Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JBIM
Journal of Building Information Modeling
An official publication of the National Institute of Building Sciences
buildingSMART alliance™
National Institute of Building Sciences: An Authoritative Source of Innovative Solutions for the Built Environment
Fall 2010
International
Finance Centre
22°17’6.43”N
114° 9’33.79”E
22°16’46.49”N
114° 9’41.27”E
72 Floors
90 m2 135,000 m2
Apartment 45 Elevators
Lights On 24th Floor
Lights Off Carpet 48,600 m2
Renewable Energy:
107,219 Megajoule
Energy Use:
26th Floor Hong Kong Population: 7,055,071 8,101,080 Megajoule
22°16’44.02”N Water: 2.63 Million Cubic Meters Per Day
114° 9’0.05”E
Energy: 805 Terajoules Per Day
BIM BIM BIM Photo of Hong Kong from Victoria Peak: Samuel C. Louie | 392M | 22°16’42.08”N | 114° 8’47.86”E
Creative Commons: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hong_Kong_Night_Skyline.jpg
Contents
JBim
Cover Story:
Expanding Thought:
14
Published for:
The National Institute of Building Sciences
buildingSMART alliance™
1090 Vermont Avenue, NW, Suite 700 19 Laying the Foundation for
BIM Interoperability
Washington, D.C. 20005-4905
Phone: (202) 289-7800
Fax: (202) 289-1092
nibs@nibs.org
www.nibs.org
21 Location, Location, Location
BIM, BIM, BIM Case Studies / Best Practices
President
Henry L. Green, Hon. AIA
Chief Operating Officer
23 Convergence Yields
Smarter Facilities: Practical
26 Building Interior Space Data
Model: The Link from BIM to
Earle W. Kennett Applications for Building GIS and the Foundation for
Executive Director Planners and Operators an Existing-Structure BIM
Dana K. Smith, FAIA
TM
buildingSMART alliance
Economics
Published By:
Matrix Group Publishing inc.
Please return all undeliverable addresses to:
5190 Neil Road, Suite 430 29 Savings Through
Collaboration: A Case Study
Reno, NV 89502
Phone: (866) 999-1299 on the Value of BIM
Fax: (866) 244-2544
President & CEO Education
Jack Andress
31 Industry
29
Senior Publisher Expectations
Maurice P. LaBorde
Help Drive BIM in Today’s
Publishers
Peter Schulz
University Undergraduate
Jessica Potter Curriculum
Trish Bird CLOUD
JBIM
Journal of Building Information Modeling
Editor-in-Chief An official publication of the National Institute of Building Sciences
buildingSMART alliance™
Shannon Savory
Messages:
National Institute of Building Sciences: An Authoritative Source of Innovative Solutions for the Built Environment
Fall 2010
Editor
07 Message
International
Karen Kornelson
114° 9’33.79”E
Carpet 48,600 m2
Renewable Energy:
107,219 Megajoule
Energy Use:
Shoshana Weinberg
114° 9’0.05”E Energy: 805 Terajoules Per Day 8,101,080 Megajoule
Fall 2010 5
Message from the National Institute of Building Sciences
Fall 2010 7
Message from the buildingSMART alliance™
Fall 2010 9
Message from the National BIM Standard™ Executive Committee
make recommendations regarding the school Latin and Greek, the term “Tetra”
document outline and where content is Greek for four.
should appear in the document. This ef- At the highest level, everything re-
fort will naturally lead to a table of con- ports to four categories: design, procure,
tents that follows a logical hierarchy. assemble and operate. Each of the top
The technical sub-committee has level categories has four sub-categories
David Morris been working diligently on the Stake- and each of the four sub-categories has
holder Activity Model (a high-level four additional sub-(sub)-categories, all
The National BIM Standard™ process flow diagram showing the inter- reporting up to a higher level. This rep-
(NBIMS) Version 2 is underway and the relationships between activities and resents a base four system of exponents
committees are engaged in the prelimi- data exchanges) and is nearing a final or, from the top down, 4, 16, 64, 256 and
nary stages of organizational efforts. draft. This will allow the NBIMS Plan- 1024. From 4x4x4x4x4, within five levels,
The Planning Committee is working on ning Committee to “see” the “big pic- an extremely complex graphical depic-
the “big picture issues”, determining ture” and relationships between various tion of interactions is expressed. The
how to break up the workload between processes. Many of the sub-committee concept also enables the cross-linking of
the various sub-committees and task and task force activities will rely on the relationships and the ability to have the
forces, what groups are best suited for Stakeholder Activity Model to provide a levels of detail expressed in a 3D format.
each activity and how to pull everything clear vision of how their tasks fit into the For instance, the second or third
together into a cohesive document that whole. tier of detail items that belong to a
meets the industry’s expectation of a Speaking of how things fit into the certain category or sub-category will
standard. Given the massive amount of bigger picture, the buildingSMART occupy the same relative vertical po-
data involved and the diversity of view- alliance™ (as part of the NBIMS effort) sition on the group. For example un-
points by various stakeholders, this is a has developed a very simple view of a der the assemble category and one of
monumental task. mature BIM to allow the technical en- its sub-(sub)-categories, prefabrica-
With any large undertaking, the abil- tities to understand how and where an tion, on the same vertical level of de-
ity to take a high-level approach that item would be represented in NBIMS. tail but on differing horizontal planes
leads to greater levels of detail, then cat- The purpose is to provide a graphical ex- you would find pre-cast concrete, pip-
egorizes and prioritizes the process into ample that is easily understood without ing fabrication, duct fabrication, etc.
manageable work processes, is impera- volumes of explanation. This will allow By pure coincidence (or perhaps by
tive. Without a logical breakdown of the organizations with interest in funding design) the four top categories can be
work structure, the ability to delegate research projects or standards to review represented by the buildingSMART
and manage multiple concurrent activi- the proposed project narrative, compare alliance™ logo of four interlocking and
ties is difficult, if not impossible. it to the graphic and determine whether inter-woven rectangular rings, each in-
By charter, the Planning Committee it provides high-value proposition to the terdependent upon the other.
is tasked with the primary responsibility intended end-users or if funding should In conclusion, the National BIM
for oversight of the process and the cre- focus on other higher-level activities. It Standard™ has made good progress and
ation of sub-committees and task forces will also give individuals the opportuni- is gaining momentum. The NBIMS Proj-
to work on component parts or sections ty to propose standards candidates that ect Committee has doubled in size in
of the BIM Standard. To that end, it has satisfy the most compelling needs. the last six months, with individuals and
created several initial task forces and The NBIMS Planning Committee organizations expressing an interest in
is considering the need for others. The had two working meetings each lasting participation. There is always room for
ballot task force will create a ballot form two days to brainstorm the concept, more help and diverse points of view. If
to be used for voting on documents create the graphic, identify multiple you, your company or organization have
submitted as Standards candidates. An touch points and establish a hierarchy. an interest in assisting in the process, go
NBIMS, Version 1, Part 1 content review The result is a very simple and graceful to www.buildingsmartalliance.org and
task force was drafted to review what depiction of the BIM. The name of the follow the links to join and participate.
content from the first NBIMS will be car- concept is The Tetralogy of BIM rep-
ried forward into Version 2. A structural resented by the acronym ToBIM. The David Morris
content task force will be created to re- graphic is called the BIM Tetragram. For Chair, U.S. National BIM Standard™
view the Stakeholder Activity Model to those long in the tooth and far from high Project Committee
Fall 2010 11
Collaboration • PerformanCe • teChnology
Special
Institute Member
Discount – details
below.
