Professional Documents
Culture Documents
the
“The body knows who you are,
even if you don’t.”
An Interview with
Dr.
hapiro
Dr. Allan Shapiro is a fictional cognitive psychologist. The following
“interview” is a character study. Writers will often draft biographies
of their key characters as a means of understanding who they are and
why they are. For Dr. Shapiro, who is a principle character in my
novel CLONE, I have tried to accomplish this by conducting an
interview with him. Although the points illustrated in this interview
are based on actual research, the conclusions are for creative and
entertainment purposes only.
INTRODUCTION
SentientCell
the
SniffCode.com: Before we start this interview, maybe you can summarize
for the readers – in a few words if that is possible – the basis of your theory.
ALLAN: Hmmm... that’s always a tall order. But I guess it would be that
evolution is actually an entelechy. What that means is that the body is
directing itself towards a final goal. A destination. To do that the body itself
must have some form of memory and intelligence.
ALLAN: I’m suggesting that these properties pervade the entire body.
I’m not just talking about human beings. This would be true for all living
things, even single cellular entities like bacteria, which uses phase variation
-- a microbial stealth strategy -- where it hides proteins and sugars from the
body’s immune system. It waits patiently until it builds a large enough army
to cause infection.
ALLAN: Yes. You need some kind of mnemonic capacity to carry out such
a sophisticated infection strategy. Flatworms are another example. Thinking
requires a brain – or, at least, that’s what we think. Flatworms, however, are
without either a brain or a nervous system. They are, essentially, just bodies.
So it is very surprising then that Flatworms have the wherewithal to selectively
alter its diet according to its immediate survival needs. Changing one’s
mind about what’s on the menu may not seem all that impressive, but when
the Flatworm changes its diet it is quite astonishing. When a Flatform chooses
to switch its food source to the Hydra, it does this to appropriate the Hydra’s
defense system. After it has ingested the Hydra, it steals the Hydra’s sting cells
and turns them into weapons to ward of enemies. When the Flatworm has
stocked up on enough “hydra rockets” to protect itself, it reverts back to its
normal diet.
ALLAN: Yes! See I think our key problem in accepting this is that humans
have a very limited definition of life, intelligence and memory. We tend to use
ourselves as the rigid standard for what is possible. The other problem is that
we tend to think only in terms of hierarchy, putting ourselves at the top.
This tendency to create hierarchies is everywhere: in government, in business
and our models for biology and evolution.
ALLAN: The entire body, from the tiniest cell to the big brain in our skulls,
is a thinking body. Even at a microscopic level we find memory and decisions.
Those two characteristics alone result in behavior that is very close to what we
tend to define as intelligence.
ALLAN: They don’t “think” that the limb is still there, per se. They know
the limb is not there, but they feel the limb as if it were there. In other
words, despite logically knowing that an arm has been amputated, they
still have tactile sensations or stimuli of a limb that has long since been
absent. The explanation for phantom limb is a relatively simple one:
memory. Once the mind remembers sensory information from the body,
it can self-generate that sensory information without a body. Cells are
memory storage houses and the brain in particular turns cellular memory
into nucleo-codes that messages to other cells what it remembers about
the “Sensorial World” around it.
ALLAN: ...to eventually break free of the material-based logic of the body.
ALLAN: No. My crazy idea is that maybe the genome, as a form of intelligence,
is trying to figure out how to continue being a living, intelligent being without the burden of hav-
ing aSniffCode.com: Is this
body. The real obstacle philosophy
of survival or itself.
is the body science?
ALLAN:
(silence) All science begins with philosophy. But you can’t use that word
“philosophy” with any dignity in the world of science because of what
ALLAN: I told you that you would think I was crazy. But do you at least know why?
philosophers have done to it. Philosophy became idyll once it became
more preoccupied
SniffCode.com: (Laughing)with
I thinklogical
I do. Mygames
trouble and conundrums.
is...not my trouble... It used to run
my challenge...
in place with such games, now it is barely walking in place. So scientists
avoid
ALLAN: -- isthat
your label.
body. They don’t “philosophize”. They “theorize”. But I’m okay
with
That’sthe
yourlabel of philosophy.
