You are on page 1of 5

Accident Analysis and Prevention 39 (2007) 624–628

Breathing difficulty and tinnitus among children exposed


to airbag deployment
Manoj K. Mittal a,∗ , Michael J. Kallan b , Dennis R. Durbin a,b
a Division of Emergency Medicine, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard,
Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
b Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine,

Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States


Received 16 May 2006; received in revised form 2 September 2006; accepted 10 October 2006

Abstract
Objective: To assess the incidence of breathing difficulty and tinnitus in children involved in motor vehicle crashes with and without passenger
airbag (PAB) deployment, and its relationship to seating position and to whether the airbag deployed was first versus second-generation.
Methods: We studied motor vehicle crashes with child passengers, over a 3-year period, in three large regions of the United States, by means
of telephone interviews with the driver/parent. The crashes were classified into those with and without a PAB deployment. Complete data were
collected on 7383 children in 4817 crashes, who, because of the sample design of the study, represent an estimated 120,987 children in 83,267
crashes.
Results: Among children involved in crashes with PAB deployment, 6.6% complained of breathing difficulty versus 1.4% without airbag deployment
(OR 5.2, 95% CI 3.3–8.2). The corresponding figures for tinnitus were 5.0% versus 0.7% (OR 7.4, 95% CI 4.0–13.7).
Analysis of data for children exposed to PABs indicated that 14.1% of children in the front seat versus 1.1% in the rear complained of tinnitus
(OR 14.4, 95% CI 5.9–34.7). Seating row did not significantly affect the incidence of breathing difficulty. The type of airbag deployed did not
significantly affect the incidence of breathing difficulty or of tinnitus.
Conclusion: Breathing difficulty and tinnitus were much more common among children in crashes with PAB deployment as against those without
PAB deployment. Among children in crashes with PAB deployment, tinnitus was about 14 times more likely for those sitting in the front versus
rear seat. The incidence of breathing difficulty was not affected significantly by seating row. Introduction of second-generation airbags has not
affected the incidence of breathing difficulty or of tinnitus.
© 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Passenger airbag; Tinnitus; Breathing difficulty; First-generation airbag; Second-generation airbag; Seating row

1. Introduction Besides traumatic injuries, airbag exposure has also been


linked to breathing difficulty and audiologic abnormalities.
Passenger airbags (PAB) began appearing in vehicles in the Experimental studies have confirmed that aerosol particles
United States in the mid-1990s (Durbin et al., 2003). Their use released with airbag deployment can cause bronchospasm in
has been linked with an overall reduction in deaths and severe susceptible people (Gross et al., 1994). There have been several
injuries amongst front seat passengers (Braver et al., 1997). case reports of breathing difficulty and asthma exacerbation
Deploying PABs, however, may increase the risk of death in associated with airbag deployment among drivers and passen-
exposed children (Braver et al., 1997). They have also been gers with and without a past history of asthma (Epperly et al.,
linked to a wide variety of injuries of all severities in exposed 1997; Mazieres et al., 2002; Perez-Camareo et al., 2000). These
adults and children (Boyd, 2002; Durbin et al., 2003). episodes tend to respond to usual treatment for asthma exacer-
bation. Sound impulses generated with airbag deployment can

result in noise induced hearing loss (Banglmaier and Rouhana,
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 215 590 1944; fax: +1 215 590 4454.
E-mail addresses: mittal@email.chop.edu, manojmital@yahoo.com
2003). As experience with airbags has grown, multiple case
(M.K. Mittal), mkallan@cceb.upenn.edu (M.J. Kallan), reports and case series have indicated that airbag deployment can
durbind@email.chop.edu (D.R. Durbin). result in persistent tinnitus and permanent hearing impairment

