Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Benchmark Results
Docking Program Accuracy
Molegro Virtual Docker 87.0%
Glide 81.8%
GOLD1 78.2%
Surflex 75.3%
FlexX2 57.9%
Table 1: Accuracy of selected docking programs on 77 complexes. See 'MolDock:
A New Technique for High-Accuracy Molecular Docking': René Thomsen and Mikael
H. Christensen (J. Med. Chem., 2006, 49(11), pp 3315 – 3321) for more details.
[1] Based on 55 out of the 77 complexes [2] Based on 76 out of the 77 complexes
Advanced Features
Visual inspection of docked conformations Ability to only report diverse
displaying relevant interactions conformations based on a clustering
Sidechain minimization tool for optimizing measure
receptor conformation before docking Reranking score (rerank docked solutions
Docking with sidechain flexibility taking to increase docking accuracy)
induced fit interactions into account Docking using precalculated energy grids
to speed up calculations
Data Analyzer for creating regression Similarity Docking for flexible ligand
models (using neural networks or MLR) alignment and focused docking/screening
and visualizing data using templates (pharmacophores)
The user interface can be customized and User-defined constraints to increase
extended via the built-in macro language docking performance
Advanced Features (continued)
Biomolecule generator Ligand Energy Inspector
Structural Protein Alignment Support for batch jobs – distribute the
Spherical cropping tool docking simulations on multiple
computers
Sequence viewer
Support for scripting of the docking
RMSD measure taking automorphisms
engine (Python wrapper included)
into account
About Molegro