff Liberi, Ostella and Berg, see EXHIBITS “F” through “X”, which
are posts just since July 1, 2010. All previous posts by Defendant Taitz have previously been
filed with this court. I have also attached a blog-url search using the terms
blogurl:http://www.orlytaitzesq.com(space)Liberi, so this Court can see the continued posts by
Defendant Taitz just as to Plaintiff Liberi, see EXHIBIT “Y”, please note in the search, Dossier
#6 still appears. The return for Plaintiff Ostella blog-url search is attached as EXHIBIT “Z”.
Plaintiffs Liberi and Ostella are continually harassed, they receive death threats, they live in fear
daily. As this Court can see, all the elements of Harassment, Stalking and Cyber-Stalking have
been met.
21. Your Honor, the longer Defendant Taitz is permitted to get away with her
unlawful actions, the more serious the crimes have become. Your Honor our courts are here to
utilize to protect those parties and situations that get in the way of safety and violations of the
law. Defendant Taitz actions have become more serious and escalated, as clearly demonstrated
by her continued publication of Plaintiff Liberi’s family picture, continued publication of where
she believes Plaintiff Liberi resides, defendant Taitz’s recent radio appearances, continued
attacks on the Plaintiffs, and the fact she (Taitz) had an actor, David Acton to do a video on or
Page J39
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340428
Filed 14
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:14
11/07/2010
of 14
Page J40
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 109/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
1 of 37
EXHIBIT “A”
Page J41
Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/ Document 144-2 Page:
Filed 209/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
2 of 37
Home
Appeal of Carter Case
From reader Carol
Quo Warranto Filed and Served
US state dep is paying to restore mosques around the world
Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation – 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, ste 100, Rancho
Santa Margarita CA, 92688 – Copyright 2010
World's Leading Obama Eligibility Challenge Web Site

Your donations to the cause are much appreciated.
WHEN THE PEOPLE FEAR THEIR GOVERNMENT,
THERE IS TYRANNY.
WHEN THE GOVERNMENT FEARS THE PEOPLE,
THERE IS LIBERTY.
- Thomas Jefferson
The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers, do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, ESQ, and Dr. Taitz, ESQ has no means of
checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
DR. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE PLAINTIFF v.

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, DEFENDANT:
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION UNDER
RULE 60 B
Posted on | August 26, 2010 | 18 Comments
Page J42
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 309/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
3 of 37
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
September 2010
M T W T F S S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30
« Aug
Search for:
Official Facebook Page

Orly Taitz
Create Your Badge
Blogroll
Conservative Monster
Give Us Liberty Blog
How to contact public Integrity unit
IMPORTANT.. PLEASE READ!!!!!
Judges Hall of Shame
Paypal Donate
Page J43
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 409/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
4 of 37
Advertisement / Sponsors
Vote Dr. Orly Taitz for CA Secretary of State
Click the picture below to visit the campaign website.
--------------------------------------
Make a donation to Dr. Orly Taitz for CA Secretary of State 2010 Campaign
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Page J44
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 509/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
5 of 37
EXHIBIT “B”
Page J45
09/17/2029 06:03 110493 P.001/080
Case:
Case
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Document
Document144-2
136 Page:
Filed
Filed07/29/10
609/14/10
Date Page
Filed:
Page111/07/2010
6ofof51
37
Dr. Orly Taib, Esq

Attorney Pro Se & Attorney
For Defelld Our FreedolDl Foundation
29839 Santa Margari1a Parkway, Suite 100
Randlo Sata Margarita CA 92688
Tel: (949) ~5411; Fax (949) 7"-7603
E-Mail: dr_ tait7@.yshoo.eom
Il5J [§ © [§ U'\'i' ~ - (\
,.,
JUL 2 8 2010
J
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT :::
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICf OF PENNSYLVANIA
LISA LmERI, et at., ) Response to tbe 07.26.10. emergency motion by the

plaintiffs to keep tnmscnp. ts under
seal
) Motion for clarification and motion-request
) for order to show cause, wby sanctions shouldnot - '
) be assessed against parties defrauding the courts c'
"
)by ciaivtiog that Judge Robreno issued an
, .
Pla.iD.tiffs )"order" to seal transcript of Liberi v Taitt j..... ;
) forwarded to the Third Circuit court of Appeals ~)

v. )
) District Court ease # 09-cv- 01898-ER ',... __.t
ORLY TAITZ, et at, ) Court ofAppeals number case #09-3403 ;:!i"~'
) aad other repeated ads oftraud "~,,fl)' c", 6,
DefendaDts.. ) 60 B motion AW/CJrJ.. ~- ~ ~ {J (. {J .
-z -......,~. "- III
~~. "(,/"~
BaCkground of the ease . '~O"'1Ji-
~
Due to the great importance of this. matter. and fraud being perpetrated on the US District
Court as well as the Court of Appeals, and due to the fact that the plaintiff here Lisa
Liberi is cur.rently on probation in the state of CA as a result of 10 felony convictions of
forgery, forgery of an official seal and gmnd theft, this motion is addressed to the
presiding judge The Hon Eduardo Robreno; as well as the Chief Judge of US District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania The Hon Harvey Bartle, ill; and the Chief
Liberi v Taitz Motion for Clarification 1
Page J46
09/17/2029 08:08 #0493 P,038/080
Case:
Case
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Document
Document 144-2
136 Filed
Page:
Filed07/29/10
709/14/10
DatePage
Filed:
Page3811/07/2010
7 of
of 51
37
San Bernardino CA 92415-0004
909-387-8309
www.co.san-bemardino.ca.uslda
San Bernardino County, CA
Probation Department
175 w. Fifth str. 4th floor
S. Bernardino, CA
Audrey B. Collins
Chief Judge
US District Court
411 W. Fourth str
Santa Ana CA 92701
Judge David O. Carter -
..
-'
USDC Central Dis1rict of CA
411 West Fourth Str
Santa Ana CA 92701
US Commission on Civil Rights
624 Ninth Street, NW
Page J47
Case
Case
09/17/2029Case:
06:09 2:09-cv-01898-ER
2:09-cv-01898-ER
10-3000 Document: Document
Document 144-2
136 Filed
003110340429 Filed07/29/10
Page: 809/14/10
DatePage
Page40
Filed: of#0493
8 of 37 P,040/080
51
11/07/2010
Office ofthe High Commissioner for Hwnan Rights
tel: + 4122 917 9151
email: OWth~
lsI OrlyTaitz ~
07.27.10.
Proposed order
I"":
c;
..
-' , ,
c,..""
,(11
Law offices of
Page J48
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 909/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
9 of 37
EXHIBIT “C”
Page J49
Case:
Case
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Document
Document144-2
143 Page:
Filed
Filed 10
09/08/10
09/14/10
DatePage
Page
Filed:110
11/07/2010
ofof1837
Page J50
Case:
Case
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Document
Document144-2
143 Page:
Filed
Filed09/08/10
11
09/14/10
DatePage
Page
Filed:
14
11
11/07/2010
ofof18
37
Page J51
Case:
Case
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Document
Document144-2
143 Page:
Filed
Filed09/08/10
12
09/14/10
DatePage
Page
Filed:
16
12
11/07/2010
ofof18
37
Page J52
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 13
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:13
11/07/2010
of 37
EXHIBIT “D”
Page J53
Important expose from Capt. Neil Turner | Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12845
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12845 Document 144-2 Page:
Filed 14
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:14
11/07/2010
of 37
Home
From reader Carol


THERE IS TYRANNY.
THERE IS LIBERTY.
- Thomas Jefferson
Important expose from Capt. Neil Turner

Posted on | August 7, 2010 | 1 Comment
From ‘Hawaii Born’ to ‘Native ’Born’, and finally to ‘Natural Born’, the Usurper’s apologists have
come a long way in their world-wide “Obfuscation* Tour”.
* Obfuscation is the concealment of intended meaning in communication, making communication confusing,