0001-4575/$ – see front matter © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.aap.2006.10.005
M.K. Mittal et al. / Accident Analysis and Prevention 39 (2007) 624–628 625

in some individuals (Buckley et al., 1999; Chao and Pomerantz, treatment received by child occupant(s). A probability sample
2004; Mattox and Price, 1995; Mcfeely et al., 1999; Morris was selected at random with a higher probability of selection
and Borja, 1998; Saunders et al., 1998; Yaremchuk and Dobie, for vehicles in which a child occupant died, was admitted to
2001). Presence of tinnitus causes discomfort in its own right the hospital or evaluated in a physician’s office or emergency
and is also a marker for the presence of hearing impairment. department. In this way, the majority of injured children would
In 1997, the US National Highway Traffic Safety Admin- be selected while maintaining the representativeness of the over-
istration issued a change to airbag regulations, which led to all population. If a vehicle was sampled, the “cluster” of all child
a reduction in the power of the airbags during inflation by occupants in that vehicle was included in the survey. Surveys
20–35% (Kiuchi, 1998). These new airbags are referred to as were conducted in English with the driver of the vehicle and
second-generation airbags. They were introduced in most US parent(s) of the involved children.
automobiles beginning with the 1998 model year. Separate verbal consent was obtained from eligible partici-
While previous case reports have identified the nature of pants for the transfer of claim information from State Farm to
breathing difficulty and tinnitus/hearing impairment resulting CHOP/Penn, and for conducting the telephone survey.
from airbag deployment, no study has determined the incidence The data collected included age and sex of child passengers,
of these conditions in a large population of children exposed to their restraint status, PAB/DAB (driver air bag) deployment, type
airbags. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the and model year of vehicle involved, position of the child in the
incidence of breathing difficulty and tinnitus in children involved vehicle with respect to seating row, and whether the child passen-
in crashes with PAB deployment versus no PAB deployment. In ger complained of breathing difficulty and/or ringing in the ears
addition, we examined the effect of seating row and the intro- (tinnitus) following the crash in answer to the following ques-
duction of second-generation airbags on the incidence of both tions: (1) Did the child passenger, XYZ in your car complain of
conditions among children in PAB-deployment crashes. difficulty in breathing following the crash? (2) Did the child pas-
senger, XYZ in your car complain of ringing in one or both ears
2. Methods following the crash? The type of airbag, first-generation versus
second-generation was determined from the type and model year
2.1. Study population and data collection of the vehicle.

Data for this study were drawn from the Partners for Child 2.2. Statistical methods
Passenger Safety (PCPS) program over a 3-year period from
January 2003 through December 2005. A detailed description Initial analyses determined the incidence of breathing diffi-
of the study methods has been published previously (Durbin et culty and tinnitus for all children involved in crashes with or
al., 2001). Because of the aforementioned case reports linking without PAB deployment. Among children in PAB deployment
breathing and hearing problems with airbag deployment, ques- crashes, the incidence of each condition was then stratified by the
tions regarding breathing difficulty and ringing in the ears (tinni- seating row of the child and by whether the airbag was a first ver-
tus) were added to the survey instrument in January, 2003 PCPS sus second-generation system. Logistic regression modeling was
consists of a large scale, child-specific crash surveillance system. then used to separately compute the unadjusted odds ratio (OR)
Insurance claims from State Farm Insurance Co. (Bloomington, of (1) breathing difficulty and (2) tinnitus for children in vehicles
IL) function as the source of subjects, with telephone survey equipped with second versus first-generation airbags, both over-
and on-site crash investigations serving as the primary sources all, and also stratified by seating row. To compute p-values and
of data. The study has been approved by the Institutional Review 95% confidence intervals while taking into account the stratifi-
Boards at the University Of Pennsylvania School Of Medicine cation of subjects by medical treatment, clustering of subjects by
(Penn) and The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP). vehicle, and the disproportional probability of selection, Taylor
Vehicles qualifying for inclusion were State Farm-insured, Series linearization estimates of the logistic regression param-
model year 1990 or newer, and involved in a crash with at least eter variance were calculated using SAS-callable SUDAAN:
one child occupant 4–15 years of age. We excluded children Software for the Statistical Analysis of Correlated Data, Ver-
under the age of 4 years from the study because history of sion 9.0 (Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park,
breathing difficulty or tinnitus could not be reliably obtained NC, 2005). Results of logistic regression modeling are expressed
from them and very few were sitting in the front seat of the as unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios with corresponding 95%
vehicle at the time of the crash. Qualifying crashes were those confidence intervals. Because of the relative rarity of the out-
that occurred in any of 15 states and the District of Columbia, comes of interest, the odds ratio and relative risk measures are
representing three large regions of the United States (East: New assumed equivalent.
York, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, West Vir- 3. Results
ginia, North Carolina, District of Columbia; Midwest: Ohio,
Michigan, Indiana, Illinois; and West: California, Nevada, Ari- 3.1. Sample characteristics
zona, Texas [starting 6/03]).
A stratified cluster sample was designed with a vehicle as Complete interview data were obtained on 7383 children
the unit of sampling. Vehicles were stratified on whether they in 4817 vehicles representing an estimated 120,987 children
were towed from the scene or not, as well as the level of medical in 83,267 vehicles in the overall PCPS population. Of these,
626 M.K. Mittal et al. / Accident Analysis and Prevention 39 (2007) 624–628