2010
Conference: Dec. 6-10 Convention Center
exhibition: Dec. 8-9 Washington, D.C.
Fall 2010 13
Cover Story
By now the use of a building A building information model (BIM) In evaluating the definitions, it is
information model (BIM) as the optimal is a digital representation of physi- obvious why the two systems need to
tool for facility design and construc- cal and functional characteristics of interact: BIM provides physical and
tion is an accepted fact. The benefits of a facility. As such, it serves as a shared functional detail that is not typically
BIM technology and related business knowledge resource for information available in GIS. GIS places facilities
practices are well-established. But the about a facility forming a reliable within an existing context (for example,
design and construction processes are basis for decisions during its lifecycle site, campus and surrounding area),
just part of any facility’s lifecycle. And, from inception onward. A basic prem- while BIM’s focus is much more specific
like any technology, BIM does not ex- ise of BIM is collaboration by different within the facility context.
ist in a vacuum. Other technologies ex- stakeholders at different phases of the A more practical way to define each
ist that can assist facility owners and lifecycle of a facility to insert, extract, system is to explain what business needs
operators in solving problems over a update or modify information in the they are designed to address. After all,
facility’s lifecycle. One such tool is a BIM process to support and reflect the both BIM and GIS are interfaced through
geographic information system (GIS). roles of that stakeholder. The BIM is a commercial software products designed
This article explores the functions shared digital representation founded to solve real-world problems. If these
and roles of both BIM and GIS and de- on open standards for interoperability. products don’t succeed in solving prob-
fines the effort that exists within the Here is the definition of GIS from lems, they soon won’t exist in the mar-
buildingSMART alliance™ (bSa) to bring Wikipedia: ketplace.
these technologies together to maximize A geographic information system
the value of both. (GIS), or geographical information The Focus of BIM
Although there are no universal defi- system, is any system that captures, Generally speaking, the purpose of
nitions for either BIM or GIS, a brief defi- stores, analyzes, manages and pres- BIM is to support the planning, design,
nition of what each system is (and is not) ents data that are linked to location. fabrication and construction of new
may be a good starting point. Here is the In the simplest terms, GIS is the merg- facilities. Commercial BIM software
definition of BIM from the National BIM ing of cartography, statistical analysis products are optimized to facilitate
Standard™: and database technology. these processes and each has its own
Fall 2010 15
Facility owners and operators are BIM-GIS interoperability effort showed that integration can
using GIS to manage entire campuses, progress work but it did not tap the full poten-
including utility system tracing, way- There have been multiple efforts to tial of BIM and GIS.
finding, buffer analysis, maintenance bridge the gap between BIM and GIS, • The Construction Operations Build-
management and asset management. A including recent articles in JBIM and ef- ing information exchange (COBie)
key purpose of GIS is to spatially enable forts from varied organizations around standard focuses on the non-spa-
the applications that perform these func- the world. tial elements of BIM. COBie captures
tions (for example, computerized main- • An international standard, CityGML, project handoff data from the BIM
tenance management systems [CMMS] was developed to support GIS and provides it in spreadsheet or XML
and integrated workplace management for buildings (www.citygml.org). format so it can easily be incorpo-
systems [IWMS]). The open architecture CityGML is a common information rated into information systems used
of GIS makes it especially well-suited to model for the representation of 3D in a facility’s operations and mainte-
act as a “geographic window” into the urban objects. Used widely in Europe, nance. While COBie is a good solu-
data that exists in other systems. And be- it is primarily intended for citywide tion to meet its defined objectives, it
cause of the server-based nature of GIS, or local visualization of proposed doesn’t provide a full bridge to GIS be-
these tools and capabilities can be used changes to urban areas. While it of- cause it lacks spatial data integration.
by anyone given proper access via an in- fers analytical capabilities, CityGML • The development of the Build-
tranet or internet connection. has been limited in use to exterior ing and Interior Spaces Data Model
Until recently, many server-based buildings and their surroundings. (BISDM) for GIS by Environmental
GIS products were missing one essential • buildingSMART International (the in- Systems Research Institute Inc. (ESRI)
element that BIM excels at—the ability ternational parent of bSa) sponsored enables spatial features (for example,
to work in full 3D. Recent mainstream a project called “IFC for GIS.” The walls, doors and drinking fountains)
product releases have largely remedied project sought to demonstrate how to link to external features. This abil-
this limitation. This new development IFCs could incorporate the informa- ity opens the door to a higher level of
opens the door for better interoperabil- tion needed to give new facilities the interaction.
ity between BIM and GIS and greatly in- spatial context necessary to auto- While all of these efforts have value,
creases the value of GIS to support the mate decisions based on geograph- none of them encompass a comprehen-
needs of facility owners and operators. ic location. The limited scope of this sive BIM-GIS solution.
Fall 2010 17
found at: www.buildingsmartalliance. • What tools (BIM, GIS, CMMS, IWMS, • What standards exist or need to be
org/index.php/projects/activeproj- etc.) should be used to perform what developed?
ects/27. functions? • How can web services play a role?
The project’s charter is to address • What level of detail should be stored As the chair of the BIM-GIS project,
the following concerns: in each environment? I invite anyone interested in becom-
• What are the best business practices • What format(s) should be used for ing involved to contact me at john.
for BIM-GIS information exchange? data exchange? przybyla@woolpert.com. The project
members are currently in the process
of defining use cases that will be used
to develop Information Deliver Manu-
als (IDMs) and Model View Definitions
(MVDs) that can provide the basis for
software development. As an indica-
tion of the importance of this topic,
EcoBuild 2010 includes a BIM-GIS
track with two panel discussions and a
number of highly informative sessions.
n
BIM interoperability has already advanced from total vendor In the not-too-distant future, BIM interoperability will be accomplished
lock-in to batch conversion of files, including IFCs and various XML through service interfaces, not file transfers and conversions. Image
encodings. Image courtesy of the Open Geospatial Consortium (2007). courtesy of the Open Geospatial Consortium (2007).
Fall 2010 19
• AGCxml (for electronic interchange of AEC transactional Information Delivery Manuals (IDMs) and Model View Defini-
data); and tions (MVDs).
• OGC® CityGML (for storage and exchange of virtual 3D city
models). SDO collaboration
Internet and web standards development organizations
Separation of concerns (SDOs) increasingly collaborate on problems to take advan-
Different smart people in any enterprise have different con- tage of one another’s expertise and to avoid duplication of
cerns (or views) and related expertise. In the BIM world, the effort and avoid creation of new obstacles to interoperability.
views are those of architects, owners, lenders, insurers, build- Similarly, the buildingSMART alliance™ and buildingSMART
ers, realtors and regulators. Various view modeling systems International, two organizations linked by charter, have coop-
guide the structuring, classifying and organizing of informa- erated more closely over time, aligning both their names and
tion system architectures to capture the “separation of con- activities.
cerns.” Their joint programs—aimed at a single international BIM
The Reference Model for Open Distributed Processing (RM- standards framework—also make it easier for other interna-
ODP) (ISO 10746) is one widely used view modeling system. tional standards groups to relate to what might otherwise be
In the OGC, the geospatial technology industry developed an seen as a strictly U.S. activity. For example, there is an obvious
abstract specification based on the RM-ODP, which has been need for standards to integrate indoor and outdoor locations
a reliable guide for the development of standards for that in- and to integrate the technologies of design (AEC, CAD and
dustry. Similarly, the U.S. National Institute of Standards and BIM) with the technologies of observation and measurement
Technology (NIST) is using RM-ODP to lead a national effort (surveying, GIS, remote sensing, LIDAR, navigation, location
to develop a standards framework for the modernization of the services). Improving interoperability in this area was the main
U.S. Smart Grid. In both domains, “separation of concerns” is reason for the buildingSMART alliance™ and buildingSMART
a key to creating “service oriented architectures” that provide International to sign a formal memoranda of understanding
the basis for “systems of systems” that take advantage of “com- with OGC, the international geospatial standards organiza-
puting across the network.” tion, in 2006.