intentionally ambiguous, and more difficult to interpret.
And if the ‘BIRTH CERTIFICATE’ is a red herring** here (no matter where in the universe he was born,
Obama’s admitting that his father was not a U.S. citizen, openly concedes that he [Obama] does not meet the
Page J54
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 15
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:15
11/07/2010
of 37
Article II requirements for the Office of President and Commander in Chief), then attorney Philip Berg’s
arguments, actions, and employees are ‘blood-red herrings’!
** Red herring (logical fallacy), a deliberate attempt to change a subject or divert an argument
Berg, an admitted ‘life-long Democrat’, was, and still is, a “Hillary Supporter”, and, when he didn’t get his
way by having her as the Democrat Presidential candidate in 2008, he stayed in the game of ‘Obama’s not
eligible’ in order to:
1. Make money with his ‘half-truth’ argument (being born on soil not under U.S. jurisdiction would also
make Obama ineligible);
2. Keep his ‘Hillary for President’ hopes alive (and an eventual appointment as U.S. A/G perhaps);
3. Destroy other attorneys who might have a better case for Obama’s removal, and might just implicate
Hillary in the deception, fraud, and the treasonous altering our form of government by unconstitutional
means.
Below is an expose of the ‘blood-red herring’ employee that Philip Berg has kept on in his employ as his
number one assistant –
· as he beats the drum for the Kenyan birth-only (listen as he denies the ‘both parents must be U.S.
citizens’ argument here:
PHIL BERG DENIES de VATTEL’s “BOTH PARENTS MUST BE CITIZENS – TO BE A ‘NATURAL
BORN’ CITIZEN” ARGUMENT
Check it out at 1 minute, 10 seconds, when Phil Berg says that it is not necessary for both parents to be
U.S. Citizens for Obama to be Natural Born!
JEFF KUHNER SHOW w-Phil Berg-Neil Turner questions March 8-2010.wmv Time: 1:49
JEFF KUHNER SHOW w-Phil Berg-Neil Turner questions March 8-2010 ;
· refuses to explain why he has a convicted forger and a felon assisting him in promoting his Kenyan
birth documents;
LISA LIBERI (cropped).jpg
· and continues his relentless legal attack on the one attorney who has been the most successful in
changing the red-herring argument from ‘Hawaii-Born’ to ‘Native-Born’, and finally to ‘Natural Born’.
Attorney Orly Taitz, who has been the most effective force in bringing the obfuscatory Press and media from
‘Hawaii-Born’ to actually saying and printing the words ‘Natural-Born’, writes about the extra battle she has
had to fight against those purportedly on our side in saving the Constitution, but have instead employed
forgers and felons to defeat us, and to perpetuate the treason.
Neil B. Turner
Citizens for the Constitution
NBTurner@Earthlink.net
OrlyTaitzEsq.com.jpg
This is Lisa Liberi, who was convicted in CA in 2008 on 10 counts of forgery and theft
Page J55
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 16
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:16
11/07/2010
of 37
Posted on | July 30, 2010 |
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com This is a picture of Lisa Liberi, who was convicted in CA in 2008. There
/wp-content/uploads/2010/07 were 23 charges; she was convicted in 10. She got 8 years prison term,
/Liberi-jpg-photo-217x300.jpg which was reduced to probation. According to the terms of her
probation she is allowed to live only in CA or NM, she is not allowed to
live in any other state. This woman assists Attorney Philip Berg with
preparation of documents. She forwards the documents by e-mail, fax
and mail. A year ago I asked Berg to see the original docs from Kenya,
since in light of her forgery convictions, there is a serious doubt if those
are genuine. Having those documents in the pleadings can be
problematic and will simply undermine the whole case. I also related to
Berg that, according to the terms of her probation, she is not allowed to
handle credit cards of others.
Instead of giving me access to original documents and disassociating

himself from a person who was convicted of forgery and theft, Berg
filed a legal action, claiming that she is a different person, residing in
PA, who was never convicted of any crimes, and both of them were
defamed, he proceeded to attack me time and again.
A year ago this woman appeared in the courtroom in Philadelphia, PA and claimed that she is a different
person. All the pleadings and documents are filed below in PDF files. (http://www.orlytaitzesq.com
/?p=12690)
My question is, why did the court allow such flagrant fraud and perjury to go on for a year? Why nothing was
done by the probation department, by DA, by US attorney’s office? Does someone want me bugged in this,
so I will not have time to deal with Obama case? You can also see manipulation of the file by someone in the
district court.
It is very sad. Berg was the first attorney who filed anti Obama law suit, but for over a year now his main
occupation was attacking and denigrating me.
There are other attorneys who do not associate with criminals, who do not defraud the court, among them is
John Hemenway, representing Retired Col Hollister, the Jag Attorney representing Lt.Col Lakin, and Mario
Apuzzo representing 4 retired members of the military. Unfortunately Berg acted not better than Obama, but
worse. His actions towards me were reprehensible and criminal. He needs to dismiss his law suit that he filed
based on perjury and fraud and he needs to issue a public apology to me.
I also need anyone with knowledge about this woman to contact me at 949-683-5411
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
One Response to “Important expose from Capt. Neil Turner”
1. Alec
August 7th, 2010 @ 2:26 pm
Page J56
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 17
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:17
11/07/2010
of 37
I am certain you have already thought this through, but just a suggestion anyway. The defense against
Berg seems to boil down to a simple question: are there two different Lisa Liberi’s, or are they one and
the same? The Lisa Liberi who appears in Federal Court in PA could easily (since she lives right there
in Berg’s office:)) be fingerprinted in open court in front of the judge and defendants, and those
fingerprints compared to the ones in CA or FBI data base. Of course, considering the bizarre history of
the eligibility case, one would have to make sure there was no tampering. Perhaps the Judge could
order the Lisa Liberi in NM to be fingerprinted again, with representatives of the defense present.
!! IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ !!
NEW! CA REP CENTRAL COMMITTEE LIST

CAMPAIGN FLIER for Orly Taitz as CA SOS
CAMPAIGN FLIER for Orly Taitz as CA SOS, 2 Per Page
See The PDF File Here
US Department of Justice has a special unit in their Criminal Division called the
PUBLIC INTEGRITY SECTION
Contact Orly!
email: dr_taitz@yahoo.com Urgent? Call: 949-683-5411
Recent Posts
AOL and American Free Press report: In front of the White House on 9/11 6 christians rip out pages
from the Koran, that are full of hate against Christians and Jews, police does not intervene.
“This is a person who is fundamentally out of touch with how the world works, who happened to have
played a wonderful con, as a result of which he is now president,” Gingrich said.
Why liberal media protects burning of American flag as a protected free speech, but not burning od
Koran?
The most important clip you’ll ever need to watch. It’s time! The whole nation is on the verge of
financial slavery and economic collapse.
Why media does not show burning of bibles in muslim World?
Categories
Dossiers (47)
Dr. Orly TV; Videos (100)
DUNNGATE (60)
Events (199)
Health & Safety (7)
Help Needed (127)
HOT ITEMS! (537)
Humor (49)
Important Contacts (18)
Latest News (489)
Legal Actions (194)
Page J57
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 18
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:18
11/07/2010
of 37
Create Your Badge
Blogroll
Paypal Donate
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Page J58
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 19
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:19
11/07/2010
of 37
EXHIBIT “E”
Page J59
From Veteran and Community leader Neil Turner and from Political Corru... http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=13737
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 20
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:20
11/07/2010
of 37
Home
From reader Carol


THERE IS TYRANNY.
THERE IS LIBERTY.
- Thomas Jefferson
From Veteran and Community leader Neil Turner

and from Political Corruption Researcher Linda
Belcher
Posted on | September 6, 2010 | Comments Off
Flag this message
Page J60
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 21
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:21
11/07/2010
of 37
RE: Obama Birth Certificate Philip Berg’s

association with a convicted docume…
Monday, September 6, 2010 12:45 AM
From:
This sender is DomainKeys verified
“Neil Turner” <NBTurner@earthlink.net>
View contact details
To:
Newwomensparty@aol.com
Cc:
Linda;
Aside from just making money, does my analysis that Berg is also trying to preserve Hillary’s reputation so he
can help make her President (and perhaps become Attorney General)?
From ‘Hawaii Born’ to ‘Native ’Born’, and finally to ‘Natural Born’, the Usurper’s apologists have
come a long way in their world-wide “Obfuscation* Tour”.
* Obfuscation is the concealment of intended meaning in communication, making communication confusing,

intentionally ambiguous, and more difficult to interpret.
And if the ‘BIRTH CERTIFICATE’ is a red herring** here (no matter where in the universe he was born,
Obama’s admitting that his father was not a U.S. citizen, openly concedes that he [Obama] does not meet the
Article II requirements for the Office of President and Commander in Chief), then attorney Philip Berg’s
arguments, actions, and employees are ‘blood-red herrings’!
** Red herring (logical fallacy), a deliberate attempt to change a subject or divert an argument
Berg, an admitted ‘life-long Democrat’, was, and still is, a “Hillary Supporter”, and, when he didn’t get his
way by having her as the Democrat Presidential candidate in 2008, he stayed in the game of ‘Obama’s not
eligible’ in order to:
1. Make money with his ‘half-truth’ argument (being born on soil not under U.S. jurisdiction would also
make Obama ineligible);
2. Keep his ‘Hillary for President’ hopes alive (and an eventual appointment as U.S. A/G perhaps);
3. Destroy other attorneys who might have a better case for Obama’s removal, and might just
implicate Hillary in the deception, fraud, and the treasonous altering our form of government by
unconstitutional means.
Below is an expose of the ‘blood-red herring’ employee that Philip Berg has kept on in his employ as his
number one assistant –
· as he beats the drum for the Kenyan birth-only (listen as he denies the ‘both parents must be U.S.
citizens’ argument here:
PHIL BERG DENIES de VATTEL’s “BOTH PARENTS MUST BE CITIZENS – TO BE A ‘NATURAL
Page J61
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 22
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:22
11/07/2010
of 37
BORN’ CITIZEN” ARGUMENT
Check it out at 1 minute, 10 seconds, when Phil Berg says that it is not necessary for both parents to be
U.S. Citizens for Obama to be Natural Born!
JEFF KUHNER SHOW w-Phil Berg-Neil Turner questions March 8-2010.wmv Time: 1:49
JEFF KUHNER SHOW w-Phil Berg-Neil Turner questions March 8-2010 ;
· refuses to explain why he has a convicted forger and a felon assisting him in promoting his Kenyan
birth documents;
LISA LIBERI (cropped).jpg
· and continues his relentless legal attack on the one attorney who has been the most successful in
changing the red-herring argument from ‘Hawaii-Born’ to ‘Native-Born’, and finally to ‘Natural Born’.
Neil
From: Newwomensparty@aol.com [mailto:Newwomensparty@aol.com]

Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2010 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: Obama Birth Certificate Philip Berg’s association with a convicted docume…
Jeff,
I am the person who actually convinced Berg to file the first suit. Everything Orly said in this email to you
about Berg and Liberi is true. While I was a close insider with Berg and Liberi, I began learning many things
which disturbed me greatly as evidenced by my statements to the courts in PA. They might even face some
sort of criminal prosecution for some of their activities. Because I told the truth, that Liberi resides in NM
and not PA as they falsely allege, I was included in the suit against Orly to retaliate against me. Adams began
the smears openly, while Liberi started using aliases, but she messed up. I won’t say how unless it goes to
court, but I will make sure that the truth comes out eventually. Orly, the Hales, Neil and I will all be
vindicated. Someone with more integrity (ie not using a convicted felon as a paralegal handling evidence and
gossiping about clients private business) should be prosecuting the eligibility issue. I’d have never tried to
convince Berg to file the first suit if I’d known. I have been through the process of exposing political
corruption before and you just dare not go into such a project with employees with unclean hands handling
evidence or confidential matters. No if’s, and’s, or but’s.
No one lied about Liberi having an extensive criminal felony history. Berg and Liberi are submitting false
sworn affidavits to the courts. Liberi does have access to donors credit card info in violation of the terms of
her probation. We are gathering the evidence proving our allegations. Liberi resides at 2983 Plaza Blanca,
Santa Fe, NM. The address she and Berg claim she resides at in PA is Berg’s law office.
I have good reasons to suspect Berg and Liberi are using this cause as nothing more than a massive fund
raising scheme to line their own pockets. I am so disgusted I brought this issue to Berg. While I believe in
giving credit where it is due, how can I give Berg credit for the good he’s done when he is doing so much evil
and harm to people just because we were honest and told the truth to alert his donors whose creidt card info
Liber has obtained and might use in some nefarious way? Failure to warn the public of what we knew would
make us liable if there are any financial crimes against his donors credit cards. Liberi and Berg and Adams
have been smearing me with the vilest of lies to obfuscate the fact I told the truth, Liberi is a convicted felon
of the crimes of theft, forgery, forgery of an official government seal and I don’t remember all her other
crimes.
Page J62
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 23
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:23
11/07/2010
of 37
Linda Starr
Feminism: (noun) the radical notion that women are people.
Well behaved women seldom make history!
Category: Events, HOT ITEMS!, Latest News, Letters from Readers and Patriots, Letters/Feedback from
Readers, Uncategorized
Comments
Comments are closed.

Contact Orly!
Recent Posts
Koran?
Categories
Dossiers (47)
DUNNGATE (60)
Events (199)
Health & Safety (7)
Help Needed (127)
HOT ITEMS! (537)
Humor (49)
Page J63
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 24
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:24
11/07/2010
of 37
Create Your Badge
Blogroll
Paypal Donate
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Page J64
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 25
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:25
11/07/2010
of 37
EXHIBIT “F”
Page J65
Linda C. Belcher Filing pro se in U. S. District Court, Eastern District of ... http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12091
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 26
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:26
11/07/2010
of 37
Home
From reader Carol


THERE IS TYRANNY.
THERE IS LIBERTY.
- Thomas Jefferson
Linda C. Belcher Filing pro se in U. S. District

Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case
Number: 09-cv-01898 ECR
Posted on | July 1, 2010 | Comments Off
Linda Belcher’s Statement re Liberi’s and Berg’s Affidavits, etc.

Page J66
Linda C. Belcher Filing pro se in U. S. District Court, Eastern District of ... http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12091
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 27
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:27
11/07/2010
of 37
Create Your Badge
Blogroll
Paypal Donate
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Page J67
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 28
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:28
11/07/2010
of 37
EXHIBIT “G”
Page J68
Please read these horrifying report from the International criminal bar. If ... http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12426
Case:
Case10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 29
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:29
11/07/2010
of 37
Home
From reader Carol


THERE IS TYRANNY.
THERE IS LIBERTY.
- Thomas Jefferson
Please read these horrifying report from the

International criminal bar. If we don’t stand up to
lawlessness in this nation, we will be the next
Rwanda.
Posted on | July 19, 2010 | 5 Comments
NEWS ADVISORY:
Page J69
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 30
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:30
11/07/2010
of 37
Contact: ICTR-ADAD Bureau, Arusha, TZ
Pres: Prof. Peter Erlinder (peter.erlinder@wmitchell.edu) E
Beth Lyons (bethlyons@aol.com ) Fr/E
John Philpot (jphilpot@videotron.ca) Fr/E
ICTR Defense Lawyers Condemn Murder of ICTR Lawyer Mwaikusa:
Continuing Threats from Rwandan Government
July 16 –ARUSHA, TZ –The Bureau of the ICTR Association des Avocats de la Defense (ADAD), notes
with sadness and alarm the murder of our ICTR colleague, University of Dar es Salaam Law Professor
Jwani Mwaikusa, who was shot to death at his home on July 14. Professor Mwaikusa had recently
prevented the transfer of ICTR defendants to Rwanda on “lack of fair trial” grounds, and announced
the appeal of his client’s July 3 conviction.
Our colleague’s murder is not an isolated incident. Within the past month, a prominent Rwandan
opposition journalist was also shot to death in front of his home; a former Rwandan general survived an
apparent assassination attempt in front of his home in South Africa, where he is seeking asylum; the
de-capitated body of the Rwandan Green Party Vice-president was found near his abandoned car and,
the Party’s President has been publicly threatened with assassination.
Hundreds of potential Rwandan opposition candidates and supporters have been arrested or
disappeared. Presidential candidate Victoire Ingabire was arrested for suggesting that both Tutsi and
Hutu were victims during the 1990-94 civil war and genocide, and her Dutch, U.S. and Rwandan
lawyers were also arrested.
The Mwaikusa murder also follows the illegal arrest of other lawyers. U.S. Law Professor Peter
Erlinderwas arrested in late May on “genocide-denial” charges based on his public statements arising
from his work in the ICTR Military 1 Trial, in which four former senior military officers were
acquitted of “genocide conspiracy” charges in February 2009, and his representation of Madame
Ingabire. ICTR defense lawyers refused to participate in proceedings after his arrest, and he was
released after an international campaign.
But, the Rwandan government refuses to recognize meaningful UN-granted immunity for Erlinder or
other ICTR defense counsel. Defense lawyer Peter Robinson (a former Assistant U.S. Attorney) has
asked to withdraw from the ICTR representation because a meaningful defense is not possible, under
current conditions. Other ICTR defense attorneys are considering similar measures.
Rwandan government threats to ICTR defense counsel are also not isolated incidents. In 2006, ICTR
defense lawyer Me. Gakwayawas arrested on a Rwandan “genocide” warrant when he arrived at the
ICTR to represent his client and, although he was eventually released, he was forced to end his ICTR
work. Many other defense team members have been forced to give up ICTR work, because of threats,
Page J70
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 31
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:31
11/07/2010
of 37
or arrest, by the Rwanda government. The Erlinder arrest, Mwaikusa murder and continuing threats
against defense team members make clear that the ICTR cannot guarantee the safety of defense team
members, anywhere in Africa.
In addition, during the past-2 months credible media reports have documented the systematic
withholding of evidence helpful to the defense by the ICTR Prosecutor, which further deepens our
concern because only the losing side in the Rwanda civil war has been prosecuted at the ICTR. The
ADAD Bureau is deeply concerned that the impossibility of meaningful defense at the ICTR has called
into question the legitimacy of the ICTR, itself, an open question.
ADAD calls on the UN Security Council to ensure the safety of ICTR defense teams; to undertake an
independent investigation of the Mwaikuza murder; and, to re-establish the integrity of the Tribunal by
fully disclosing evidence of crimes committed by both the former and current Rwandan government .
This report came from Laura Vericat, secretary of the International Criminal Panel.
In response I have sent an update to the international criminal bar panel
Dr. Orly Taitz esq
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
ph. 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603-
orly.taitz@gmail.com
Attention Laura Vericat International Criminal Bar
Pres: Prof. Peter Erlinder (peter.erlinder@wmitchell.edu) E
Beth Lyons (bethlyons@aol.com ) Fr/E
John Philpot (jphilpot@videotron.ca) Fr/E
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders
The Honorable Mrs. Margaret Sekaggya
Palais des Nations
CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
International Criminal bar Hague
BPI-ICB-CAPI
Page J71
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 32
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:32
11/07/2010
of 37
Head Office
Neuhuyskade 94
2596 XM The Hague
The Netherlands
Tel : 0031 (70) 3268070 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 0031 (70)
3268070 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax : 0031 (70) 3353531
Email: info@bpi-icb.org
Website: www.bpi-icb.org
Regional Office – Americas / Bureau régional – Amériques / Oficina regional – Américas

