John Rex describes colonial immigrants in Great Britain as the "underclass" for two reasons: 1) They have an inferior position within the working class and are politically separated from organized labor movements. 2) Their colonial heritage leads the white working class to view black workers as outsiders and competitors. This underclass status is due to disadvantages in housing, work, and education, as well as the unwillingness of the white working class to include blacks and Asians in labor movements or improve their conditions, benefiting the white working class through "exploitation by proxy."
Original Description:
Original Title
Why Does John Rex Describe the Colonial Immigrants in Great Britain as The
John Rex describes colonial immigrants in Great Britain as the "underclass" for two reasons: 1) They have an inferior position within the working class and are politically separated from organized labor movements. 2) Their colonial heritage leads the white working class to view black workers as outsiders and competitors. This underclass status is due to disadvantages in housing, work, and education, as well as the unwillingness of the white working class to include blacks and Asians in labor movements or improve their conditions, benefiting the white working class through "exploitation by proxy."
John Rex describes colonial immigrants in Great Britain as the "underclass" for two reasons: 1) They have an inferior position within the working class and are politically separated from organized labor movements. 2) Their colonial heritage leads the white working class to view black workers as outsiders and competitors. This underclass status is due to disadvantages in housing, work, and education, as well as the unwillingness of the white working class to include blacks and Asians in labor movements or improve their conditions, benefiting the white working class through "exploitation by proxy."
Why does John Rex describe the colonial immigrants in Great Britain as the “under-class”?
What has contributed to this situation?
- (First is to define what is underclass)
- In the US, the term „underclass‟ refers to the individuals who fail to become economically self-supporting, as determined by Gunnar Myrdal - This means that those individuals who depend on the state and others are part of the underclass - However in relation to Great Britain, John Rex decided to change the concept and states that in Britain the concept has a different meaning than in the US - In case of Britain, the difference is in terms of who shares and who does not share in the „welfare state deal‟ - Rex stated that a certain individual‟s position and rights in the welfare state would determine their access to employment, social insurance, health, housing, education and personal social services - Therefore from the “welfare state deal”, certain social rights defines the position of the working class - To determine whether a certain minority group is part of the working class will depend whether the minority group shares the same full rights as the working class - Furthermore, Rex states that there is a difference under the US and British welfare state model whether an individual is accepted into a capitalist society or not - Under the US model, an individual is accepted in the society if he is capable of standing on his own feet and can take care of himself, as a property-owning individual - Whereas in the British Welfare state model, it will depend upon the acceptance into a working class which itself processes substantial social rights
- Rex characterises the colonial immigrants as “under-class” in nature
- This “under-class” nature of theirs is due to their inferior position within the working class as well as the colonial immigrants being politically separated from the organized labour movement - Furthermore, the colonial heritage is responsible for the White working class to mark the Black workers as outcast - From this, the white workers also consider the black workers as being outsiders and are also competitors to the white workers - Rex also suggests that there is a political division between the „natives‟ and the „outsiders‟ within the working class - He also states that the ideologies and structures of the immigrant underclass are not only based on the false or true consciousness of their position in the metropolitan society - But also reflects their role in the structure of the world economic system - On the other hand, Rex & Moore state that in a market situation where there are unequal access to property, men in the same labour situation may have unequal access to housing - The underclass are defined as not only having a disadvantage in housing but also having disadvantages in work and education - They are the migrants in the inner city - They are created by the creation of similar groups who are also disadvantaged in specific zones of the city - In the UK, these are the Blacks and Asians together - They are a part of the working class, who are not owners of the means of production, but remaining as a different fragment - In other words, their position is beneath the white working class - This position is due to their alleged race - Therefore they are stratified by both class and what others think their respective races are - Cashmere and Troyna also describes the underclass as a two-fold stratification - The unwillingness of the majority of the working class to include the Blacks and the Asians in the organized labour movement has led to this stratification - This is made worse by their refusal to campaign enthusiastically for the improvement of the general condition of these Black and Asian workers and non- workers - This policy of near exclusion where the Blacks and Asians are kept down as underclass benefits the working-class and is referred to as “exploitation by proxy” by Frank Parking - Furthermore, these conflicts are initiated by the powerful bosses for which they would receive the grand benefit - These facts have contributed to the migrants being categorised as the underclass