Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract: An earthquake of magnitude 5.0 with its epicenter in the West Sikkim district occurred on the evening of 20th
May 2007. The macroseismic study revealed an ENE-WSW isoseismal pattern indicating a trend conforming to that of
the major tectonic discontinuities in this part of the Himalaya.
The relatively moderate event, felt even at far away places like, Siliguri, Darjeeling, etc induced a maximum intensity
of VI (MSK) in the form of development of cracks in the walls, fall of thick chunks of plaster in Type A or even Type B-
C structures at localities like Tashiding, Ralang, Rabang, Keozing, Sakyong, etc.
The study also revealed that the NW-SE trending Tista lineament is playing an important role in the release of the
tectonics strain in this region and that the rupture initiated under the influence of the northward directed tectonic stresses
at an asperity formed at one of the decollements within the crust by the intersection of this tectonic discontinuity was
interpreted to be responsible for this seismic event.
thrust movement, northwards are followed by the poorly Table 1. Frequency distribution of earthquakes
between 25°-29° N and 87°-90° E
metamorphosed (Tethyan) Paleozoic-Mesozoic sequence,
which got folded during Himalayan orogeny. The Tertiaries, Mag. range No. of events Percent
comprising the Siwalik Group of rocks, are followed by 6.0 <7.0 1 0.69
Gangetic alluvum further south. 5.0 <6.0 38 26.38
Interestingly, the ENE-WSW trending Siwaliks abut .0 <5.0 70 48.60
against a NNE-SSW trending fault, beyond which the <4 12 08.33
Siwaliks are not exposed and the Gangetic Alluvium is Not determined 23 15.97
juxtaposed with the pre-Tertiaries along the MBT.
Besides these, another important tectonostratigraphic a matter of fact, the magnitude of this solitary event in this
feature here is the presence of the Gondwana Group of rocks range is M b6.0. There is no record of a larger event
exposed in a tectonic window, known as Rangit Window. originating in this region. However, 1934 Bihar-Nepal
Similar lithopacket is also exposed towards south in the form earthquake induced ground motions equivalent to intensity
of a lenticular tectonic wedge along the MBT (Narula et al. VII in the Sikkim region, which means that the area suffered
2000). damage comprising extensive cracks in many structures and
One significant feature in the tectonic scenario of this partial collapse in some of the stone masonry constructions
region is the reentrant formed by one of the most important (GSI, 1939). Bilham and Wallace (2005) have mentioned
tectonic surfaces of the Himalaya, the MCT, which though about an earthquake in the year 1713 in Western Bhutan,
disposed parallel to the MBT at a more or less constant which damaged several monasteries in the area. Also on the
aerial distance of about 5 km in this part of the Eastern basis of their study of the slip potential in the Himalaya,
Himalaya, suddenly swerves northward and makes a they have come up with the possibility of a future earthquake
reentrant of considerable spread, forming a narrow neck at in this region with a maximum magnitude of Mw 8.2.
its base. Seismotectonically, most of the thrusts, which are The records also reveal that most (82.6%) of the recorded
either parallel or sub parallel to the Himalayan trend are seismic events had a shallow crustal origin with their depth
believed to merge with a gently north dipping tectonic being less than 40 km.
discontinuity formed by the upper surface of the The fault plane solutions of the events belonging to the
underthrusting Indian Plate, known as decollement (Seeber years 1965, 1980 and 1982, which occurred in the Himalaya,
and Armbruster, 1981, Ni and Barazangi, 1984). Nakata et indicate predominantly strike slip type mechanism with
al. (1990) have reported neotectonic activity along the nodal planes striking in NW-SE and NE-SW directions
Himalayan Frontal Fault (HFF). (Table 2) (Fig.1). The other two solutions for the earth-
Additionally, there are a number of transverse lineaments quakes of 1979 and 1993, which occurred in the foredeep
/ faults having great relevance to the contemporary tectonics. region, however, indicate a predominantly normal fault
The NW-SE trending Tista lineament, Purnia-Everest mechanism with both the nodal planes, striking in almost
lineament and another lineament east of Tista Lineament, N-S direction for the former and NE-SW and E-W directions
passing through west of Cooch Bihar, appear to have a for the latter.
significant influence on the seismicity of the region. De and Kayal (2003) presenting the seismotectonic
model of Sikkim Himalaya concluded that the earthquake
activity was concentrated mainly along the MBT and
SEISMICITY
NW-SE trending lineament. A composite fault plane
The affected area falls in Zone IV of the Seismic Zonation solution of a cluster of micro earthquakes recorded just north
Map of India, which implies that the area may be jolted by of MCT, during a survey conducted by GSI indicated a
seismic activity equivalent to intensity VIII. predominantly thrust type mechanism with nodal planes
As per the Seismotectonic Atlas of India and its Environs oriented in E-W directions (De et al. 1995).
