Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PART II
Course Instructors:
Dr. K. V. Lo
Office: CEME 2004D;
E-mail: kvlo@civil.ubc.ca;
Tel: 604-822-4880
2009
2.0 MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT
Wastewater Treatment 1
Industrial waste discharges (two types: on-site
treatment and disposal/discharge, and treatment to
appropriate standard and discharge to sewerage
system).
Pipe into a receiving water.
Wastewater Treatment 2
2.3 Urban Runoff and Wastewater Composition
2.3.1 Comparison of Urban Runoff with Municipal
Wastewaters
Table 2.1 Wastewater characteristics
Biochemica
l Oxygen
Suspended Demand Total Total Fecal
Solids (SS) (BOD5) Nitrogen Phosphorus (P) coliforms
Background levels 5-100 0.5-3 0.05-0.5 0.01-0.2 ..........
Stormwater runoff 415 20 3-10 0.6 14,500
Combined sewer
overflow 370 115 9-10 1.9 670,000
Untreated
Municipal 200 200 40 5 1,000,000
Primary Effluent 80 135 35 8 200,000
Secondary Eff. 15 25 11 4 1,000
Tertiary Eff. < 10 <5 <3 <2
Adapted from US EPA, 1977
Wastewater Treatment 3
2.3.2 Typical Composition of Domestic Sewage
Total Solids (TS) is the sum of Total Suspended Solids
(TSS) and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), i.e. TS = TSS +
TDS
Suspended solids are particulate and can be removed by
settling or filtration. Dissolved solids may be atoms or
compounds that are in solution, for instance sugar may be
dissolved in water.
When placed in a muffle furnace at 550°C for one hour, a
portion of the solids will volatilize (burn off) and the remainder
will not. This is how volatile and fixed solids are defined.
Volatile solids are typically smaller organic compounds.
Table 2.2
Concentration
Constituent Strong Medium Weak
Solids, total 1200 700 350
Dissolved, total 850 500 250
Fixed 525 300 145
Volatile 325 200 105
Suspended, Total 350 200 100
Fixed 75 50 30
Volatile 275 150 70
Settleable Solids (ml/liter) 20 10 5
Biochemical oxygen demand, 5-day, 20°C 300 200 100
Total organic carbon (TOC) 300 200 100
Chemical oxygen demand (COD) 1000 500 250
Nitrogen, (total as N) 85 40 20
Organic 35 15 8
Free ammonia 50 25 12
Nitrites 0 0 0
Nitrates 0 0 0
Phosphorus (total as P) 20 10 6
Organic 5 3 2
Inorganic 15 7 4
Chlorides† 100 50 30
Alkalinity (as CaCO3)† 200 100 50
Grease‡ 152 100 50
Table 2.3
Wastewater Treatment 5
2.3.4 Population Equivalent Defined
Population Equivalent is the per capita per day BOD5 loading
(approx 0.2 lb/day·cap). This measure is used to easily
compare the organic pollution potential of industries presenting
large BOD loads to the system. This is important in
determining treatment plant capacity – waste streams include
both household and industrial wastewaters.
Table 2.4
Wastewater Treatment 6
2.3.5 Variations in Waste Characteristics for Some
Industrial Wastes
Table 2.5
Suspended Solids,
Flow, gal/production unit BOD, lb/production unit
Waste lb/production unit
% frequency % frequency % frequency
10 50 90 10 50 90 10 50 90
Pulp and paper1 11,000 43,000 74,000 17 58 110 26 105 400
Paperboard1 7,500 11,000 27,500 10 28 46 25 48 66
Slaughterhouse2 165 800 4,300 3.8 13 44 3 9.8 31
Brewery3 130 370 600 0.8 2 44 .25 1.2 2.45
Tannery4 4.2 9.0 13.6 575 975 1,400 600 1,900 3,200
1
tons paper production
2
1000 lb live weight kill
3
bbl beer
4
pounds of hides
Wastewater Treatment 7
2.3.6 Physical Characteristics of Domestic Wastewater
Table 2.6
Wastewater Treatment 8
SOLIDS (TS,TSS,TDS,VSS,FSS,TVS,VDS,FDS,&TFS)
Wastewater Treatment 9
(2.0 m)
103C
550C
Figure 2.1 Interrelationships of solids found in water and wastewater. In much of the
water quality literature, the solids passing through the filter are called dissolved solids.
(Tchobanoglous and Schroeder, 1985.)
Wastewater Treatment 10
Figure 2.2 Imhoff cone used to determine settleable solids in wastewater. Solids that
accumulate in the bottom of the cone after 60 min are reported as mL/L.
