The aim of euthanasia is let the patients leave the world happily and no misery, its basic reason is avoid having a rough time. The Second reason is that many patients will use this way to end their life easily. The third reason is there will be a lot of patients want to die earlier at the same time.
The aim of euthanasia is let the patients leave the world happily and no misery, its basic reason is avoid having a rough time. The Second reason is that many patients will use this way to end their life easily. The third reason is there will be a lot of patients want to die earlier at the same time.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The aim of euthanasia is let the patients leave the world happily and no misery, its basic reason is avoid having a rough time. The Second reason is that many patients will use this way to end their life easily. The third reason is there will be a lot of patients want to die earlier at the same time.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Euthanasia is a controversial issue in society today. Many people have
discussed this issue for a long time but in fact there is no modal answer. In 2001, Dr. Lo Wing Lok brought up that use euthanasia to treatment of terminal patients. But many councilors Disagreed and criticized this motion. It was because they though that Lo Wing Lok is a doctor, the responsibility of a doctor is save the life but now a doctorto have the impudence to suggested to kill people! (Legislative council Hansard, 2001). I disagrees euthanasia legal in Hong Kong because it will bring out a lot of ethic problems. Before I state my opinions, we need to understand the definition and different kinds of euthanasia. The aim of euthanasia is let the patients leave the world happily and no misery, its basic reason is avoid having a rough time. And there are few kinds of euthanasia. The first kind of euthanasia is active euthanasia; it means that the doctor can terminate a patient’s life. The Second one is passive euthanasia, it means that the patient want to die without misery. (Noman.L.2003,p.170). The third kind is voluntary euthanasia, which is the patient ask to receive medical treatment in order to die). The last one is non- voluntary euthanasia, which ending the life of a patient that is incapable giving permission (BBC, 2005b). Now I am going to use some famous cases and different society personages’ opinions to state my own opinions. The first reason is if euthanasia legalize, many patients will use this way to end their life easily. Then there will be a lot of patients want to die earlier at the same time. For example, in Tang Siu Pun(Ah Bun)’s case, he was paralyzed from the neck down in a somersaulting accident when he was 21. He wrote a letter to Tung Chee Hwa in 2003 to be allowed to die and ignited a debate about euthanasia. In his opinion, he said that Hong Kong laws discriminated against that handicapped because those without the physical ability to kill themselves did not have the opinion of euthanasia.(2007, South China Morning post publishers Ltd.). After the letter sent out, it brought out a great response in Hong Kong society and many people cared of him. And he wrote a letter to say thank you to Hong Kong people and admitted his opinion was wrong. In this case, we can know that euthanasia is incorrect. Ah Bun wanted voluntary euthanasia. But in his thank you letter, he said that it was very selfish. He has found the value of the life. So he disagree euthanasia finally. In this case we can know that all of us are different, although some of the people are disabled, their life are also wonderful. But if it is legalized, Ah Bun will die under euthanasia, and then many patients learn from him. But there are not enough place to deal with and buried so many corpses in Hong Kong. Secondly, I want to discuss the relationship between non- voluntary euthanasia and murder. Non- voluntary euthanasia means that when the person who is killed can make no request and give no consent. In my opinion, euthanasia is no different from murder. It has violated the principle in the Bible. According to Exodus in the Bible, The God said that ‘Do not put anyone to death without cause’. Now I am going to use a case to support this reason. The case happened in America. There was a woman called Terri Schindler Schiavo. She collapsed at home on 25th February, 1990. Then she was sent to the hospital. After that, in 1991, her husband let the doctor made some mistakes because he wanted to use euthanasia to end her life and start a new relationship with another girl. But Theresa’s parents disagreed because they think that children are the gift which given by god and Terri Schindler Schiavo also enjoyed the time with her family member. From that day, Terri Schindler Schiavo must use the tube to get food and air. Her tube was removed three times. And Terri Schindler Schiavo died from severe dehydration without nutrition or hydration 14 days on 31st march, 2005. In this case we can know that Terri Schindler Schiavo was murdered clearly. Her husband exploited the living right of his wife. It is absolutely unacceptable and ridiculous. The third reason is euthanasia will bring out some ethic problems and doctors will be difficult to do their job. It is because the responsibility of doctor is rescuing life. But if euthanasia was legalized, doctors will be hard to provide a correct treatment to patients. In the above paragraph we have known the relationship between non- voluntary euthanasia and murder. If the doctor can control the life of patients, he had violated the deportment of their occupation because they can kill people if euthanasia legalize. The second reason that the doctors will difficult to do their job because not all the doctors agree use euthanasia to end the patients’life. If euthanasia legalize, there will be a lot of arguments between doctors and patients or their family members. In Europe and North American, some of the cases were argued in the court. For example, there was a case happened in Paris. In 2008, Chantal Sebir, a 53- years old woman, wants to use euthanasia to end her life but failed in the argument in the court. And the government also disagree euthanasia. In my opinion, it will waste time and money to deal with this kind of cases. Time is limit! Don’t waste time to do these things. For the activist, they think that we can control our life. It is because this is our right, it can help the patient’s family solve the economical problem and the patient can have no misery. But in my opinion, we can learn some new knowledge and get some experience when you have misery. It can increase your confidence to front every problem. And some of the activists will ask a question: Why abortion can legalize but euthanasia cannot? In fact, if a woman wanted to abort, they must be under 16 years old; the pregnancy will be a mental or psychological risk to the life of the mother, the foetus has mental or psychological abnormalities that would lead to it becoming seriously disabled and the woman has been victim of rape or incest and the crime has been report to the police within 3 months of date of the offence. And the different between abort and euthanasia is if you abort, the bay cannot say no but euthanasia can. So I disagree euthanasia legalize in Hong Kong. Overall, in this essay, we can understand that there will bring out some ethic problems and negative effects in the society if euthanasia legalize in Hong Kong. And I do not want to let the young people learn the wrong value. So I disagrees euthanasia legalize in Hong Kong.