It is a solar group and not a solar system

By Professor Joe Nahhas 1979

Greetings: my name is Joe Nahhas and I am the greatest physicist of all time since July 4th 1973
I am unknown to the world of physics but I have 1001 new physics formulas to change physics and history

There is no solar system. I can say that there is no solar system because I can prove that there is no solar system.
There is a group of objects humans call one star few planets and few moons that can be called a solar group.
Each object of the solar group has its own independent orbit and all are in the same neighborhood looking like a
solar “system”. Gravity is a spin effect because I can prove gravity is a spin effect.

If we took a look at the most famous physics fundamental constant G from Newton’s 350 years old
Equation F = - G m M/r², or, Coulomb electric force equation F = - Q q/4π r² ε (0), one can see
that, for example, G’s value has unit dimension of [G] = [1/ρ T²]; ρ is atmospheric density and T is
time rotational period. If we can show that the gravitational constant G = G (ρ, T) is a variable air
density and Earth rotational period dependent then we can say what Earth is saying that the most
famous physics fundamental constants are not so universal constants because all physics
fundamental constant are air density and Earth spin dependent. For example:

G = G (ρ, T) = 1/ [(2/5) (4 π/3) ρT²]; 5/2 ~ √ (2 π)

Nothing that: 8 π /15 = (2/5) (4π/3); 4π/3 and 2/5 come from spherical aspect
Where: ρ = air density; T = Earth rotation period; T = 23.9333 hours and ρ = 1.2045 kg/m³

G = 1/ (8 π/15) ρT² = 6.674 x 10 – 11; ε (0) = 1/4πρT² = 8.85 x 10 -12; μ (0) = 4πρT²/c²
[G] = [1/ρ T²] ~ 0 if spin period is very long or atmospheric density is very high

Page 1
 2 – There is no “gravity” between the “sun” and “planets” and that means:

A-F=0

B- There is no sun moon planets but there is an absolute motion of a circle for each of those we
call sun moon and planets independent of each other

C – F = - G m M/r² gravitational law to justify an ellipse observation of a planet around the sun is
not necessary because the difference between sun and planets absolute circular motion is a visual
ellipse and not actual ellipse

Yes I am saying that astronomers have no clue what they see using their telescopes

What I am saying is that there is no F = - G m M/r² and there is no solar system where the motion
of a planet around the sun is an ellipse with the sun at the focus of the ellipse.

Mercury

r
θ

Sun

Figure - 1

Kepler wrote the acceleration law: a/T2 = k/a2

And said that the motion of a planet around the sun is an ellipse like in figure - 1
And wrote the equation of motion law
 As: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)]
Newton and Hooke reiterated the same thing as Kepler and wrote: r/ t2 = k/r2
Astronomers found that the motion is not an ellipse but a rotating ellipse
And wrote the equation of motion law
As: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)]
Page 2

Einstein wrote another acceleration law r/t2 = k/ r2 + k1/r4 to describe a rotating ellipse

Mercur
y

θ
ψ

Sun

Newton gave the equation of the ellipse:

As: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)]
Einstein said he corrected Newton and wrote the new equation:
Is: r (θ, t) = a (1-ε²)/ [1+ε cosine (θ - Ψ)]

It is a fact that Astronomers see this axis tilt and Einstein got a formula for
it: ψ = {6 π G M/a c² (1 - ε²)} [180/ π] [36526/T (days)][3600]

G = 6.673 x 10-11= gravitational acceleration constant

M =2x1030kg = mass of the Sun
Eccentricity of Mercury’s orbit = ε = 0.206

T= 88 days = period of Planet mercury’s rotation around the Sun

And c = 299792.458 km/sec =light speed/sec
And a = 58.2 x 106 km/sec = semi major axis of planet Mercury orbit

ψ = {6 (π) 6.673 x 10-11 (2 x 1030)/58.2 x 106 (299792.458) ² [1– (0.206)²]} x

[180/ π] [36526/88] [3600] = 43 seconds of an arc per century

Page 3
Newton used magical powers or action at a distance
force F = G m M/r2
Einstein said if Newton can add magical power then I
can do magic powers of Newton and add Einstein’s
own magical powers of time travel force and the force
Is F = G m M/r2 (space force) + k/r4 (time force)