Figure 2.3 Apparatus use for the determination of total suspended solids. After wastewater
sample has been filtered, the preweighted filter paper is placed in an aluminium dish for
drying before weighing.
Wastewater Treatment 11
2.3.7 Harmful effects of Domestic and Industrial Waters
Table 2.7
Wastewater Treatment 12
2.4 Wastewater Treatment Processes
2.4.1 Steps in the Development of Wastewater
Treatment Systems
Figure 2.4
Source: Viessman & Hammer, Water Supply and Pollution Control, 5th Ed., Figure 11-19
Wastewater Treatment 13
2.4.2 WASTEWATER TREATMENT
Wastewater Treatment 14
2.4.3 Generic Flow Schematic for Wastewater
Treatment
Figure 2.5
Source: Davis & Cornwell, Introduction
to Environmental Engineering, Fig 5-10
(1998)
Wastewater Treatment 15
Figure 2.6 Schematic layout of a septic tank and tile field.
Wastewater Treatment 16
Figure 2.7 Schematic diagram of a wastewater management infrastructure (Metcalf & Eddy,
2003).
Wastewater Treatment 17
Figure 2.8 Typical Flow Diagram
Wastewater Treatment 18
Table 2.8 Approximate Composition of an Average Domestic Wastewater (mg/l)
Wastewater Treatment 19
Refer to Viessman & Hammer, Chapter 9.
Waste Segregation
The separation of different types or strengths of waste.
Sometimes necessary for industrial wastes, where
process, cooling and sanitary wastes are all generated
on-site.
May involved individual pre-treatment, controlled
mixing, separate disposal, etc.
Note exclusions: Wastes that would
1) create fire/explosion hazard (e.g., gasoline or cleaning
solvents;
2) impair hydraulic capacity (e.g., manure, or sand)
3) cause hazard to people or the treatment system (e.g.,
toxic metal ions, hazardous organic chemicals)
Waste Equalization
Used by both industries and many municipalities.
Municipal systems experience diurnal fluctuations in
flows corresponding with people’s activities, with
morning (e.g. showering, toilet flushing) and evening
(e.g. cooking, washing) peaks.
Involves a ―holding basin‖ that will generate a
stable/uniform effluent for further treatment in the
process train.
Extremely important for municipal secondary treatment
plants.
Wastewater Treatment 20
Possible Benefits:
Uniform hydraulic/organic loading
Possible acid/alkaline neutralization
Removal/Pretreatment of specific toxic compounds
(e.g. heavy metals).
Figure 2.9 Typical Diurnal Flows. Source: Dept. Civil Engineering, Monash University website
(2002)
Wastewater Treatment 21
Combined Sewers (see Sect. 9.2, p 333)
Very common in North America
One pipe collects domestic wastewater, stormwater,
light commercial and industrial wastewaters (etc).
Usually only dry weather flow (domestic, street
drainage and commercial/industrial wastewaters) is
intercepted for treatment.
During major storm events, combined volumes may
exceed the capacity of the treatment plant, requiring
bypass directly to the receiving water: ―Combined
Sewer Overflow.” (CSO)
Vancouver City sewers built before in the first half of
the 20thC were typically combined sewers. 38%/675 km
of Vancouver’s sewers were built before 1930;
31%/565 km were constructed between 1930-59.
Stormwater and wastewater collection systems are
typically separated when old combined sewers are
replaced.
Water quality problems on Vancouver’s beaches are
often linked to CSOs.
Many North American cities prohibit the construction
of combined sewers in new subdivisions.
Wastewater Treatment 22
2.4.4 Preliminary Treatment (Municipal Wastewater
Only)
May include:
Coarse screens (aka bar racks)
Medium screens
Comminution
Flow measure (e.g. Parshall flume)
Grit removal
Pumping
Pre-air, pre-Cl2, etc.
Refer to Viessman & Hammer, Figure 9.2
for pre-treatment unit arrangement.
Figure 2.10 Bar rack
Figure 2.11
Possible
arrangements of
preliminary
treatment units
in municipal
wastewater
processes.
Wastewater Treatment 23
Screening Devices (see Sect. 10.4)
Purpose: to remove large solids, and protect pumps if
possible
Coarse Screens
Also called ―bar racks.‖
Comprised of steel bars, <2½‖ (6 cm) apart (clear
openings).
Usually to protect lift pumps.
Bars are inclined to flow channel @ 30-45º to assist
in cleaning
Usually hand-cleaned.
