Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
Simplifying
Procurement
Technology
Issues, Challenges & Trends
First there was darkness. Enterprises realized that the biggest savings opportunities lay trapped in the
silos of diverse procurement systems. Then there was light. The insight gleaned from
aggregating and cleansing spend data for the entire enterprise led to consolidation of the supplier base
and creation of a preferred supplier pool with national and global contracts. The bottom-line savings that
could potentially be realized through better sourcing far outweighed benefits accrued via process
improvements or outsourcing. Investments in strategic sourcing platforms soared as a result, and
electronic procurement platforms took a backseat.
Is Technology to Blame?
So who is to blame?
The responsibility for failure certainly lies with all of us. As users we
have refused to 'buy-in' to the big picture; savings mandate have never
been a personal responsibility, and no one held us accountable. As
Procurement heads, we often failed to understand the needs of our
internal customers, and were insensitive to the needs of the user
community. As vendors, we have focused on solving the problem in
parts and pieces, and overemphasized the use of technology, at the
expense of people and processes.
We will submit FOUR (4) key issues that need to be addressed in the new
generation simplified procurement systems.
1 DATA
MANAGEMENT
Enterprises cannot afford to build multi-million master data management
infrastructures using spaghetti code that fetches data from multiple disparate
systems, maintains one clean datapool, syndicating it back to source systems
when needed. It is easier done on paper than realized in the real world. We can
all learn to live with bad data, as long as we have efficient tools like Google to
help us find what we want, when we want. We could turn the Procurement Data
problem on its head, and adopt a simpler approach to managing the same.
What if we could
All users care about, is discovering the product or service that they want to buy,
within an electronic procurement environment, when they need it.
All procurement teams care about, is ensuring that the user stays informed
about preferred products and services that are contracted within the
organization and prompting user about
purchasing guidelines on the same.
The inventory folks want to notify the user, if a similar item is in stock and the
sourcing experts want to get alerted, when a lot of similar items are being
bought, because that represents a significant sourcing opportunity.
2 FEATURE
MANAGEMENT
Enterprise cannot afford to keep writing custom code to solve all their business
problems. We have seen the rapid rise of packaged applications and death of
bespoke solutions that mired the enterprise in the nineties, but even
packaged solutions came with their own little bag of secrets, a.k.a the 'feature
list'.
So enterprises learn to either live with problems and limitations (read lack of
features), or face huge slippages in project timelines as code warriors battle it
out translating business requirements into additional software features for
the next release. Over time, this further fuels the classic 'feature-warfare'
between vendors as unsuspecting buyers 'buy' features which others paid-for
to 'build'.
Business Users could care less about the published feature-set of COTS
(commercially off-the-shelf) procurement technology to cater to their
procurement and sourcing processes, if given a choice.
3 COMPLIANCE
MANAGEMENT
Achieving 100% compliance with corporate procurement guidelines remains a
distant dream, as stake holders remain locked in conflict when it comes to
implementing 'controls' based on policies and guiding procedures, within a
sourcing and procurement technology platform. Over time enterprises have
matured and employed visionary leaders as change agents, who rally support
for a common cause. Compliance today is thus driven exceptionally well by
people and extremely poorly by technology. Left to technology, very little would
have been achieved in terms of compliance management.
Master Data compliance policies that are governed by tight controls (ex.
explicit authorization on who is eligible to enter and edit a master data record)
translate to delays of several days, before a record can be entered on a system,
triggering a purchase process. Contract compliance policies that block every
requisition, means countless re-routes between users, buyers and supervisors
for approval. “More Control for Better Compliance” is the best that current
technology has to offer to enterprises today.
The reality of business is dynamic and rule books need to be rewritten every so
often, to stay in sync with the global supply and demand chain. Tax rules
change, Supplier performance metrics change, markets change almost
everything changes in the real world. Procurement processes can no longer
afford to be driven from static policies and procedures hardwired as 'rules'
within a particular process environment.
4 VISIBILITY
MANAGEMENT
The concept of visibility within a procurement organization has been
traditionally limited to an archaic definition of aggregated historical spend. It is
a fact that enterprises have struggled to get spend visibility, shifting from ad-
hoc query based reporting to OLAP tools, and then flirting with dashboards.
The wake-up call about poor data quality came in quite late, but millions had
already been expended trying to scrub data using excel based tools with
expensive consulting eye-balls. Possibly lot more was spent in cleansing
supplier content, matching records against proprietary databases.
The problem of visibility is not just historical. Probably too much emphasis has
been put on spend analysis (for the right reasons though), that enables
discovery of savings opportunities. Discovery of opportunity is one thing but
harnessing these opportunities to formulate the right sourcing strategies,
revamp and renew contracts, and drive compliance to realize the savings
identified, is a totally different ball game.
The issue of visibility is not just about historical spend data, but 360? across
the entire procurement transformation value chain.
Users want visibility into prefer redsuppliers and contracts at the time of
making a requisition, Sourcing Experts want deep visibility inside commodity
categories and supplier performance metrics, Vendors want visibility inside
their electronic invoices and forecasted demand, and corporate chieftains
want visibility against their stated compliance drives.
So who is to blame?
'Compliance everywhere' will not remain an utopian dream and can be realized
only when it becomes easy to wire-up a business process with a generic
compliance 'service'. Since compliance requirements are dynamic by its very
nature, a process manager or supervisor should be able to use business rules to
drive compliance, on-demand.
The realization of this vision of simplified technology is not far away. Many
vendors are aggressively engineering services based procurement platforms,
and are driven internally by such a vision. Customers on the lookout for potential
solution partners must balance their search for credibility and proven solutions
with 10 demonstrable evidence to stay on the leading edge.
Technology is changing fast, and one has to safeguard against obsolescence. Yet
at the same time, one needs to safeguard the investments being made, by
putting the right combination of people and process expertise to harness the
benefits. Ultimately it always is a people, process and technology game.
10
11