Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REPORT
TRAINING &
DEVELPOMENT
MR. VISHAL
GULERIA
AEMB0115B/09
YEAR:-- SEP. 2010
ARNI SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
MANAGEMENT
( ARNI UNIVERSITY )
PROJECT REPORT
ON
“TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT”
SUBMITTED TO ARNI UNIVERSITY IN THE PARTIAL
FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DEGREE IN
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Session (2009-2011)
ARNI SCHOOL OF BUSINESMANAGEMENT
ARNI UNIVERSITY KATHGARH (INDORA)
KANGRA
(HIMACHAL PRADESH)
Page4
2|Page
AUTHENTICATION CERTIFICATE
This is to certify the Project Report entitled “Training
& Development” is an authentic record of research
work done by Vishal Guleria M.B.A Student & submitted
for award of degree of Business Administration to the
ARNI SCHOOL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT is an original
work carrier of out under my guidance & no part thereof
has been presented for any other degree.
Page4
3|Page
DECLARATION
Myself Vishal Guleria (Roll No. AEMB0115B/09)
Student of MBA 2nd semester, “Arni School of
Business Management” hereby declare that this
project report being submitted to(ARNI
UNIVERSITY) KATHGARH (INDORA) KANGRA
(H.P.) is made in fulfillment for the award of the
Degree Master of Business Administration, is an
original piece of work done by me.
Date----------
Place---------
MR.VISHAL GULERIA
Page4
4|Page
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I present this project report on “Training &
Development” with a sense of great pleasure and
satisfaction. I undersign with pleasure take this
opportunity to thank all those related directly or
indirectly in preparation of this project report.
Mr.Vis
hal Guleria
5|Page
INDEX
S.NO. CHAPTER NAME
1. INTRODUCTION
2. COMPANY PROFILE
3. THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE
5. FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS
6. SUGGESTIONS
7. BIBLIOGRAPHY
6|Page
7|Page
TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT
8|Page
Development is a related process. It covers not only
activities, which improve job performance, and also
those, which bring about growth of the personality. In
organizational terms, it is intended to equip persons to
earn promotions and held greater responsibility.
Training a person for a bigger and higher job is
development.
IMPORTANCE OF TRAINING:---
TRAINING PROCESS:---
ORGANISATIONAL OBJECTIVES
AND STRATEGIES
ESTABLISHMENT OF TRAINING
GOALS
9|Page
DEVISING TRAINING
PROGRAMME
IMPLEMENTATION OF
TRAINING PROGRAMME
EVALUATION OF RESULTS
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
RESEARCH METHDOLOGY
To design this project report, a through literature
survey was conducted which included detailed study
of books and journals available on the subject. Based
on this survey, a questionnaire was prepared to
10 | P a g e
evaluate training and development programs. The
research also included few personal interviews with
the trainees as well as the trainers who gave an
insight into the various training programs conducted
to gain practical view of the programs.
11 | P a g e
12 | P a g e
COMPANY PROFILE
Founded in 1960 by Late. Sh. Suchet Singh Kochar, VI-
JOHN GROUP has emerged today known products of
PERSONAL CARE,SKIN CARE & COSMETICS,ourbest-
known product are Shaving cream, Toothpaste,
Aftershave Lotion, Hair Removing cream,ST.JHON
range of Perfumes and various other Cosmetic &
Herbal Product. The company has established strong
foothold in almost every developed country in ASIA,
EUROPE, and AFRICA & AUSTRALIA. Combining ancient
wisdom with modern technology, the company has
expanded business activity into related trade lines.
13 | P a g e
International limelight. Today the Group stands
majestically as a Grand conglomerate of 7 companies.
ETHICS:---
Code of ethics
“The VI-JOHN GROUP recognizes its responsibility to its
business partners, suppliers and the community at
large”
(OPERATING PRINCIPLES)
The VI-JOHN GROUP has a strong ethical ethos which is
evident in all facets of the operation and is
demonstrated in the following ways:
14 | P a g e
Manufacturing is monitored and controlled in line
with cosmetics good manufacturing practices and
the VI-JOHN GROUP cosmetics supplier code of
practices to ensure high quality product.
VI-JOHN GROUP has open and honest relationship
with all suppliers ensuring confidentiality of their
specialist technologies & formulations.