The BIM standards effort needs to do much more with
view modeling but progress in this direction is evident in The path forward
The buildingSmart alliance™ is bringing AEC stakeholders
into the fold and promoting an international effort to modern-
ize the IFCs. It is anticipated that service interfaces for BIM will
result from these efforts, driven partly by the growing momen-
tum of the AEC Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) process. At-
tention to “separation of concerns” will help guide this process
and the buildingSMART alliance™ will provide “rapid proto-
typing” and testing of standards in industry testbeds, pilots
and interoperability experiments.
If the AEC industry participates actively in this process, BIM
will get the foundation it needs and the promise of BIM will
become a reality. n
“Levels of Detail” (LoD) in CityGML, an application schema
for Geography Markup Language 3 (GML3), the extendible Louis Hecht, Jr. is the Executive Director, Business Develop-
international standard for spatial data exchange issued by the OGC ment, Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC). He can be reached
and ISO TC211. Image courtesy of Dr. Steidler, CyberCity Modeler. at lhecht@opengeospatial.org.
The internet has changed everything. Layering Traditionally, data is shared between applications by ex-
maps with restaurant locations, real-time weather, real-time porting a file from application A, then importing the file into
airline information, bus and train schedules on a computer or application B, thereby creating multiple copies of the data. In
phone are now common place. GIS data has been around for an SOA approach, the data remains with application A and is
a long time and initially was reserved to be used by those with used or modified by application B (or other applications).
technical backgrounds. The internet and easy access to GIS Just as it isn’t necessary to reference Excel files when making
data has now made it ubiquitous to the point that users don’t Expedia reservations, it’s not necessary to move a whole BIM
even know they’re accessing GIS data. model. An SOA approach lets the user access pertinent BIM and
What if the building industry took this location functional- GIS data. Linking complex BIM and GIS data with agile, flexible
ity and merged it with building information modeling (BIM)? tools, apps and processes are the only infinitely scalable solu-
Imagine BIM and geographic information systems (GIS) in a tion for the built environment. This is how BIM “model views”
simple environment providing real-time building and GIS can be shared in small BIM data chunks (See the Fall 2007 and
data. Why connect GIS to BIM? Both are complex systems de- 2008 issues of JBIM).
scribing the built environment and can help us to visualize With more BIM and GIS being accessed, information be-
more intelligent decisions. We would all benefit hugely from comes more relevant and valuable. A live 2006 Open Geospa-
new knowledge gained by linking the data in these two key sys- tial Consortium demonstration (OGC Web Services, Phase 4)
tems (FIGURE 1). demonstrated the relevancy and value to these processes, gar-
The building industry lags in tapping into these resources. nering an American Institute of Architects Technology in Prac-
Google’s ease of use coupled with GIS is critical for location- tice BIM Award by substantiating powerful cloud-base BIM +
based BIM to thrive. Standards support cloud-based BIM and GIS + SOA + open standards. Go to: http://goo.gl/aXlh.
GIS interoperability. The key to solving complex problems is to
start simple and build up on top of the foundation. Boiling the Hybrid Environment
ocean will not work. The internet moves in real-time. Computing devices cou-
pled with cloud-based tools make information more acces-
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) sible to users. BIM and GIS become more robust as more users
Downloading an airline master list and flight schedule as an take advantage of the power of this complex combination.
Excel file, then pouring through the document to select a flight Cloud-based tools are becoming the new normal. This ap-
and seat is cumbersome. It isn’t impossible, but why use a file- proach allows access to computing resources much as one
based system when the information is rendered obsolete the would tap into the electricity grid that powers a home. Google,
minute it’s saved? In a services-based approach such as Expe- Microsoft, IBM, Apple and others have made cloud computing
dia, available flight data information, accessed in real-time via central to their business strategy. For more information go to:
an internet browser, enables powerful purchasing decisions. It’s http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing.
simple and elegant. Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) delivers Hybrid approaches will be integral to BIM and GIS consumers
information via the internet for the specific query—in an open and producers, with no single desktop or cloud-based tool solv-
standard, flexible and agile format that’s easily understood. ing all the BIM and GIS needs. BIM and GIS are infinitely scalable.
Primavera
Schedule ArcGIS Output
Text
Excel
System
Excel
IFC
BIMXML
98 Buildings
43,554,958 SF
Building #23
114,866 SF
1,809,139
kWh
Carpet:
InterfaceFLOR BIM 2010 - ONUMA.com
Figure 2. Real-time GIS and BIM in the cloud. PBS&J’s Fort Belvoir
2010 - ONUMA.com
Figure 1. Real-time GIS and BIM in the cloud. Mash-Up using ESRI and ONUMA.
Fall 2010 21
The more users access, consume and produce BIM and GIS data, collaboration at a new level. Since the award winning web-
the more relevant and valuable their information becomes. based BIMStorm LAX event (FIGURE 3), Integrated Project
Delivery (IPD) workshops have allowed more than 4,000 par-
Information Democracy ticipants to use various tools, in cloud-based environments
The internet moves in real-time. No one consumes last supported by the buildingSMART alliance™, Open Geospatial
week’s “new”spaper. The word itself is a relic—nothing “new” Consortium (OGC) and open standard exchanges, demon-
is on paper. Cloud computing enables access to tools and in- strating that BIM elements and GIS data take the lifecyle of the
formation in a simple way. built environment to a whole new level.
The seemingly random layering of information leads to
more collaboration and patterns emerging that lead to more Getting Real - Linking Live Sensors to
intelligent decisions. Users will absorb building, product and live BIM
geographic data through open standards portals in real-time, High-performance buildings are becoming the fabric of
multi-user mash-ups, while at meetings, waiting for a train, environmentally conscious owners. Owners want them now.
drinking coffee at Starbucks or managing a project at the job GSA announced that the building industry needs to address
site...it is über information democracy. and meet Executive Order 13514 goals. Real-time building
information that includes room temperature and equipment
Standards and Flexibility conditions can meet these goals in a BIM + GIS + cloud envi-
Standards and free access for all are hallmarks of the internet. ronment. At the 2010 Connectivity Week conference, Anto Bu-
BIM and GIS also require standards for interoperability. Com- diardjo promoted and demonstrated the benefits of real-time
bining the open standards of BIM, GIS and the internet yield BIM + GIS + Live Sensors (FIGURE 4). Linking-up, connecting,
enormous capabilities. The internet thrives on information. BIM sharing and transparency are important to owners.
generates mountains of information and if properly structured, BIM + GIS continues to evolve and the new normal will con-
provides great value in our interconnected world (Figure 2). nect desktop tools with agile and flexible cloud-based tools.
