ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, ELECTION LAW AND THE LAW ON PUBLIC OFFICERS PART A. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW I. GENERAL PRINCIPLES § Definitions a. Administrative Law b. Government of the Republic of the Philippines (see Administrative Code of 1987, Section 2) National Government (see Administrative Code of 1987, Section 2) Local Government (see Administrative Code of 1987, Section 2) Agency of the Government (see Administrative Code of 1987, Section 2) Department (see Administrative Code of 1987, Section 2) Bureau (see Administrative Code of 1987, Section 2) Office (see Administrative Code of 1987, Section 2) Instrumentality (see Administrative Code of 1987, Section 2) Regulatory agency (see Administrative Code of 1987, Section 2) Chartered institution (see Administrative Code of 1987, Section 2) . Government-owned or controlled corporation (see Administrative Code of 1987, Section 2) GOCC Governance Act of 2011 (Republic Act No. 10149) Kinds of Administrative Law Scope of Administrative Law ‘Sources of Administrative Law rrvrse> co: tn en eon Cases: 1. Mecano v. COA, 216 SCRA 500 2, Leveriza v. IAC 157 SCRA 282 3. Luzon Development Bank v. Association of Luzon Dev. Bank Employees, 64 SCAD 918 or 249 SCRA 162 4. Iron and Steel Authority v. Court of Appeals, 65 SCAD 261 or 249 SCRA 538 1, ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES § Creation, Establishment and Abolition of Administrative Agencies Cases: 1, Crisostomo v. Court of Appeals, 258 SCRA 134 2. Viola v. Alunan, III, 277 SCRA 409 (1997) 3. Biraogo v. The Philippine Truth Commission of 2010, G.R. No. 192935, Dec. 7, 2010 § Reorganization of Administrative Agencies a. Definition of Reorganization b. President's power to reorganize; basis c. Power of other agencies to reorganize; limitations Page 1 of 10Cases: 1, Anak Mindanao Party-List Group v. The Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 166052, August 29, 2007 2. Bagacisan v. National Tobacco Administration, G.R. No. 152845, August 5, 2003 3. Kapisanan ng_mga Kawani ng Energy Regulatory Board v. Commissioner Fe Barin, G.R. No. 150974, June 29, 2007 4. National Land Titles and Deeds Registration Administration v. Civil Service Commission, 221 SCRA 145 5. Eugenio v. Civil Service Commission, 60 SCAD 262 or 242 SCRA 196 (1995) Reasons/purposes for creating administrative agencies Common types of administrative agencies con 200 Il. POWER OF ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES § General Principles Cases: 1. Makati Stock Exchange, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, W426 SCRA 623 (1965) Ck L-2tvo4 Cho/to 2. Kilusang Bayan, etc. v, Dominguez, 205 SCRA 92 (1992) 3. Senator Robert S. Jaworksi v. PAGCOR, G.R. No. 144463, January 14, 2004 4. Radio Communications of the Phils., v. National Telecommunications Commission, 215 SCRA 455 (1992) 5. Cooperative Development Authority v. Dolefil Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries Cooperative, Inc., 382 SCRA 552 (2002) 6. Matienzo v. Abellera, 162 SCRA 11 (1988) 7. Laguna Lake Development Authority v. Court of Appeals, 49 SCAD 649 or 231 SCRA 292 (1994) § Quasi-Legislative Power (Rule-Making) a. Legislative power b, Doctrine of Separation of Powers ¢. Non-delegation of legislative power d. Exceptions to the doctrine of non-delegation of legislative power Cases: 1. US v. Barrias, 11 Phil. 327 (1908) 2. People v. Vera, 65 Phil 327°(1937)S& 3. Eastern Shipping Lines, Inc. v. POEA, 166 SCRA 533 (1988) 4, Rabor v. CSC, 244 SCRA 614 (1995) 5. Re: Entitlement to Hazard Pay of SC Medical and Dental Clinic Personnel, A.M. No. 03-9-02-SC, Nov. 27, 2008 Page 2 of 10@. Kinds of Administrative Rules and Regulations © Supplementary or detailed legislation © Interpretative legislation © Contingent legisiation Cases: 1, ABAKADA Guro Party List v. Purisima, G.R, No. 166715, August 14, 2008 2. Gutierrez v, DBM, G.R. No. 153266, March 18, 2010 (and other allied cases) 3. BPI Leasing v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 127624, Nov. 18, 2003 |. Board of Trustees v. Velasco, G.R. No. 170436, February 2, 2011 f. Requisites for Validity of Ad istrative Rules and Regulations Cases: 1, Dagan v. Philippine Racing Commission, G.R. No. 175220, February 12, 2009 2. Smart Communications Inc., v. NTC, G.R. No. 151908, August 12, 2003 3. Conte v. Commission on Audit, 76 SCAD 16 or 264 SCRA 19 (1996) 9. Penal Rules and Regulations Cases: 1. People v. Santos, 63 Phil. 300 (1936) 2. People v. Que Po Lay, 94 Phil. (1954) 3. People v. Maceren, 79 SCRA 450 (1977) h, Force and effect of administrative rules and regulations Cases: a 1. Peralta v. Civil Service Commission, 212 SCRA 425 (1992) 2. Javellana v. DILG, 212 SCRA 475 (1992) i. Requirements of notice and hearing or publication Case: 1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Court of Appeals, 261 SCRA 236 (1996) 2. Commissioner of Customs v. Hypermix Feeds Corp., G.R. No. 179579, Feb. 1, 2012 J. Construction of administrative rules and regulations Page 3 of 10