Table 1
Characteristics of the study subjects (as a whole) and of those exposed to deploying PABs
Total population: unweighted N Those exposed to deploying PABs:
(total N = 7383) (weighted %) unweighted N (total N = 1476) (weighted %)

Male 3449 (47.4) 668 (41.8)


Restrained 6869 (97.2) 1354 (96.1)
Front row seated 2296 (26.9) 502 (30.0)
Back row seated 5088 (73.1) 974 (70.0)
Second row 4473 (63.8) 887 (63.0)
Third row 615 (9.3) 87 (7.0)
Age-group
4–8 years 2748 (43.8) 486 (39.8)
9–12 years 2343 (31.5) 476 (32.6)
13–15 years 2292 (24.7) 514 (27.6)
Type of vehicle
Passenger car 3560 (43.2) 903 (54.9)
SUV 1693 (24.8) 267 (21.5)
Minivan 1399 (21.9) 238 (19.3)
Pickup truck 577 (8.2) 53 (2.9)
Cargo van 154 (1.8) 15 (1.4)
Model year of vehicles
1990–1993 906 (9.3) 6 (0.2)
1994–1997 1831 (20.8) 490 (28.4)
1998–2005 4646 (69.9) 980 (71.4)

111,636 children [unweighted (U) = 5 565], were estimated to the rear, yielding an OR of 1.4 (95% CI 0.7–2.8). Tinnitus was
be in vehicles without airbag deployment, 1512 (U = 342), in reported by 332 of 2350 (14.1%) children in the front seat, ver-
vehicles with only a driver airbag (DAB) deployment while 7839 sus 62 of 5489 (1.1%) in the rear, yielding an OR of 14.4 (95%
children (U = 1476) were estimated to be in vehicles with PAB CI 5.9–34.7, p < 0.001).
deployment as well. Of the children involved in crashes with
no airbag deployment, 7.7% were in vehicles with no airbag 3.4. Effect of type of airbag
installed, while 6.8% were in vehicles with DAB only. The
median length of time between the date of the crash and the Breathing difficulty was reported by 362 out of 5525 (6.6%)
completion of the interview was 8 days. children exposed to second-generation airbags versus 159 out of
The characteristics of the study subjects (as a whole) and of 2314 (6.9%) of those exposed to first-generation airbags, yield-
those exposed to deploying PABs on which much of the further ing an OR of 0.9 (95% CI 0.5–1.9). Tinnitus occurred in 231
analysis has been done, are listed in Table 1. children out of 5 525 (4.2%) in vehicles with second-generation
versus 163 out of 2314 (7.0%) of those in vehicles with first-
3.2. Incidence of breathing difficulty and tinnitus related to generation airbags, yielding an OR of 0.6 (95% CI 0.2–1.5).
PAB deployment
4. Discussion
Of the estimated 7839 children involved in crashes with PAB
deployment, 521 (6.6%) complained of breathing difficulty ver- Breathing difficulty and tinnitus were more common among
sus 1614 of 113,148 children (1.4%) in crashes without PAB children in crashes with PAB deployment as opposed to those
deployment, yielding an OR of 5.2 (95% CI 3.3–8.2, p < 0.001). without PAB deployment. Among children exposed to PAB
Tinnitus was reported by an estimated 394 (5.0%) children in deployment, the incidence of breathing difficulty was not sig-
crashes with PAB deployment, as opposed to 802 (0.7%) chil- nificantly affected by seating row. Tinnitus, on the other hand
dren in crashes without PAB deployment, yielding an OR of 7.4 was predominantly a problem for front seat passengers, and was
(95% CI 4.0–13.7, p < 0.001). about 14 times more likely for children sitting in the front ver-
Data for children in crashes with PAB deployments were sus rear seat. Introduction of second-generation airbags did not
further analyzed to examine the association between breathing affect the incidence of breathing difficulty or of tinnitus in a
difficulty and tinnitus with seating row and the type of airbag significant manner.
deployed.
4.1. Tinnitus/hearing difficulty
3.3. Effect of seating row
The peak sound pressure in a vehicle exposed to a barrier
Breathing difficulty was reported by 195 of 2350 (8.3%) chil- crash without an airbag deployment is about 145 decibels (dB)
dren in the front seat as compared to 326 of 5489 (5.9%) in (Banglmaier and Rouhana, 2003), whereas addition of a rapid
M.K. Mittal et al. / Accident Analysis and Prevention 39 (2007) 624–628 627