Proprietary information and file-based processes will no lon-
Fort Belvoir Mash-Up ger be standard procedure. Embrace innovation and be part
A July 14, 2010, Engineering News-Record article, described of the “new” reality by joining the buildingSMART alliance™
the tight $4 billion Fort Belvoir mash-up project as a “Twitter for and/or the Open Geospatial Consortium. Join BIMStorm.com
BIM.” The PBS&J Alexandria, Virginia, office used PBS&J 4D Plan- at the Ecobuild Conference in Washington, D.C. and be part
ner, along with BIM and GIS cloud technologies to deliver “new” of Location, Location, Location | BIM, BIM, BIM. Learn more at
information and solutions mashed from ESRI, Google Earth, www.aececobuild.com. n
Onuma System and Primavera Schedule data. Weekly meetings
utilizing web-based tools and data streaming from various sourc- Kimon Onuma, FAIA, is the President and Founder of Onuma.
es make real-time decisions a reality. The client recognized the For more than a decade, he has promoted open standards as the
value from this process and rendered paper less relevant. best mechanism for integrated practice. On January 31, 2008,
Onuma and his team made a turning point in architectural
28 BIMStorms history. Within little over a month, his simple concept became a
Since 2008, BIMStorms have made “news” as hands-on “Woodstock” for the building industry. BIMStorm LAX brought
real-time collaborations. Kenneth Wong’s 2008 Cadlyst article together a wide cross-section of building industry professionals
summarized one event as a Woodstock for BIM that promoted from 11 different countries to design over 50 million square
feet, creating massing models and schematic designs for 420
buildings, in real-time.
Live Data V
ROC
2010 - ONUMA.com
Figure 4. Real-time GIS and BIM connected to the smart grid and
Figure 3. Real-time GIS and BIMStorm LAX poster. sensors in the cloud.
The spring 2010 issue of JBIM provided a number of The implicit structure and organization of BIM objects and
interesting articles focused on building information modeling their attributions, coupled with the ability to store BIM object at-
(BIM) and facility management (FM) applications. One of these tributes in a relational database, provide helpful technical inte-
articles, written by Kurt Maldovan and Tammy McCuen, LEED AP, gration points with GIS. GIS natively stores data in a geospatial or
discussed the increasing request for better support of the plan- location-based relational database management system. When
ning and operations portion of the facility lifecycle. This is a trend BIM models and GIS are integrated, this opens up a suite of new
that people in the geographic information system (GIS) industry analysis options for facility owners and operators. It also allows
believe is quickly driving an anticipated and necessary nexus be- the results of these analyses to be reported and visualized at all
tween BIM data and GIS technologies. geographic scales or levels of detail.
The BIM Use Categories and Frequency Used Table 1 in At the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s
the BIM Best Practices article from that issue (available for (NASA) Langley Research Center’s New Town project in Hamp-
download at www.buildingsmartalliance.org) actually dem- ton, Virginia, building designers are working with GIS and facil-
onstrates why BIM-GIS interoperability is increasingly desired ity managers to develop an interoperable system of BIM, GIS and
by facility owners and operators. Most categories listed in the EAM technologies to benefit the facility owner/operator. System
table with a Frequency of Category Use value of 5 or smaller interoperability alone will save substantial time and lower the
describe analyses that are native to GIS. The contents of this cost typically required to locate, convert and/or translate data
table are derived from a set of presentations delivered at the into one authoritative information source. Once interoperable,
buildingSMARTalliance (bSa) International Conference in De- NASA facility managers will recognize improved space and asset
cember 2009. management analysis, visualization and reporting capabilities at
Why do facilities owners and operators wish to incorporate all levels of geography.
GIS? Arguably, it is because they face increasing pressures to make Another sustainable, green project is being developed from
their buildings “smarter.” Operating and maintaining buildings the ground up in Abu Dhabi, UAE. Masdar City uses a combina-
for longer periods of time requires retrofitting existing buildings tion of BIM and GIS technologies to plan and design buildings
or designing and constructing new buildings to be sustainable and supporting infrastructure. After construction, GIS will con-
for optimal occupancy and use. Owners and operators also find tinue to be used by integrating it with CMMS. This integration
they must comply with a host of compliancy issues such as those will make facilities maintenance easier, as well as enable the
represented in Federal Executive Orders 13327, 13423 and 13514. tracking of resource use and reuse and the overall carbon balance
Regardless of the driver, facility operators are increasingly using of the operational city.
GIS to achieve their smart building goals.
What is a smart building? It’s a building that is managed with Improved building and asset analysis
data and information systems capable of supporting building plan- ESRI’s ArcGIS system includes out-of-the-box proximity
ners and operators with faster, more accurate decision-making analysis tools such as a 2D or 3D buffer or the Find Nearest tool,
applications—applications that deliver authoritative analysis, visu- which can quickly aid a planner or building operator. The tools
alization and reporting. The National Institute of Building Sciences
and bSa recognize the trend toward smarter buildings and have
proactively supported a BIM-GIS interoperability best practices
study, for which the results are presented in this edition of JBIM.
Fall 2010 23
can assist in determining where best to locate, or not locate, a compliance and crime mapping. The CCSF project shows col-
particular exhibit or store materials. For example, if a museum or laboration between the Facilities Management and Buildings
historical building has rooms, spaces or antiquities that are sen- and Grounds departments to create a mutually beneficial GIS
sitive to vibration, the proximity of a nearby subway system could data repository and decision support application interface. Net-
have an impact on specific sections of the building. The same works and supporting analyses can also easily be set up and es-
type of scenario can be assumed for proximity to above-ground tablished for building interior systems like HVAC water, telecom
sounds and vibrations, such as street noise. and electric systems.
Proximity analysis is standard practice for emergency manag- Other proximity and topologic analyses useful to planners
ers and those performing continuity of operations analyses for include determining the impact of building shadows or window
building and infrastructure assets. The U.S. State Department’s glare on adjacent buildings and city streets (FIGURE 2). GIS
Office of Emergency Management is one example of where there analyses can also be used inside buildings to calculate visibility
are plans to integrate building and facility data into emergency and sunlight volume for use in threat/vulnerability and energy
management situational awareness map viewers. This integra- analyses (FIGURE 3, FIGURE 4).
tion will provide timely, accurate, map-based emergency assess- Energy or “green” building analyses are increasingly being
ment and response decision support. performed using GIS by organizations such as National Insti-
Practitioners can also model building interior networks. Net- tutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland, and the New York City
work analysis tools can be used to determine the best route from Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, to quantify indoor
one location to another either inside or outside the building and environmental quality and energy metrics. These attributes are
all points between (FIGURE 1). analyzed and mapped in two, three and four dimensions, room
Network obstacles or time-of-travel constraints can also be by room, floor by floor and building by building, to help quan-
modeled and used in best-path analyses. This is particularly tify the impact of implementing ENERGY STAR products and/or
helpful for safety and security planning and compliance. City following sustainable LEED practices. The U.S. Green Building
College of San Francisco (CCSF) is taking advantage of simi- Council recognizes the value of GIS technology to capture and
lar capabilities for both Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) analyze proposed building locations and building sustainability
Figure 2. Shadow and glare analysis showing impact of proposed building on adjacent buildings. Yellow dots = windows receive sunlight;
blue dots = windows in shade; red dots = windows receive sun light as well as glare.
Figure 3. Building interior visibility volumes and heat maps calculated for three spotter positions.
Figure 5. BIM IFC file shown as wireframe in IFC viewer and in ESRI’s ArcScene application.
