Professional Documents
Culture Documents
It all began back in 351 BC with an Athenian orator and public official by the name of
Demosthenes. Despite the fact that he was born with a speech impediment,
Demosthenes decided that he wanted to become the best public speaker of his time,
so he packed up some supplies and sojourned to the Athenian woods. After pitching
camp, he took to his task. He put several small Grecian pebbles in his mouth and
began to recite some of his old speeches and verses while out jogging.
At first he sounded much like you would expect him to have sounded—a fellow with
rocks in his mouth. However, after a few weeks of practice he began to sound
"normal."
As you may have guessed by now, he spit out the Grecian pebbles and was all the
better for the experience; the theory being that if he could speak normally with pebbles
in his mouth, he would be that much better without them. Unfortunately, you cannot
follow in Demosthenes' footsteps. First off, you will not be able to find any Grecian
pebbles or Athenian woods unless you happen to live on that side of the ocean. In
addition, you would lose many of your friends if you walked around with rocks in your
jaw. So, what can you do?
Don't worry, public speaking will come to you. Since Oratory was one of the three
major studies of the Middle Age's Seven Arts along with logic and philosophy, you can
still achieve classical skills in this modern age. Public speaking cannot be taught in a
normal lecturing kind of way; it is not something that you are born with; you can't even
discover it in the normal sense by downloading it from the Internet—it must be
experienced! You can only learn by doing. Don't be afraid to grow! Also, do not worry
about the size of your audience (often referred to as the group or the listeners).
Delivery Styles
Before you begin, you should know about the various tactical speaking delivery styles.
Whether you are delivering a classroom speech, or talking before your professional
peers, you can decide which style is best for each speech when the time comes.
The three fundamental ways you can deliver a public speech are having your
materials and notes in hand, memorizing your speech verbatim, or speaking
extemporaneously, or "off the cuff." Certain situations call for different styles. For
example, a formal speech that you have known about for some time would warrant
either a memorized or a prompted speech; speaking off the cuff could seem
disrespectful.
1. Materials in hand. Here you have your speech in front of you, either in a major
outline form or word-for-word. The advantage here is that it is hard to lose any
material. The major disadvantage is that you cannot establish much eye contact with
the group.
2. Memorized. If you have the time to sit down and memorize a speech, you will be
greatly rewarded in terms of group interaction. Further on in this text are memory
enhancement tips and suggestions for interacting with an audience.
3. Extemporaneous Speaking. Extemporized speeches are pretty much "off the cuff."
These are the most difficult speeches to deliver since you have to think on your feet,
and unless you are very confident about your ability to synthesize information, process
the data, and say it all in a normal conversational tone you may want to avoid this style
as much as possible early on. Of course, there are times when you simply must speak
at a moment's notice.
The group must be careful to avoid hidden agendas in its critiques. A hidden agenda
is a message or a purpose beneath the message being communicated to the
speaker. An obtuse example of this might be if someone in the group is madly in love
with the speaker, his or her critique might be overly kind, even if a more terse critique
was due.
To help you get a better feel for some of the behaviors that really damage a speaker's
pride and eventual development, these five simple actions can delay a person's
growth. When you are speaking you tend to be very aware of how people are sitting
and what kinds of facial expressions they are wearing. It is important to realize that
even when a group seems to be paying attention, if their reflective comments are not
honest it is potentially damaging. To avoid these problems, whatever you do as a
member of a group when offering a critique do not:
-Offer clichés as real advice.
-Drift off during the speech and then pretend to have all of the right comments.
-Try to show-off by listing trivial concerns or to nit-pick.
-Make comments directed at speaker's personality.
-Moreover, maybe the worst of all - let someone "get away" with a flawed speech.
This proves that you do not care about the speaker's growth enough to take the
personal risk of being honest. It is very difficult to develop trust within a group if
everyone sweet-talks to one another instead of employing genuine communications.
Several famous speakers have commented on what the most important thing to
remember for effective public speaking is: "Tell 'em what you're going to tell, 'em; tell
'em; and then tell 'em what you told 'em."
As simple as this may sound, this is the format for the typical deductive public speech:
the introduction (tell 'em what you are going to tell 'em); the body (tell 'em); and the
conclusion (tell 'em what you told 'em). It is important to explore the nature of these
three speech elements. The following goes into detail about the functionality of each
of the main components of the speech.
The Introduction has three major roles: to catch the listener's interest, to move the topic
from general to specific, and to deliver the Speech Focusing Statement. Whatever
you do, do not start your speech by merely stating your topic!
To catch the listener's interest you may want to try a few techniques. You could ask a
rhetorical question (Is humankind really heading towards disaster). On the other
hand, you could start with a short story that will pull the listener in, such as a small
narrative about a soldier in battle. It really does not matter what technique you use to
attract the listener as long as you follow two basic rules:
1) The story or question you choose is related to your topic
2) You finish the story or answer your question in your conclusion
Once you have everyone's attention, you next move your introduction towards your
exact topic. Most speakers give a general background of the topic. For example, if
your topic is on World War II, you might want to discuss wars in general with such
elements as arms and planes and strategy. Then once you have set the stage, you
can begin to tighten the aspects about World War II, which will be included in the body
of the speech. For example, if your topic is still World War II, you might find it a bit
difficult to cover every facet of the war. What you have to do is to zoom in on three or
four of the basic areas of World War II, such as the air war, naval battles, and the major
weapons used.
Think of the process like a funnel sitting on a bottle. You start with a wide discussion
at the top, and then constrict your discussion sliding down to the specifics of your
topic. By the time you hit the neck of the funnel, the audience knows exactly where
you are heading and what the elements of your topic will be.
Finally, once you are sliding down the neck of the funnel and have announced the
specifics of your speech, you deliver your Speech Focusing Statement. The Speech
Focusing Statement is your "tell 'em what you're going to tell 'em."
After you have your introduction, you have to move along to the "meat" of your speech
- the body. The body tells all of the facts and explains all the details of your Speech
Focusing Statement. Tips on how to construct the body are covered in the Strategy
section. You should be very careful to follow the pattern as outlined in your
introduction. If you tell your listeners that you are going to discuss issues A, B and C
in your introduction, then you must discuss A, B, C, not B, C, A or C, B, A, etc.
While the order of your topics is an important issue, the logical design and construction
you employ is equally as important. In other words, what reasoning did you use for
ordering your speech? Are you showing how something developed over time? Are
you explaining why something happened the way it did? Are you detailing how to do
something?
Methods of Presentation
Once you have decided on the logical development of your topic, you can consider
some of the various methods to present the order of your ideas:
-Chronological order - the time order in which events took place.
-Cause to effect - show how your topic was the result of essential events.
-Climax order - work from the least important information to the most important.
-Anti-climax order - work from the most to least important information.
-Spatial order - describe the physical setup of your topic.
Finally, you move to your conclusion. To begin, never say, "in conclusion," or "at last,"
in your speech. This gives the listener permission to tune you out. It is a much better
idea to simply restate your introduction and tell the audience why it was important that
they listened, and what you want them to do or to get out of the presentation.