Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
When a borrower who is under a liability to pay to secured creditor, makes any
default in repayment of a secured debt, the account of borrower is classified as NPA.
The money locked up in NPA is not available for productive use and banks make
provision to write them off as a charge against their profit. High level of NPA
adversely affect financial health of banks.
The bank had to take recourse to the long legal route against the defaulting
borrowers. A lot of time was usually spent in getting decrees and execution therof
before the banks could make some recoveries. In the meantime the promoters could
seek the protection of BIFR and could also dilute the security available to banks. The
DRT set up by government also did not prove to be of much help as these are also
overburdened with huge volume of cases referred to them. All along, the banks were
feeling greatly handicapped in the absence for seizure of assets charged to them.
Our existing legal framework relating to commercial transactions has not kept pace
with changing commercial practices and financial sector reforms. This has resulted
in slow pace of recovery of defaulting loans and moulding levels of NPA of banks and
FI’s.
The SRFAESI Act 2002 empowered the banks and financial institutions with vast
power to enforce the securities charged to them.
The banks are allowed to issue notices to the defaulters to pay the dues and if
they fail to do so within 60 days of the notice , the banks can take the
possession of the assets like factory, land and building charged to them
including the right to transfer by way of lease , assignment or sale and realize
the secured assets.
In case the borrower refuses the peaceful handing over of secured assets, the
banks can also takes over the management of business of borrower.
The bank in addition can appoint any person to manage the secured asset the
possession of which has been taken over by the bank. Banks can package and
sell the loans via ‘Securitisation’ and the same can be traded in the market like
bonds and shares.
Concepts
(c) "Debts Recovery Tribunal" means the Tribunal established under sub-
section (1) of section 3 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial
Institutions Act, 1993 (51 of 1993);
ARC’s are allowed to do incidental & ancillary business apart from the above
only with prior approval of RBI.
However, if an ARC carries on any business other than the business of ARC , it
shall cease to carry on any such business within 1 year of doing such other
business.
The Reserve Bank may, for the purpose of considering the application for
registration make itself satisfied regarding the following conditions by an
inspection of records or books of such securitisation company or
reconstruction company–
(a) that ‘the company’ has not incurred losses in any of the 3 preceding FY;
(b) that ‘the company’ has made adequate arrangements for realisation of the
financial assets acquired for the purpose of securitisation or asset
reconstruction and shall be able to pay periodical returns and redeem on
respective due dates on the investments made in the company by the qualified
institutional buyers or other persons;
(c) that the directors of ‘the company’ any have adequate professional
experience in matters related to finance, securitisation and reconstruction;
(d) that the board of directors of ‘the company’ does not consist of more than
half of its total number of directors who are -
either nominees of any sponsor or
associated in any manner with the sponsor
or any of its subsidiaries;
"sponsor" means any person holding not less than ten per cent of the
paid-up equity capital of a securitisation company or reconstruction
company;
(e) that any of its directors has not been convicted of any offence involving
moral turpitude;
(f) that a sponsor, is not a holding company of ‘the company’, as the case may
be, or, does not otherwise hold any controlling interest in such ‘the company’
(g) that ‘the company’ has complied with or is in a position to comply with
prudential norms specified by the Reserve Bank.
(h) that securitisation company or reconstruction company has complied with
one or more conditions specified in the guidelines issued by the Reserve
Bank for the said purpose.
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any agreement or any other law for
the time being in force, any securitisation company or reconstruction company
may acquire financial assets of any bank or financial institution--
(a) by issuing a debenture or bond or any other security in the nature of the
debenture, or
(b) by entering into an agreement with such bank or financial institution for the
transfer of such financial assets to such company on such terms and
conditions as may be agreed upon between them.
(2) If the bank or financial institution is a lender in relation to any financial
assets acquired by the securitisation company or the reconstruction company, such
securitisation company or reconstruction company shall, on such
acquisition, be deemed to be the lender and all the rights of such bank or
financial institution shall vest in such company in relation to such financial assets.
company,
but the suit, appeal or other proceeding may be continued, prosecuted and
enforced by or against the securitisation company or reconstruction
company, as the case may be.