(2000) and the USGS website, a total of one hundred and Recently, another micro earthquake study was carried
forty four seismic events have been recorded in the area out by the GSI in the southern part of Sikkim and northern
bounded by latitude 25°-29° and longitude 87°-90° till part of West Bengal, through a four-station network between
August 2007, which show following frequency distribution. 19th Feb. and 19th April 2007 (Chakraborty, 2006-07). The
A perusal of the table shows that about half of the number survey revealed that a majority of the seismic events, and
of total events are of magnitude between 4.0 and <5.0 and thus the seismic activity, is concentrated on the eastern side
that there is only one event in the range of 6.0 <7.0. As of the Teesta lineament (Fig.2).
Lac
hun
(F)C Mz
gC
Cz1
Kanchenjunga
hu
8586 m
(F)F Pt (F)C Mz
Thimpu
20.05.07
nt
(F)F T
C
ea
Gangtok Wangdi
M
Lin
T
MC
(F)FC Pt
T (F)C
C
M
a
Rangit R.
ng
nju
MCT
he
Darjeeling Kalimpong
nc
(F)FPt1
Ka
Dogan
Tis
F
(F)FPt1
ta
R.
F
80 F
(F)FC
(F) Cz -1
(F) Cz
-140
Purn
Al Siliguri
ia
0
Tis
-12
ta
Morang
0
-10
Ever
F Jalpaiguri
F
est
Alipur Duar
Lin
ea
F
me
25
nt
Forbesganj
00
Kooch Bihar
Linea
40
men
00
30
00
t
Kishanganj -80
25
00
Gravity contours /
0
-12
Fig.1. Seismotectonic map of Himalaya and the foredeep region of North Bengal and Sikkim (modified after Seismotectonic Atlas of
India and its environs, GSI, 2000).
Sankar Kumar Nath et al. (2000) has carried out site the overall site response was higher at higher frequencies.
response studies in Sikkim Himalaya by using strong motions Site response at lower frequencies (1 – 5 Hz) was, however,
recorded with the help of an array of 7 instruments for about either low or moderate.
4 months in 1999. A keener look on the Fig.3 of this paper Interestingly, there was a spate of seismic activity just
indicates that there exists a somewhat predominance of prior to and after the instant event of 20th May 2007. Two
seismic events on the eastern side of the Tista lineament. events of M 4.0 and 4.7 occurred on 16th and 18th May
Additionally, although their studies were of preliminary respectively, and another event of M 3.5 took place on 23rd
nature, they concluded that, in general, in Sikkim Himalaya, May 2007 (Figs. 2 and 3). It was even more interesting that
Table 2. Fault plane solutions of the earthquakes between 25°-29° N and 87°-90° E (from Seismotectonic Atlas of India and its Environs, 2000)
all these events were located in the close vicinity of the Tista which, in fact, is the updated version of MSK scale (Grunthal
lineament. 1993). A maximum intensity of VI has been assigned to this
earthquake (Fig.3). Besides intensity VI, isoseismals of lower
intensity, viz. V and IV were also delineated. The isoseismal
EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS AND DELINEATION
OF ISOSEISMALS IV could be drawn as intermittent line, which though does
not provide the detailed behaviour of the isoseismal, does
The isoseismals for the earthquake were delineated on indicate its aerial extent. All the isoseismals, except VI,
the basis of the study of its effects in about 35 localities. however, were left open, as they could not be followed
The effects were studied by exhaustively interviewing the further due to the inaccessible and uninhabited nature of
inhabitants of different localities. The enquiries were mainly the area.