“challenge”. (Laughs)
The Chinese philosopher
SniffCode.com: (Laughing) You’reChaung
saying
the genome is a thinking thing, and that
Tzu, who lived from 399-295BC,
it wants to abandon its body. Doesn’t it
spoke about
need a body non-identification
to exist? Don’t we need a
with
body tothe body when he wrote: “If
exist?
one recognizes his identity with unity,
ALLAN: At the moment, yes we do. But
then
maybethe parts
that won’tofalways
his body mean
be the no
case.
moreoftothehim
One mostthan so much
tantalizing dirt.” of
qualities
the human condition is the duality of The
Human Being and the Human Body. It’s
SniffCode.com: Yeah, that sounds
the difference between the Self and The
like philosophy
Somatic. One of the(laughs).
simplest yet fasci-
nating experiments that demonstrates
just how disconnected
ALLAN: theinteresting
I find it very Min
the similarities of the Greek words
for “Body” and “Tomb”, which are,
“Soma” and “Sema”, respectively.
In fact, it is from the Greek word
“Soma” that we arrive at the word “Somatic” which refers to the Body.
The close relationship to the word “Sema”, would suggest that the Body is little
more than a tomb. The Greeks would have appreciated Chaung Tzu’s observation.
ALLAN: Does it matter? Or maybe I should ask this: if the mind does
figure out how to disembody itself, will it matter
what we call it?
“We discount
anything that
is imaginary.”
ALLAN: I see what you mean. Giving a definition of “soul” is as elusive as
giving a definition to intelligence and consciousness.
ALLAN: For the most part, yes. People who believe in such a thing don’t need
a definition because, as far as they’re concerned, believing is good enough.
People who don’t believe in such a thing obviously don’t need a definition either.
ALLAN: Well, the world certainly doesn’t need anymore philosophical pablum
about “what is real?” and “matter is mostly empty space” etcetera, etcetera.
Having said that, I do think we need to divorce the concept of “real and reality”
from the concept of “existence”. For instance, getting back to the imaginary
number in mathematics: it is not considered a “real” number – it’s considered an
imaginary number. It’s not “real”, but it exists. Imaginary entities aren’t real, nor
are real entities imaginary. But both exist.
Human reasoning favors reality, but the human mind is ambivalent. It will take
it either way, real or imaginary – or a hodgepodge of the two. Psychologists still
wonder if consciousness and observed reality are one (monism) or two (dualism).
The same question has been asked about brain and mind: are they one thing or
two things. I say, they are one, evolving into two.
SniffCode.com: I’m glad you said that because it brings us back to the question
of how a thinking body could – or if it even would – go about discarding itself.
ALLAN: Well, right now brain is mind and mind is brain. They are one.
If I’m right and this brain-mind is in the process of becoming brain and mind,
then one of the two eventually becomes unnecessary. I think memory will play
an important role in this, and I sometimes wonder if dreaming is the body’s way of
practicing this disembodiment. When we dream the sensorial body shuts down and
even the frontal areas of the brain that govern “reality” are shut down. So really all
that’s left is this imaginary playground of memories about reality. As many of
us have experienced in dreams, we have light, sound and tactile experiences –
an entire world of physics even in the absence of physical stimuli. We have a
Newtonian psychology that is pretty much useless in the world of dreaming.
SniffCode.com: We need our “Newtonian Psychology” to describe and
understand the Three Dimensional world. What other kind of psychology
can there be for understanding the world you’re talking about?
ALLAN: It’s a median point between the incorporeal mind and the corporeal body.
There is the exteroceptive space of the body and then there is the “space” that
exists in the Mind: the internal proprioception -- the cognitive sense of space
that comes from thinking about a circle, or a square.
ALLAN: A world where, as Muslim mystics say, images are, not real, but actual.
From Autism to Synaesthesia and onward, we are finding that the Entelechial Mind
is finding its own way past the boundaries of reality; blurring
lines that were once hard and defined. Even reality is not so
sure of itself when it looks deep into its own quantum world
and discovers the uncertainty behind its own dogmatic
mass. Imagination is still an enigma of human
consciousness; a final frontier of the explorer.
No matter what our means of investigating and
interrogating reality, the mind does not inhibit
our investigation.
The End
S NI F Fc o d e. c o m