137, rue St-Pierre
Montréal, Québec, Canada, H2Y 3T5
Tel : 001 (514) 289-8757 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 001 (514)
289-8757 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax : 001 (514) 289-8590
Email: admin@bpi-icb.org
Website: www.bpi-icb.org
Laura Vericat Figarola
BPI-ICB-CAPI
Secretaria Barcelona
laura_bpi@icab.es
Address: Avenida Diagonal 529 1º2ª
08029 Barcelona, España
tel/fax 0034 93 405 14 24
United Nations Commission for
Civil Rights Defenders
Orsolya Toth (Ms)
Human Rights Officer
Civil and Political Rights Section
Special Procedures Division
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
tel: + 41 22 917 91 51
Page J72
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 33
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:33
11/07/2010
of 37
email: ototh@ohchr.org
Dear Laura,
please read the following update of my prior filing with the international criminal bar
please forward it to the members of the bar and UN Security Council
Currently we have the following flagrant violations of Human rights:
1. instances of civil rights attorneys in US being framed based on perjured testimony of convicted
criminals
2. Constitutional attorney Richard Fine being imprisoned in Los Angeles for over a year without trial
3. An individua,l Barack Hussein Obama, occupying the White House in the position of the president
and Commander in Chief without having a valid US long form birth certificate with a name of the
hospital and attending physician and signatures of the witnesses and without a valid Social Security
number of his own, using a social security number issued in the state of CT to an individual born in
1890
4. Attorney Orly Taitz was assessed $20,000 in sanctions for representing active members of the
military demanding to see actual vital records of Obama, to verify that he is a legitimate president and
Commander in Chief
5. Attorney John Hemenway was threatened sanctions for representing a retired member of the
military
6. Attorney Mario Apuzzo was threatened sanctions by the third circuit Court of Appeals for
representing retired members of the military
7. When Attorney Orly Taitz submitted an application for stay of the certification of election of Barack
Hussein Obama, her case Lightfoot v Bowen was erased from the docket of the Supreme Court of the
united states on the inauguration day when the court was closed.
8. After enormous pressure from the public to re-enter the case, clerk for the stays Danny Bickel called
Taitz and claimed that the case was never deleted.
9.When Taitz stated that she has signed affidavits of witnesses who saw the case on the docket on
January 19th before inauguration and not on the docket on January 21st, when the court re-opened,
Bickel stated that it was a computer glitch that affected all the case of the Supreme Court.
10.When Taitz stated that she has an affidavit from the member of the bar of the Supreme court, stating
that other cases were on the docket, but Taitz’ case was deleted, Bickel stated that the case will be
re-entered within an hour.
11. On March 9 of 2009 Ttaitz saw Supreme Court Justice Scalia at a book signing in Los Angeles.
when Taitz asked Scalia, why wasn’t the stay granted, Scalia had no knowledge that the case even
existed, even though according to the letter Taitz received from the Supreme Court all 9 Justices have
reviewed her case in the conference on Jnauary 23, 2009 and decided not to proceed with the Oral
argument.
12. On March 13, 2009 Taitz attended a lecture given by the Chief Justice Roberts at the university of
Page J73
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 34
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:34
11/07/2010
of 37
Moscow Idaho. Taitz addressed Roberts (available on You-tube Attorney Orly Taitz addresses Chief
Justice Roberts) . Taitz demanded an answer in regards to the fact that her case Lightfoot v Bowen was
supposedly heard by all the justices, but that Justice Scalia didn’t even know that the case existed.
Roberts responded that he will read the papers Taitz had with her. Taitz gave Roberts motion for
reconsideration in Lightfoot v Bowen and another case Easterling v Obama. For over a year Taitz did
not receive any response from Roberts.
13.Around the same time attorney Leo Donofrio filed a complaint against the same clerk Danny Bickel
for improperly withholding his case Donofrio v Wells, against secretary of state of New Jersey Nina
Mitchell Wells for improperly certifying candidacy of Barack Obama without any verification of
legitimacy. Dionofrio v Wells was similar to Lightfoot v Bowen filed by Taitz against secretary of state
of CA Debra Bowen for not verifying credentials of Obama.
14. On July 4 2010 Taitz filed with the Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Clatrence Thomas her
application for stay of $20,000 of sanctions assessed against he by Judge Clay D. Land for representing
active members of US military demanding verification of Obama’s legitimacy.
15. On Friday July 16, 2010, around nine PM EST Taitz checked the docket of the Supreme Court and
found no decision on her application for stay. She issued a press release, that went to numerous media
outlets around the World, stating that no decision was made on he application for stay.
16. On Saturday July 17. 2010 Taitz started getting comments on her web site/blog, stating that Justice
Thomas has denied her application on July 15th. Taitz checked the docket and saw that the entry was made
on Saturday, July 17th, when the Supreme Court was closed, but it was backdated for Thursday the 15th.
17 Due to the fact that the court was closed on the 17th of July, when the entry was made, there is a suspicion
that illegal order was issued. On a previous date Taitz has filed demands for investigation, as to whether
Justices actually signed the order not to proceed to conference and whether they signed similar orders in
Donofrio v Wells and Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz, or whether those were illegal orders, whereby the cases were
never read by the Justices and the orders were never signed by the Justices. No response was received for
over a year, in spite of numerous demands for investigation forwarded to the FBI, Department of Justice,
Secret Service, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
18. In a different case Barnett v Obama Judge David O Carter originally made a decision to hear eligibility
case on the merits. After an attorney from Perkins -Coie, defense firm representing Obama in such litigation,
was appointed as a law clerk for judge Carter, he changed his opinion and suddenly decided that he no longer
had jurisdiction. Judge Carter received letters from two individuals, who had prior convictions of forgery
of documents, claiming that attorney Taitz asked them to testify to something that is not true, de facto
accusing Taitz of suborning perjury and undermining her, even though those allegations were a total and
complete fabrication.
19. Judge Carter included reference to such letters in his order and refused Taitz’s demands for criminal
investigation of the matter.
20. Currently Taitz received a sworn affidavit from a witness Linda Belcher, attesting to the fact another
convicted criminal, Lisa Liberi who has 10 felony convictions for forgery of documents and grand theft
colluded with one of the individuals, and solicited such fraudulent defamatory letter to be sent to the
presiding judge, in order to undermine Taitz. liberi is currently working for attorney Philip J. Berg. No actions
were taken so far by the courts against either Liberi or Berg. There is a pattern of someone using convicted
criminals like Liberi in undermining civil rights attorneys, framing them and trying to endanger their licenses.
21. Former employee of the US justice department J. Christian Adams has become a whistle blower and
reported corruption in US Justice Department, where orders were given not to prosecute cases of voter fraud
Page J74
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 35
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:35
11/07/2010
of 37
and voter intimidation, specifically when those are committed by minorities.
Situation in US regarding civil rights violations is becoming more grim by the hour.This Nation used to be
the beacon of civil rights, now, under Obama regime it is quickly becoming a cesspool of civil rights violations
and lack of access to courts by the citizens, whereby most, if not all of the Constitutional law challenges
brought by the citizens are thrown out of court on standing and not heard on the merits. While
there were over a 100 law suits filed by some 15 attorneys challenging Obama’s legitimacy to US presidency,
not one single case was heard on the merits.
If US citizens and US attorneys are losing their rights to defend the Costitution and citizens of this nation,
who will be there to defend the innocent in Rwanda, Uganda and Kenya?
Please, let me know if there can be any assistance from the International Criminal Panel and the Security
Council
Sincerely,
ICP member Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
Comments
5 Responses to “Please read these horrifying report from the International criminal bar. If we don’t stand up
to lawlessness in this nation, we will be the next Rwanda.”
1. Paul Jaffee
July 19th, 2010 @ 10:58 am
Dr. Taitz – You forgot to mention the attempts on your life and the lives of your family members — the
gas hose in your car that was tampered with. And the hate crimes against you and your family with
those horrible pancake paintings. Are those mentioned in your prior letter? Can we see a copy of your
prior letter and this one as pdf files so we can spread them around the Internet like wildfire?
God bless you, Lady Liberty!
2. Carlo
July 19th, 2010 @ 3:00 pm
Bravo, bravo.
I hope that pdfs will be available soon!
3. Ro
July 20th, 2010 @ 6:23 am
Don’t know where to post this. Hope it comes out. We need help to squash this.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/06/pat-condell-on-ground-zero-mosque-is-it-possible-to-be-
astonished-but-not-surprised.html
Please go viral with this people.
4. forex robot
Page J75
7 of 11 9/12/2010 3:10 PM
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 36
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:36
11/07/2010
of 37
July 20th, 2010 @ 6:41 am
Keep posting stuff like this i really like it
5. Henry Tisdale
July 20th, 2010 @ 6:52 am
And hey, what about the two murders, one in D.C. the other in Chicago, to which Obama is directly
linked? The FBI has apparently washed its hands and walked away from both murders. So has the D.C.
Chicago police departments. Lt Harris, the D.C. victim, was on the verge of cooperating with the
investigators when he took a single bullet hole in the back of his head, sitting in his own auto. I really
doubt if the usurper has the b–ls to directly order any murder, but Emanuel would set up this sort of
thing at the blink of an eye.