airbag deployment leads to the generation of a much louder Nearly 7% of children in our study complained of breathing
impulse noise of 165–175 dB (Price and Kalb, 1999). Exposure difficulty after being involved in a crash with PAB deployment
to noise of 140 dB or more for more than 5 ms may lead to per- as opposed to only 1.4% of those without an airbag deployment.
manent hearing loss. Levels in excess of 165 dB, even for shorter Similar proportions of children sitting in the front passenger
durations, are likely to cause cochlear damage, potentially caus- seat had symptoms of breathing difficulty (8%) as those in the
ing tinnitus and hearing impairment (International Programme rear seat (6%). This is consistent with experimental observa-
on Chemical Safety, 1980). tions showing that the aerosol exposure for people sitting in
Tests run when airbags were first proposed for automotive use the front or back rows of a vehicle is similar (Gross et al.,
indicated negligible auditory hazard (Nixon, 1969). As experi- 1994). Serious airbag-related injuries have decreased signifi-
ence with airbags has grown, however, multiple case reports cantly in children since the introduction of second-generation
and case series have indicated that airbag deployment can result airbags (Arbogast et al., 2005). Our study shows that introduc-
in tinnitus and permanent hearing impairment in some individ- tion of second-generation airbags has not affected the incidence
uals. Huelke et al. (1999) found that 1.7% (3 of 177) of car of breathing difficulty or of tinnitus, however, in a significant
occupants complained of hearing-related problems following a manner.
crash. In the largest case series of its kind published so far,
members of the American Academy of Otolaryngology, Head 4.3. Limitations
and Neck Surgery submitted case reports on 71 patients, aged
4–81 years, with audiologic problems, chiefly hearing loss and The data for this study were obtained via telephone interview
tinnitus, after being involved in a crash with airbag deployment. with the driver/parent of the child and therefore are subject to
Fifty-two patients complained of persistent tinnitus, while 47 potential misclassification. However, on-going comparison of
had a confirmed unilateral hearing loss (Yaremchuk and Dobie, several driver-reported variables including child restraint use
2001). The vast majority of cases did not involve any physical and seating position with evidence from crash investigations
contact between the airbag and the subject’s ear. The disability performed as part of this research project have demonstrated
is mostly due to the cochlear damage resulting from the noise a high degree of agreement (κ-statistic = 0.99 for seat row,
impulse. Results from this and other studies (Buckley et al., 0.77 for restraint use). In addition, our results on age-specific
1999; Mattox and Price, 1995; Mcfeely et al., 1999; Morris and restraint use and seating position are similar to those of other
Borja, 1998; Saunders et al., 1998; Yaremchuk and Dobie, 2001) recently reported population-based studies of child occupants
suggest that tinnitus and hearing impairment usually coexist, so (Glassbrenner et al., 2004; Wittenberg et al., 1999).