Wastewater Treatment 24
Medium Screens
Popular alternative to above unit.
Clear openings between bars of only 5/8 – 1¾‖ (1.5
4.5 cm).
Mechanically cleaned by ―rake‖ or rotating blades.
Screenings are typically landfilled.
Figure 2.12 Screening unit in operation at Lions Gate WWTP. Seen from above, the unit is
about 5 m high. The screen is on a conveyer and screenings are cleaned at the top of the unit.
Waste water flows in at the bottom and screenings are conveyed to the dumpster seen in the
upper left corner of the photo. There are two parallel screening units at Lions Gate. The room
in which they are located is quite malodorous.
Wastewater Treatment 25
Figure 2.13 Continuous countercurrent solid bowl conveyor discharge centrifuge.
Wastewater Treatment 26
Comminutors
Sophisticated shredding devices.
Reduce solids size further to ¼ - 3/8‖ (0.6 – 1 cm)
Sometimes installed directly in the flow-measuring
channel, with separate by-pass ―screen & channel‖
combination (for emergency use or maintenance
purposes).
In small plants, treating sanitary wastes only (i.e. not
combined sewer), the unit is not preceded by any
other screening device.
Figure 2.15 Wastewater grinders: (a) channel unit and (b) in-line unit.
Wastewater Treatment 27
Figure 2.16 Drawing and schematic diagram of comminutor. (Courtesy of Worthington Pump,
Inc.)
Wastewater Treatment 28
Parshall Flume (refer to p. 352-353)
Wastewater measurement system.
Free-flow, Venturi-type flume.
Has smooth hydraulic flow, no solids deposition and
low head loss.
(1)
where:
Q = flow, cfs
W = throat width, ft
h = upper head, ft
Figure 2.17. Parshall Flume schematic for measuring flow in an open channel by measuring
the free-flowing upper head h.(Viessman & Hammer).
Wastewater Treatment 29
Grit Chambers (refer to p. 382)
Grit is defined as gravel, sand, broken glass, bone
chips, coffee grounds, etc.
Grit chamber is designed to protect mechanical
equipment and pumps from abrasive wear, to reduce
pipe clogging and reduce accumulation of settled
material in clarifiers.
Type I – discrete particle sedimentation.
Chamber usually sits between lift pumps and primary
clarifier for sanitary waste systems; if there is a large
solid waste component, then it is placed before lift
pumps. If the chamber is placed after the pump units,
increased pump wear is accepted to afford the
convenience of having the grit chambers at ground
level.
Wastewater Treatment 30
Many types or designs are available, depending on the
specific treatment situation, e.g.:
Figure 2.18 Aerated Grit Chamber. Source: Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental
Engineering, Fig 5-12 (1998)
Wastewater Treatment 31
Figure 2.19 Typical section through an aerated grit chamber.
Wastewater Treatment 32
Figure 2.20 Vortex-type grit chambers: (a) Pista (courtesy Smith & Loveless) and (b) Teacup.
(Courtesy Eutek.)
Wastewater Treatment 33
Grit Chambers, cont.
For design purposes:
grit = fine sand
= 0.2 mm dia.
= specific gravity of 2.65
= settling velocity = 0.075 fps
For large, channel-type systems, the horizontal velocity
designed ~ 1 fps (0.3 m/s).
Settled grit removal: via gravity, bottom scrapers,
screw conveyors, air-lift pumps, etc.
Wastewater Treatment 34
Figure 2.21 Counterflow Grit Washer
Wastewater Treatment 35
Special Installations:
A.Sometimes air diffusers are used to keep organics in
suspension, while grit settles out; this also degases and
freshens the sewage. (e.g. large municipal plants like
Lions Gate in North Vancouver.)
Wastewater Treatment 36
Purposes of Preliminary Treatment
1. Remove large and small objects
2. Shred some of the solids (minimize wear on pipes and
pumps)
3. Remove grit/sand/other inert waste
4. Freshen incoming sewage (aeration)
5. BOD5 removal
Wastewater Treatment 37
2.4.5 Primary Treatment
Refer to Sect. 10-11
Target performance:
Suspended solids (SS) removal 60 – 70%
Bonus: BOD5 removal 30 – 40%
Wastewater Treatment 38
Analysis of Discrete Particle Settling (Type 1)
C D A 2
Frictional drag force = (3)
2
Wastewater Treatment 39
Equating the gravitational force with the frictional drag force
for spherical particles yields Newton’s law:
4 g s d
1/ 2
Vc
CD
(4)
3
Q = A Vc (5)
Q
Vc = overflow rate, gal/ft2 d (m3/m2 d) (6)
A
Wastewater Treatment 40
Liquid settling/detention times = 1 to 3 hours.