Contact Orly!
Recent Posts
2 Pastors in TN burned the koran today. So far 3 Americans burned the Koran in protest
So far one American actually did it. He burned the Koran at Ground Zero on 9/11. So far it is only one
such incident, that I know of
Obama can issue an executive order, fed gov can take over any building in eminent domain
Categories
Dossiers (47)
DUNNGATE (60)
Events (198)
Health & Safety (7)
Help Needed (127)
HOT ITEMS! (536)
Humor (49)
Page J76
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340429
Filed 37
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:37
11/07/2010
of 37
Create Your Badge
Blogroll
Paypal Donate
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Page J77
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340430
Filed 109/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
1 of 14
EXHIBIT “H”
Page J78
Judge swap, official swap and what else can be done. | Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12458
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340430
Filed 209/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
2 of 14
Home
From reader Carol

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation – 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, ste 100, Rancho Santa
Margarita CA, 92688 – Copyright 2010


THERE IS TYRANNY.
THERE IS LIBERTY.
- Thomas Jefferson
Judge swap, official swap and what else can be done.

Posted on | July 21, 2010 | 1 Comment
Submitted on 2010/07/20 at 8:20pm
Dear Lady Liberty, This is outstanding for Patriots everywhere to learn about! I
Motion -request for
think you have the Supreme Court right where you want them! Still not enough verification of
Patriot people know about your amazing fight. I have friends at ABC and talked with them signature of Justice
about you for the TV show “Wife Swap.” It’s a very long running successful show
Thomas was submitted
and in the show, the wives swap lives for two weeks. You could teach a whole new to Chief Justice
family (and the Nation) about your brilliant ideas. Would you consider it? If you
Roberts
would I’ll ask them to come visit the site. Keep up the great work!
I got this comment. I clearly don’t like the idea of wife swap , there is something very weird about this TV show,
and the whole comment is probably a joke anyhow but it got me thinking: I like the idea of a judge swap or official
swap, where judges or maybe retired judges are shown the cases, where presiding judges were flagrantly arrogant,
where they disregarded the law and the Constitution and retired judges are asked to step into the shoes of the
ordinary citizens and try to fight this arrogance and corruption.
Page J79
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340430
Filed 309/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
3 of 14
Let’s bring investigative reporters and retired judges, retired congressmen, senators, even presidents and ask them
to confront their colleges. Maybe, there will be less corruption.
I received a comment from someone, saying, how come you didn’t put any authority or precedent cases in the latest
motion. I dare them, if they are so good, such great attorneys, be my guest and find a precedent, where there is a
pattern like this.
Did we ever have a person sitting in the White House without a long form birth certificate and without a valid
Social Security number of his own? No. What precedent can I bring?
I know there were rumors regarding president Chester Arthur, but both of his parents were US citizens and record
keeping in those years was not as good as today.
Obama’s father was never a US citizen, he didn’t even have a green card. Minister of lands of Kenya, James
Orengo, stood up on the podium on March 25 2010 and stated that Obama was born in Kenya, and we don’t have
one honest judge: from lower courts to the Supreme court, who will state: this is fraud, it is the most despicable
fraud in the history of this Nation and the history of the World. Fraud is fraud, it needs to be heard on the merits.
We get all kinds of excuses, saying it is a political question, even though it has nothing to do with politics.
Does any attorney know of a case where there is a pattern in the Supreme court or any other court, where a case
disappears from the docket, somebody deletes it from the docket. Later an entry appears on the docket on the
weekend, when judges are not there and clerks are not there, where judges don’t have a clue about the most
important case on their docket? Tell me, when did it happen, what was done? How do you fight it? I am not looking
for a monopoly here. Anyone can jump in and help, but most attorneys talk the talk, but don’t walk the walk. No
wonder attorneys are the most hated profession, no wonder there are so many attorney jokes. The Nation no longer
believes in the honesty and integrity of the legal profession. We don’t have examples of honest, decent attorney
standing up for the system of justice against massive corruption at the top. Do you think this nation would have
around 120 trillion dollars of total debt: between foreign debt and unfunded obligations of the Social Security and
Medicaire, if we had decent people at the top and attorneys who cared about the system of justice?
Unfortunately even among patriots and people who started this fight there is a lot of posturing butvery little action. I
remember, that both I and Leo Donofrio were asked to go on a radio show, which we did together. We talked about
the fact that members of the military, particularly active members of the military have great standing. Leo just
talked the talk and went back to playing professional poker, playing in his band and whatever else he is doing. I
actually did the work and took some 34 trips around the country to gather a large group of military plaintiffs, I
brought those case to court, I didn’t run away from the battle field, I was attacked by the judge, who was simply
pandering to Obama. What did Donofrio do? He turned around and attacked me for doing what he, himself, said
was a great idea to do.
Let’s take quo warranto. Donofrio talked about it. He said he will file in DC a legal action on quo warranto, he will
do it with Chrysler dealers, as they were hurt by an illegitimate president. He said, that he will do it together with
Steven Pidgeon. Did they do it? No. It was a lie, they never went to DC, they never filed a quo warranto. they just
dealt with the bankruptcy matter and that’s it. I was the one who went to DC and filed Quo Warranto with judge
Lamberth.
Let’s take Philip Berg. He was the first one to file a case against Obama. His case was dismissed. Second case,
which was recommended by attorney Thompson, a Qui Tam, False claims case, was dismissed by the court of
appeals and the third case, inter-pleader, which was written by attorney Laurence Joyce and handled in DC by
attorney Hemenway was dismissed in the district court, Berg handled an appeal for a short while until the client
fired him and that was it. What was Berg’s main occupation for the last year and a half? Attacking me. I will post
later a letter from his former volunteer, as well as actual counts of indictment and convictions of his assistant Lisa
Liberi, so everyone can see what this man is doing and what his assistant is doing, as well as the transcripts of the
court hearings so everyone can see.
Here is another example. Berg wants to keep sealed the transcripts, he filed documents stating that the presiding
Page J80
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340430
Filed 409/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
4 of 14
judge has sealed the transcripts of the proceedings. I filed a motion to unseal them and the judge responded that
those transcripts were never sealed. What do you do about it? How do you stop a person from continuously lying to
the district court and the court of appeals. Why is he lying? When he started attacking me, I got a phone call from a
volunteer, Linda Belcher, who worked with him and stated that Berg’s assistant Lisa Liberi has 10 felony
convictions of forgery of documents, forgery of an official seal and grand theft. I checked with Lisa Liberi’s
arresting officer, probation officer, San Bernardino county DA James Secord, victims, family, checked her
photographs. The woman, who was convicted in CA in 2008 and got 8 years prison term, that was reduced to
probation is indeed Berg’s assistant, who showed up with him in court. So, Berg decided to attack me with a
frivolous law suit in order to keep me quiet about the fact that he is working with a convicted forger and thief and
endangering the public at large by allowing her to prepare or handle documents for his court pleadings or engaging
in fund raising activities with her. Interesting point is, that I did not file a law suit against them, as I felt there are
more important things to do, at least I did not do it yet, but Berg went ahead and filed a frivolous law suit, claiming
that she is a different Lisa Liberi, even though there are witnesses, mug shots, finger prints, showing that indeed it is
the same person. I am wondering, why are Liberi and Berg so bold? Why are they perpetrating such a bold lie
without being afraid for Liberi going back to prison for violation of her probation, whereby she will have to actually
serve her 8 year prison term and Berg losing his law license and going to prison for defrauding the court. Why
would Liberi show up in court in PA, claiming to be a different person, when her photographs show that she is
indeed Lisa
Page J81
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340430
Filed 509/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
5 of 14
Page J82
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340430
Filed 609/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
6 of 14
Page J83
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340430
Filed 709/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
7 of 14
Page J84
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340430
Filed 809/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
8 of 14
Page J85
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340430
Filed 909/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
9 of 14
Page J86
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340430
Filed 10
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:10
11/07/2010
of 14
Page J87
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340430
Filed 11
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:11
11/07/2010
of 14
Page J88
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340430
Filed 12
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:12
11/07/2010
of 14
Page J89
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340430
Filed 13
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:13
11/07/2010
of 14
Liberi, who was convicted in CA? Either they are dumb, totally insane or there was a deal made for them to lie and
go after me with obviously fraudulent and frivolous complaint in order to waste a lot of my time and divert my
attention from Obama litigation, and they were promised that they will not be prosecuted for fraud on the court and
perjury and for submitting forged documents. If so, who made such deal?
In the state of CA there are some 300,000 attorneys.There must be between 2-3 million attorneys around the
country. How many attorneys or paralegals or legal secretaries or court reporters have the strength of character to
stay the course and clean up this mess? If there are any, call me 949-683-5411. There is a lot of work to be done.
Category: Events, Latest News, Legal Actions, Letters from Readers and Patriots, Letters/Feedback from Readers
Comments
One Response to “Judge swap, official swap and what else can be done.”
1. Yephora
July 21st, 2010 @ 9:07 am
“… he will do it with Kreisler dealers.”
LOL. Fritz Kreisler was a great violinist.

