Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • SF 812a-811a

    Uploaded by

    Alan Vincent Fontanosa
    1 views3 pages
    Renac v anthorpe

    Original Title

    SF 812A-811A

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Renac v anthorpe

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views3 pages

    SF 812a-811a

    Uploaded by

    Alan Vincent Fontanosa
    Renac v anthorpe

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3
    Judge's Name (please pri Applicant's Team Number I x Respondent's Team Number: $ Courtroom: Round: (iy FIN COMPETITOR'S NAME Applicant 4 Applicant 2 Respondent 4 Respondent 2 Name: Name: Name: Sie ( Name: Nae Ue. Ma. Wl Andiren |Carmelit> ; i Sheree Neo CATEGORY Qywes elabigellas gr. Organization and clarity (10 possible points: Excellent = 10; Good = 8; Avg. = 6) £ al 9 Analysis and thoroughness (25 possible points: Excellent = 25; Good = 21; Avg. = 17) 2 Ze) Lo Knowledge of facts and law (25 possible points: Excellent = 25; Good = 21; Avg. = 17) ~ &Y z4 Courtroom manner and style (10 possible points: Excellent = 10; Good = 8; Avg. = 6) 10 Ability to answer questions and 10; Good = 8; Avg. = 6) control argument (1 possible ie c |3 points: Excellent = 15; Good = tha) 2 iS t 12; Avg. = 10) Overall persuasiveness (10 possible points: Excellent = 4 1p Professionalism (5 possible points: Excellent = 5; Good =4; Avg. = 3) tn be wn TOTAL SCORE Judge's Name (please print): Applicant's Team Number: Respondent's Team Number: _& Courtroom: 20 Round: SF COMPETITOR'S NAME CATEGORY Applicant 1, Name: Ma. Nikko Arcee. F Quias Applicant 2 Name: Carmelite D Ciabrsellas oe Respondent 1 Name: Soe( Shere dh ool Respondent 2 Name: A(ave(re el Organization and clarity (10 possible points: Excellent = 10; Good = 8; Avg. = 6) 4] c 1 jo g Analysis and thoroughness (25 possible points: Excellent = 25: Good = 21; Avg. = 17) 20 Knowledge of facts and law (25 possible points: Excellent = 25: Good = 21; Avg. = 17) Courtroom manner and style (10 possible points: Excellent = 410; Good = 8; Avg. = 6) Ability to answer questions and control argument (15 possible points: Excellent = 15; Good = 12; Avg. = 10) (40 possible points: Excellent = 10; Good = 8; Avg, = 6) Professionalism (5 possible points: Excellent = 5: Good =4; Avg. = 3) TOTAL SCORE Judge's Name (please print) Applicant's Team Number: gi Respondent's Team Number: _

    You might also like