(a) act as an agent for any bank or financial institution for the purpose of recovering
their dues from the borrower on payment of such fee or charges as may be mutually
agreed upon between the parties;
Under the Act security interest created in favour of any secured creditor may be
enforced,
without the intervention of court or tribunal, by such creditor in accordance
with the
provision of this Act. (Notwithstanding anything contained in section 69 or section
69(A)
of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882)
Classes for CS PROFESSIONAL EXAM AT FARIDABAD 7
Section 13(2)
Where any borrower, who is under a liability to a secured creditor,
makes any default in repayment of secured debt or any instalment thereof ,
and his account in respect of such debt is classified by the secured
creditor as non-performing asset,
then the secured creditor may require the borrower by notice in
writing to discharge in full his liabilities to the secured creditor with
in sixty days from the date of notice,
failing which the secured creditor may take following steps to recover
his secured debt, namely:- (section 13(4))
(a) take possession of the secured assets of the borrower including the
right to transfer by way of lease, assignment or sale for releasing the secured
asset.
(b)take over the management of the assets of the borrower including the
right to transfer by way of lease, assignment or sale for releasing the secured
asset.
(c) appoint any person to manage the secured assets the possession of
which has been taken over by the secured creditor.
(d) demand assets from person who has acquired any of the secured
assets from the borrower .
Connection of section 13 with winding up sections of Companies
Act.
In case of company under liquidation, the amount realised from sale of
secured Assets are to be distributed in accordance with provisions of section
529A of Companies Act 1956.
The secured creditor who opts to realize its security instead of relinquishing its
security
And proving its debts may retain the sale proceeds of its secured creditors
after depositing the workmen’s dues with the liquidator in accordance with
section 529A of that Act.
Where the dues of secured creditor are not fully satisfied with the sale
proceeds of the secured assets, the secured creditor may file an application
with DRT having jurisdiction or a competent court, as the case may be, for
recovery of balance amount from the borrower.
5. BPV Classic Tea Factory Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Corporation Bank 2008 (85)
CLA(SNR) 8 Ahmedabad.
In case any person is aggrieved by any of the steps taken by the Secured
Creditors in terms of Section 13(4) of the Securitization Act, the remedy as
provided under the Securitization Act, could only be availed and other
remedies either under the Companies Act or under the Civil Law is barred.
Classes for CS PROFESSIONAL EXAM AT FARIDABAD 9
7. Core Ceramics Ltd Vs. Union of India 2009 (89) CLA 37 Bombay
High Court
In case the Bank has classified an account as NPA and has initiated
action U/s 13(2) of the Securitization Act, such classification cannot
be challenged by way of writ petition before the High Court but the legal
and proper remedy is to challenge the same by way of petition before
Debt Recovery Tribunal in a proceedings U/s 17 (1) of Securitization
Act.
8. Ponnusamy Vs. DRT 2009(90)CLA 225 (Madras High Court.
In case an appeal has been filed against the order under Section 13(4)
of SECURITISATION ACT, against the action of the Bank and the
appeal is filed beyond the time prescribed under the Act, then
application under Section 5 of Limitation Act, would be maintainable as
the applicability of the Limitation Act, 1963, has not been specifically
excluded or by necessary intendment.
10. Shyam Kishore Vs. Bank of Baroda 2009(90) CLA 363 Patna.
The action of the Bank and the Financial Institutions can be
questioned in a writ petition if the action of the Bank or FI is arbitrary,
whimsical or unbridled in selecting the person or the property against
whom the action under Section 13(4) of SECURITISATION ACT, is
required to be initiated.
11. Mohammed Ashraf Vs. Union of India 2009(88)CLA 99
(Kerala).