VI-JOHN GROUP is committed to conducting its
business in a manner that demonstrates respect
for the environment all supplier are expected to
act responsible with regard to a protection &
preservation of the environment, Implementation
of proper environmental controls and compliance
with national and local regulations .
15 | P a g e
M.H.C.D. DIVISION OF KISHANPURA
ORGANAZTIONAL STRUCTURE
G.M.
16 | P a g e
A/C
H.R. Manager Production Manager Store Manager Quality Executive
Dep’t.
Sr. Supervisor
Jr.Astt. Store. Manager
Sr.Quality Asst.
Personal Officer
Supervisor in Different dep’t.(Oil,
Shaving
Cream, Perfume,Talc,Toothpaste,Hair Jr. Quality Asst.
Colure,Sope
Line Supervisor
Jr. H.R.Asst.
19 | P a g e
ORGANIZATION CHART OF TRAINING &
DEVELOPMENT CENTRE
DGM (P & A)
20 | P a g e
Specific programs are also conducted at the
request departmental heads and as per
instructions from Corporate Office in the field of
Technical, functional and managerial areas.
21 | P a g e
programs are evolved during shop level
meetings / GM’s meeting with departmental
heads / management committee meeting at
corporate level.
TRAINING METHODOLOGY
This consists of conventional methods of lecture and
discussion and modern methods such as case studies,
exercises, syndicate work role – play etc. Sometimes
video / 16 mm film are shown on specific topic
relevant to the session to bring more effectiveness in
learning.
23 | P a g e
THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE
TRAINING POLICY:---
24 | P a g e
committing such huge resources, organizations need to assess the
training needs of their employees. Needs assessment occurs at two
levels – group and individual.
Performance appraisal
Work sampling
Interviews
Questionnaires
Attitude survey
Training progress
25 | P a g e
Rating seals
Observation of behavior
PROGRAMMES
27 | P a g e
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TRAINING
PROGRAMME
Once the training programmed has been designed it needs to be
implemented. Programme implementation involves action on the
following lines:
Deciding the location and organizing training and other
facilities
Scheduling the training programme
Conducting the programme
Monitoring the progress of trainees
Observations
Ratings
Trainee surveys
Trainee interviews
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
1. AGE PROFILE OF THE EMPLOYEES:
The respondents for this project work have been classified into various age
groups and are shown below in the given table.
30 | P a g e
No. Of employees
20-29
30-39
40-49
50 and above
31 | P a g e
2. DESIGNATION LEVEL OF EMPLOYEES
DESIGNATION
LEVEL OF
First Line
Suervisor
Middle
Management
Senior
Management
32 | P a g e
1)The program objectives were clear to me?
PERCENTAGE 13 53 13 16 5
RESPONSES
Strongly Agree
Agree
Not sure
Disagree
Strongly disagree
The analysis revealed that 66% of the respondents have agreed or strongly
agreed that objectives of training programmes were in line with their needs.
Interpretation:
33 | P a g e
2). The nomination procedure to the training programme was good.
RESPONSES
60
50
40
30 RESPONSES
20
10
0
Strongly Agree Not sure Disagree Strongly
Agree disagree
Since 62% of the respondents did not agree with the nomination procedure, the
training programme should be planned in such way that employees are
consulted before nominating them to any training programme.
Interpretation:
A detailed study was conducted to know whether the nomination to the
training programmes was made in consultation with the employees or not. The
Maximum No. Of Employees have not agreed that nomination procedure to
the training programme was good.
34 | P a g e
3).Is the methodology adopted was adequate?
PERCENTAGE 15 56 17 10 2
RESPONSES
60
50
40
30
RESPONSES
20
10
0
Strongly Agree Not sure Disagree Strongly
Agree disagree
Analysis of the data reveal that 71% of the sample scored very high in stating
that the methodology adopted was adequate.
35 | P a g e
4). Is the Course structure was well organized?
16 58 13 13 1
PERCENTAGE
RESPONSES
Strongly Agree
Agree
Not sure
Disagree
Strongly disagree
The analysis revealed that 74% of the participants have agreed or strongly
agreed that the structure of the programme was good.
Interpretation:
A detailed study was conducted to know the Course structure was well
organized.
The Maximum No. of Employees have agreed that the Course structure was
well organized.
36 | P a g e
5). The training was imparted considering the change in Job factor
and Individuals responsibility.
