Professional Documents
Culture Documents
On August 10, very short-term US clinical trials for several H1N1 flu
vaccines began at eight medical university centers. As my previous articles
have noted, there are five different pharmaceutical companies that will
supply the US with various vaccine formulas. While there are major
concerns about the high-level of toxic ingredients in these vaccines, the ones
being used for these trials do not contain the toxic squalene adjuvant. How
can there be any real test of any vaccine being planned or forced on
Americans this Fall, if it does not contain squalene? Can this be considered
another way that the trials are being rigged? Data cannot be compared or
equated, if the vaccine ingredients are different. The real issue, however, is
that there are toxic ingredients in all the vaccines: formaldehyde
(carcinogenic and an embalming fluid); thimerosol (ethylmercury that is 50
times more dangerous; there is no safe level of mercury); pesticides,
detergents, and squalene (the toxic ingredient and cause of Gulf War
Syndrome).
Why are these ingredients in vaccines? There is a long history of how grave
this harm is; with our children now getting 40 vaccines as they are growing
up. American children have very seriously compromised immune systems.
How much of this is due to the heavy overload of dangerous vaccines?
The following two vaccine companies (Sanofi-Pasteur and CSL Limited) are
involved in the US clinical trials this month.
Then, just recently, Dr. Keijo Fukuda, WHO's flu chief, warned about the
potential dangers of these different kinds of vaccines, saying: "There are
certain areas where you simply do not try to make any economies. One of
the things which cannot be compromised is the safety of the vaccines."(7)
This statement is a bit tardy in coming. Why was this not the very first thing
WHO addressed in May and June, before they rushed to declare a Level 6
"pandemic" (without supporting medical proof)?
These next few paragraphs are a necessary tangent, and need to be included,
as they are relevant to a larger environmental picture.
Over the past nine years, the US Department of Defense [DOD], using
military and commercial planes (around the world), have been releasing
billions of tons of aerosolized deadly poisons into the air we are breathing
--quite literally with each and every breath we take. There are now more
than 60 different Clandestine Weather Modification Programs. These toxic
Chemtrail aerosols are, for the most part, invisible. People can go to the
movies and see the latest high-tech film about some sci-fi release of
pathogens; but when it comes to the reality of what is actually happening,
it's off the proverbial radar. Global Research has also published numerous
articles on the militarization of health and our planet, the proliferation of
extremely hazardous bioweapons labs (with frequent breaches of security),
and the toxins that have been deliberately but secretly released.
There are national and international laws that forbid the use of humans as
uninformed tests subjects. That is precisely why the Nuremberg Codes were
established: to make sure another genocide [what Dr. Leonard Horowitz
calls "Iatrocide"] could never happen again. Nonetheless, we all have been
experimental guinea pigs for nine or more years. The corporate-controlled
media is complicit in this massive cover-up. In my book, I write that
"invisible does not mean safe." Just because we cannot see some poison, or
it is off our radar, it does not mean that we are not being harmed. This is
precisely why the enormous poisonous assault on our environment poses
such a vast threat to our already damaged DNA and the very future of our
planet. It is often invisible, but it is not safe.
The global assault of more than 100,000 highly dangerous chemicals, that
surround our every move, leaves no one safe. Most of these chemicals have
never been tested for human safety. Further, there is no research on how the
thousands of chemicals interact with each other in the human body. The
infinite mathematical combinations make this impossible. What is known,
however, is that even very small amounts of toxins (carcinogens, heavy
metals, and hormone disruptors) add up synergistically: sometimes, 1+1
does not equal 2, but can equal 1,500 times the original exposure dose. In
the ground-breaking book, "Our Stolen Future," Dr. Theo Colburn et al.,
warned us in 1996 about the DNA devastation wrought by hormone
disruption caused by chemicals. As With Rachel Carson's pivotal writings in
the 1950s and early 1960s, all these warnings go unheeded, as we continue
to face one epidemic after another, due to these highly toxic chemicals.