on the following pattern. Notwithstanding the incompleteness (due to the reasons
stated above), the major trend of the elliptical isoseismals
1. Effects on persons i.e. human perception
can easily be deciphered as ENE-WSW. A perusal of the
2. Effects on surroundings
isoseismal map shows that the attenuation of intensities is
3. Effects on structures
maximum towards SW. Further, whereas the long axes of
Since the effects were not strong enough to cause much all the elliptical isoseismals are extending towards ENE,
damage to structures, mainly the human perception factored southeastwards the isoseismals tend to be somewhat
in the assessment of intensity at most of the places. Intensities inflated.
were assigned using Medvedev - Sponheuer - Karnik (MSK- There was no report of injury to any one due to the
64) scale and European Macroseismic scale (EMS-92), earthquake. Nor there was report of any significant damage
to property, save for some instances of development of
cracks or fall of chunks of plaster representing the severest
Total selected events- 31 effects of the seismic event. As such, one had to fall back on
Magnitude
3.4 3.7 BLOCK-A
human perceptions for constraining the isoseismals,
Recent Earthquakes especially of intensity V to III. Therefore, in order to achieve
EQ MAG 4.0 on 16-05-07 maximum accuracy, several localities were visited to make
EQ MAG 5.0 on 20-04-07 BLOCK-B an on the spot assessment of the intensity at respective areas.
GANGTOK
EQ MAG 4.6 on 18-06-07
STM The following paragraphs are devoted to the brief description
JTG
EQ MAG 3.5 on 23-05-07
DAR of the effects of tremors at different localities. For the sake
EQ MAG 4.8 on 11-06-07 KAG
of referral convenience different localities included within
an isoseist have been grouped together. Also the descriptions
Tis
aLt
SILIGURI
am
to avoid repetition.
en
t
N
2.5 0 7.5km
IMD
SCALE 20.05.07 IV
Mangan
TISTA R.
Namok
Kabi
18.03.98
Yoksam USGS
14.02.06
Polot
Darjeeling
LIN
Kalimpong
T
EA
13.09.96 M C
ME
st
NT
ru
(F)F Th
ary
nd F
TIS
u
Bo
TA
(F)FC in
Ma
R.
rust (F)C
l Th
Centra Al
Main
(F)
th
Fig.3. Isoseismal map of 20 May 2007 earthquake.
Although the area of influence of this isoseist was of the few most sacred monasteries of the Sikkim – imparting
considerable the intensity everywhere, close to or away from prominence to it, is located on a gently sloping spur. Here
the isoseismal, was, more or less, just on the higher side of almost all the people, inside or outside their houses felt the
the threshold of the intensity VI. Localities like Tashiding, tremors. Rattling of doors, windows, utensils, were few of
Ralang, Rabang, Keozing, Sakyong, etc have been included the common observations. Some people, who were inside
in this isoseist. their houses, ran outdoors as they reportedly got frightened.
Small, less stable objects were reported to have fallen during
Tashiding the ground shaking.
The serene Tashiding village with its monastery – one The ground shaking also induced damage up to grade 2
Rabang
Inhabitants of this town with a gentle and rolling
topography at a height of 2100 m, felt the shock. Many of
them ran outside in panic. A few of them reported about a
sound like that of ‘light blasting’ just before the ground
shaking.
There were reports of fall of photo frames and other
Fig.4. Cracks developed in one of the walls of the Tashiding
Monstery as a result of earthquake shaking items kept on shelves. A few RCC constructions reportedly
developed cracks.
The other effects include a little shifting of the heavy
furniture and the fall of some of the articles placed in the Sakyong
hands of the statue of Lord Buddha, encased in a glass This locality is aerially about 5 km north of Geyzing
covered shelf, which resulted in breaking of another statue. and about the same distance WNW of Tashiding. Here, most
of the people felt the shock. Many of them rushed outside
Ralang as the tremors frightened them.
Situated at a distance of about 10 km from Rabangla There was also damage to structures, which include RCC
(Rabang) on the road to Brang and founded on gentle slopes framed structures, Ikra constructions and wooden houses.
of deeply weathered rocks, this locality experienced strong Sakyong secondary school, developed oblique as well as
ground shaking that most of the people felt the shock. Many horizontal cracks in the walls. Opening of construction joints
people ran outdoors in panic. Articles and utensils kept in between the beams and walls was a relatively more common
shelves fell in good numbers. phenomenon.