Liquid ―overflow rates‖ = 300 – 1000 gpd/ft2
but GLUMRB (Great Lakes Upper-Mississippi
River Board of State and Provincial Public Health
and Environmental Managers) recommends:
Wastewater Treatment 41
Figure 2.23 Primary clarifier suspended solids removals versus overflow rates
showing idealized curve2 with data.
Wastewater Treatment 42
Primary Clarifier Sizing
Wastewater Treatment 43
Figure 2.24 Lions Gate WWTP Primary Clarifier. The system consists of numerous
rectangular operating in parallel. Visible at the surface are some of the mechanical scrapers,
which move floatables to a collection pipe as well as settled material to the sludge hopper.
Wastewater Treatment 44
Figure 2.25 Primary Clarifier Schematic. Source: Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to
Environmental Engineering, Fig 5-14 (1998)
Wastewater Treatment 45
Figure 2.26 Typical primary settling tank for wastewater treatment. (a) Circular settling tank
with an inboard weir trough. (b) Stilling well and sludge-collecting mechanism in a circular
clarifier. Source: Courtesy of Walker Process Equipment, Division of McNish Corp.
Wastewater Treatment 46
SPECIAL TOPIC: BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
(BOD) (Ref. Text 8.11)
Wastewater Treatment 47
The BOD test is used to:
1. define the organic carbon strength of municipal
wastewaters;
2. evaluate the ―efficiency‖ of treatment by measuring
the oxygen demand remaining in the effluent;
3. determine the amount of organic pollutant in
surface waters, e.g. Fraser River.
Wastewater Treatment 48
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (BOD):
Wastewater Treatment 49
The BOD test: This is essentially a bioassay procedure
involving the measurement of oxygen consumed by living
organisms (mainly bacteria) while utilizing the organic matter
present in a waste, under conditions as similar as to those occur
in nature.
Wastewater Treatment 50
Limitations of the BOD test:
Wastewater Treatment 51
The carbonaceous oxygen demand curve can be expressed
mathematically as
where
BOD
D1 D2 B1 B2 f (9)
P
where
Wastewater Treatment 52
volume of wastewater
=
volume of dilution water plus wastewater
D1 D2
BOD (10)
P
Example
BOD tests were conducted on composited samples of a raw
wastewater and a treated wastewater after chlorination.
Wastewater Treatment 53
Solution:
1. Using Eq. 10,
8.4 3.7
BOD5 282 mg / l
5.0 / 300
Using Eq. 8,
282
L 412 mg / l
1 100.15.0
2. Using Eq. 9,
BOD
7.6 2.9 8.4 3.7 0.5 / 5.0 25 mg / l
50 / 300
Wastewater Treatment 54
2.4.6 Secondary Treatment
Viessman & Hammer, Chapters 11 & 12
Treatment Methods
Wastewater Treatment 55
Chemical Precipitation
Chemical precipitation in wastewater treatment involves the
addition of chemicals to alter the physical state of dissolved
and suspended solids and to facilitate their removal by
sedimentation.
In the past, chemical precipitation was used to enhance the
degree of suspended solids and BOD removal:
(i) where there were seasonal variation in the
concentration of wastewater,
(ii) where an intermediate degree of treatment was
required,
(iii) as an aid to the sedimentation process.
Now chemical precipitation is also used to provide more
complete removal of organic compounds and nutrients
(N&P).
The common precipitants (coagulants or flocculants) area:
Alum [Al2(SO4)3 18 H2O],
ferric chloride [FeCl3],
ferric sulphate [Fe2(SO4)3 or Fe(SO4)3 3 H2O],
ferrous sulphate [FeSO4 7H2O] and
lime [Ca(OH)2].
There are other chemicals, mostly polymers, such as PERCOL
728, and chitosan, which can be used effectively to achieve
the precipitation.
Wastewater Treatment 56
B. Biological
(p. 520-527) 98-99% of all 2º treatment processes are
biological.
can be aerobic and/or anaerobic systems.
usually municipal wastewater main stream
treated aerobically.
Biological treatment is comprised of a living system which
relies on mixed bio-cultures to break-down waste organics and
remove them from solution.
e.g. bacteria & soluble C-organics and N, P etc. + O2
CO2 + H2O + E + more bacteria
(=sludge or biosolids)
where E heat and chemical energy
Micronutrients include Fe, Mn, Zn, Co, Mg, Ca.