Fall 2010 25
Case Studies / Best Practices
The value of any standard is in of greater amounts and types of data. With few exceptions, the GIS commu-
its utility. The utility of a data modeling When the BIM is first established, this nity has, until the last few years, shown
standard is determined by its value to data is available, accurate and orga- little interest in, and offered little value
the applications that access the data. Ul- nized, usually remaining so prior to and to, applications inside buildings. The
timately, the value of those applications, during construction. Its utilization by reasons for this are evident. Data that
especially of their potential interaction, mutually complementary planning and includes relative and geographic posi-
is the reason we establish data modeling construction phase applications saves tioning of its elements (spatial data) just
standards at all. As the applications that time, money and energy. wasn’t available. In fact, common defini-
access in-building data models become After construction, relatively few ap- tions of Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI)
more common, they also become more plications access BIM. Thus, with less have no explicit references to building
important. And, the more important value to the data, the data is commonly interiors. As a result, the integration
these applications become, the more allowed to deteriorate. Given this, it is of GIS applications with BIM and with
important it becomes to link or share in the best interest of the software com- other CAD-based planning, design and
their data models. munity to develop not just the facilities construction applications, was usually
Growth in the adoption of the Na- automation applications, particularly more likely a hand-off than an integra-
tional BIM Standard™ (NBIMS) has those supporting operations and main- tion, with the hand-off taking place at
generally been driven by the advanced tenance that make valuable use of BIMs, the building boundary, with CAD or BIM
applications that access it. These appli- but, because of the value of these appli- inside and GIS outside.
cations, usually supporting the design cations, to look at the particular classes Recent technological advances have
and construction of facilities, require a or subsets of BIM data that are worth begun to blur and, in some cases, erase
vast range of data relating to many di- evergreen maintenance and update. If this building border dividing line. As
verse aspects of a building, from materi- neither these application types nor their noted above, there are a number of rea-
als to mechanicals, from measurements data requirements are known, justified sons for this, but the primary driver is
to suppliers. The value of construction and planned-for by the end of the con- the value of a wide range of new software
management applications is undeni- struction phase, the data will not be ade- applications. The value of traditional GIS
able. Their voracious appetites for more quately maintained, often rendering the empowered applications such as those
and more detailed data have helped to data update costs prohibitive to future in urban and environmental planning,
steer the NBIMS toward the inclusion application start up. emergency response services, space
management, routine maintenance
scheduling and way finding can be radi-
cally higher if they don’t stop at the door.
However, until a few recent technologi-
cal and conceptual developments, the
spatially referenced data was simply not
available indoors.
Driven by application value, ready
availability of spatially referenced in-
building data is now a reality. In existing
buildings, data providers now employ
a variety of spatially aware data col-
lection technologies and procedures.
In new buildings, BIM data can be ac-
cessed and necessary geo-referenceable
data extracted, using a number of com-
monly available software tools from the
CAD and GIS communities. In existing
buildings, companies employ advanced
Figure 1. The relationships between data elements of an SDI, a BISDM and a BIM. techniques and technologies to quickly
Fall 2010 27
Economics
The need for building information modeling (BIM) already released. In each of these instances, mechanical infra-
in the construction industry is apparent. Nearly all of the top structure was installed strictly based upon the use of 2D CAD
architecture, construction management and MEP (mechanical, drawings.
electrical, plumbing) firms have embraced the transformative The 3D lonely BIM category identified projects that were co-
technology and software that engineers use to continue to en- ordinated by J.C. Cannistraro using 3D modeling software, but
hance the BIM product mix. What began as a simple, object- not necessarily by the entire project team. For projects in this
based visual aid for the most progressive designers has grown category, the firm’s modelers coordinated the mechanical sys-
into a dynamic, multidimensional tool that helps streamline tems in 3D with fabrication-level detail, based upon tradition-
the construction of projects of all types and sizes. The user-base al 2D design documents. On these projects, these steps were
for BIM has also expanded to include project partners from a completed while working in concert with the general contrac-
variety of disciplines, ranging from architects to sophisticated tor/trade-specific subcontractor’s 2D coordination process.
subcontractors. The collaborative BIM category consisted of projects that
To this point however, quantitative data proving the return were designed and installed by a project team that was sub-
on investment of BIM is yet to be substantially proven in a real stantially experienced in BIM. The construction team was
project environment. In 2009, Boston-based mechanical con- assembled early in the pre-construction process and a fully-
struction firm J.C. Cannistraro LLC formed a BIM Task Force to coordinated, construction-ready model was completed prior
study exactly how BIM had improved its construction practices. to construction. Collaborative BIM projects required that con-
To quantify the savings that were becoming evident through struction managers and major subcontractors were all profi-
the growth of BIM adoption in the industry, J.C. Cannistraro cient in BIM.
examined $500M of past work and separated its projects into The comparison of the firm’s projects resulted in a natu-
three categories. Each category differentiated the projects ral, downward trend in percentage of total change orders. The
and determined the grounds for comparison based upon the data suggested that as project teams embrace collaboration
method used for design. Base contract data was gathered for and high-level BIM use, cost savings become increasingly
all plumbing, HVAC and fire protection projects and the total more significant. FIGURE 1 shows that through collabora-
value of all change orders for each trade was compiled for each tive BIM efforts, 10 to 20 percent of a project’s finances can be
project. The six years of construction data included more than saved and possibly reinvested into a project. FIGURE 1 also
400 new construction and renovation projects and was sepa- supports the common assumption that when BIM is profes-
rated into 3 categories: 2D projects, 3D lonely BIM projects and sionally executed, it enables a project team to erase costly er-
collaborative BIM projects (note, lonely BIM is building models rors during pre-construction, therefore saving additional time
for internal use only). and money for the owner. While the ultimate goal is to keep
2D projects referred to projects built using the traditional de- the cost of change orders at zero, there is clearly a downward
sign-bid-build method. For these projects, the firm was award- trend in change order percentage when a BIM-centric ap-
ed the contract after an approved set of design documents were proach is taken.
Fall 2010 29
Given this data, it is clear that projects using strictly 2D de- and establish milestones that gave the owner and construction
sign methods are not taking full advantage of the resources manager a realistic timetable of expected completions. Such
available to the construction industry. While the use of BIM is a methods can be further augmented by BIM solutions that grant
company standard at the firm, the number of future 2D projects model access to foremen in the field via wireless tablet PCs.
in the marketplace is expected to decline in the coming years Massachusetts General Hospital’s “Building for the Third
as owners continue to see positive results from BIM. While 3D Century” is a large-scale, new construction project that has
lonely BIM projects have shown improvements in cost savings become one of the leading case studies for successful BIM
through change order reduction, there will always be waste as implementation. Though this was not an IPD or design-assist
long as key members of the project team are left behind. project, the owner (Partners HealthCare System) and the gen-
It is widely accepted that the interoperability of modeling eral contractor (Turner Construction) made collaboration an
technology is one of the leading concerns in the adoption of BIM. important part of the preconstruction process. Having the sub-
According to research completed by McGraw-Hill Construction, contractor co-located with the project team during design and
“79 percent of BIM users believe that improving the interoper- coordination revealed HVAC installation details that may have
ability gap among modeling programs is the best way to improve gone unnoticed in a 2D environment. Noticing these observa-
the overall value of BIM.”¹ However, the issue of interoperabil- tions and making appropriate adjustments prior to construc-
ity does not solely pertain to software. It extends to the entire tion ultimately led to savings for the owner.
design-development process, which uses traditional delivery The firm also used 4D BIM-enabled scheduling to plan and
methods that exclude key members of the AEC and subcontrac- visualize the rigging plans for equipment and piping deliveries.
tor teams. In fact, the lack of design interoperability is one of the The project featured several custom air handling units, each
leading factors driving firms to practice lonely BIM. Truly accu- made up of eight tractor-trailer-sized segments and a delivery
rate BIM incorporates the means and methods of construction portal just big enough to fit one flatbed truck. J.C. Cannistraro
and therefore requires the subcontractors’ involvement. modelers, project managers and field foremen worked with
When a project successfully implements the collaborative precision to plan virtually the exact delivery paths of all pip-
BIM process, the savings are not limited to a decreased number ing and equipment in the hospital’s fifth floor mechanical room
of unexpected changes. Collaborative BIM allows companies to (FIGURE 3). Through off-site prefabrication and this level of
employ lean methods that eliminate waste and add value to the coordinated scheduling, the mechanical room is set to be de-
overall project. Early participation in BIM coordination gives livered four months ahead of schedule.
