a
BERCOW RADELL FERNANDEZ & LARKIN
ZONING, LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.
Drow 29657-6296
a:
‘VIA HAND DELIVERY
July 8, 2019
DMr.Joseph Rui, Zoning Administrator
‘Mr. Joseph Eisenberg, Planning Department UDRB Liaison
City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department
‘ULSW 26 Avene, 3rd Floor
Miami, FL 3310-1910,
Re: Waiver Application for 255 NE 1 Street, Miami, Florida
Dear Mr. Ruiz & Mr. Eisenberg,
‘This law firm represents Mishorim 255, LLC (the “Applicant”) the owner of the
property located at 255 NE 1 Street in the City of Miami (the “Property”). This letter shall
serve as the letter of intent in support of the accompanying application for Waivers and,
Urban Design Review Board ("UDRB”) review.
Property Information, The Property is approximately 37,500 square feet (0.86
actes) in size and is located within the T6-80-O Usban Core Zone. The Miami-Dade
County Office of the Property Appraiser (the “Property Appraiser”) identifies the
Property by Folio No, 01-0110-030-2010. The Property is located on the north side of NE
1 Street, between NE 3 Avenue to the east, and SE 2 Avenue to the west. According to
the Property Appraiser, the Property is currently improved with a multi-story parking
‘garage constructed in approximately 1973,
Proposed Development. The Applicant intends to develop the Property with a
sixty-three (63) story, mixed-use structure (the “Projec”). The Project will contain
approximately 1,006,004 square feet of floor area; including approximately eighthundred
(G00) residential units, approximately one hundred twenty (120) hotel units, as well as
approximately 7,110 square feet of commercial uses. The Project's proposed mi of uses
results in approximately eighty-six (86) required parking spaces! however two hundred
ty (268) spaces will be provided on site. The proposed structure will feature modem
"The Property i located within the T60.0 transect which does not requie parking fr reskntil uses
‘within 1,00 fet of « Metrorail or Metromover station,Mr, Joseph Ruiz, Zoning Administrator
Mr. Joseph Eisenberg, Planning Department UDRE Liaison,
July 8, 2019
Page2
architecture and is designed to complement the downtown area's existing architectural
‘mosaic. One of the most unique features of the proposed design is the separation of the
structure into two thin towers, which artfully reduces the perception of mass.
Waiver Requests, ‘The Applicant respectfully requests Waivers in order to
‘accommodate the proposed design. Miami 21 provides that a Waiver application may be
requested pursuant to Article 7.1.2.5 of Miami 21 as follows:
1) Per Article 7.125.a.28, to permit lot coverage of eighty-eight percent (88%)
‘where eighty percent (80%) is required;
2) Por Article 7.1.25.a.28, to permit the pedestal setback (floors 1-8) tobe nine feet
(@) where ten feot (10’)is required for the south (NE 1 Street), primary frontage;
3) Per Article 7.1.25.a.28, to permit the pedestal setback (floors 1-8) to be nine feet
(0) where ten feet (10°) is required for the north (NE 2Stroet), primary frontage;
4) Per Article 7:1.25.2.28, to permit the tower setbeck (floors 9-63) to be eighteen
feet (18°) where twenty fect (20°) is required for the south (NE1 Street), primary
frontage;
8) Per Axticle 7.1.2.5.2.28, to permit the tower setback (floors 9.63) to be eighteen
feet (18°) where twenty feet (20') is required for the north (NE2Street), primary
frontage;
6) Per Article 7.1.25..28, to permit the tower setback (floors 9-63) to be twenty-
seven feet (27) where twenty feet (20')is required for the east frontage;
17) Per Article 71.25.0.28, to permit the tower sethack (floors 9-63) to be twenty
seven feet (27°) where twenty feet (30') is required for the west frontage;
8) Der Article 7.1.25..28, 0 permit two-way drive eisle widths to be twenty two
fect (22), where twenty-three feet (28) is required:
9) Per Article 71.25.a.28, to permit a building separation of fifty-four feet (54°)
above the eighth floor where sixty feet 60°) is required;
10) Per Article 5.6.2. to permit vehicular entries, loading docks, and service areas
to be acvess from the principal frontage:
BERCOW RADELL FERNANDEZ & LARKINMr, Joseph Ruiz, Zoning Administrator
‘Mr. Joseph Bisenberg, Planning Department UDRB Liaison,
July 8, 2019
Pages
11)Per Article 54.4.4, to permit parking within the Second Layer above the first
story along a Primary Frontage (NE 1 Street) with an art or glass treatment;
12) Per Asticle 5.4.4, to permit parking within the Second Layer above the first
story along a Primary Frontage (NE 2 Street) with an art or glass treatment;
15)Per Article 4. Table 5, to permit substitution of an Industrial loading berth to
by two (2) Commercial loading berths.
Asticle 7.125 2.28 Waiver Standard, Article 71.25 a.28 of Miami 21 permits
Waivers of up to ten percent (10%) of any particular standard of this Code except Density,
Intensity and Height. A Waiver may be granted according to this section when doing so:
4) promotes tite intent of the particular transect zone; b) is consistent with the guiding
principles of Miami 21; and ¢) there is practical difficulty in otherwise meeting the
standards of the transect zone, or when doing so promotes energy conservation and
Building sustainability. The Applicant is requesting seven (7) Article 71.25 a.28 Waivers,
all of which satisty the abovementioned criteria, as described further below.
‘Analysis: Lot Coverage. Pursuant to Illustration 5.6 of Article 5 of Miami 21, lot
coverage in the 16-80 transect zone can reach up to eighty percent (80%) as of right. The
proposed increase in lot coverage to eighty-cight percent (88%) is not a request for an
{impermissible increase in Intensity. The total permissible floor area forthe Property, as
measured by FLR, is not proposed to be increases! above what io permissible as of right.
In effect, the increase in Lot Coverage is only a redistribution of the Property's
permissible Intensity to achieve a pedestrian-oriented project that communicates with the
built urban context in downtown. It should be noted that the Project is well-below the
maximum permitted Intensity, as the Applicant's goal is to develop a project that is
compatible with the neighborhood, not one that maximizes the developable area of the
Property. ‘The Applicant's request for cighty-cight percent (88%) lot coverage where
eighty percent (G0%) is required is a ten percent (10%) reduction and satisfies all three
Article 7.1.25 2.28 Waiver criteria,
Article 4. Table 1 of Miami 21 describes the 76 transect as “A network of small
blocks [with] Thoronghfares with wide Sidewalks, steady street tree planting and
Buildings set close to the Frontages with frequent doors and windows.” The proposed
building features large glass windows set at the Property's required front setbacks.
Farther, the guiding principles of Miami 21 contemplate 2 pedestrian-friendly and
cohesive urban fabric for this area, This area is characterized by commercial and mixed-
use structures that occupy over eighty percent (80%) oftheir lots with litte to no setbacks.
‘The Project's proposed lot coverage contributes to the public domain by providing
BERCOW RADELL FERNANDEZ & LARKIN