Further, standard blood tests do not include a diagnosis for heavy metal
poisoning a prevalent result of all of us breathing billions of tons of toxic
metals released into our air. Yet, the possibility that the overwhelming
majority of Americans or Canadians have heavy metal poisoning is very
probable. [FYI: Testing to find heavy metal poisoning can be done through
laboratory hair analysis.]
Dr. R. Michael Castle has written recently and very persuasively about the
extreme dangers that a highly toxic assortment of chemicals pose to our
entire web of life a web that is unraveling faster and faster. In fact, our
climate change may be caused, significantly exacerbated, and destabilized
by the billions of tons of aerosolized chemicals that we breathe. We do not
know enough about the intricate workings of our planet's systems for the
military to be tampering with them (unsupervised by the public) on such a
massive scale.
Our most basic human rights --including not being deliberately poisoned by
the very air we are breathing- continue to be repeatedly violated, and
without our informed consent. We share the air in common. It is a basic
human right not to be deliberately poisoned by Clandestine Weather
Modification Programs. In a recent conversation, Dr. Castle told me "these
aerosol operations have significantly changed our weather; and now we
don't have real seasons." Dr. Castle writes about "The Methodic Demise of
Natural Earth" and the critical need for us to demand that "The Unified
Atmospheric Preservation Act of 2008" he authored must be passed by
Congress and signed into law.(11) Our very lives and the survival of our
planet rest on all of us becoming informed about these deadly programs and
the urgent passage of this act, so this can be stopped.
On August 10, Dr. Sharon Fey, an infectious disease expert from St. Louis
University, was quoted saying: "What we are looking at is both the
safety[sic] and effectiveness of the vaccine. We measure antibody responses
by taking pre-vaccination blood and posts-vaccination blood, and
comparing the change in antibody to the vaccine." Dr. Frey also said:
"Typically, it takes a year to do this. I can tell you we're working at
breakneck speed."(12)
There are urgent questions that continue to go unanswered: Why are these
medical centers using vaccines without adjuvants that will be part of the
Fall flu vaccines? How much real "care" can really be taken when everyone
is rushing? How can these rushed vaccine results be compared with different
Fall vaccines that will be given to millions people? Realistically, can any
public official be believed? Remember the rush that also preceded the polio
vaccines and the 1976 swine flu? Has the system improved since then? Look
at all the medical warnings (not reported in mainstream media) over just the
last two weeks. What is different or safer today with dangerous ingredients
that do not always manifest serious problems in a few days or weeks of
these very rushed experimental trials? There was a tremendous rush 54
years ago with the polio vaccine, for the financial benefit of the drug
companies. It is the same scenario today. Greed continues to trump
precaution.
This is again another historical reminder about the deadly polio vaccine that
contained African green monkey virus. In the rush, short-sightedness, and
pharmaceutical greed 54 years ago, the long-term cancer link did not show
up right away. But the millions of people who received the Salk polio
vaccine have an increased risk of developing cancer later in life. Do we want
a whole new generation of children and adults infected with carcinogenic
monkey virus?
****
Environmental writer Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri is the author of the highly
acclaimed "The Uterine Crisis."
7. WHO changes its mind: Mark Prigg. "Vaccine from swine flu may be
unsafe warns WHO." London Evening Standard. July 27, 2009:
www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23724398-details/Vaccine+
for+swine+flu+may+be+unsafe+warns+WHO/article.do
10. Dr. Tim O'Shea. "The Sanctity of Human Blood: Vaccination I$ Not
Immunization." 8th edition, 2004: 95
11. Dr. R. Michael Castle. "The Methodic Demise of Natural Earth." June
26, 2009: www.newswithviews.com/guest_opinion/guest154.htm; and "The
Unified Atmospheric Preservation Act of 2008": www.
thepowerhour.com/news3
/The%20Unified%20Atmospheric%20Preservation%20Act.pdf
12. Jane Burgermeister. "Trials on 'swine flu' vaccine without adjuvants state
at St. Louis University" Aug. 11, 2009: http://birdflu666.wordpress.com
16. Dr. O'Shea, cited in #10 above, "The Sanctity of Human Blood" p. 148.
Disclaimer
MainPage
http://www.rense.com