J.C. Cannistraro and other contractors the opportunity to pro- Today’s owners are aware of the benefits of BIM and are
vide practical solutions for constructability complexities. demanding its use on future projects. Groups such as the U.S.
For example, at the Genzyme Biologics Support Center in General Services Administration (GSA) are making commit-
Framingham, Massachusetts, the firm delivered laboratory ments to use BIM on all buildings moving forward and have
floors earlier than scheduled by pre-fabricating custom racks awarded contracts to the most BIM-proficient firms around the
of laboratory piping (FIGURE 2). Before leaving the shop floor, country. This increase in BIM awareness will lead to increased
wheels were welded directly onto the racks and bundled into expectations and there will be no room for models that are not
assemblies that made up half a floor of laboratory piping (1,000 100 percent accurate and equipped to process multi-dimen-
feet of pipe for 12 different systems). sional features such as 4D scheduling and 6D facilities man-
This lean suggestion saved time in the field for installation, agement.
avoided worries about space restraints and helped alleviate Assembling the project team early brings subcontractors
some of the construction manager safety concerns. Using the to the table during design. Doing so creates an opportunity
Last Planner Scheduling method, the firm’s foremen and project for savings by designing for the means and methods. These
managers worked together to set weekly, look-ahead schedules savings can now be realized as the design progresses and al-
low for value-added, pre-construction program changes to be
incorporated into a project, therefore maximizing the owner’s
investment. n
Over the past few years, the architecture, engineering and construc- for estimating, the procurement pro-
construction industry has seen in- tion (AEC) industries. cess and turnover to the owners (FIG-
creased usage of technology to help URE 1).
reduce time and cost on projects¹. Industry survey An objective of the research was to
New forms of collaborative software, An information survey was sent understand the knowledge-base ex-
such as building information model- to FIATECH members in September/ pected for new hires to suggest educa-
ing (BIM), are being introduced into October 2008. There were a total of 77 tional curricula that will support the
the construction industry, helping respondents, mainly representing en- industry expectation. From this survey,
the industry shift from the traditional gineering construction (EC) firms (47 industry expects new hires to have a
design-bid-build process to a more percent) and combined architecture, grasp on skill knowledge (95 percent)
efficient design-build process². What engineering and construction (AEC) rather than knowledge pertaining to a
core competencies are needed for new firms (25 percent). The companies are particular software program (5 percent).
graduates to ensure qualified person- located throughout the U.S., Canada, As indicated in FIGURE 2, the majority
nel are entering the construction work- Europe and the Middle East. The major- of companies (70 percent) expect new
force? ity of companies (66 percent) are large hires to have a working knowledge of
To gain a better understanding of companies with over 5,000 personnel 2D line drawings for use as construc-
the industry’s current requirement and gross revenues of over $1 billion tion documents. This is expected more
with new technologies available, a sur- annually. than the ability to develop and work
vey was conducted to help understand From the respondents to the survey, with conceptual modeling (56 percent).
what the construction industry desires 56 percent indicated that they use a
from a recent graduate. A second sur- BIM-based software. Of those who in- Academic survey
vey was conducted among academic dicated that they do not currently use The academic survey was developed
institutions to provide insight into what BIM in their company, 46 percent plan to gain an understanding of the current
skills schools are providing students. A on using BIM in the future. This indi- state of BIM implementation into the
site visit to an academic institution was cates that approximately 77 percent of curriculum at academic institutions.
also conducted to obtain a more in- companies ultimately foresee using Construction-specific education pro-
depth analysis of their teaching style, BIM in their future work. grams were targeted but the survey also
techniques and concepts. This research Results from this survey indicate included schools with architectural and
was supported by FIATECH, an indus- most companies use BIM for design, engineering programs having a con-
try consortium that supports the devel- concept development and construction struction focus. The survey was sent
oping usage of new technology in the documents. Fewer companies use BIM to academic members of the Associate
Figure 1. Industry use of BIM (n= 36). Figure 2. Level of knowledge Figure 3. Courses Utilizing BIM (n=38).
expected by the industry.
Fall 2010 31
Schools of Construction (ASC), the the students better visualize the design community into developing curriculum
American Council of Construction Edu- as well as use the same information in to match industry’s needs. The industry
cation (ACCE), the buildingSMART alli- the construction phase. This assists desires students to possess a working
anceTM and FIATECH. with quantity determination, installa- knowledge of the construction pro-
Of the 59 respondents, 70 percent tion coordination, project scheduling cess and how technology can benefit
indicated they integrate BIM into their and other construction operations. This key skills needed such as scheduling,
curriculum, with several noting that spans several classes within the five- estimating and project management.
they are just starting to develop their year program. The ability to retain the Learning to communicate and work
curriculum. For those not currently im- software skills needed is easier when collaboratively with owners and with
plementing BIM into their curriculum, spread across several courses. design and construction teams is an-
88 percent indicated they plan on doing Penn State has also developed an other key skill BIM usage benefits.
so, suggesting that 97 percent of all re- Immersive Construction Lab consist- At the time of this survey, the majori-
spondents will have an element of BIM ing of a computer with three projection ty of schools were starting to implement
in the curriculum in the near future. screens, 3D glasses and a smart board. BIM into their curriculum. Teach-
From those who indicated they were This allows students to fully visualize ing students BIM concepts and skills
using BIM in their curriculum, the ma- a project and gives them the ability to through a lab/lecture combination is
jority taught in a combination format. collaborate with others while working an ideal way to teach the students while
FIGURE 3 indicates the types of classes on projects. tying the skills to a model for schedul-
being taught utilizing BIM, including Arizona State University’s Del E. ing, estimating and understanding and
design-based classes, project manage- Webb School of Construction imple- visualizing drawings. This allows indus-
ment, scheduling and estimating. These ments BIM in a senior level project try skills to be developed along with an
correlate well with what the industry management class. The BIM lab is understanding of how to use the BIM
desires. The degree of modeling imple- taught by industry professionals so the tool in a more real world scenario. This
mentation is shown in FIGURE 4. The students gain a basic understanding of technique can be used whether through
majority of those who teach BIM only the software and can develop skills as- one dedicated class or across several
teach 3D modeling, with less than half sociated with the construction process. classes that teach different skill sets. As
tying in schedules and cost to the model. Classroom lectures provide the tie be- BIM is further developed, the key will be
tween BIM and project management, to continue to tie industry to the class-
Curriculum examples with industry professionals (design- room to support the industry expecta-
With the surveys completed, sev- ers, general contractors and subcon- tions and needs. n
eral schools with more advanced BIM tractors) visiting as guest lecturers to
implementation were studied and a site discuss the benefits of BIM in their seg- This research was funded by a grant
visit was undertaken to Pennsylvania ment of the industry. Each semester, the from FIATECH as part of the Knowledge
State University’s (Penn State) Archi- curriculum in the class is refined based Enabled Workforce Element of the Capi-
tectural Engineering Department to on lessons learned and with direct in- tal Projects Technology Roadmap.
discuss BIM implementation and the put from industry. With such input, the Allan Chasey, PE, LEED AP, is an Associ-
use of technology into the classroom. class can remain aligned with the most ate Professor at the Del E. Webb School of
This school was chosen based on the current technology implementation in Construction at Arizona State University.
degree of BIM implementation and the the construction industry. Christopher Pavelko, EIT, is a recent
number of classes using BIM. Since it The curriculum requirements for M.S. graduate from the Del E. Webb
is a design school, BIM software helps design and construction programs are School of Construction at Arizona State
different. Design focuses on producing University.
construction documents, working with
a BIM during design into construction.