that presence of tinnitus should warrant formal hearing assess- The information obtained in this study does not tell us about
ment. the severity or the duration of breathing difficulty or tinnitus.
Studies with ear models and airbag deployment have previ- Further studies need to be done to assess these issues. The
ously suggested that the occupants in the second row and beyond study does, however, show significant association between PAB
may be at less risk of noise induced hearing loss, the risk reduc- deployment and breathing difficulty and tinnitus. Considering
tion being ∼30% for each seating row away from the frontal the biologic plausibility, and multiple case reports showing these
airbag system (Banglmaier and Rouhana, 2003). This is related associations, this study provides crucial hypotheses which need
to attenuation of high frequency noise with increasing distance to be tested further.
from the source of the sound impulse. In our study, tinnitus was
reported 14 times more often by children sitting in the front pas- 4.4. Implications for prevention
senger seat than those in the back seat. Most case reports linking
hearing impairment with airbag deployment have also been in Future research should assess the degree of breathing diffi-
driver or front seat passengers (Buckley et al., 1999; Chao and culty and include follow-up regarding the duration of tinnitus
Pomerantz, 2004; Mattox and Price, 1995; Mcfeely et al., 1999; and formal hearing assessment of affected patients. As newer
Morris and Borja, 1998; Saunders et al., 1998; Yaremchuk and model year vehicles are equipped with additional airbags like
Dobie, 2001). Thus our study adds more data in support of cur- front side airbags and side curtain airbags, deployment of more
rent recommendations for children to sit in the rear seat. of these airbags in a crash may increase the amount of particulate
matter and noise generated, and may thus further increase the
4.2. Breathing difficulty chance of precipitating asthmatic attacks/breathing difficulty,
and noise-induced tinnitus/hearing loss among the affected pop-
An estimated 9 million children aged <18 years have had ulation.
asthma diagnosed at some time in their lives (Dey and Bloom, Airbag suppliers and auto manufacturers need to continue
2005). Inhalation of the aerosol produced by airbag deployment efforts to improve airbag design to reduce noise levels and the
can result in significant bronchospasm in 40% of asthmatics release of particulate matter at the time of deployment. In the
(Gross et al., 1994). The asthmatic response is induced by meantime, emergency medicine physicians, EMT technicians
inhaled particulates dissolving in the airway fluids and changing and other physicians treating trauma patients should be aware
osmolarity (Gross et al., 1995). Most of the cases of breathing of the potential for both tinnitus and breathing difficulty follow-
difficulty associated with exposure to a deploying airbag are ing exposure of children to deployed airbags and should ensure
likely related to induction of an asthmatic attack. appropriate initial treatment and follow-up.
628 M.K. Mittal et al. / Accident Analysis and Prevention 39 (2007) 624–628