Chrysler is a car

Contact Orly!
Recent Posts
The most important clip you’ll ever need to watch. It’s time! The whole nation is on the verge of financial
slavery and economic collapse.
2 Pastors in TN burned the koran today. So far 3 Americans burned the Koran in protest
So far one American actually did it. He burned the Koran at Ground Zero on 9/11. So far it is only one such
incident, that I know of
Obama can issue an executive order, fed gov can take over any building in eminent domain
Categories
Dossiers (47)
Page J90
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340430
Filed 14
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:14
11/07/2010
of 14

Orly Taitz
Create Your Badge
Blogroll
Paypal Donate
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Page J91
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 109/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
1 of 39
EXHIBIT “I”
Page J92
Response to the 07-26-10 emergency motion by the plaintiffs, LISA LIBER... http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12690
Case:
Case10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 209/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
2 of 39
Home
From reader Carol


THERE IS TYRANNY.
THERE IS LIBERTY.
- Thomas Jefferson
Response to the 07-26-10 emergency motion by the

plaintiffs, LISA LIBERI, et al, to keep transcripts
under seal
Liberi-v-Taiitz-07-27-10-filed-response-from-Taitz-pp-1-9.pdf
Page J93
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 309/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
3 of 39
Category: Legal Actions, Supporting Documentation, Uncategorized
Comments

Page J94
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 409/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
4 of 39
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
September 2010
M T W T F S S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30
« Aug
Search for:

Orly Taitz
Create Your Badge
Blogroll
Page J95
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 509/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
5 of 39
Paypal Donate
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Page J96
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 609/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
6 of 39
EXHIBIT “J”
Page J97
This is Lisa Liberi, who was convicted in CA in 2008 of 10 counts of forg... http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?attachment_id=12691
Case:
Case10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?attachment_id=12691 Filed 709/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
7 of 39
Home
From reader Carol


THERE IS TYRANNY.
THERE IS LIBERTY.
- Thomas Jefferson
Liberi jpg photo

Page J98
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 809/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
8 of 39
Comments

Contact Orly!
Recent Posts
Koran?
Page J99
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 909/14/10
Date Filed:
Page 11/07/2010
9 of 39
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Page J100
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 10
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:10
11/07/2010
of 39
EXHIBIT “K”
Page J101
This is Lisa Liberi, who was convicted in CA in 2008 of 10 counts of forg... http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12692
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 11
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:11
11/07/2010
of 39
Home
From reader Carol


THERE IS TYRANNY.
THERE IS LIBERTY.
- Thomas Jefferson
This is Lisa Liberi, who was convicted in CA in

2008 of 10 counts of forgery and theft
Page J102
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 12
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:12
11/07/2010
of 39
This is a picture of Lisa Liberi, who was convicted in CA in 2008. there were 23 charges, she was convicted
in 10. She got 8 years prison term, which was reduced to probation. According to the terms of her probation
she is allowed to live only in CA or NM, she is not allowed to live in any other state. This woman assists
Attorney Philip Berg with preparation of documents. She forwards the documents by e-mail, fax and mail. A
year ago I asked Berg to see the original docs from Kenya, since in light of her forgery convictions, there is a
serious doubt if those are genuine. Having those documents in the pleadings can be problematic and will
simply undermine the whole case. I also related to Berg, that according to the terms of her probation she is
not allowed to handle credit cards of others. Instead of giving me access to original documents and
dissassociating himself from a person, who was convicted of forgery and theft, Berg filed a legal action,
claiming that she is a different person, residing in PA, who was never convicted of any crimes, and both of
them were defamed, he procedeed to attack me time and again.
A year ago this woman appeared in the courtroom in Philadelphia, PA and claimed that she is a different
person. All the pleadings and documents are filed below in PDF files.
My question is, why did the court allow such flagrant fraud and perjury to go on for a year? Why nothing was
done by the probation department, by DA, by US attorney’s office? Does someone want me bugged in this,
so I will not have time to deal with Obama case? You can also see manipulation of the file by someone in the
district court.
It is very sad. Berg was the first attorney, who filed anti Obama law suit, but for over a year now his main
occupation was attacking and denigrating me.
There are other attornes, who do not associate with criminals, who do not defraud the court, among them is
John Hemenway, representing Retired Col Hollister, Jag Attorney representing Lt.Col Lakin, Mario Apuzzo
representing 4 retired members of the military. Unfortunately Berg acted not better than Obama, but worse.
His actions towards me were reprehensible and criminal. He needs to dismiss his law suit that he filed based
on perjury and fraud and he needs to issue a public apology to me.
I also need anyone with knowledge about this woman to contact me at 949-683-5411
Category: HOT ITEMS!, Help Needed, Latest News, Legal Actions, Uncategorized
Comments
Page J103
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 13
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:13
11/07/2010
of 39
Create Your Badge
Blogroll
Paypal Donate
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Page J104
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 14
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:14
11/07/2010
of 39
EXHIBIT “L”
Page J105
can you find out, who owns this site? | Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12751
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 15
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:15
11/07/2010
of 39
Home
From reader Carol


THERE IS TYRANNY.
THERE IS LIBERTY.
- Thomas Jefferson
can you find out, who owns this site?

there is a a pro-Obama, bash patriots sitte, called “Oh for goodness sake”. What I noticed recently, that they
exclusively attack me and support Berg and Liberi and I am wondering why. Can anyone check, who owns
this site?
Comments
Page J106
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 16
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:16
11/07/2010
of 39
4 Responses to “can you find out, who owns this site?”
1. Robert
August 3rd, 2010 @ 12:41 am
Wow, that site is posting so much filth and garbage that it’s hard to know where to start. But here is the
registration data:
Registrant:
LANE, DORIS
ATTN:
P.O. Box 430 c/o NameSecure
Herndon, VA. US 20171-430
Domain Name: OHFORGOODNESSSAKE.COM
Administrative Contact:
LANE, DORIS
DORIS LANE
ATTN:
P.O. Box 430 c/o NameSecure
Herndon, VA 20171-430
US
570-708-8782
Record expires on 22-Mar-2011.

Record created on 22-Mar-2009.
Database last updated on 3-Aug-2010 04:30:44 EDT.
Domain servers in listed order:
DNS22.LIVINGDOT.COM 72.34.56.24
DNS21.LIVINGDOT.COM 72.34.55.84
This listing is a NameSecure Private Registration. Mail

correspondence to this address must be sent via USPS Express Mail(TM) or
USPS Certified Mail(R); all other mail will not be processed. Be sure to
include the registrant’s domain name in the address.
This whois service currently only reflects registrations

made through NameSecure as a registrar in the .com and .net
top-level domains.
2. Robert
August 3rd, 2010 @ 12:54 am
The name is quite likely to be a pseudonym as this person is hiding behind “nameprivacy.com”. There
is an email contact that didn’t show up on the cut/paste:
wf75f6d44ru@nameprivacy.com
3. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
August 3rd, 2010 @ 1:17 am
Page J107
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 17
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:17
11/07/2010
of 39
Of course, dep of justice could find out, but I am wondering on whose side is Dep of Justice under
Obama regime
4. Ann Murray
August 3rd, 2010 @ 4:25 am
Why do you want to know the identity of people who run websites who disagree with you? Are you a
fascist trying to intimidate them or threaten them? You really need a bullet between your eyes you
fascist bitch Orly. I am damn serious too. I’m sick of your witch hunts and I’m damn prepared to put an
end to it.

Contact Orly!
Recent Posts
Koran?
Categories
Dossiers (47)
DUNNGATE (60)
Events (199)
Health & Safety (7)
Help Needed (127)
HOT ITEMS! (537)
Humor (49)
Important Contacts (18)
Page J108
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 18
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:18
11/07/2010
of 39
Create Your Badge
Blogroll
Paypal Donate
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Page J109
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 19
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:19
11/07/2010
of 39
EXHIBIT “M”
Page J110
More on undue influence of law clerks | Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12779
Case:
Case10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 20
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:20
11/07/2010
of 39
Home
From reader Carol


THERE IS TYRANNY.
THERE IS LIBERTY.
- Thomas Jefferson
More on undue influence of law clerks

Law clerk ideology is not a new topic for Supreme Court observers. Concern over law clerk ideology was first
sparked by an article written by then private attorney William Rehnquist in December of 1957. In a U.S.
News and World Report article titled “Who Writes Decisions of the Supreme Court?,” Rehnquist discussed
his clerkship with the late Robert H. Jackson, summarized the basic duties performed by law clerks, and
expressed his concern that substandard legal research as well as the “unconscious slanting” of cert.
memoranda by legal law clerks might result in a justice’s decision-making process being influenced.
Rehnquist’s suggestion of improper influence ignited a firestorm of controversy, including stinging rebuttals
Page J111
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 21
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:21
11/07/2010
of 39
from former Supreme Court law clerks Alexander Bickel and William D. Rogers (who found Rehnquist’s
claims of law clerk influence to be absurd), and
prompted Senator John C. Stennis of Mississippi to take to the Senate floor and argue that minimal
professional competence requirements be established for these young, liberal, and incompetent legal
assistants.
After you read, what these law clerks are doing , you realize that I desperately need your assitance. I
resubmitted my application to Justice Alito. The person, who is supposed to docket the application, is a clerk
for stays Danny Bickel. The case number is 10A56 Rhodes v MacDonald by attorney Orly Taitz. They docket
it as Taitz v MacDonald. I desperately need to get through this clerk and have my 10 books (required 10
copies ) forwarded to Justice Alito. I need Justice Alito to actually see the application and all the exhibits. I
need to get a legal order from him. Legal order is supposed to be signed by the Justice and his clerk or they
can sign on the cover of the pleadings. Just an entry on the electronic docket without a signed document is
not a legal order, it is a fraud on the court.
Public is allowed to call the Supreme Court and demand that application be docketted and forwarded to
Justice Alito. phones of the Supreme court are 202-479-3000, 202-479-3472
I am also having a problem in the Eastern District of PA. I demanded a copy of the transcript of the hearing
held on August 7 2009. At this hearing Philip Berg and his assistant Lisa Liberi clearly committed fraud on
the court and perjury. They both clearly know that Liberi is indeed currently on probation of 10 felony
convictions of forgery and documents and grand theft and lied by claiming that she is an innocent woman
residing in PA, who was never convicted and was defamed by me, investigator Sankey, their volunteer Linda
Sue Belcher and talk show host Ed Hale and his wife. I paid $1,100 for the transcript, the judge issued a
written order, stating that the transcript is not sealed, but somebody at that court is playing games and not
releasing the transcript. The number of that court phone number is 215-597-7704 .Manager of the clerks is
Rick Sable. His assistant is Mary Chase 267- 299- 7012 Clerk in charge of transcripts is David Hayes. case
is 09-1898
This is important, as Berg and Libery have been harassing and defaming innocent people for some time
now. Liberi has violated the terms of her probation time and again and she is supposed to be going back to
prison to serve her 8 year term. PA state bar needs to know, what Berg is doing, he needs tobe sanctioned
for submitted perjured testimony, forged documents and fraud on the court
PA bar 717-238-6715
100 South str
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Category: HOT ITEMS!, Help Needed, Latest News, Legal Actions
Comments
2 Responses to “More on undue influence of law clerks”
1. Jeff Lichter
August 4th, 2010 @ 5:06 am
Page J112
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 22
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:22
11/07/2010
of 39
I called the Supreme Court this morning at the number you have listed and was told that no complaints
are taken and that “honestly, even if you write in your complaint, it will get trashed”. The only
exception conceded by the operator was perhaps if I wrote to the Marshall’s office at the Supreme
Court. Tyranny!
2. ch
August 4th, 2010 @ 8:06 am
Why not send a copy to the Sheriff Department of that area and have them hand deliver the material to
the Justice, and with a letter explaining the situation, and ask for a signed receipt by the Sheriff and the
Justice.