Bacteria are single-celled micro-organisms. They can be
classified as heterotrophs or autotrophs.
Autotrophs use carbon dioxide as a carbon source and
oxidize inorganic compounds for energy. They are used
primarily in specialized treatment systems as nitrification.
e.g. NH3 + O2 NO3
Heterotrophs, sometimes called ―saprophytes,‖ use
organic carbon (organic defined as having C—H bonds)
as their energy source and are used in conventional waste
treatment systems.
Wastewater Treatment 57
Two subclasses of heterotrophs:
Wastewater Treatment 58
Bacterial Growth and Factors
*Reading Assignment*
§12-6 Text – Kinetics
§12-7 Text – Growth
K = K20T-20 (11)
where
Wastewater Treatment 59
Figure 2.28 General effect of temperature on biological activity.
Wastewater Treatment 60
MICROGANISMS
Bacteria:
spherical cocci – 0.5 - 1.0 μm in diameter;
cylindrical rods – 0.1 to 1 μm in width by 1.5 to 3.0 J-lm in length;
helical spirilla – 0.5 to 5 μm in width by 6 to 15 J-lm in lendth for
spirilla.
Fungi:
Heterotrophic organisms (classified into four distinct groups
according to their mode of reproduction, encompassing fission,
budding, and spore formation.)
Algae:
Unicellular or multi-cellular photo-autotrophs.
Protozoa:
Usually motile single cells (the majority of which are aerobic
heterotrophs).
Aerobic Anaerobic
Suspended- Activated-sludge (AS) Anaerobic digester
Earthen lagoon
Growth* Aerated lagoon
(facultative)
Attached- Trickling filter (TF) Anaerobic filter
Rotating biological
Growth * Fixed-film reactor
contactor (RBC)
* Hybrid reactors
Wastewater Treatment 61
Trickling Filter
Wastewater Treatment 62
Basic Design
Figure 2.30 Trickling Filter. Source: Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, Metcalf & Eddy,
Tchobonaglous, 1998.
Wastewater Treatment 63
Types
Wastewater Treatment 64
Figure 2.32 Schematic diagram showing the form of the biological process in a tricking filter.
Wastewater Treatment 65
Figure 2.33 Random packing for both shallow and deep trickling filters. Each element is a
plastic cylinder (3.5 x 3.5 in.) with perforated walls and internal ribs. (Courtesy of Norton
Chemical Process Products Corp., Stow, OH.)
Figure 2.34 Typical packing material for trickling filters: (a) rock, (b) and (c) plastic vertical-
flow, (d) plastic cross-flow, (e) redwood horizontal, and (f) random pack. [Figs. (c) and (d)
from Americal Surfpac Corp., (e) from Nepture Microfloc, and (f) from Jaeger Products, Inc.]
Note: the random pack material is often used in air stripping towers. (Metcalf & Eddy, 2003)
Wastewater Treatment 66
Table 2.12 Physical properties of trickling filter packing materials. (Metcalf & Eddy, 2003)
Approx.
specific
Approx. unit surface
Nominal weight, area Void space,
Packing material size, cm kg/m3 m2/m3 %
River rock (small) 2.5-7.5 1250-1450 60 50
River rock (large) 10-13 800-1000 45 60
Plastic—conventional 61 x 61 x 122 30-80 90 >95
Plastic—high specific surface area 61 x 61 x 122 65-95 140 >94
Plastic random packing— Varies 30-60 98 80
conventional
Plastic random packing—high Varies 50-80 150 70
specific surface area
a
C = BOD removal; N = tertiary nitrification; CN = combined BOD and nitrification.
Note: kg/m3 x 0.0624 = lb/ft3.
m2/m3 x 0.0305 = ft2/ft3.
Wastewater Treatment 67
Figure 2.36 Typical recirculation patterns for single-stage trickling-filter plants. (a)
Recirculation with sludge return. (b) Direct recirculation around the filter.
Wastewater Treatment 68
Figure 2.37 Typical recirculation patterns for two-stage trickling-filter plants without and
with intermediate sedimentation.
Loading (organic)
Usually given in: lb. BOD5/d/1000ft3 (kg/d/1000m3) of
volume
or: lb. BOD5/d/acre-ft (kg/d/hectare-m) of
plan area
Wastewater Treatment 69
e.g. low rate – 3 mill.gal./acre-day
high rate – 20 mill.gal./acre-day
Formulae:
1. Many, many empirical equations/formulae avail. to
choose from, to define a suitable mathematical
model; but no universal model exists that can
precisely describe substrate removal.