Acknowledgments Glassbrenner, D., Carra, J.S., Nichols, J., 2004. Recent estimates of safety belt
use. J. Safe. Res. 35 (2), 237–244.
Gross, K.B., Haidar, A.H., Basha, M.A., et al., 1994. Acute pulmonary response
The authors would like to acknowledge the commitment and of asthmatics to aerosols and gases generated by airbag deployment. Am. J.
financial support of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Respir. Crit. Care Med. 150 (2), 408–414.
Company for the creation and ongoing maintenance of the Part- Gross, K., Koets, M.H., D’Arcy, J.B., et al., 1995. Mechanism of induction of
ners for Child Passenger Safety (PCPS) program, the source of asthmatic attacks initiated by the inhalation of particles generated by airbag
data for this study. The authors also thank the many State Farm system deployment. J. Trauma 38 (4), 521–527.
Huelke, D.F., Moore, J.L., Compton, T.W., et al., 1999. Hearing loss and auto-
policyholders who consented to participate in PCPS. The results mobile airbag deployments. Accid. Anal. Prevent. 31 (6), 789–792.
presented in this report are the interpretation solely of the authors International programme on chemical safety, 1980. Environmental Health Cri-
and are not necessarily the views of State Farm. We thank Kristy teria for Noise. World Health Organization, Geneva, ISBN 92 4 154072
Arbogast, PhD for reviewing the manuscript. 9.
Kiuchi, T., 1998. A simulation study on inflation induced injury and NCAP
with depowered airbag. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Technical
References Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Windsor, Ontario, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, pp. 2518–2525.
Arbogast, K.B., Durbin, D.R., Kallan, M.J., et al., 2005. Injury risk to restrained Mattox, D.E., Price, G.R., 1995. Acoustic properties of automobile airbag
children exposed to deployed first- and second-generation air bags in frontal deployment. In: Proceedings of 18th Midwinter Meeting of Association for
crashes. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 159 (4), 342–346. Research in Otolaryngol, St. Petersburg, FL 672, Session T4, Poster.
Banglmaier, R.F., Rouhana, S.W., 2003. Investigation into the noise associated Mazieres, J., Merault, J.M., Borrel, B., et al., 2002. Acute bronchial constriction
with airbag deployment. Part III. Sound pressure level and auditory risk as in a non-asthmatic patient provoked by airbag activation (French). Revue
a function of inflatable device. In: 47th Annual Proceedings/Association for Des. Maladies Respiratoires. 19 (4), 537–538.
the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, vol. 47, pp. 25–50. Mcfeely Jr., W.J., Bojrab, D.I., Davis, K.G., et al., 1999. Otologic injuries
Boyd, B.C., 2002. Automobile supplemental restraint system-induced injuries. caused by airbag deployment. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 121 (4), 367–
Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontics 94 (2), 143–148. 373.
Braver, E.R., Ferguson, S.A., Greene, M.A., et al., 1997. Reductions in deaths Morris, M.S., Borja, L.P., 1998. Airbag deployment and hearing loss. Arch.
in frontal crashes among right front passengers in vehicles equipped with Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 124 (5), 507–508.
passenger airbags. JAMA 278 (17), 1437–1439. Nixon, C.W., 1969. Human auditory response to an airbag inflation noise, Report
Buckley, G., Setchfield, N., Frampton, R., 1999. Two case reports of possible for contract no. P.O. #9-1-1151. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal
noise trauma after inflation of airbags in low speed car crashes. BMJ 318, Highway Administration, National Highway Safety Bureau, Washington,
499–500. DC, 20591.
Chao, N., Pomerantz, W.J., 2004. Acute hearing loss after airbag deployment. Perez-Camareo, E.R., Lezama Garcia De Cortazar, J., Jimenez Caudevilla, C.,
Pediatr. Emerg. Care 20 (10), 683–686. et al., 2000. Airbag lesions. Eur. J. Emerg. Med. 7, 160.
Dey, A.N., Bloom, B., 2005. Summary health statistics for U.S. children: Price, G.R., Kalb, J.T., 1999. Auditory hazard from airbag noise exposure. J.
National health interview survey, 2003. Vital Health Stat. 10 (223). Acoust. Soc. Am. 106 (5), 2629–2637.
Durbin, D.R., Bhatia, E., Holmes, J.H., et al., 2001. Partners for Child Passenger Saunders, J.E., Slattery III, W.H., Luxford, W.M., 1998. Automobile airbag
Safety: a unique child-specific crash surveillance system. Accid. Anal. Prev. impulse noise: otologic symptoms in six patients. Otolaryngol. Head Neck
33, 407–412. Surg. 118 (2), 228–234.
Durbin, D.R., Kallan, M., Elliott, M., et al., 2003. Risk of injury to restrained Wittenberg, E., Nelson, T.F., Graham, J.D., 1999. The effect of passenger
children from passenger airbags. Traffic Injury Prevent. 4, 58–63. airbags on child seating behavior in motor vehicles. Pediatrics 104, 1247–
Epperly, N.A., Still, J.T., Law, E., et al., 1997. Supraglottic and subglottic airway 1250.
injury due to deployment and rupture of an automobile airbag. Am. Surgeon Yaremchuk, K., Dobie, R.A., 2001. Otologic injuries from airbag deployment.
63 (11), 979–981. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 125 (3), 130–134.

You might also like