Contact Orly!
Recent Posts
Koran?
Categories
Dossiers (47)
DUNNGATE (60)
Events (199)
Health & Safety (7)
Help Needed (127)
HOT ITEMS! (537)
Humor (49)
Page J113
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 23
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:23
11/07/2010
of 39
Create Your Badge
Blogroll
Paypal Donate
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Page J114
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 24
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:24
11/07/2010
of 39
EXHIBIT “N”
Page J115
More evidence of fraud on the court | Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12799
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 25
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:25
11/07/2010
of 39
Home
From reader Carol


THERE IS TYRANNY.
THERE IS LIBERTY.
- Thomas Jefferson
More evidence of fraud on the court

Berg claimed for a year that the transcript of the court hearing with Lisa Liberi was under seal. It took nearly
a year for me to get the actual transcript. I finally got it with an order by judge Robreno, denying Berg’s
motion to keep it under seal. The only reason Berg wanted it under seal, was because he and his assistant Lisa
Liberi and other witnesses were committing fraud on the court and he was concerned that this fraud on the
court will become known to the public at large.
Page J116
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 26
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:26
11/07/2010
of 39
liberi-v-Taitz-08-04-10-order-from-Judge-Robreno.pdf
Comments
2 Responses to “More evidence of fraud on the court”
1. Politijabber
August 4th, 2010 @ 6:40 pm
When something is under seal, it is by order of the court. How is it that you failed to notice there was
no order entered by the court sealing the transcript?
August 4th, 2010 @ 8:04 pm
there was so much fraud committed by Berg, that I don’t know where to start.
1. A year ago he filed a request for transcript, certifying that he made financial arrangements to
purchase it, no mention of any seal. For half a year he harassed the defendants with thousands of pages
of garbage filed in both courts, no mention of any seal. When there was an order to show cause, why
there is no transcript, he started this song and dance about the seal. Apparently he or Liberi talked to
the clerk David Hayes and told him that it was sealed and Hayes told it to another clerk Joan Carr, who
sent a letter to the Court of appeals. I questioned right away and written to the court of Appeals and
District court, but nohing was done about it.
2. Now, when I finally got the transcript, I see that Berg filed Liberi’s ID documents under seal, but
Judge Robreno never noted it in the docket, so for a year I had no idea. Either Berg lied and never filed
any ID documents with the court and never notified me, which be the hundred and first reason for
sanctions against him, or he filed ID under seal with Robreno, but Robreno never docketted existence
of those documents and never notified the defendants, which is outrageous and can be a basis of
Judicial misconduct complaint, aside from sanctions against Berg, who never notified us, particularly in
light of the fact that residence was at issue. He could redact her address and only leave the name of the
state, but not hide it from us completely and allow this harassment and slander for a year and a half.

Contact Orly!
Page J117
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 27
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:27
11/07/2010
of 39
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
September 2010
M T W T F S S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30
« Aug
Search for:

Orly Taitz
Create Your Badge
Blogroll
Paypal Donate
Page J118
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 28
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:28
11/07/2010
of 39
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Page J119
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 29
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:29
11/07/2010
of 39
EXHIBIT “O”
Page J120
Evidence of fraud on the court, perjury by Berg, Liberi, Ostella, fabricatio... http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12814
Case:Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 30
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:30
11/07/2010
of 39
Home
From reader Carol


THERE IS TYRANNY.
THERE IS LIBERTY.
- Thomas Jefferson
Evidence of fraud on the court, perjury by Berg,

Liberi, Ostella, fabrication of evidence and vicious
attacks on me by Berg
Liberi-v-Taitz-Transcript-of-08-07-09-hearing.pdf
Page J121
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 31
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:31
11/07/2010
of 39
Comments
7 Responses to “Evidence of fraud on the court, perjury by Berg, Liberi, Ostella, fabrication of evidence and
vicious attacks on me by Berg”
1. Brianroy
August 4th, 2010 @ 10:56 pm
I went through the whole transcript.

I noticed that the pro-Berg witnesses on the stand contradicted themselves, and were given over to
sniping slander at every opportunity.
Further, Mr. Hale’s sound clips appeared to derail Berg’s presentation. Witnesses conveniently leaving
important data at home, not showing up with filed police reports in hand, saying that they spoke once
with someone and only once, in both February and in November, etc. And Berg used to be an Assistant
District Attorney? What a disappointment…no wonder he isn’t one anymore. He’s supposed to know
about preparing witnesses if he is any kind of competent lawyer…but clearly his own staff as witnesses
are clearly disgraceful.
I can tell you, if I was being harassed and had to go to Court, I would come with every bit of legal
material possible, from police reports to what have you, and go after the opposition as aggressively
legally and peacefully as the Court would allow me in the time allotted before the judge. There would
be no messing around like Berg and his staff did in the hearing…no I left it at home, or I didn’t bring
that, but somebody has it somewhere nonsense.
At one point in the transcript, when Mr. Hale objected to a Berg witness, the Berg witness answered in
such a way as if her statement, even though it was perjorious then and and it is perjorious now…well,
that doesn’t count, because it wasn’t then under oath or penalty of perjury? What kind of an answer is
that?
I have previously posted at the top of my blog to support your nomination to California’s Secretary of
State for the Republican Party in November 2010. It isn’t visited very much, but you do have
grassroots support morally by many of us who are considered poor and the peons of society.
I still await Damon Dunn’s removal as illegitimate, and after careful examination of the hearing
transcript of Berg, Liberi, Ostella…I still see no reason to either withdraw or be concerned in even the
least regarding designating you, Orly Taitz, as the one who should be California’s next Secretary of
State: one who will then truly have virtually uncontested legal standing from activist judges, being able
to sue on Healthcare and any number of other issues (using 333 US 640 @ 653 et al.) to expedite the
usurper Obama right out of the White House, reverse his entire usurpation of Office and all Laws back
to a status of Laws in effect on January 19, 2008; and truly help to save this nation (at least
temporarily) from the Communist-Socialists seeking to overthrow this Republic and replace it with
some kind of oligarchal dictatorship.
Thank you Orly, for your service to this your new home Country. Thank you for legally immigrating,
and being one of our more outstanding citizens. Bless you.
2. Henry Tisdale
August 5th, 2010 @ 8:19 am
Page J122
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 32
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:32
11/07/2010
of 39
Boy, do I love Brianroy’s comments. This person if full of vim and vinegar as we used to say in the
Navy. I cannot help but ask, is he or has he ever been on the Bench? He is quite knowledgeable in this
law business.
I need some updating, Orly. What happens to your case against Dunn now that Justice Thomas has
denied your request for stay? Or has he officially denied it? Whatever support you need in this SoS
thing, let me know. If it is within my reach, I will do my best.
3. ch
August 5th, 2010 @ 12:20 pm
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=187797
Talk about Fraud. Ellen Kagan participated in blocking lawsuits. Unbelievable. What a character. I
wonder if anybody has a list of all the lawsuits across the nationa attempted to get to the truth. We need
that list and the list of judges who blocked. The picture would be pretty interesting.
4. ch
August 5th, 2010 @ 2:44 pm
Some background information on world situation, not related to Berg….Iran, Iraq and Russia are not
yet allowed in World Trade Organization. Is that not interesting?
Saudi Arabia was not allowed entry until 2005. (4 years after 9/11).
So at time of attack, those 4 countries were all not allowed in the World Trade Organization. Why???
The World Trade Towers attacked in 9/11.
Russia and Saudi Arabia seem to act together in many world crises situations.
Just food for thought as lines of connection are drawn.
5. Citizen Don in California