These two morons claim that what we see is due to

magic where the Sun is pulling on the planets to keep
them around? Did anyone see the Sun Pulling?
Did anyone see a damn robe not the Sun hanging the
planets to revolve around it but to hang these two
idiots with Alfred Nobel physicists?!
 There is nothing Nobel about Alfred
Nobel institution that gave prizes for magical forces
and garbage for physics.
Page 4
I am not saying that Alfred Nobel physicists are idiots
to say the least but what I am saying is that Alfred
Nobel prize winner physics is stupidity itself and
Alfred Nobel prize winner physicists are crooks to be
exact. Time is not a structure like space to allow
Alfred Nobel Institution to dictate stupidity on the rest
of us and Alfred Nobel Physicists can keep stupidity to
themselves. Alfred Nobel prize is worth 1001 times in
money. Alfred Nobel prize is a 1 billion dollar business
each. Big Institutions with massive funding needs
backed bad physics and idiots for physicists for 1
billion dollars prize and the world stuck with garbage
for physics.
What is modern physics?
Did anyone hear the big bang? Did anyone saw a black hole? Did anyone find Einstein’s
gravity waves? Did anyone hook up a hose to the sky and funnel dark energy to verify E
= mc2? Does anyone have a proof of Newton’s action at a distance? Does anyone have a
proof of Einstein time travel? Does anyone figure out why humans have to accept Alfred
Nobel prize winners nuclear claims that the universe is made up of particles that dies and
rebirth billion billion times a second? Hey dude I am a redneck one grandfather was a
damn farmer and my other grandfather was a damn Carpenter and my father was a much
damn redneck I sometimes feel reluctant to claim my dad but I never knew what a dumb
ass is really is till I met my science teacher talking about the greatest idiots of physics
Newton and Einstein!
What did Alfred Nobel honor?
My answer to that is: “University” Crooks in Alfred Nobel Suit
The difference between a crook and a Nobel Prize winner is a flip of a coin
The difference between me and all others I can prove them crooks and I dare all to prove
me wrong. Starting with Einstein and Newton to make Galileo irrelevant to the subject of
planetary motion around the Sun because of now and now is July 4th 1973 there is no
Galileo and there is No Einstein and there is no Newton because I can prove them all
wrong including NASA and Europeans space agency and all others!
Newton’s space force: F = G m M/r2
Einstein’s – Newton space - time:
F = G m M/r2 (Newton’s space force) + k/r4
(Einstein’s time force)
The force is with Joe Nahhas and in real time space F = 0
Nahhas said the only magic is an act of kindness of a human to all others!
My act of kindness to humanity is to make humanity aware of the criminals with Nobel
prizes and the idiots with intelligent portfolios!

Page 5
What I am saying is that there is no Newton’s
gravitational force and Einstein’s space – time force is
silly to say the least and I can prove that there is no
gravitational force between the Sun and the Planets
force, or, F = o solution is a rotating ellipse Illusion.

What I am saying dear Pope John Paul is that those

with “knowledge” and sick intentions to be arrogant
and claim magical forces and mocks the believers
have absolutely no clue what they see in their
telescopes and have nothing to offer beside stupidity
that started with Newton and perfected with Alfred
Nobel Institution’s dumbest Einstein. To start with let
me solve this equation F = 0. The solution of F = 0 is
the equation of a real time circle
Is r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t)

All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at

a location
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed
as the product
S = m r; State = mass x location:
P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment
= change of location + change of mass
= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate
F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force
= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r
= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate
In polar coordinates system
r = r r (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r θ' θ(1) ; γ = (r" - rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + r θ")θ(1)
r = location; v = velocity; γ = acceleration
F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r

F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)]

+ (m" r) r (1)
= [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/m r) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)
= [-G m M/r²] r (1) -------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law

Page 6

Proof:
First r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1)
Define r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ
Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t
= r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ]
= r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)
Define θ (1) = -sine θ î +cosine θ Ĵ;
And with r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ
Then d [θ (1)]/d t= θ' [- cosine θ î - sine θ Ĵ= - θ' r (1)
And d [r (1)]/d t = θ' [-sine θ î + cosine θ Ĵ] = θ' θ (1)
Define γ = d [r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] /d t
= r" r (1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' θ' r (1) + r θ" r (1) +r θ'd [θ (1)]/d t
γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)
With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = F (r)
And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0
With m = constant, then
With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = F (r) Eq-1
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2
With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2
From Eq-2: d (r²θ')/d t = 0
Then r²θ' = h = constant
Differentiate with respect to time
Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ" = 0
Divide by r²θ'
Then 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0
And 2(r'/r) = - θ"/θ' = 2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)]
Also, r = r0 (θ, 0) e [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
 And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
For a fixed orbit: λ r = 0
Also, r = r 0 (θ, 0) e ỉ ω t
And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2ỉ ω t
With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0
Let u = 1/r; r = 1/u; r²θ' = h = θ’ /u²
And d r/d t = (d r/ d u) (d u /d θ) (d θ/ d t) = (- 1/u ²) (θ’) (d u/ d θ)
= - h (d u/ d θ)