2. However, a ―common model‖ used in practice does
exist and is comprised of the following general
equations:
CD
1. Contact time - t (12)
Qn
where t = mean residence time, min.
D = filter depth, ft.
Q = hyd. loading, mill.gal./acre-day
or gpm/ft2
C & n are constants, depending on
shape and specific surface area of the
media.
Wastewater Treatment 70
K = reaction-rate constant, gpm/ft3,
dependent on specific surface area,
type of waste, etc. (usually found in
pilot plant studies).
La NLe
Lo (14)
N 1
Wastewater Treatment 71
Operational Problems
Organic overloading
Plugs the bed and may cause wastewater ―ponding‖
on the surface.
Reduces BOD removal efficiency.
Cold weather:
Causes ice formation on the surface.
Reduces bio-activity and thus, efficiency.
Foul Odours:
Due to overloading and poor air circulation.
More of an aesthetic problem.
Toxicity:
Trickling filters are very sensitive to ―toxic‖
material in the waste, especially near the top of the
bed.
Filter flies:
Called Psychoda flies.
Grow on the media, along inside of walls etc. and
are more of a ―nuisance‖ than any health concern.
Usually controlled by mild application of an
insecticide or by flooding the bed with treated
wastewater or fresh water.
Wastewater Treatment 72
Table 2.13 Comparison of different types of trickling filters a (Davis & Cornwell, 1998)
Wastewater Treatment 73
The NRC formula for a single-stage trickling filter is
100
E (15)
1 0.0561w / VF 0.5
where
E = BOD removal at 20C, %
w = BOD load applied, lb/day
V = volume of filter media, ft3 x 10-3
F = recirculation factor
w/V = BOD loading, lb/1000 ft3/day
1 R
F (16)
1 0.1R 2
100
E2 (17)
1 0.0561 / 1 E1 w2 / VF 0.5
where
E2 = BOD removal of the second stage at 20C, %
E1 = fraction of BOD removed in the first stage
w2 = BOD load applied to the second stage, lb/day
w2/V = BOD loading, lb/1000 ft3/day
Wastewater Treatment 74
The effect of wastewater temperature on stone-filled trickling-
filter efficiency may be expressed as
Solution:
3 kg / m 3
BOD load = 1530 m /d x 130 mg/l x
1000mg / l
= 200 kg/d
Wastewater Treatment 75
surface area of filter = (18.0)2/4 = 254 m2
200,000g
BOD loading = = 375 g/m3 d
533 m 3
= 23.5 lb/1000 ft3/day
1530m 3 / d 765m 3 / d
hydraulic loading = 9.04m 3 / m 2 d
254m 2
= 0.15 gpm/ft2 d
1 0.5
F 1.36
1 0.1 0.5 2
100
E 20 81.1%
1 0.056123.5 / 1.36 0.5
Wastewater Treatment 76
Figure 2.39 Profile of a combined trickling-filter activated-sludge process.
Figure 2.40 Flow diagram for a domestic wastewater plant using rotating biological contactors
for secondary treatment.
Wastewater Treatment 77
Figure 2.41
Wastewater Treatment 78
Activated Sludge Process
(Viessman & Hammer, p. 577–)
Theory
Wastewater fed continuously into an aerated tank.
―Bugs‖ metabolize and biologically flocculate the
dissolved/colloidal organics.
Bugs and organics known as ―activated sludge,‖ while
entire tank contents known as ―mixed liquor.‖
Settling of the activated sludge is carried out in the
secondary clarifier; part of the settled solids is usually
returned to the aeration tank and the rest is ―wasted‖ to
further processing.
Settled effluent/supernatant is then discharged.
General Schematic
Wastewater Treatment 79
Figure 2.43 Generalized biological process reactions in the activated-sludge process.
Wastewater Treatment 80
―Bug growth‖ in the mixed-liquor is usually maintained
in the declining or endogenous growth phase, for a
variety of reasons, including good settling properties of
sludge.
Figure 2.45 Bacterial log-growth curve for a
pure culture. Source: Davis & Cornwell,
Introduction to Environmental Engineering,
Fig 5-14 (1998)
Wastewater Treatment 81
Loading
(Refer to Viessman & Hammer, 12-19)
Wastewater Treatment 82
Also, have the concept of ―sludge age‖ (average time bugs
live in the tank) = retention time of the activated sludge
solids in the system, days.
e.g.,
MLSS V
sludge age , days
SS Q
MLSS AP
SS
MLSS V
QW SS W Q E SS E
Wastewater Treatment 83
Treatment Systems
Process Stability
Problems include:
Wastewater Treatment 84
ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS CONTROL
Wastewater Treatment 85
(v) sludge quality.