August 5th, 2010 @ 4:46 pm
Just a quick comment. Even if you are not on the ballot in Nov. I will be writing your name in as Sec.
Of State for California. I do believe that write in’s are still legal.
Keep up the good work!!
August 5th, 2010 @ 5:48 pm
I am supposed to get a date for trial in OC CA
7. Phil
August 6th, 2010 @ 8:41 pm
Lady Liberty:…
Just wanted to say “thanks” to Henry for his gracious words on one of my recent posts. I’ve had some
problems with accessing the site and sometimes I don’t get a chance to take the time to post, as well.
As I have some tech problems at my end-(?) and it keeps me from posting, when I would like to post!
Page J123
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 33
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:33
11/07/2010
of 39
So…let this post say that I do appreciate your words! I’ve had you and another person (“RETRIED!”)
post on one of my posts and say some good, “Patriotic” support for my efforts. That’s great to read!
So thanks again…to both of you! And I will endeavor to begin to do this myself, as I think this is a
“great idea” to offer “support” and “encouragement” to all of the people who post on Orlys’ Site!
And I think that doing this, when we get the chance, will bring about a “cohesive,” political “unit” for
our fight. Which will also help all of us to “hang tough”!
Your friend, Davey Crockett…

Contact Orly!
Recent Posts
French are fighting back with “Pork and wine” parties and rallies and fighting Muslim , sharia invasion
of France. Please, email me at orly.taitz@gmail.com or call at 949-683-5411 if you can help stage
“Pork and Wine” party by this mega mosque at ground zero
Koran?
Categories
Dossiers (47)
DUNNGATE (60)
Events (200)
Health & Safety (7)
Help Needed (127)
HOT ITEMS! (538) Page J124
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 34
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:34
11/07/2010
of 39
Orly Taitz
Create Your Badge
Blogroll
Paypal Donate
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Page J125
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 35
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:35
11/07/2010
of 39
EXHIBIT “P”
Page J126
Here we go again, looks like someone is working over time to make me di... http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12835
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 36
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:36
11/07/2010
of 39
Home
From reader Carol


THERE IS TYRANNY.
THERE IS LIBERTY.
- Thomas Jefferson
Here we go again, looks like someone is working

over time to make me disappear or at least less
visible
I noticed, that when my case Lightfoot v Bowen was supposed to be heard in conference of all 9 Justices of
the Supreme Court, there was a massive scrubbing of the Internet of any positive material about me. My case
was erased from the docket, nobody could find me in the list of attorneys with American Bar Association,
Page J127
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 37
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:37
11/07/2010
of 39
even my bio on WIKI was erased. People were calling me and raising concerns that someone is preparing to
have me physically erased.
Now, as my case with Justice Alito was finally docketted, something similar happened. Prior to docketting
with him, if you were to google my name, you will get 5million 300 thousand hits. Now you can see only
200,000. It means that someone scrubbed or unlinked over 5 million hits. At the same time Berg
re-appeared with no new cases against Obama, but with new garbage allegations from his convicted forger
and a convicted thief Lisa Liberi. What are they gearing to? Will Justice Alito ever see the pleading? I doubt
that.
Comments
3 Responses to “Here we go again, looks like someone is working over time to make me disappear or at least
less visible”
1. Kathy M
August 7th, 2010 @ 6:33 am
Thank you for all of your hard work and efforts. I am still praying for you daily.
Someone must really fear you to go to so much trouble. Hang onto your courage, and do not let anyone
take away your joy in life.
God Bless
2. Ghost Writer
August 7th, 2010 @ 8:55 am
You’re absolutely right. WE are working over time to make sure that you are an epic fail.
3. Elizabeth
August 7th, 2010 @ 7:51 pm
Mr. Ghost Writer,
If she fails, so do we all.

Get that through your
empty-headed noggin.
Why can’t you see that

Orly isn’t working for
fame or fortune.. she is
working for all of us,
including you, even though
you don’t deserve it.
If you can’t see this,

then you aren’t really
an American but a ‘plant’
to undermine truth and
justice and freedom.
Page J128
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 38
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:38
11/07/2010
of 39
In that case, I cannot
fault you, because you
are most probably an
agent for the enemy
within.
That’s what saboteurs

do. This makes your
negative comment irrelevant.
Now, go away and undermine

another country. I hear
that Iran needs someone
to speak out for them.

Contact Orly!
Recent Posts
Gingrich calls our elite “arrogantly dishonest”. Who is our elite: Obama, his administration, most of
Congress, judges and media
French are fighting back with “Pork and wine” parties and rallies and fighting Muslim , sharia invasion
of France. Please, email me at orly.taitz@gmail.com or call at 949-683-5411 if you can help stage
“Pork and Wine” party by this mega mosque at ground zero
Koran?
Categories
Dossiers (47)
DUNNGATE (60)
Page J129
Case:
Case
10-3000
2:09-cv-01898-ER
Document: 003110340431
Filed 39
09/14/10
Date Page
Filed:39
11/07/2010
of 39

Orly Taitz
Create Your Badge
Blogroll
Paypal Donate
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Page J130

Liberi V Taitz Appendice II Exb J PT 1 - PT 5 - Opt

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Liberi V Taitz Appendice II Exb J PT 1 - PT 5 - Opt

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case: 10-3000 Document: 003110340427 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/07/2010

Law Offices of:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

LISA LIBERI, et al, :

PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT ORLY TAITZ’S

Plaintiffs aver as follows:

 Defendant Taitz Motion is FRIVOLOUS.

 Defendant Taitz failed to serve the undersigned with this filing.

Liberi\Opp. to Def. Taitz’s Motion for Plaintiff Liberi’s D.L.

A. Lisa Liberi’s full Social Security number;

Liberi\Opp. to Def. Taitz’s Motion for Plaintiff Liberi’s D.L.

 This Case is supposed to be transferred to the Central District of California, Southern

Taitz has continued obstructing justice by filing frivolous motions.

and the within Plaintiffs are the actual victims.

Defendant Orly Taitz attempting to further manipulate this Court.

Liberi\Opp. to Def. Taitz’s Motion for Plaintiff Liberi’s D.L.

Court claiming Plaintiff Liberi resides in New Mexico.

Liberi\Opp. to Def. Taitz’s Motion for Plaintiff Liberi’s D.L.

the Affidavit of Evelyn Adams attached as EXHIBIT “2”.

witnesses or retaliation against actual witnesses; willfully withholds, misrepresents, alters or

successful does not matter. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1501-1507.

Defendant Taitz’s continues publications of private data of Plaintiff Liberi claiming

Liberi\Opp. to Def. Taitz’s Motion for Plaintiff Liberi’s D.L.

as EXHIBIT “1” and Affidavit of Shirley Waddell attached as EXHIBIT “3.

[8]. What Plaintiffs stated was:

Liberi\Opp. to Def. Taitz’s Motion for Plaintiff Liberi’s D.L.

Entry No. 137.

Cyber-Stalking. See below:

The Legal Definition of Criminal Harassment is:

Liberi\Opp. to Def. Taitz’s Motion for Plaintiff Liberi’s D.L.

The Legal Definition of Stalking is:

The Legal Definition of Cyber-Stalking is:

Defendant Taitz’s continued publication of information pertaining to the Plaintiffs and

Liberi\Opp. to Def. Taitz’s Motion for Plaintiff Liberi’s D.L.

as EXHIBIT “1” and Affidavit of Shirley Waddell attached as EXHIBIT “3”;

case has NOT been transferred?

Liberi\Opp. to Def. Taitz’s Motion for Plaintiff Liberi’s D.L.

asked if something happened to Plaintiff Liberi’s son. This is extremely concerning as

can be instructions to commit an act or instructions to locate a place.

Liberi\Opp. to Def. Taitz’s Motion for Plaintiff Liberi’s D.L.

“4”. This “Convention” never took place.

demanding the arrest of Lisa Liberi10.

depose John Mark Allen.

Liberi\Opp. to Def. Taitz’s Motion for Plaintiff Liberi’s D.L.

B. DEFENDANT TAITZ’S MOTION MUST BE DENIED AS THE ISSUES

Courts how to treat Motions to Reconsider, the Court found:

Liberi\Opp. to Def. Taitz’s Motion for Plaintiff Liberi’s D.L.

available to the Court.

Liberi\Opp. to Def. Taitz’s Motion for Plaintiff Liberi’s D.L.

Defendant Taitz Motion is nothing more than Frivolous.

Again, Defendant Taitz fails to meet any of the required grounds.

reconsideration of matters properly encompassed in a decision on the merits." White v. New

Liberi\Opp. to Def. Taitz’s Motion for Plaintiff Liberi’s D.L.

without a Court Order.

Strebel attached as EXHIBIT “1”.

Liberi\Opp. to Def. Taitz’s Motion for Plaintiff Liberi’s D.L.

C. SANCTIONS and ATTORNEY FEES AGAINST DEFENDANT ORLY

publicity tour instead of attending the hearing.

Plaintiffs have not filed any proof.

Liberi\Opp. to Def. Taitz’s Motion for Plaintiff Liberi’s D.L.

“Liberi is a resident of Pennsylvania”, based on the documents provided by Liberi”. [emphasis

“Liberi is a resident of Pennsylvania”, based on the documents provided by Liberi”. This is