Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Isaac Cheah, Dr Ian Phau, Curtin University of Technology, Curtin Business School
Abstract
This paper identifies the key antecedents and moderators with regard to willingness of
consumers in the purchase of environmentally friendly products. Three antecedents
namely, ecoliteracy, interpersonal influence and value orientation are proposed to have
strong correlations with the attitudes towards environmentally friendly products. Product
necessity is proposed to moderate the relationship between these attitudes and the
willingness to purchase environmentally friendly products. To bridge the gap that the
green marketing literature is not well supported with theoretical underpinnings, this paper
has also identified the most relevant theories to explain the antecedents and moderator as
proposed. These theories include the social cognitive theory, the theory of reasoned
action, Hofstede’s cultural dimensions theory and the self-image congruity theory. A
research model is developed together with an agenda of five hypotheses. The main
contributions of the proposed research are also delineated.
Introduction
Environmentalism has fast emerged as an important global phenomenon during the last
decade owing to increase in environmental related concerns and ecological pressures
derived from non-governmental organisations, local environmentalists and governmental
agencies (Jain and Kaur 2004; Global Civil Society, n.d.; Samhat et al. 2000;
Shellenberger and Nordhaus 2005). The trend had recently shifted to the consumers
whom have also become concerned with environmental problems and have started
demanding more environmentally friendly products. Within the green marketing
literature, the concept of environmentalism has been operationalised in terms of consumer
goods, industrial goods and even services. The underlying importance of this concept
relates to an economic perspective of how people use their limited resources to try to
satisfy their unlimited wants. To put this into perspective, Polonsky (1994) defined green
marketing as “all activities designed to generate and facilitate any exchanges intended to
satisfy human needs or wants, such that the satisfaction of these needs or wants occurs,
with minimal detrimental impact on the natural environment”.
The social cognitive theory defines human behavior as a triadic, dynamic, and
reciprocal interaction of personal factors, behavior, and the environment (Bandura
1977; 1986; 1989). According to this theoretical perspective, human functioning (an
individual’s behaviour) is uniquely determined by each of these three factors; a
The two most studied values in the research of environmentally friendly products and
ecological behaviour are collectivism and individualism (Triandis 1988, 1993; Hui and
Triandis 1986; McCarty and Shrum 1994, Markus and Kitayama 1990; Laroche et al.
2001; Jain and Kaur 2004). In general, individualism in cultures implies loose ties;
The theory of reasoned action popularized by Ajzen and Fishbein (1980) stated that “a
person's behavior is determined by his or her intention to perform the behavior and that
this intention is, in turn, a function of his or her attitude toward the behavior and his or
her subjective norm”. In this theory, a person’s attitude toward a specific behaviour
consists of (1) a belief that that particular behaviour leads to a certain outcome and (2) an
evaluation of the outcome of that behaviour. This introduces the self -efficacy
concept/beliefs which are capable of enhancing human accomplishment and well-being in
countless ways. The majority of the influence affects the choices in which people make
and the courses of action they pursue (Bandura 1977). For example, high self-efficacy
helps create feelings of serenity in approaching difficult tasks and activities. Conversely,
individuals with low self-efficacy may believe that things are tougher than they really are,
a belief that fosters anxiety, stress, depression, and a narrow vision of how best to solve a
problem (Bandura 1977). From the supporting literature, we can hypothesise that a
consumer who supports the “perceived importance” of being environmentally friendly
and not perceive it as “inconvenient” will likely buy environmentally friendly products
and vice versa. This proposition is summarised in the fourth hypothesis:
The self-image congruity advocates the relationship between one's self-image and
one's image of a product or service and is noted as a widely accepted consumer
behaviour theory. The theory also proposed the impact of a consumer's self-concept to
his or her purchasing behaviour in a self-image or product-image congruity model
(Sirgy 1982). According to the self-image or product-image congruity model, a
consumer's specific value-laden self-image belief interacts with a corresponding
value-laden product-image perception in terms of the typical user image in a product
purchase (Sirgy 1985). The result of such an interaction occurs in the form of the
following four congruity conditions: (1) a “positive self-image congruity” (2)
“positive self-image incongruity” (3) a “negative self-image incongruity” and (4)
“negative self-image congruity”. This has profound implication in explaining how
product necessity can dictate a consumer’s willingness to purchase an
environmentally friendly product.