ACTIVATED-SLUDGE PROCESS
Process Description
Endogenous respiration:
bacteria
C5H7NO2 + 5O2 5CO2 + 2H2O + NH3 + energy
(cells)
113 160
1 1.42
Wastewater Treatment 86
Oxygen Requirements and Transfer
kg O2/d =
QSo Se 103 g / kg 1 1.42P (22)
x
f
Wastewater Treatment 87
a) Plug-flow process:
Tapered air (more at front
end).
Conventional process.
PFAS design.
BOD5 gradient.
b) Step air:
Wastewater injected at no.
of points BOD loading is
uniform.
Uniform air supply.
c) Contact Stabilization:
BOD mostly colloidal.
Mostly used in food
processing (dairy).
d) Extended Aeration
No primary clarifier.
Used mainly for small
communities.
e) Completed-mixed activated
sludge process (CMAS):
Often used for toxic
substances – diluted (effects
are reduced).
Wastewater Treatment 88
Figure 2.47 Conventional activated-sludge process. (a) Long rectangular aeration tank with
submerged coarse-bubble diffusers along one side (Santee, CA). (b) Cross section of a typical
aeration tank illustrating the spiral flow pattern created by aeration along one side.
Wastewater Treatment 89
Figure 2.48 Fine-bubble diffuser for wastewater aeration. (a) A disc diffuser mounted on top
of an air distributed pipe. (b) A grid of diffusers attached to air pipes mounted on the floor of
an aeration tank. (c) Long rectangular aeration tank with uniform mixing and oxygenation by
a grid of fine-bubble diffusers. (Courtesy of SANITAIRE, Water Pollution Control Corp.)
Wastewater Treatment 90
1. Basic monitoring/testing includes:
a) [D.O.] in mixed liquor – computer-controlled in most
plants, through auto-sensors.
b) Influent/effluent BOD5 – measure of efficiency (also
must meet plant permit value).
c) [MLVSS] in tank.
d) Effluent SS leaving system (also must meet plant
permit value).
e) Activated sludge settleability/thickening capacity –
affects sludge processing operation/efficiency.
f) A well-trained operator is the key to overall plant
performance, regardless of the level of sophistication
of the plant.
Wastewater Treatment 91
THE ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS
Wastewater Treatment 92
Table 2.14 General Loading and Operational Parameters for Activated-Sludge Processes
BOD LOADING
AVERAGE
lb BOD lb BOD/ SLUDGE AERATION RETURN
1000ft3/ day/lb of AGE PERIOD SLUDGE
PROCESS day a MLSS (days) (hr) RATES
(%)
Step aeration 30-50 0.2-0.5 5-15 5.0-7.0 50
Conventional
(tapered 30-40 0.2-0.5 5-15 6.0-7.5 30
aeration)
Contact
30-50 0.2":"0.5 5-15 6.0-9.0 100
stabilization
Extended
10-30 0.05 0.2 20+ 20-30 100
aeration
High-purity
120+ 0.6-1.5 5-10 1.0-3.0 30
oxygen
a
1.0 Ib/1000 ft3/day = 16 g/m3.d.
Wastewater Treatment 93
Figure 2.49 Schematic diagram of a typical activated sludge process
Wastewater Treatment 94
Figure 2.50 Definition sketch for suspended solids mass balances for return sludge control:
(a) secondary clarifier mass balance and (b)aeration tank mass balance. (Metcalf
& Eddy, 2003)
Wastewater Treatment 95
Table 2.15 Factors affecting the performance of typical secondary treatment processesa
Wastewater Treatment 96
Figure 2.51 Sequencing batch reactor operation for carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus
removal (Metcalf & Eddy, 2003).
Wastewater Treatment 97
Table 2.16 Description of the operational steps for the sequencing
batch reactora
Operational
step Description
Fill The purpose of the fill operation is to add substrate (raw
wastewater or primary effluent) to the reactor. The fill
process typically allows the liquid level in the reactor to rise
from 25 percent of capacity (at the end of idle) to 100
percent. If controlled by time, the fill process normally lasts
approximately 25 percent of the full cycle time.
React The purpose of react is to complete the reactions that were
initiated during fill. Typically, react takes up 35 percent of
the total cycle time.
Settle The purpose of settle is to allow solids separation to occur,
providing a clarified supernatant to be discharged as effluent.