Page 7
And d² r/ d t² = - h (θ’) (d² u/ d θ ²)
= [- h²/r²] (d² u/ d θ ²)
= - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²)
With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1
And - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) – (1/u) (h u²) ² = 0
Then (d² u/ d θ ²) + u = 0
Then u = A e - í θ
Then r 0 (θ, 0) = (1/A) e í θ
And r 0 (θ, 0) = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ
And r = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ e ỉ ω t
Or, r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t)
What I am saying Dear Pope is this is the equation of
motion of any planet!
It is also the equation of motion of the smallest
particle light!
Now Planet Mercury motion is r m = r m 0 e í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]
The Sun Motion is r s = r s 0 e í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

Sun r
r s Mercury

r1 r0 r m
X1 r2
X2
Earth
 In mathematical form: r1 = x1 + r s
And r2 = x2 + r m
Then r2 - r1 = x2 - x1 + r m – r s
Or, r = r0 + (r m – r s)

Page 8

To find the extreme values of r,

Then: d r/d t = d r0/d t+ (d r m/d t – d r s/ d t) = 0

And (d r m/d t – d r s/ d t) = 0; d r0/d t = 0

And d r m/d t = d r s/ d t
í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]
Now Planet Mercury motion is r m = r m 0 e
The Sun Motion is r s = r s 0 e í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]
And d r m/d t = r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] e
í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]
And d r s/ d t = r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] e

With r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] Cosine [θ (m) + ω (m) t]

= r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] Cosine [θ (s) + ω (s) t]
And r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] sine [θ (m) + ω (m) t]
= r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] sine [θ (s) + ω (s) t]
Then dividing we get: tan [θ (n) + ω (n) t] = tan [θ (s) + ω (s) t]
Or, [θ (m) + ω (m) t] = [θ (s) + ω (s) t] + [n π = 0; n =0]

And θ (m) - θ (s) + = [ω (s) - ω (m)] t

This is the time delay Illusion
And, r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] = r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)]
And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] = (r m 0 /r s 0) [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]

And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] = [(r m 0/ r s 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]
In arc second per century:

Is: [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)
= [(r m 0/ r s 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)

And, r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] = r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)]

And r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] = r e 0 [θ’ (e) + ω (e)]

Page 9

And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (e) + ω (e)] = [(r m 0/ r e 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]

In arc second per century:

Is: [θ’ (e) + ω (e)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)
= [(r m 0/ r e 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600) = 43

r m 0

r s 0
M M M Mercury S Sun
r m 0 r 0

Is: r 0 = distance between centers

Is: r = r 0 + (r m 0 + r s 0)
max
And r min = r 0 - (r m 0 + r s 0)
And c = (r max - r min)/2 = r m 0 + r s 0
And a = (r max + r min)/2 = r 0

With c = (r max - r min)/2 = r m 0 + r s 0

And a = (r max + r min)/2 = r 0
This establishes visual ellipse of semi major axis a and a semi minor
axis b = √ (a² - c²) = a √ [1 – (c/a) ²] = a √ (1 – ε ²)
And h = 2 π a b = 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)
Areal Velocity is: 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)/T

Page 10
 Mercury

r
θ

Sun

Figure - 1

Page 11

And Farthest distance = r max = r 0 + (r m 0 +r s 0 )=a+c

And closest distance = r min = r 0 - (r m 0 +r )=a-c

s 0
At closest approach: h =2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)/T
And dividing h / (a – c) ² = 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)/T a² (1 – ε) ²
Or r²θ' = h will give θ' (a) = 2 π √ (1 – ε ²)/T (1 – ε) ²

And for any motion θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2ỉ ω t

And θ’ = {[cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] – 1} θ' 0 (θ, 0)
And θ’ = θ’ (x) + í θ’ (y)
= [cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] θ' 0 (θ, 0)
And θ’ (x) = [cosine 2 ω t] θ' 0 (θ, 0)
= [1 – 2 sine² ω t] θ' 0 (θ, 0)

And θ’ (x) - θ' (0) = - 2 θ' 0 (θ, 0) sine² ω t

= -2(2π) [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t
= - 4 π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t

Page 12

If this apsidal motion is to be found as visual effects, then

 Mercur
y

θ
Ψ

Sun

With, v ° = spin velocity; v* = orbital velocity

And v/c = (v* + v°)/c = tan ω t

= -4 π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} radians

Multiplication by 180/π to change to degrees

Ψ ° = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]}

Degrees
And multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days

Ψ’’ (calculated) = (-720x36526/T days) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x

sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years
And in arc seconds per century:
Ψ’’ (calculated) = (-720x36526x3600/T days) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x
sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years = 43

Page 13
All rights reserved