146 views

Original Title: p1 Solution Scribd Upload

Uploaded by mb_0483

- Tutorial MICRO II 2 and 3
- Developmental Social Work
- Econ 469 Risk Fall 2014
- Quasilinear Utility
- Blomquist 2004
- Indifference Curve
- Jehle and Reny Solutions
- Solution Exercises 2011 PartI
- lecture4.pdf
- weebly 3 3 1
- Managerial Economics
- 422bfisher.pdf
- ACST152 2015 Week 9 Utility TheoryACST152 2015 Week 9 Leverage
- Princ 001
- Utility-11_bb
- A Practical Guide to Conjoint Analysis M-0675
- mydata(RLAB 2).xlsx
- EC3128MPS2_11
- F4 Add Maths Annual Scheme of Work_2013
- (Theory and Decision Library 10) Fumiko SEO, Masatoshi Sakawa (Auth.)-Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in Regional Planning_ Concepts, Methods and Applications

You are on page 1of 5

Problem Set 1

1 Excercise 1

Question:

For each of the following subsets of the <2 sketch the set, state whether it is open,

closed or neither, and justify your answer based on the corresponding definitions.

Answer:

Definition of a closed set: A set X is closed if for every sequence {(x1 , . . . , xi }i∈N

with xi ∈ N , converging against some limit x∗ then x∗ ∈ X.Consequently a set is

open if a converging sequence of points has its limits outside this set.

1

a) {(x, y) : −1 < x < +1, y = 0},

closed set

closed set because it is a set of integers.

c) {(x, y) : x + y = 1},

closed set

2

d) {(x, y) : x + y < 1}

open set

e) {(x, y) : x = 0 ∪ y = 0}.

closed set because set includes only the axis

2 Excercise 2

Question:

Prove that if is a preference relation, then the relation is transitive and the

relation v is transitive. Also show that if x1 v x2 x3 , then x1 x3 .

Answer:

then x1 x3

3

Accordingly, if x1 x2 and x2 x3 then transitivity holds if x1 x3 . Verbally,

if x is strictly prefered to x2 and x2 is strictly prefered to x3 then transitivity holds

1

transitive if x1 v x3 . Or in words if x1 is indifferent to x2 and x2 is indifferent to x3

then transitivity holds if x1 is indifferent to x3 .

3 Excercise 3

Question:

Sketch a map of indifference sets that are all parallel, negatively sloped straight

lines, with preference increasing northeasterly. We know that preferences such as

these satisfy Axioms 1, 2, 3 and 4 (strict monotonicity). Prove that they also satisfy

Axiom 50 (convexity). Prove that they do not satisfy Axiom 5 (strict convexity).

Answer:

The way we have drawn the lines i.e. parallel, negatiely sloped and straigth we

see that they are allways complete, transitive and continious (i.e. there are no prefe-

rence reversals). Since we drew slim lines we can assume local non-satiation because

there are no zones of indifference or more precicely, in the vicinity of any point there

will allways a point that the individual prefers.

The displayed indifference sets are also strictly monotonic because there every

indifference line (moving outwards i.e. with increasing quantities of one good or

4

another) is strictly better then the one before since it contains strictly more goods.

The displayed lines are convex but not strictly convex since a linear combination

of the two goods would not increase the individuals utility but the individual is

indifferent as to the extreme points of only one good or the other or the combination

of the two. Therefore we cannot say that these indifference sets rule out extreme

prefrences as does the strict convexity axiom.

4 Excercise 4

Question:

Sketch a map of indifference sets that are all parallel right angels that kink on

the line x1 = x2 . If preference increases northeasterly, these preferences will satisfy

Axioms 1, 2, 3 and 40 (local non-satiation). Prove that they also satisfy Axiom 50 .

Do they satisfy Axiom 4? Do they satisfy Axiom 5?

Answer:

This set of indifference curves is not strictly monotonic because we can increase

the amount of one good and remain at the same level with the other good. Thererfore

it does not satisfy axiom 4. But they are strictly convex since every combination of

the two goods is possible and would increase the individuals utility. Strict convexity

does imply weak convexity, therefore the indifference set does satisfy axiom 50 and

axiom 5.