In an SBR, this process is normally much more efficient than
in a continuous-flow system because in the settle mode the
reactor contents are completely quiescent.
Drawb The purpose of draw is to remove clarified treated water from
the reactor. Many types of decant mechanisms are in current
use, with the most popular being floating or adjustable weirs.
The time dedicated to draw can range from 5 to 30 percent of
the total cycle time (15 minutes to 2 hours), with 45 minutes
being a typical draw period.
Idleb The purpose of idle in a multitank system is to provide time
for one reactor complete its fill cycle before switching to
another unit. Because idle is not a necessary phase, it is
sometimes omitted.
a
Adapted from Metcalf & Eddy, 2003.
b
Sludge wasting usually occurs during the settle or idle phases, but wasting can occur in the other
phases depending on the mode of operation.
Wastewater Treatment 98
Figure 2.52 Sequencing batch reactor (SBR) design principle
Wastewater Treatment 99
Table 2.17 Factors That Can Adversely Affect Settleability of Activated Sludge
BIOLOGICAL FACTORS
Species of dominant microorganisms (filamentous)
Ineffective biological flocculation
Denitrification in final clarifier (floating solids)
Excessive volumetric and food/microorganism loadings
Mixed-liquor suspended-solids concentration
Unsteady-state conditions (nonuniform feed rate and discontinuous
wasting of excess activated sludge)
CHEMICAL FACTORS
Lack of nutrients
Presence of toxins
Kinds of organic matter
PHYSICAL FACTORS
Excessive agitation during aeration resulting in shearing of floc
Ineffective final clarification: inadequate rate of return sludge,
excessive overflow rate or solids loading, or hydraulic
turbulence
5. Uniform temperature
6. Quiescent water
7. Up to 3 hours
Two circular final clarifiers of the type shown in Figure 2.56, with
100-ft diameter and 12-ft side-water depth, are provided for an
activated-sludge plant designed to treat 12.5 mgd. Calculate the
overflow rate and detention time based on design flow. If the
aeration tank is operated at a mixed-liquor suspended-solids
concentration of 4000 mg/L and a recirculation ratio of 0.5,
calculate the solids loading on the clarifier.
Solution:
Surface area of clarifiers = 2 (50)2 = 15, 700 ft2
Volume of clarifiers = 15,700 12 7.48 = 1, 410, 000 gal
12,500,000
Overflow rate = 800 gpd / ft 2 (32m3/m2 d)
15,700
1,410,000 24
Detention time = = 2.7 hr
12,500,000
Flow from the aeration tank to the clarifier with a recirculation
ratio of 0.5 equals 1.5 12.5 = 18.8 mgd.
Design Approach
Thickening Area
Q tu
AT (24)
Ho
where:
Q = volumetric flow rate into the basin
AT = surface area of settling zone
Ho depth of fluid in settling column (= initial
=
interface height).
tu = time to reach desired underflow or sludge
concentration at the bottom, Cu
Raw Primary
Grey in colour.
Very high in suspended organics.
60-80% volatile.
Usually aim for 4-6% thickened product, prior to
digestion – thus, may need separate thickener.
Anaerobically-Digested Sludge
Figure 2.58 Common disposal methods for waste-activated sludge from small treatment plants
without settling prior to aeration.
Note:
Most digested sludge is further ―mechanically dewatered‖
before final disposal.
Aim for 25-35% ―sludge cake‖ density, even if polymers
have to be used.
In comparison:
1st Step – slower
2nd Step – faster
2nd Step
pH
drop
1st step
Figure 2.67 Lions Gate WWTP sealed anaerobic digester (centre), next to a CH4 storage tank.
Primary objectives:
1. Clear supernatant.
2. Sludge thickening
3. Better efficiency
Temperature
Optimum 98F (37C)
General range of operation 85 - 95F (29 - 35C)
pH
Optimum 7.0 – 7.1
General limits 6.7 – 7.4
Gas production
Per pound of volatile solids added 8 – 12 ft3 (230 – 340 L)
Per pound of volatile solids destroyed 16 – 18 ft3 (450 – 510 L)
Gas composition
Methane 65% – 69%
Carbon Dioxide 31% - 35%
Hydrogen sulphide Trace
Volatile acids concentration as acetic
acid
Normal operation 200-800 mg/l
Maximum Approx. 2000 mg/l
Alkalinity concentrations as CaCo3
Normal operation 2000 - 3500 mg/l
Minimum solids retention times
Single-stage digestion 25 d
High-rate digestion 15 d
Volatile solids reduction
Single-stage digestion 50% - 70%
High-rate digestion 50%