The provisions of The provisions of this Act or No civil court shall have
this Act shall have the rules made thereunder jurisdiction to entertain any
effect, shall be in addition to, and suit or proceeding in respect
notwithstanding not in derogation of, of any matter which a Debts
anything the Companies Act, Recovery Tribunal or the
inconsistent there 1956 Appellate Tribunal is
with contained in the Securities empowered by or under this
any other law for Contracts Act to determine
the time being in (Regulation) Act, and
force or any 1956, no injunction shall be
instrument having the Securities and granted by any court or
effect by virtue of Exchange Board of other authority in
any such law. India Act, respect of any action
the Recovery of Debts taken or to be taken in
Due to Banks and pursuance of any power
Financial Institutions conferred by or under
Act, or this Act or under the
any other law for the Recovery of Debts Due
time being in force. to Banks and Financial
Institutions Act, 1993
(51 of 1993).
The combined effect of the above provisions is that in cases of any conflict with these
acts over SRFAESI Act 2002, shall have overriding effect over such other acts.
Further it is not possible to get any injunction under any other law.
Moreover, SRFAESI Act , after its enactment has been amended the following
legislations:
1. Companies Act- definition of PFI altered , to include ARC within its ambit.
2. SCRA ACT 1956- Section 2 amended, to include the definition of ‘security deposit’
as defined in section 2(f) of existing act.
3.SICA altered- to the extent it provides that after amendment of SRFAESI Act 2002
and if the financial assets have been acquired by ARC, then no reference shall be
made to BIFR.
(c) the directors or the administrators appointed under this section shall take such
steps as may be necessary to take into their custody or under their control all the
property, effects and actionable claims to which the business of the borrower is, or
appears to be, entitled and all the property and effects of the business of the
borrower shall be deemed to be in the custody from the date of the publication of the
notice;
(3) Where the management of the business of a borrower,is taken over by the
secured creditor, then, notwithstanding anything contained in the said Act or in the
memorandum or articles of association of such borrower,--
(a) it shall not be lawful for the shareholders of such company or any other person to
nominate or appoint any person to be a director of the company;
(b) no resolution passed at any meeting of the shareholders of such company shall
be given effect to unless approved by the secured creditor;
(c) no proceeding for the winding up of such company or for the appointment
of a receiver in respect thereof shall lie in any court, except with the consent of
the secured creditor.
(4) Where the management of the business of a borrower had been taken over by the
secured creditor, the secured creditor shall, on realisation of his debt in full,
restore the management of the business of the borrower to him .
If, the Debts Recovery Tribunal comes to If, the Debts Recovery Tribunal declares
the conclusion that any of the measures the recourse taken by a secured creditor
referred to in section 13(4), taken by the under section 13(4), is in accordance with
secured creditor are not in accordance the provisions of this Act and the rules
with the provisions of this Act and the made thereunder, then,
rules made thereunder, and require
restoration of the management of the
business to the borrower or restoration of
possession of the secured assets to the
borrower
It may by order, declare the steps u/s Notwithstanding anything
13(4) taken by the secured creditors as contained in any other law for the time
invalid and restore the possession of the being in force, the secured creditor shall
secured assets to the borrower or restore be entitled to take recourse to one or
the management of the business to the more of the measures specified under
borrower, as the case may be, and pass section 13(4) to recover his secured debt.
such order as it may consider appropriate
and necessary.
Any person aggrieved, by any order made by the Debts Recovery Tribunal under
section 17, may prefer an appeal alongwith such fee, as may be prescribed to the
Appellate Tribunal within thirty days from the date of receipt of the order of Debts
Recovery Tribunal.
(1) The Central Government may specify the names and sddresses of head office &
branch offices of the Central Registry.
(2) The Central Government may define the territorial limits within which an office
of the Central Registry may exercise its functions.
PROVIDED that the Central Registrar may allow the filing of the particulars of such
transaction interest within thirty days next following the expiry of the said period of
thirty days on payment of such additional fee not exceeding ten times the amount of
such fee.