- Tutorial MICRO II 2 and 3Uploaded bySaran Raj
- Developmental Social WorkUploaded bystephene
- Econ 469 Risk Fall 2014Uploaded bycookie23456
- Quasilinear UtilityUploaded bysaswat1953419
- Blomquist 2004Uploaded byIzzatul Yazidah
- Indifference CurveUploaded byfaheemhashmi644
- Jehle and Reny SolutionsUploaded byKevin Andrew
- Solution Exercises 2011 PartIUploaded bycecch001
- lecture4.pdfUploaded byRaffael Russo
- weebly 3 3 1Uploaded byapi-355599571
- Managerial EconomicsUploaded byanon-771135
- 422bfisher.pdfUploaded byAmit Santra
- ACST152 2015 Week 9 Utility TheoryACST152 2015 Week 9 LeverageUploaded bynigerianhacks
- Princ 001Uploaded byAnandKuttiyan
- Utility-11_bbUploaded byIra Borovik
- A Practical Guide to Conjoint Analysis M-0675Uploaded bySriram Chepuri
- mydata(RLAB 2).xlsxUploaded byMuhemmedz Sujak Kuddah
- EC3128MPS2_11Uploaded byindy_singh
- F4 Add Maths Annual Scheme of Work_2013Uploaded byRah Imah
- (Theory and Decision Library 10) Fumiko SEO, Masatoshi Sakawa (Auth.)-Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in Regional Planning_ Concepts, Methods and ApplicationsUploaded byGuilherme Proni
- Utility and Game TheoryUploaded bygzel07
- Arrow and Health EconomicsUploaded byjamazalale
- 4bohanCUploaded byrameshaarya99
- 0212009Uploaded byrightforyouok6140
- lecture3Uploaded byRagunatha Rao A
- Urs Luterbacher.pdfUploaded byPeng Wang
- Topic 2 Expected Utility TheoryUploaded byJeremiahOmwoyo
- Choice Under Uncertainty and AmbiguityUploaded byMiguel Antonio Barretto García
- DualityUploaded byHitokiri Battōsai
- Behavioral Economics - Script SummaryUploaded byBirte Gröger

- Bainbridge Island SMP Public Participation PlanUploaded byBSH Admin
- Environmental Impact Assessment of Landless Livestock Production SystemUploaded byWellfro
- Malformatiile Intestin Subtire EnglezaUploaded byDiana Diaconescu
- obligation of a ship agentUploaded bySuzette Abejuela
- Amardham KaruleUploaded bybapusonwane
- JonasUploaded byMelvin Cabonegro
- Low Power Portable Solar Based ECG SystemUploaded byInternational Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
- D5200 ManualUploaded byManas George
- Ece 422 IntroUploaded byabdessalem_t
- sample-resumes.pdfUploaded byVenkatesh Hemadribhotla
- Hardness Test MethodUploaded byDhirham rentaim
- 02-ThesisStatementUploaded byMohamed Elsaid El Shall
- Daily Weather Reports 1917 08Uploaded byDruid_ian
- Finance Mid SemUploaded bypeter kong
- satellite remote sensingUploaded byRanjana Priya
- Capital Budgeting NotesUploaded bywgl.joshi
- Hydrogen atom in quantum chemistryUploaded byzulhusni
- AF Klercker-Lookbook SS16.pdfUploaded byjoeymassa
- Circulation TheoryUploaded bytvkbhanuprakash
- UntitledUploaded byRahul Kapale
- Malaysian Economy SystemUploaded byKassthurei Yogarajan
- Production & Operation ManagementUploaded bypura_malli
- Test AssignmentUploaded byAmardeep Singh
- 115hradmUploaded bybarbarossa65
- C. Elegans Genetic PortaitUploaded bybelovedaffection
- Oracle ERP - BasicsUploaded byanitlin_jinish
- information literacy project explanation and assessment guideUploaded byapi-269454684
- Exp6Uploaded byDesmond Lew
- Project ProposalUploaded byEmily Pieris
- Crederity Brochure - The art of hiring the right peopleUploaded byCrederity