Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Microstructural changes and propagation of subsurface cracks during rolling contact have been studied to clarify rolling contact fatigue of
0.44%C-1.7 1%Mn induction-hardened bearing steels, using the specimens with different induction-hardened layer. The specimens were pre-
treated to form lower bainite and induction-hardened to form fine martensite in shallow induction-hardened layer or coarse martensite in deep
hardened layer. Rolling contact fatigue tests were conducted under maximum a Hertzian contact stress of 508 kgf mm-’ with circulating
lubricant through a filtered-pump feed system. Heavy plastic deformation of fine martensite in shallow induction-hardened layer and
propagation of subsurface crack across grain boundaries were observed with superior resistance to fatigue. On the other hand, intergranular
crack along grain boundaries in coarse martensite of deep hardened layer were observed with poor resistance to fatigue. Deformed martensite
and dense tangles of dislocations in ferrite were observed by transmission electron microscopy for a shallow induction-hardened layer which
was heavily deformed during rolling contact fatigue.
tt
change accompanying hardening, easier control of case depth
and lower cost than carburizing. Mn element is known to
increase hardenability, needful to induction hardening, and
inexpensive in comparison with Cr. However, few studies on
the rolling contact fatigue of induction-hardened
steels have been performed.
In this point of view, induction hardening to form hard
bearing
-_\ -
1-m
Pi
SL-
11
Shatt
imen holder
t
Load
900 I I I I I I I I
800
700
600
4v
rc.
.
i
z 500
.__.
_.___-
c _._ .-.___ ._..__
.._._.-_____ _..___. .._....
f 400
=!
I
300
200
100
i
0 J I I I I I I I I
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
DEPTH FROM SURFACE (urn)
Fig. 4. Microhardness variation as a function of depth from surface in the induction-hardened specimen with effective depth of 1.50 mm
::$ , , , , , , , 1
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
DEPTH FROM SURFACE (urn)
Fig, 5. Microhardness variation as a function of depth from surface in the induction-hardened specimen with effective depth of 6.70 mm.
Fig. 6. CLIVImicrographs showing martensite formed in the induction-hardened layer of specimens with different effective depth: (a) 150 mm; (b) 6.7 mm.
Fig. 7. SEM micrograph showing propagation of subsurface cracks across grain boundaries. Flaking was observed after rolling contact of I .7 X 10” revolutions
in the specimen with effective depth of 1SO mm.
Depending on the heating conditions, shallow hardened tance to rolling contact fatigue of coarse martensite formed
layer or deep hardened layer was obtained. The microstruc- in deep hardened layer.
ture of shallow hardened layer was fine martensite as shown It seemed that microstructural changes during rolling con-
in Fig. 6(a), while coarse martensite was formed in deep tact fatigue, fine martensite to deformed martensite and dense
hardened layer (Fig. 6(b) ) The difference in microstructure tangles of dislocation in ferrite, as shown in Fig. 9 and
for the induction-hardened layer is due to different heating Fig. 10, were due to plastic deformation of fine martensite
conditions, resulting from different speed of movement of with higher toughness than coarse martensite.
coils and distance between coils and specimens. Since most of the plastic deformation for shallow hardened
Rolling contact fatigue tests were conducted with circulat- specimen was concentrated on the hardened layer, the differ-
ing lubricant through filtered-pump feed system, that is, under ence in resistance to rolling contact fatigue between the two
elastohydrodynamic lubricating conditions. Thus, the for- kinds of specimens can be said to be due to the difference in
mation of flaking was due to fatigue of induction hardened microstructure rather than the difference in depth of hardened
specimens. layer. The difference in the mode of crack propagation also
Heavy plastic deformation of fine martensite in the shallow supports this explanation.
induction-hardened layer [ 71 and propagation of subsurface
cracks across grain boundaries were observed as shown in
Fig. 10 and Fig. 7, respectively. This resulted in superior 5. Conclusions
resistance to rolling contact fatigue of shallow hardened layer.
On the other hand, intergranular cracks along grain bound- 0.44%C-1.7 1%Mn induction-hardened bearing steels
aries as shown in Fig. 8 leading to flaking was caused by with effective depth of induction-hardened layer, 1.50 mm
stress concentration at grain boundaries and it was also and 6.70 mm, were prepared and rolling contact fatigue test
observed in the surface hardened layer of high-carbon chro- was carried out at a shaft speed of 1.700 rev min- ’ under
mium bearing steel in the previous work [8]. This stress maximum Hertzian contact stress of 508 kgf mm-*, circu-
concentration at grain boundaries was due to increasing dis- lating lubricant through filtered-pump feed system. Fine mar-
locations pile-up against grain boundaries as a result of long tensite in shallow induction-hardened layer and coarse
slip distance in coarse martensite. This resulted in poor resis- martensite in deep induction-hardened layer were formed
B.-Y. Choi et al. / Wear 192 (1996) l-5
Fig. 10. TEM micrograph showing deformed mattensite and dense tangles
of dislocations in ferrite, in the induction-hardened layer of specimen with
effective depth of 1SO mm after rolling contact of 1.7 X lo6 revolutions.
References