Some of the stone masonry structures in the village
reportedly suffered damage in the form of fairly deep cracks Keozing (Samsing)
in the walls. However, the monastery here remained The twin localities – Keozing being a cluster of newly
unscathed. Most of the constructions in the villages are either built predominantly RCC structures, situated on the road to
Yuksam
Yuksam, a tourist destination being the first capital of
Sikkim where first Chogyal of the Kingdom of Sikkim was
consecrated in 1642 A.D. is located at a distance of about
40 km from Pemayangtse –where one of the oldest
monasteries of the state is situated.
The earthquake effects were felt by most of the
Fig.6. Peeling off of chunks of plaster from a thick ground floor
inhabitants. Many of those who were standing out in the
wall of random rubble masonry set in mud mortar. The open also felt it. Few of those inside their dwellings came
upper storey is made up of the ubiquitious Ikra type out in fear. However some who were inside their vehicles
construction in the village. Location Samsing village. did not feel the shaking. Although people informed of fall
of articles kept in shelves there was no report of damage to
Rabangla and Samsing being its rural part located aerially any structure, most of which are either wood constructions
about 1 km north of it – experienced considerably strong or Ikra type.
ground shaking, which resulted in the development of
cracks between beam and the walls in even Type B to C Isoseist IV
structures. The damage in the poor quality constructions The isoseist follows more or less the same ENE-WSW
of rubble masonry set in mud mortar (Type A) was of trend of higher isoseists. It encompasses localities like
somewhat higher grade in the form of fall of thick chunks of Gangtok, Namchi, Naya Bazar, Kabi and Mangan in the
plaster and development of deeper cracks in the walls southwest. In these places most of people inside their houses
(Fig.6) felt the tremors. The shocks were not frightening.
Places like Mangan, Rangpo and Pakyong have been
Isoseist V kept in Isoseist III, where only few people reported of slight
This isoseist, like others, has also an elliptical shape with trembling.
the long axis trending in ENE-WSW directions. Due to
unavailability of the data towards west, it had to be left Hypocentral Depth Calculated from Macroseismic Data
open-ended. The isoseismal of intensity V passes through By using maximum intensity value Io = VI in various
places just north of Yuksam, in the north, just around empirical relations relating magnitude (M), maximum
Namok in the ENE, through Ben (Thalabari) and Rishi, and intensity (Io) and depth of hypocenter (h), we get the
just south of Rinchingpong in the south. Interestingly, the following results.
isoseismal extends more towards ENE to impart an element
1. Gzovsky’s formula
of asymmetry in this direction. Observations, as recorded at
Io = 1.5 M - h/15 gives h = 22.5 km
some of the localities within this isoseist, are described
below. 2. Shebalin’s formula
Io = 1.5 M - 3.5 log h + 3 gives h = 19.3 km
Polot
3. Gutenberg and Richter’s formula
Located about 2 km south of Brang along the road on
M = 0.6 Io + 1.8 log h – 1.0 gives h = 21.54 km
the eastern flank of the Rangit River, the landscape here is
in the form of gently sloping surface made up of deeply These values of depth of hypocenter are somewhat
weathered rocks. The area boasts of the hottest hot water higher than the instrumental depth of 17.0 km and 15.0 km
springs among the many such springs located all along the provided by USGS and IMD, respectively.
length of the Rangit River.
The earthquake effects in this locality were strong enough
DISCUSSION ON SOURCE MECHANISM
to be felt by most of the inhabitants. However, the shock
was not frightening enough to cause panic among the Regarding the seismotectonics of the region, Seeber and
Armbruster (1981) and Ni and Barazangi (1984), have transverse Himalayan features have a significant role in
proposed the most convincing models for the Himalaya. the generation of the earthquakes. This, in other words,
According to them there exists a gently dipping decollement/ implies that such transverse features deciphered on the
detachment surface underlying the entire Himalaya. This ground extend downwards at least to the detachment surface
plane, which controls the major seismic activity in the Sub, or still lower. There are many earthquakes e.g. 1978
Lesser and Higher Himalaya, represents the upper surface Dharamshala Earthquake; 1980 Dharchula Earthquake;
of the under thrusting Indian Plate, and the MCT, MBT, 1996 Chamoli Earthquake and 2005 Dharamshala
FHT and their subsidiary thrusts and faults, merge with this Earthquake, whose isoseismal trends are transverse to the
plane at depth. Srinivasan and Khar (1996) have supported Himalayan grain.