Construction deals with the advantages
References
1. Allmon, E., Haas, E., Borcherding,
of utilizing a BIM to benefit the work
J., & Goodrum, P. (2000, March /
flow and processes during execution.
April). U.S. Construction Labor
Productivity Trends, 1970–1998.
Conclusion
Journal of Construction Engineer-
The increased use of technology and
ing and Management, 97 - 104.
tools such as BIM in the construction
2. Konchar, M., & Sanvido, V. (1998,
industry has provided companies ben-
November/December). Compar-
efits by saving time and money and in-
ison of U.S. Project Delivery Sys-
creasing productivity. BIM is becoming
tems. ASCE Journal of Construction
a cornerstone in the industry and is now
Figure 4. BIM Implementation in Engineering & Management, Vol
required by many owners. The rapid in-
Curriculum (n=39). 124, No 6, 435-444.
crease of use has pushed the academic
Think Locally -
Act Globally
By David M. Hammond, RLA, APA
A new opportunity is emerging in Washington, D.C., Seoul and Copen- IFDs, MVDs, IFCs and open BIM stan-
for buildingSMART alliance™ Interest hagen. dards will remain with the ITM and its
Groups. Issues that are causing users These “pre-operational” discussions subcommittees.
“pain” will have a path for elevation to introduced, conceptualized and social-
the international community. Issues dis- ized the concept among national and re- Role of the
cussed at the local level will be consoli- gional representatives to the IC. The goal International User
dated at the national/regional level and of the “pre-operational” discussions is to Group (IUG)
then presented to the buildingSMART complete organizational activities so the It is the aim of the International
International Council (IC) at the Inter- group can hit its full stride in accordance User Group and the Regional User
national User Group (IUG) meetings. with schedules and meetings recently Groups to promote and stimulate use of
To date, three preliminary related meet- published by the IC Executive Commit- buildingSMART deliverables in order to
ings have been held in Washington, tee (ExCom). The Interim IUG lead for improve interoperability in the construc-
D.C., Seoul and Copenhagen. These the IC ExCom is Jøns Sjøgren (Norwegian tion industry and to share experiences
“pre-operational” meetings were highly Chapter). It is envisioned that the IUG among its members in a bi-directional
organizational in nature and focused will report to the IC. The International way in which there is a balance between
on ensuring that user needs and global User Group will be led by an Interna- sharing intellectual capital and receiving
representation concerns will be properly tional User Group Chair. National or Re- open solutions for common problems
met in the soon-to-be IUG organization. gional User Groups will be represented at and “pain points.” The IUG Chair leads
Following the September IUG meet- buildingSMART IUG meetings. the IUG. The IUG reports to the IC.
ing in Copenhagen (which will have oc-
curred by the time this goes to press), a Why establish an Mission
North American User Group meeting International User The IUG has two main objectives:
will be held in Washington, D.C., at the Group? • Operational issues: Improve interop-
buildingSMART allianceTM Conference in Function and structure for the IC and erability-based buildingSMART so-
December. Several representatives from ExCom are defined in the Articles of As- lutions in construction, operation,
around the globe will also attend, which sociation. The articles give the IC the maintenance and facility manage-
will provide an international perspective power to establish standing committees. ment industries and thereby related
as well as an opportunity to exchange There are now two standing commit- educational activities.
ideas and viewpoints. The national and tees: the original International Techni- • Strategic and tactical: Collecting
international event will also highlight cal Management Committee (ITM) and views on strategic and tactical prior-
what the vendors are able to deliver today the newer IUG. The standing commit- ities regarding interoperability from
in terms of interoperability using open tees can establish sub-committees and clients and the industry. Gain criti-
building information modeling (BIM) working groups. While the ITM of build- cal mass in the industry and among
standards. This article will first cover this ingSMART International has been almost clients to influence acceptance of
new opportunity from the international exclusively involved in identifying, prior-
perspective and then from the local and itizing and developing the International
national/regional viewpoint. Foundation Classes (IFCs) and open BIM
standards, relatively little actual strate-
Establishing the IUG is a gic or operational decision-making has
work in progress been the result of actual users of build-
The buildingSMART International ingSMART-compliant software tools
Council has been working to establish and processes. The IUG is a deliberate
and organize the work of the IUG since attempt to place the responsibility for
2008. Jan Karlshøj (Nordic Chapter) identifying and prioritizing Information
drafted an International User Group Delivery Manuals (IDM) or use cases, the
Charter that provided the conceptual International Framework for Dictionar-
basis for IC discussions and developed ies (IFD) Library, Model View Definitions
the many details found in this article. (MVD), the IFCs and open BIM standards It is important to engage users on a local
Preliminary discussions took place at in the hands of real end-users, while the level across multiple domains and around
buildingSMART International meetings user-prioritized development of IDMs, the globe.
Fall 2010 33
buildingSMART-based solution by production, such as using IFC for data national/regional level and what must
commercial companies, authorities exchange between IFC-compatible be resolved at the international level (like
and other relevant organizations. software products. setting priorities, identifying funding
sources and work execution).
Main focus areas Think locally – act Output from a National/Regional
include locally User Group may include appointing a
• Sharing Experiences: Sharing with In North America, the buildingSMART delegate to the IUG, shared experiences
other members of the buildingSMART alliance™ chapter of the buildingSMART and best practices to be shared regionally
alliance.™ This is an important pur- International organization has ap- and globally, input to national and inter-
pose of the group as it is a prerequisite proximately 13 local User Groups. User national standards and specifications,
for supporting other buildingSMART Group activities are mainly based on input content to IDM/use cases, input
alliance™ activities. This includes local projects and experiences. Com- content to the IFD Library, input into the
contributing to the development of mon locally-focused experiences range IUG agenda and discussions by way of
Information Delivery Manuals and from demonstrating new products and national/regional resolutions, input to
Model View Definitions. The User applications, providing networking op- software vendors, prioritizing the cre-
Group should stimulate its mem- portunities and highlighting vendor ation of Information Delivery Models,
bers to play an active role and act as a interoperability issues with current ap- Model View Definitions and continued
community in which problems, ques- plications. Other focuses are solving a development of Industrial Foundation
tions, tips, etc. should be exchanged specific inter-office or project-specific Classes.
and answered. Software vendors are interoperability problem or issue and As presented and discussed in this ar-
welcome to provide information in ultimately developing strategic alliances ticle, we, in North America, have a new
relation to buildingSMART alliance™ and competitive advantages. Many lo- and emerging opportunity to identify
related issues. cal buildingSMART alliance™ Interest and resolve common as well as unique
• Information Delivery Manuals (IDM) Groups and individuals are also con- problems or “pain-points” efficiently
and Guidelines: Taking part in devel- cerned with the development of the within a truly global perspective. By
opment and coordination of IDM and National Building Information Model “thinking locally about these important
user orientated guidelines as much as Standard™ (NBIMS) and the continued issues and road blocks, we can actually
possible according to the available re- development of IDM/use cases, the IFD now act globally to solve these common
sources. Library and MVDs. problems more quickly and effectively.