H5 – The impact that favourable attitudes toward products have on people’s purchase
behaviour (willingness to buy environmentally friendly products) is expected to be
moderated by the perceived necessity of the ecological product. Specifically, the effect of
favorable attitudes on purchase behaviour should be relatively stronger for products
perceived as un-necessary. Figure 1 provides a research model developed for this study.
Ecoliteracy
H1
Attitudes toward H4 Willingness to BUY
Interpersonal H2 environmentally environmentally friendly
Influence friendly products products
H3
Value
orientation H5
The preceding discussion provides a sound theoretical framework and highlights the
implications between a consumer’s sociological/psychological profile (ecoliteracy,
interpersonal influence and value orientation) and their attitudes toward ecologically
friendly products. In addition, it provides an understanding of the problems and
dissonances associated with the reluctance in purchase intentions of environmentally
friendly products. The next step is to design a research methodology to test these
hypotheses. Scales and measures can be developed or adopted from existing literature to
ensure validity and reliability. The significance of this study highlights new insights into
the effects of the various proposed constructs on the consumer’s attitudes and purchase
behavior within the context of environmental marketing and related divisions.
Specifically the key implications:
(a) The research model presents a greater understanding of when, why and how
individuals’ attitudes and thoughts are correlated to the findings of the study and hence
add to more significance under different circumstances.
(b) Leading to strategies (i.e. sales promotion stratagem and product packaging) which
are more likely to result in better marketing of green products and a readiness to change
socially undesirable consumption behaviors toward environmentally friendliness.
(c) Contributions also exist for the green marketing literature. As this area of research has
focused much on empirical studies such as environmental awareness and behavioral
intentions, it has not been looked at from a theoretical perspective. This has the potential
to open a new area of research, in order to examine how theoretical concepts and
constructs can affect future literature in this field.
Amyx, DA, Dejong, PF, Lin, X, Chakraborty, G & Weiner, JL 1994, 'Influencers of
Purchase Intentions for Ecologically Safe Products",' American Marketing
Associations, vol. 5.
Bandura, A 1977, Social Learning Theory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey.
Bandura, A 1989, Social Cognitive Theory. IN: Annals of Child Development, Vasta
R, edn, Jai Press LTD.
Bearden, WO & Etzel, MJ 1982, 'Reference group influence on product and brand
purchase decisions', Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 9, pp. 183- 194.
Kinnear, T.C., J.R. Taylor and S.A. Ahmed. 1974, “Ecologically Concerned
consumers: Who are They?”, Journal of Marketing, vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 20-24.
Laroche, M, Bergeron, J & Forleo, GB 2001, 'Targeting consumers who are willing to
pay more for environmentally friendly products', Journal of Consumer
Marketing, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 503-520.
London, S, n.d. Global Civil Society. Retrieved: June 27, 2005, from
http://www.scottlondon.com/articles/civilsociety.pdf
Markus, H & Kitayama, S 1990, 'Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition,
Emotion, and Motivation', psychological review, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 224-253.
McCarty, JA & Shrum, LG 1994, 'The Recycling of Solid Wastes: Personal Values,
Value Orientations and Attitudes about Recycling as Antecedents of
Recycling Behaviour', Journal of Business Research, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 53-62.
Roberts, JA 1996, 'Green consumers in the 1990s: profile and implications for
advertising"', Journal of Business Research, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 217-231.
Samhat, NH, Bradley, H & Owen, JE 2000, 'Global Environmentalism and the
political community', Peace Review, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 601-666.
Triandis, HC 1989, 'The self and social behaviour in differing cultural contexts',
Psychological review, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 506-520.
Van Liere, K.D. and R.E. Dunlap. 1981, “Environmental Concern, Does it Make a
Difference How it is Measured”, Environment and Behavior, vol. 13, no. 6,
pp. 651 -676.
Wiser, R, K., P, J., F & A., H 1999, Green Power Marketing in Retail Competition":
An Early Assessment Report, prepared by Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory, Berkeley, California and National Renewable Energy Laboratory,
Golden, CO.
Zarnikau, J 2003, 'Consumer demand for 'green power' and energy efficiency', Energy
Policy, vol. 31, no. 16, pp. 61-72.