the existence of decollement under the outer Himalaya. The area exposes traces of ENE-WSW trending MBT
According to them, the depth of this northward dipping and MCT disposed parallel and close to each other. The
surface under Lesser and Higher Himalaya, constrained with surface disposition of these regional tectonic discontinuities
the help of accurately determined depth of thrust type events, indicates that the probable gently dipping decollements may
varies from 10 to 20 km below surface. also be, by and large, having a similar trend. The MCT,
Mattauer (1986) has proposed a model, which presents however, makes a reentrant here. It is a well known fact that
the Himalaya as a crustal stacking accretionary wedge, which the areas of reentrant, be it Kangra reentrant or Ravi
is related to inter continental subduction. He proposed for reentrant, are the locales of tectonic strain.
more than one decollements occurring along boundaries of Presence of major thrusts like MBT and MCT, and the
lithological contacts such as basement cover contact, lower available fault plane solutions of the two past earthquakes,
and upper crust, the crust mantle boundary or anisotropies which occurred east of the present event, indicating strike
within the lithosphere. slip mechanism suggest that the area is under compressional
As mentioned earlier there is a broadly NW-SE trending stresses.
Tista lineament, which passes through just east of Naya Like in almost all the past earthquakes of Himalaya the
Bazar and aerially about 6 km west of Geyzing (Figs. 1 and fault rupture in this event also did not extend up to the
3). Recently a micro earthquake study carried out by GSI in surface. However, the ENE-WSW trending typical elliptical
the southern part of Sikkim and northern part of West Bengal
through a four-station network between 19th Feb. and 19th
April 2007 revealed that the occurrence of majority of the
seismic events and thus the seismic activity was concentrated
east of the Tista lineament (Fig. 2).
Additionally, presence of a number of hot water springs
along the Rangit River valley, which also falls on the eastern
side of the said lineament further strengthens the notion that
this part of the area is under contemporary tectonic strain
(Fig.3).
Interestingly, there was a spate of seismic activity just
prior to and after the instant event of 20th May 2007. Two
events of M 4.0 and 4.7 occurred on 16th and 18th May
respectively, and another event of M 3.5 took place on 23rd
May 2007 (Figs. 2 and 3). It was even more interesting
that all these events were located in the close vicinity of
the Tista lineament. In view of this observation along
with the revelations of the micro earthquake survey, the
authors conclude that this may be the transverse feature,
laterally controlling the tectonic activity in this region,
which is taking place under the influence of regional
principal stresses acting in northerly direction. It may be Fig.7. Isoseismal and source area delineation (red dashed line) of
mentioned here that with the help of geological, geo- the 14th Feb. 2006 earthquake (from Som et al. 2008). In
thermal, macroseismic, seismological, gravity and magnetic present authors’ view an ENE-WSW trend is also
data, Narula and Shome (1992) have concluded that the discernable from the isoseismal pattern.
References
ACHARYYA, S.K. (1989) The Daling Group, its nomenclature, DZIEWONSKI, A.M., et al. (1988) PEPI, 48, 18-46 & PEPI, v.50,
tectono-stratigraphy and structural grain: with notes on their pp.127-154.
possible equivalents. Geol. Surv. India Spec. Publ. No.22, GRUNTHAL, G. (Ed.) (1993) Europian Macroseimic Scale 1992
pp.5-13. (updated MSK scale), Cahiers du Centre Europeén de
BILHAM, R. and Wallace, K. (2005) Future Mw>8 earthquakes in Géodynamic et de Séismologic, v.7, pp.79.
the Himalaya: implications from the 26 Dec 2004 Mw=9.0 GSI (1939) The Bihar-Nepal Earthquake of 1934. Mem. Geol.
earthquake on India’s eastern plate margin. Geol. Surv. India Surv. India, v.73, pp.287-288.
