Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Corporate governance:
2|Page
1. Introduction to corporate governance
The need for corporate governance is not something typical to our country
or economy. Even in the countries where regulatory mechanisms are more
demanding in their content and more vigilant in their implementation,
flagrant violations under the veil of corporate impenetrability have
generated a strident demand for better governance. The advent of the
information age has created an awakened shareholder, vigilant public and
an almost predatory journalistic fervour. Depending upon the model of
corporate disclosure followed by different legal frameworks, the right to
information has forced corporate to divulge more than they ever did.
3|Page
Why Corporate Governance?
In the beginning of the new millennium, several companies in the USA and
elsewhere faced collapse because of corporate misgovernance and
unethical practices they indulged in. the then existing regulatory
framework seemed to be inadequate to deal with the gigantic business
conglomerates that committed deliberate frauds.
4|Page
What is “good” Corporate Governance?
5|Page
Obligation to society at large
6|Page
• Ethical behaviour: Corporations have a responsibility to set
exemplary standards of ethical behaviour, both internally within the
organizations, as well as in their external relationships.
Obligation to investors
7|Page
bring about greater levels of informed attendance and meaningful
participation by shareholders in matters relating to their companies
without such freedom being abused to interfere with management
decision. An ideal corporate should address this issue and relate it to
more meaningful and transparent accounting and reporting.
Transparency means that information is freely available and directly
accessible to those who will be affected by such decisions and their
enforcement. It also means that enough information is provided and
that it is provided in easily understandable forms and media.
Obligation to employees
8|Page
direct or through representatives. It needs to be informed and
organized. This means freedom of association and expression on
one hand and an organized civil society on the other.
Obligation to customers
9|Page
Companies must constantly endeavour to update their expertise,
technology and skills of manpower to cut down costs and pass on
such benefits to customers. They should not create a scare in the
midst of scarcity or by themselves create an artificial scarcity to
make undue profits.
10 | P a g e
Managerial obligations
11 | P a g e
3. Landmarks in emergence of corporate governance
OECD Principles
12 | P a g e
The OECD guidelines are somewhat general, however, there is growing
pressure to put more enforcement mechanisms into those guidelines. The
challenge will be to do this in a way consistent with market oriented
procedures by creating self enforcing procedures that do not impose large
new costs on firms. The following are some ways to introduce more
explicit standards:
13 | P a g e
SEBI Guidelines
• Board of Directors;
• Audit Committee;
• Shareholders / Investors Grievance Committee;
• Remuneration of directors;
• Board procedures;
• Management;
• Shareholders; and
• Report on Corporate Governance.
Stock exchanges are required to set up a separate monitoring cell with
identified personnel, to monitor compliance with the provisions of the
recommendations. Stock exchanges are also required to submit a
quarterly compliance report from the companies as per the Schedule of
Implementation. The stock exchanges are required to submit a
consolidated compliance report within 30 days of the end of the quarter to
SEBI.
14 | P a g e
4. Rights and privileges of shareholders
Rights of shareholders
15 | P a g e
• He has a right to apply for investigation of the affairs of the
company.
• He has a right to remove the director before the expiry of the term
of his office.
• He has a right to make an application to company Law Board for
relief in case of oppression and mismanagement.
• He can make a petition to the High Court for the winding up of the
company under certain circumstances.
16 | P a g e
Guidelines for investors/shareholders
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), the Indian capital
market regulator in its guidelines to investors/shareholders, titled “Quick
reference Guide for Investors” published recently makes it known that a
shareholder of a company enjoys the following rights:
17 | P a g e
Rights of a Debenture holder:
Shareholder’s responsibilities:
While a shareholder may be happy to note that one has so many rights as
a stakeholder in the company, it should not lead one to complacency
because one also has certain responsibilities to discharge, such as
• To remain informed
• To be vigilant
• To participate and vote in general meetings
• To exercise one’s rights on one’s own or as a group
18 | P a g e
5. Corporate governance and other stakeholders
19 | P a g e
Corporate Governance and Customers
20 | P a g e
Corporate Governance and Institutional Investors
21 | P a g e
quality, qualification and experience of independent non-executive
directors and their role in board meetings. In addition, many
investors are not too concerned if there are insufficient independent
non-executive directors on the board.
• Corporate governance practices: Investors consider corporate
governance practices when they make investment decisions. The
company should follow the principles for corporate governance
being- auditing and compliance, disclosure and transparency and
board processes.
• Corporate image: The image of the company in the community is
also considered when an institutional investor is called on to take an
investment decision. The image of the organization should not be
bad.
• Share price: This is the last factor that is considered by an
institutional investor when an investment decision is made. If the
shares of the company enjoy continuously rising prices in the
bourses, investors could be encouraged to invest in them.
22 | P a g e
Corporate governance and Creditors
23 | P a g e
Corporate governance and the Government
24 | P a g e
6. Corporate governance: The Indian scenario
In India the real history of corporate governance dates back to the year
1992, following efforts made in many countries of the world to put in place
a system suggested by the Cadbury Committee. The Confederation of
Indian Industry framed a voluntary code of corporate governance for listed
companies in 1998. This was followed by the recommendations of the
Kumar Mangalam Birla Committee set up in 1999 by SEBI culminating in
the introduction of Clause 49 of the standard Listing Agreement to be
complied with all the listed companies in stipulated phases. The Kumar
Mangalam Birla committee divided its recommendations into mandatory
and non-mandatory. Mandatory recommendations included such issues as
the composition of board, appointment and structure of audit committees,
remuneration of directors, board procedures, and additional information
regarding management, discussion and analysis as a part of annual
report. Its non-mandatory recommendations included issues concerning
the chairman of the board, setting up of remuneration committee, half
yearly information to shareholders and appointment of nominee directors.
25 | P a g e
Suggestions to improve overall structure of Corporate
Governance:
26 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
30 | P a g e
Chapter 6
Findings and Suggestions
31 | P a g e
Findings:
32 | P a g e
• 45% of those who analyze the performance of Audit Committee
believe that it is moderate in terms of efficiency while 33%
ranked it Efficient.
33 | P a g e
• According to investors efficiency of Indian Companies in context
of:
o Transparency is 26%.
o Ethics is 16%.
• ICICI, HUL, ITC were companies which are not showing major
disclosures.
34 | P a g e
Recommendations:
• To Investors:
35 | P a g e
36 | P a g e