The study has attempted to evaluated the Training management
programme in terms of two important factors – job factor and
individual factor.
(a) JOB FACTOR
This includes study of combination of training in improvement of
analytical ability problem soling and decision – making skills and its
contribution to work place and outside work place. The responses
are given below:
RESPONSES Strongly Agree Agree Not sure Disagree Strongly disagree
PERCENTAGE 8 52 22 18 NIL
60
50
40
30 Series1
20
10
0
Strongly Agree Agree Not sure Disagree Strongly disagree
Analysis reveled that 60% of the respondents agree / strongly agree that the
training programme has contributed in improving the effectiveness of the job
in terms of factors refer to above.
Interpretation:
A detailed study was conducted to know The training was imparted
considering the change in Job factor.
(b) INDIVIDUAL FACTOR
37 | P a g e
The respondents were asked to respond on the effectiveness of the
training programme in terms of its contribution to improve their
skills as individuals. The responses are tabulated below:
RESPONSES Strongly Agree Agree Not sure Disagree Strongly disagree
PERCENTAGE 18 58 20 4 NIL
RESPONSES
70
60
50
40
RESPONSES
30
20
10
0
Strongly Agree Not sure Disagree Strongly
Agree disagree
Source:
Source: Questionnaire to the Employees.
Analysis: The above Table shows the following.
The study shows that 76% of the respondents were of the opinion that the
various training programmes conducted helped identifying their strong and
weak points
Interpretation:
The respondents were asked to respond on the effectiveness of the training
programme in terms of its contribution to improve their skills as individuals
6) I am fully satisfied with the culture and climate of the
organization
38 | P a g e
The respondents were asked to answer whether they were
satisfied with the culture and climate of organization and whether a
change has to be brought about in the working climate to implement
the skills acquired from the training programmes.
RESPONSES Strongly Agree Agree Not sure Disagree Strongly disagree
PERCENTAGE 11 23 26 28 4
RESPONSES
30
25
20
15 RESPONSES
10
0
Strongly Agree Not sure Disagree Strongly
Agree disagree
39 | P a g e
The effectiveness of the training gave emphasis to whether the
individuals made attempts to practically use the skills that were
imparted during the training programme at their work place.
The responses are as follows:
RESPONSES Strongly Agree Agree Not sure Disagree Strongly disagree
PERCENTAGE 8 36 14 36 6
RESPONSES
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Not sure
RESPONSES
Agree
Strongly Agree
0 10 20 30 40
40 | P a g e
PERCENTAGE 25 50 10 10 5
60
50
40
30 Series1
20
10
0
EE
EE
EE
EE
R
R
R
SU
R
AG
AG
AG
AG
IS
IS
LY
D
N
D
G
LY
N
O
G
R
N
ST
O
R
ST
Interpretation:
The maximum numbers of Employees are satisfied with the Training Courses
attended.
41 | P a g e
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
EE
EE
EE
EE
R
R
SU
R
R
AG
AG
AG
AG
IS
IS
LY
D
N
D
G
LY
N
O
G
R
N
ST
O
R
ST
Interpretation:
Most of the employees feel that the training objectives were in line to their
needs
42 | P a g e
45
40
35
30
25 Series1
20 Series2
15
10
5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6
Interpretation:
Most of the employees feel that the training was imparted considering the
change in Individuals responsibility were agreed.
43 | P a g e
PERCENTAGE 50 20 25 5 0
60
50
40
Series1
30
Series2
20
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6
Interpretation:
Most of the employees feel that the duration of the training Programme was
adequate.
