Digitally signed

by Joseph Zernik
Human Rights Alert DN: cn=Joseph
Zernik, o, ou,
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 email=jz12345@e
Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net arthlink.net, c=US
Date: 2010.11.14
Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ 23:57:59 +02'00'
Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

10-11-11 Did US Judge JED RAKOFF engage in IMPEACHABLE MISCONDUCT?

Further discussion of SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829)

US Judge JED RAKOFF

Comment by Dr. A. D. Jackson 58 minutes ago

Someone expressed confusion about the L. A. court system. With problems in the federal district court,
southern district of New York, I would hope that the media covering the case looks into problems with
attendant paperwork. Very few journalists went to law school, not like Bill Curtis on CBS TV who covered
the Charlie Manson trial.
Andrew

Comment by Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CA just now

Hi Dr Jackson:
I am glad that we got some of the minor confusion and distraction out of the way:
a) The paper, which was published in computer science, peer-reviewed journal opined computer fraud in
the design and operation of PACER and CM/ECF from coast to coast.
b) Also a previous example - the habeas corpus of Richard Fine - opined as Fraud on the Court as well -
was in a US District Court. Therefore, California budget deficits were irrelevant there, and are irrelevant in
the case of SEC v BAC as well. In fact, PACER and CM/ECF were implemented in a decade long project of
the Administrative Office of the US Courts, which was concluded a couple of years ago, at the estimated
cost of low $ billions. For the same money, one could easily design a valid and honest system. A system
where all authentication records are concealed from public access is not cheaper, possibly more expensive.
Regardless, there were numerous features in design of the systems that were indicative of deliberate intent
to mislead - hence fraud.
c) As you know, I am not an attorney either. The review in the paper, recently submitted for a peer-reviewed
international law journal, was not a legal review, but of clerical nature. You did not have to be a rocket
scientist to look at the docket of SEC v BAC at the US District Court in New York to figure out that it did not
resemble any kind of valid litigation. One should assume that legal reporters of major media outlets at least
are experienced at looking at dockets. Furthermore, media were repeatedly informed during the litigation of
its fraudulent nature. Regardless, such media continued to report the case as if there was no concern
regarding validity and integrity of the records.
JZ

Hi again Dr Jackson:
Let's get back to the core issue -
z Page 2/2 November 14, 2010

CONDUCT OF JUDGE JED RAKOFF IN SEC v BAC

Not being an attorney - I believe that conduct of Judge Rakoff - a judge of the highest reputation - in the
case of SEC v BAC was of the type that is Impeachable Misconduct. Similar conduct by Judge Manuel
Real at the US District Court, Central District of California, in a case that had minimal public policy
significance, led to the initiation of Impeachment Proceedings at the US Congress.
A plausible explanations for conduct of media is in concern regarding retaliation. Attorney Steven Yagman
exposed and complained about the conduct of Judge Manuel Real. Within a few months Attorney Yagman
landed in federal prison for several years - on tax evasion of the order of $100,000, which some claimed
would have been resolved with fines in other cases. In his sentencing hearing he quoted Kafka "a cage
went looking for a bird",,,
It is the standard treatment of whistleblowers in the US in recent years...
Former US prosecutor Richard Fine's case provided yet another example. He exposed and rebuked the
fact that all judges in Los Angeles County, California, took for 10 years "not permitted" payments (called by
media "bribes"), which required the enactment of "retroactive immunities" ("pardons") for all such judges.
Richard Fine landed in 18 months of solitary confinement with no warrant, no judgment/conviction or
sentencing ever entered in his case.
Most journalists are probably not that brave...
JZ