Professional Documents
Culture Documents
21st Century?
27
Life expectancy at 60
25
USA
23
France
Ireland
GB
21
19
17
100
Rate Per 100,000
Lung & bronchus
80
60
Stomach
Prostate
40
Colon & rectum
20
Pancreas
Leukemia Liver
0
1930
1935
1940
1945
1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
*Age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Source: US Mortality Data 1960-2004, US Mortality Volumes 1930-1959,
National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006.
Cancer Death Rates* Among Women, US,1930-2004
100
Rate Per 100,000
80
60
Ovary
Pancreas
0
1930
1935
1940
1945
1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
*Age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
Source: US Mortality Data 1960-2004, US Mortality Volumes 1930-1959,
National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006.
Cancer Death Rates* by Sex and Race, US, 1975-2004
450
African American men
400
350
250
African American women
200
100
50
0
1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002
Men
600
400
Women
300
200
100
0
1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002
*Age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population and adjusted for delays in reporting.
Source: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, Delay-adjusted Incidence database:
SEER Incidence Delay-adjusted Rates, 9 Registries, 1975-2004, National Cancer Institute, 2007.
Breast cancer mortality rates (age 35-74) in selected
developed countries
70
60
USA
50
ASR (world) per 100,000
UK
Italy
40
Finland
Hungary
30
Australia
France
20
10
0
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Breast cancer incidence rates (age 35-74) in selected
developed countries
250
200
USA (SEER)
ASR (world) per 100,000
England
150
Norway
Finland
Slovakia
100
The Netherlands
Japan (Osaka)
50
0
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
US advantage in cancer
screening and treatment
1950
2005
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Month of Birth
U.S. trends in selected health
outcomes (age 50+)
smoking
hypertension
obesity
diabetes
Source: Goldman et al., National Tax Journal, 2010. Data from the National
Health Interview Survey
Obesity
1998 2006
Less than 50% 50 to 55% More than 55% State did not participate in survey
*Body mass index of 25.0 kg/m2or greater. Source: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CD-ROM (1984-1995,
1998) and Public Use Data Tape (2004, 2006), National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1997, 2000, 2005, 2007.
Trends in Obesity* Prevalence (%), By Gender, Adults
Aged 20 to 74, US, 1960-2006†
45
40
36
35
33 34 34 35
35 32
31
30 28
Prevalence (%)
26
25 23
21
20 17
16 17
13 15 15
15 12 13
11
10
0
Both sexes Men Women
*Obesity is defined as a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or greater. † Age adjusted to the 2000 US standard population. Source:
National Health Examination Survey 1960-1962, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1971-1974, 1976-1980,
1988-1994, 1999-2002, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2002, 2004. 2003-
2004, 2005-2006: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Public Use Data Files, 2003-2004, 2005-2006, National
Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006, 2007.
Trends in Overweight* Prevalence (%), Children and
Adolescents, by Age Group, US, 1971-2004
20 19
17
16 16
15 14
Prevalence (%)
11 11
10
10
7
7
6
5 5 5
5 4
0
2 to 5 years 6 to 11 years 12 to 19 years
*Overweight is defined as at or above the 95th percentile for body mass index by age and sex based on
reference data.
Source: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1971-1974, 1976-1980, 1988-1994, 1999-2002,
National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2002, 2004. 2003-2004: Ogden
CL, et al. Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in the United States, 1999-2004. JAMA 2006; 295 (13): 1549-55.
Obesity does not give much
chance to survive to 100
A study of body height and
body build of centenarians
when they were young
adults (aged 30) using
WWI civil draft registration
cards.
Gavrilova N.S., Gavrilov L.A. Can exceptional
longevity be predicted? Contingencies [Journal of the
American Academy of Actuaries], 2008, July/August
Estimated 2-year
probability of dying
(confidence intervals)
for obese and nonobese
men and women aged
70 and older: AHEAD
1993–1998 (a black
square represents
obese individuals, and
a white box represents
nonobese individuals).
Men Women
40
35
30 All adults
25
20
15
10
5
0
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Year
Note: Data from participating states and the District of Columbia were aggregated to represent the United
States. Educational attainment is for adults 25 and older.
Source: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System CD-ROM (1984-1995, 1996, 1998) and Public Use Data Tape
(2000, 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006), National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, 1997, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007.
Changes in Diet
Both good and bad trends
On one hand, improvement in food
safety and quality. Better awareness
that fruits and veggies are useful for
health
30
24.2 24.4 24.1 24.4 23.6 24.3
25
Prevalence (%)
20
15
10
0
1994 1996 1998 2000 2003 2005
Year
Note: Data from participating states and the District of Columbia were aggregated to represent the United
States.
Source: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System CD-ROM (1984-1995, 1996, 1998) and Public Use Data Tape
(2000, 2003, 2005), National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, 1997, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2004, 2006.
Soda/cola Sweetened fruit drinks
Alcohol 100% Fruit juice
Whole-fat milk Low-fat milk
Coffee Tea
143
140
128
119
120
per capita calories per day
99 99
100
81
80
69
57
60
41 4040 38 39
40 35 35 36
26 25
20
20 13 14 14 11
10 9 9
6 3 1
1 1 1
0
1965 1977 1988 2002
50.6
50 48.2
2500
45.4
42.4
40 36.9 2000
36.1
33.4
30 1500
20.7
20 18.4 18.5 1000
15.6
10 500
0 0
1971-1974 2001-2004 1971-1974 2001-2004
Fully indexed by
MEDLINE
Latest Impact
Factor* is 4.138
Why Longevity Revolution may be delayed?
Because it requires serious funding
and commitment:
" It is sheer foolishness to imagine that we can extend
life ... without substantial governmental participation"
(p. 11)
Reference: The Longevity Revolution: The Benefits and Challenges of Living a Long
Life. By Robert N. Butler. 553 pp. New York, PublicAffairs, 2008
General Prediction
Effective life-extending technologies may appear within our
lifetime
However they will be initially expensive and not readily
available
Therefore, 'longevity risk' will be particularly high for persons
who are HEWM:
Healthy (at baseline)
Educated
Wealthy
Motivated
It is conceivable that such HEWM people may reach life
expectancy of about 120 years in a foreseeable future.
Acknowledgments
This study was made possible
thanks to:
http://longevity-science.org
http://longevity-science.blogspot.com/
How can we improve the actuarial
forecasts of mortality and longevity ?
μ(x ) = A + R e αx
risk of death
μ(x ) = A + R e αx
1925
1960
1980
0.1 1999
Log (Hazard Rate)
0.01
0.001
0.0001
0 20 40 60 80 100
Age
2
Factor score
-1
-2