PERCENTAGE 50 25 25 0 0
44 | P a g e
60
50
40
30 Series1
20
10
0
EE
EE
EE
EE
R
R
R
SU
R
AG
AG
AG
AG
IS
IS
LY
D
N
D
G
LY
N
O
G
R
N
ST
O
R
ST
Interpretation:
Most of the employees feel that the course structure is well organized
45 | P a g e
60
50
40
Series1
30
Series2
20
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6
Interpretation: Most of the employees feel that the quality of the course
PERCENTAGE 50 40 10 0 0
46 | P a g e
60
50
40
Series1
30
Series2
20
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6
Interpretation: Most of the employees feel that the faculty handled the Subject
effectively
PERCENTAGE 25 50 15 10 0
47 | P a g e
60
50
40
Series1
30
Series2
20
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6
Interpretation:
Most of the employees feel that the training aids used in the programme were
Sufficient
48 | P a g e
35
30
25
20
Series1
15
10
5
0
EE
EE
EE
EE
R
R
R
SU
R
AG
AG
AG
AG
IS
IS
LY
D
N
D
G
LY
N
O
G
R
N
ST
O
R
ST
49 | P a g e
45
40
35
30
25
Series1
20
15
10
5
0
EE
EE
EE
EE
R
R
R
SU
R
AG
AG
AG
AG
IS
IS
LY
D
N
D
G
LY
N
O
G
R
N
ST
O
R
ST
Interpretation:
Most of the employees feel that time to implement their Learning was
sufficient
50 | P a g e
35
30
25
20
Series1
15
10
0
STRONGLY AGREE NOT SURE DISAGREE STRONGLY
AGREE DISAGREE
55% of employees disagreed that feel that training was helpful to them outside
their workplace
Interpretation: Most of the employees feel that the training programmes were
not helpful to them outside their work place.
51 | P a g e
50
45
40
35
30
25 Series1
20
15
10
5
0
STRONGLY AGREE NOT SURE DISAGREE STRONGLY
AGREE DISAGREE
Interpretation:
Most of the employees feel that the training programme has improved their
decision-making skills.
20). The programme helped me An opportunity to become More
open minded
PERCENTAGE 5 25 50 10 10
52 | P a g e
60
50
40
30 Series1
20
10
0
STRONGLY AGREE NOT SURE DISAGREE STRONGLY
AGREE DISAGREE
Interpretation:
Most of the employees feel that the programme was not helping them to
improve human skills.
QUESTIONNAIRE
2.Designation / level
53 | P a g e
a) First line Supervisor
b) Middle Management
c) Sr. Management
1.STRONGLY AGREE
2. AGREE
3. NOT SURE
4. DISAGREE
5. STRONGLY DISAGREE
4) Is the Course structure was well organized?
1. STRONGLY AGREE
2. AGREE
3. NOT SURE
4. DISAGREE
5. STRONGLY DISAGREE
54 | P a g e
5) The training was imparted considering the change in Job
factor and Individuals responsibility.
1. STRONGLY AGREE
2. AGREE
3. NOT SURE
4. DISAGREE
5. STRONGLY DISAGREE
55 | P a g e
10) The training was imparted considering the change in
Individuals responsibility
1. STRONGLY AGREE
2. AGREE
3. NOT SURE
4. DISAGREE
5. STRONGLY DISAGREE
56 | P a g e
16).The involvement of the Participants was good.
1. STRONGLY AGREE
2. AGREE
3. NOT SURE
4. DISAGREE
5. STRONGLY DISAGREE
17). Time to implement my Learning was sufficient
1. STRONGLY AGREE
2. AGREE
3. NOT SURE
4. DISAGREE
18) Training was helpful to me outside my workplace
1. STRONGLY AGREE
2. AGREE
3. NOT SURE
4. DISAGREE
5. STRONGLY DISAGREE
19) The training program has Improved my decision Making skills
1. STRONGLY AGREE
2. AGREE
3. NOT SURE
4. DISAGREE
5. STRONGLY DISAGREE
20) The program helped me An opportunity to become More open
minded
1. STRONGLY AGREE
2. AGREE
3. NOT SURE
4. DISAGREE
5. STRONGLY DISAGREE
57 | P a g e
58 | P a g e
FINDINGS
59 | P a g e
Majorities (62%) of the respondents were not satisfied
with the nomination procedure.
A majority of 71% has responded that the methodology
adopted in the training programme
Structure (74%) of the programme has been satisfactory.
60% of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the
contents of the programme contributed to their on – the –
job effectiveness
76% of the respondents have opined that the programmes
contributed in identifying there strong and week points.
Only 44% of the respondents felt that the organization
climate was satisfactory.
CONCLUSIONS
60 | P a g e
SUGGESTIONS
61 | P a g e
enable the organization to cover the training programmes based
on their need and requirements.
The study has brought out that the organization climate is not
progressive as pointed by respondents for implementation of
the ideas generated in the training programmes. This is a major
issue and any decision on this calls for a deeper organizational
study.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
63 | P a g e