Spec. Publ., No.85, pp.1-14. JOSHI, K.C. and SENGUPTA, S. (2007) A report on geoseismological
CHAKRABORTY, G.K. (2006-07) Report on microearthquake survey study of 20th May 2007 Sikkim earthquake. Unpubl. Geol.
in Darjeeling district of West Bengal and Sikkim during Feb. Surv. India Report.
to April 2007. (GSI Report under preparation) MATTAUER, M. (1986) Intracontinental subduction crust mantle
DASGUPTA, S., MUKHOPADHYAY, MANOJ and NANDY, D.R. (1987) decollement and crustal stacking wedge in the Himalayas and
Active transverse features in the central portion of Himalaya, other collision belts. Collision tectonics. Geophys. Soc. Spec.
Tectonophysics, v.136, pp.255-264. Publ., No.19, pp.37-50.
DE, REENA and KAYAL, J.R. (2003) Seismotectonicmodel of Sikkim NAKATA, T., OTSUKI, K. and KHAN, S.H. (1990) Active Faults, stress
Himalaya: constraint from microearthquake surveys, Bull. field and plate motion along Indo Eurasian plate boundary,
Seis. Soc. Am., v.93(3), pp.1395-1400. Tectonophysics, v.181, pp.83-95.
D E , R EENA , S AHA , D.K. and C HAKRABORTY , P. (1995) A NANDY, D.R. and DASGUPTA, S. (1991) Phy. Chem. Earth Series,
microearthquake survey in the Himalayan foredeep region, (K.K. Sharma Ed.), 18(I&II), Pergamon Press.
North Bengal area, Unpub. Geol. Surv. India Report. NARULA, P.L., ACHARYYA, S.K. and BANERJEE, J. (Eds.) (2000).
Seismotectonic Atlas of India and its environs. Geol. Surv. RAY, K.K. (1989) On the problem of lithostratigraphic classification
India Spec. Publ., No. 59. of the deformed Daling Group, its equivalents and related rocks
NARULA, P.L. and SHOME, S.K. (1992) Macroseismic study of recent of Himalayas. Geol. Surv. India Spec. Publ., no.22, pp.1-5.
earthquakes in Northwest Himalaya: A review, Curr. Sci. Spec. S EEBER , L. and A RMBRUSTER , J. (1981) Great detachment
Issue, v.62, No.1&2, pp.24-33. earthquakes along the Himalayan arc and long term forecast,
NATH, SHANKAR KUMAR, SENGUPTA, PROBAL, SARADINDU SENGUPTA Earthquake prediction: An international review, Maurice Ewing
and CHAKRABARTI, AMITABH (2000) Site response estimation series 4, Amer. Geophys. Union, Washington, D.C., pp.259-
using strong motion network: A step towards microzonation 277.
of the Sikkim Himalayas, Seismology 2000, Curr. Sci., v.79, SOM, S.K., JANA P., BHATTACHARYA, U., BARDHAN SANDEEP, BASHIR
no.9, pp.1316-1333. S.R. and GHOSH ROY, A.K. (2008) Macroseismic survey of
NI , J. and BARAZANGI , M.J. (1984) Seismotectonics of the Sikkim earthquake, 14th February 2006. Jour. Geol. Soc. India,
Himalayan Collision Zone, geometry of underthrusting Indian v.71(4), pp.541-550.
plate beneath the Himalaya. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.89 (B2), SRINIVASAN, S. and KHAR, B.M. (1996) Status of hydrocarbon
pp.1147-1163. exploration in Northwest Himalaya and foredeep –
RASTOGI, B.K. (1992) Seismotectonics from earthquake sequences Contributions to stratigraphy and structure. Geol. Surv. India
in India during 1980s, Curr. Sci., v.62, nos.1&2, pp.101-108. Spec. Publ., no.21, v.1, pp.295-405.
Announcement
Scientists interested in participating in the National Seminar may please contact: Prof. Mohammad Ismail
Bhat, Professor and Head, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Kashmir, Hazratbal,
Srinagar - 190 006, Jammu and Kashmir. Phone: 0194-2422543 (O); 09419093690 (M); Fax: 0194-2421357;
Email: bhatmi@hotmail.com.
During the Annual Convention, it is customary to hold a session for the presentation of interesting
results of recent and ongoing research, especially by younger researchers, who are requested to
contact: Shri R.H. Sawkar, Secretary, Geological Society of India, No.63, 12th Cross, Basappa Layout,
Gavipuram P.O., P.B.No. 1922, Bangalore - 560 019; Telefax: 080-26613352, Phone: 080-22422943;
Email: gsocind@gmail.com