• Specifications: Stimulating necessary There are also 14 other national/re- By creating international and regional
extensions to the buildingSMART gional chapters, representing 28 coun- interest groups many people and com-
deliverables (like IFC) by specifying ties from around the world, with similar panies from diverse domains can come
content to IDMs and motivating in- problems and issues, as well as solutions. together in the same virtual global room,
volvement from the industry in These are solutions that North America asking more questions and arriving at
making IDM. The User Group should may not have thought of or implemen- more solutions together, thus hastening
provide input to decisions regarding tation issues which may have common the development of interoperability and
the content and release cycle of the solutions elsewhere world-wide. open BIM standards and tools. n
buildingSMART deliverables.
• Data: Working members to share data Think locally – act David M. Hammond is a Senior Pro-
(for example, models and configura- globally gram Manager for the United States Coast
tions) among members but still re- It is therefore important to engage Guard in Washington, D.C. He is currently
spect ownership of the data. users on a local level across multiple responsible at Headquarters for business
• Publish: Publishing results, guide- domains and around the globe. Many transformation and change manage-
lines and other relevant material as users have common experiences in us- ment, as well as the Information Manage-
widely as possible and, at a mini- ing software and processes in “real life” ment Strategic Plan for the Coast Guard’s
mum, post on the buildingSMART building projects, which are essential to Shore Infrastructure Management Pro-
alliance™ website. identifying and prioritizing the develop- gram. He has also pioneered the use of
ment work of the ITM. In order to bring BIM and leading-edge integrated assess-
Membership in IUG local experiences to the table, the build- ment tools to develop performance-based
All members of the buildingSMART ingSMART alliance™ must facilitate capital asset management and balance
alliance™ can join the National/ meetings and arenas where problems scorecard related performance measures
Regional User Group. Typical members and challenges are discussed and hope- for program and agency-wide strate-
of the Regional User Group will be fully solved. Part of the local to global gic outcomes. Hammond is currently on
from organizations (private, public and global to local process must include the Executive Committee of the build-
and universities) who are solely or a sorting out of what issues and prob- ingSMART allianceTM Board of Direction
mainly using or interested in using lems can be resolved at the local interest and is interim lead for the Alliance’s Re-
buildingSMART deliverables in their group level, what can be resolved at the gional Interest Group.
Fall 2010 35
General information based on the Likert scale of 1 to 7, ranging from “least benefi-
Part 1 (questions 1 to 4) of the questionnaire collected ba- cial” to “most beneficial” (FIGURE 9).
sic demographic information about the respondents and the Part 3 of the survey (question 9) inquired about the possible
companies for whom they worked (FIGURES 1, 2, 3, 4). Part challenges facing BIM adoption in China and also asked the
2 (questions 5 to 7) of the survey targeted the respondents and participants to give a score based on the Likert scale of 1 to
their companies’ experience with BIM (FIGURE 5, 6, 7, 8). 7, ranging from “least challenging” to “most challenging”. FIG-
Collectively, Part 1 and Part 2 revealed some quick facts URE 10 illustrates the perceived level of challenges.
about the AEC industry in China: There are three quite distinct tiers based on the Likert Scale
• The size of companies tends to be gigantic (40 percent with scoring. Management-level commitment costs were perceived
1,000 or more employees); as the biggest obstacles to BIM adoption in the industry. Lack
• Design-bid-build is the prevailing project delivery method; of external incentives was also a serious fallback. Return on in-
• Most respondents started their BIM journey in the new mil- vestment, financial risks and liability issues were considered
lennium (50 percent after the year 2000) and a significant least challenging, which was surprising. The immaturity of
portion (32 percent) of them had not done anything on BIM BIM development may account for this; it may simply be too
yet. early to think about the cost issues.
• Companies using BIM tended to be very active in BIM im- Part 3 of the survey (question 10) listed possible factors that
plementation (11 percent had 20 or more projects that used could significantly boost the development of BIM in China.
BIM). Participants were required to rank these factors based on their
• ArchiCAD (42 percent) followed by Revit (10 percent) were experience, knowledge or understanding of BIM using a Lik-
the most popular BIM authoring tools. ert scale of 1 to 7, ranging from the “least critical” to the “most
critical” factors (FIGURE 11).
Perception research “Trial-and-error” is still the most trustworthy method in
Part 3 of the survey (question 8) inquired about the per- the industry to gain knowledge and confidence in BIM. Ac-
ceived benefits of BIM to the Chinese AEC industry. The partic- cess to reliable databases that capture past project experience
ipants were required to give a score to a list of possible benefits seems to be well appreciated to help companies embark on the
Figure 5. Time when the respondents’ companies started to look Figure 6. Cumulative number of companies that started to look
into BIM. into BIM, by time period.
Fall 2010 37
Buyer’s Guide
3D Facility Modeling BIM Consulting Services BIM/Model Checking
and Management Virtual Build.................................. 6 and Analysis
Woolpert Inc................................ 18 Solibri LLC............................... OBC
BIM Consulting,
Architecture, Engineering Implementation and Building Records and
and Construction Integration Equipment Access
Mason & Hanger......................... 27 C&S Companies.......................... 17 Software
J.C. Cannistraro, LLC................. 28
Architecture, Interior BIM Software
Design, Master Planning Design Data................................... 8 Cobie Information
and Eco Services Digital Alchemy............................ 4 Management Systems
Kirksey......................................... 18 Graphisoft.................................. IFC Peripheral Systems, Inc.............. 20
An Authoritative
of Building Sciences
JBIM
Journal of Building
Information Model
An official publication
buildingSMART alliance™
ing
of Building Sciences
of the National Institute
N
22°17’2.18”N
GIS
114° 9’18.28”E
Please
Temperature: 25
88 Floors C
Humidity: 74
Air Pollution Index:
32
International
Finance Centre
22°17’6.43”N
114° 9’33.79”E
Construction Field
Software and BIM
Support
BIM and FM: Vela Systems............................... 38
l to Lifecycle
The Porta
Facility Management
22°16’46.49”N
114° 9’41.27”E
90 m2 72 Floors
Apartment 135,000 m2
Lights On 24th Floor 45 Elevators
Lights Off
Carpet 48,600 m2
26th Floor Renewable Energy:
22°16’44.02”N Hong Kong Population: 107,219 Megajoule
114° 9’0.05”E Water: 2.63 Million 7,055,071 Energy Use:
Cubic Meters Per 8,101,080 Megajoule
Day
Leading Multidisciplinary
Energy: 805 Terajoules
our
Photo of Hong Kong
from Victoria Peak:
Creative Commons: Samuel C. Louie
http://creativecommons.o | 392M | 22°16’42.08”N
rg/licenses/by-sa/3.0/dee | 114° 8’47.86”E
BIM Software
d.en http://commons.wikimed
ia.org/wiki/File:Hong_Ko
ng_Night_Skyline.jpg
AM
4/13/10 8:45:15
1
BIMB Spring 2010.indd